Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Water Health ; 11(3): 397-409, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23981869

RESUMEN

Specificity testing of two published polymerase chain reaction (PCR) markers for the detection of human faecal pollution, revealed 100% false-positive rates to brush-tailed possum faeces (n = 10), but low false-positive rates against other potential pollution sources. Cross-reaction with possums could be a problem with other human-specific markers; therefore, a possum PCR marker was developed for use in conjunction with human PCR markers. The possum PCR marker was based on Bacteroidales 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences, and was tested on 233 individual faecal samples from 11 other animal species. Sensitivity of the possum marker in possum faeces (n = 36) was high at 83.3%. Cross-reactivity of the possum marker was limited to black swan (7/20 samples), human (2/48 samples) and rabbit (1/10) faecal samples, all at marker concentrations at least four orders of magnitude lower than possum faeces. The possum marker was not detected in human sewage or the faeces of other animal species. Specificity of the possum PCR marker, therefore, was high at 95.7%. To exclude the possibility that only possum pollution is being detected, additional testing by other faecal source tracking methods is required where the water sample is positive for both human and possum markers.


Asunto(s)
Heces/química , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Trichosurus/genética , Contaminantes del Agua/química , Animales , Bacteroidetes/genética , Teorema de Bayes , Reacciones Cruzadas , ADN/análisis , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Humanos , Nueva Zelanda , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
2.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 48(2): 162-6, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19018956

RESUMEN

AIMS: To determine the survival on pasture of Campylobacter spp. naturally present in bovine faeces and compare this with a previously published study using laboratory-cultured Campylobacter spp. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten freshly collected cow pats were deposited on pasture during summer, and Campylobacter spp. were enumerated by enrichment broth culture. The counts in three pats were below detection limits. Counts of Campylobacter spp. in the other seven pats fell below detection limits within 14 days. The geometric means of the counts up to 7 days produced a T(90) of 2.2 days. Characterization of Campylobacter spp. by PCR and pulsed field gel electrophoresis indicated the presence of at least six genotypes of Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter lari. CONCLUSIONS: Campylobacter spp. naturally present in cow faeces exhibited a similar survival rate to that previously determined using laboratory-cultured strains. The highly variable counts of naturally occurring Campylobacter spp., and the predominance of lower counts, also support the earlier decision to use laboratory-cultured strains in survival experiments. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study reaffirms the short survival of Campylobacter spp. in cow faeces deposited on pasture. This information will be incorporated into a 'reservoir model' for Campylobacter spp. in cow pats on New Zealand pastures.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter/crecimiento & desarrollo , Heces/microbiología , Viabilidad Microbiana , Poaceae/microbiología , Animales , Campylobacter/genética , Campylobacter/aislamiento & purificación , Bovinos
3.
Water Sci Technol ; 47(3): 39-43, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12639003

RESUMEN

Identifying the source of faecal pollution is important to enable appropriate management of faecal pollution of water. We are developing and evaluating a combination of these microbial and chemical indicators better able to identify the source of faecal pollution. These assays make use of a combination of direct PCR, culturing, and colony hybridisation to identify source specific species of Bifidobacterium, Rhodococcus and Bacteroides. In conjunction with assays for (a) fluorescent whitening agents and (b) faecal sterols and stanols, these indicators were able to identify human derived faecal pollution in river water containing inputs from septic tanks, municipal oxidation ponds, farmed animals and feral animals. Differentiating amongst the animal sources was more difficult and will require development of molecular assays for organisms specific to each animal group.


Asunto(s)
Bacteroides/aislamiento & purificación , Bifidobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Heces/microbiología , Rhodococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Microbiología del Agua , Agricultura , Animales , Bacteroides/genética , Bacteroides/patogenicidad , Bifidobacterium/genética , Bifidobacterium/patogenicidad , Bovinos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Heces/química , Humanos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Rhodococcus/genética , Rhodococcus/patogenicidad , Medición de Riesgo , Esteroles/análisis , Abastecimiento de Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA