Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 42(1): 53-60, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36378363

RESUMEN

The increasing resistance of gram-negative bacteria is a serious global public health concern. One way to prevent increasing antibiotic resistance is by implementing the antibiotic stewardship program. This study aimed to assess the changes in the consumption of antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance rates after implementing piperacillin/tazobactam restriction. This study was conducted at Kandong Sacred Heart Hospital. We retrospectively collected and analysed data between October 2018 and May 2021 to evaluate antibiotic consumption and resistance patterns after restricting piperacillin/tazobactam. This study included two periods, a 16-month pre-restriction period and a 16-month post-restriction period. During the study period, there was a significant decrease in the consumption of piperacillin/tazobactam after implementing the restriction policy (127.82 ± 9.39 to 104.82 ± 15.66 defined daily doses/1000 patient days, p < 0.001). A significant decrease in the resistance rate of Acinetobacter spp. was observed for cefepime (p = 0.001), ceftazidime (p = 0.004), levofloxacin (p = 0.021), meropenem (p = 0.002) and piperacillin (p = 0.028). The introduction of piperacillin/tazobactam restriction reduced their use and positively impacted the resistance rates of Acinetobacter spp., carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae which are major threats to nosocomial infections.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Antiinfecciosos , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Piperacilina/farmacología , Piperacilina/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Prescripciones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 396, 2020 Jun 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32503442

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed antifungal therapy for candidemia leads to increased mortality. Differentiating bacterial infection from candidemia in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients is complex and difficult. The Delta Neutrophil Index (DNI) has recently been considered a new factor to distinguish infections from non-infections and predict the severity of sepsis. We aimed to assess if the DNI can predict and provide a prognosis for candidemia in SIRS patients. METHODS: A matched case-control study was conducted from July 2016 to June 2017 at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital. Among patients with a comorbidity of SIRS, those with candidemia were classified as the case group, whereas those with negative blood culture results were classified as the control group. The matching conditions included age, blood culture date, and SIRS onset location. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate DNI as a predictive and prognostic factor for candidemia. RESULTS: The 140 included patients were assigned to each group in a 1:1 ratio. The DNI_D1 values measured on the blood culture date were higher in the case group than in the control group (p <  0.001). The results of multivariate analyses confirmed DNI_D1 (odds ratio [ORs] 2.138, 95% confidential interval [CI] 1.421-3.217, p <  0.001) and Candida colonization as predictive factors for candidemia. The cutoff value of DNI for predicting candidemia was 2.75%. The area under the curve for the DNI value was 0.804 (95% CI, 0.719-0.890, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity and specificity of 72.9 and 78.6%, respectively. Analysis of 14-day mortality in patients with candidemia showed significantly higher DNI_D1 and DNI_48 in the non-survivor group than in the survivor group. CONCLUSIONS: DNI was identified as a predictive factor for candidemia in patients with SIRS and a prognostic factor in predicting 14-day mortality in candidemia patients. DNI, along with clinical patient characteristics, was useful in determining the occurrence of candidemia in patients with SIRS.


Asunto(s)
Candidemia/diagnóstico , Neutrófilos/citología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidemia/complicaciones , Candidemia/microbiología , Candidemia/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neutrófilos/metabolismo , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Análisis de Supervivencia , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/complicaciones , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/diagnóstico
3.
Mycoses ; 63(1): 89-94, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31610064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is used to prevent invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in patients with haematologic malignancy. In this study, we compared plasma posaconazole concentrations (PPCs) and the incidence of breakthrough IFIs between patients with haematologic malignancy receiving posaconazole oral suspension vs tablet. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on adult patients with haematologic malignancies who received posaconazole prophylaxis during chemotherapy from April 2014 through May 2018. A total of 242 cases with PPCs, 88 in the oral suspension group and 154 in the tablet group, were included in this study. RESULTS: Patients receiving tablets achieved a significantly higher mean PPC than did those on oral suspension (1.631 ± 0.878 µg/mL in the tablet group vs. 0.879 ± 0.585 µg/mL in the oral suspension group). One hundred and thirty-seven of 154 patients (89.0%) receiving tablets had PPCs of 0.7 µg/mL or more, while only 41 of 88 patients (46.6%) receiving oral suspension attained an optimal level (P < .001). The incidence of breakthrough IFIs was significantly higher in the oral suspension group compared with in the tablet group (14.8% of oral suspension vs. 4.5% of tablet; P = .005). In the analysis including patients receiving posaconazole tablets, hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 g/dL) was found to be a risk factor associated with suboptimal levels (odds ratio: 8.872; 95% confidence interval: 3.011 - 26.141; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal PPCs in the tablet group were less common than those in the oral suspension group. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be still necessary even in patients receiving posaconazole tablets, especially in those with hypoalbuminemia.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas/microbiología , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras , Triazoles , Administración Oral , Adulto , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo de Drogas , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/sangre , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Fúngicas Invasoras/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Suspensiones/farmacología , Comprimidos/farmacología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Triazoles/administración & dosificación , Triazoles/efectos adversos , Triazoles/sangre , Triazoles/uso terapéutico
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(11): 1580-1585, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135653

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of selective digestive decolonization (SDD) therapy using oral gentamicin against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) colonization and to compare the incidence of novel gentamicin resistance between SDD and non-SDD patient groups. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Acute-care referral center hospital in South Korea. METHODS: Adults aged ≥20 years identified as rectal CRE carriers hospitalized between October 2019 and June 2020 were enrolled. Patients with a <30-day follow-up were excluded. Among CRE carriers, those who received 80 mg oral gentamicin sulfate (Shin Poong Pharmaceutical, Seoul, South Korea) 4 times daily comprised the SDD group and those who did not receive SDD therapy comprised the non-SDD group. CRE decolonization was compared between groups within 15 days, and new gentamicin resistance was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 73 rectal CRE carriers were identified; 11 patients were lost to follow-up within 30 days and were excluded. Oral gentamicin was administered to 20 of 62 patients. We detected no differences in the basic demographic features between groups. The rate of decolonization within 15 days was higher in the SDD group than in the non-SDD group (70.0% vs 23.8%; P = .001). The time to decolonization was significantly shorter in the SDD group. We detected no difference in acquisition of new gentamicin resistance between the groups. No serious adverse events due to oral gentamicin SDD therapy were reported. CONCLUSIONS: SDD therapy using oral gentamicin for CRE-colonized patients may be effective for the decolonization of gut CRE and for the prevention of transmission and subsequent CRE infection.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae , Adulto , Humanos , Gentamicinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico
5.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 6(6): 1325-1331, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34938870

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Wound infection is the most common complication associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement, with an incidence between 4% and 30%. In this study, we compared the characteristics of PEG site infection between the head and neck cancer (HNC) group and the non-HNC group. METHODS: This study was conducted at Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital at the Ilsong Head and Neck Cancer Center. We retrospectively collected and analyzed data on patients who underwent PEG insertion from October 2003 to May 2019 to evaluate the risk factors and microbiological etiologies of PEG site infection. RESULTS: A total of 316 (HNC group [n = 129] and non-HNC group [n = 187]) patients undergoing PEG insertion were included in this study. Moreover, 67 episodes of PEG site infection were diagnosed, with an overall prevalence of 21.2%. PEG site infections were significantly higher in the HNC group than in the non-HNC group (32.6% vs 13.4%, P <.001). Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen associated with a PEG site infection. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) P aeruginosa was more frequent in the HNC group than in the non-HNC group (78.6% vs 25.0%, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: For appropriate treatment, P aeruginosa, especially MDR P aeruginosa, should be considered when selecting empirical antibiotics for PEG site infection in patients with HNC.Level of Evidence: 4.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA