Diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 tumor marker and CEA in pleural effusion due to mesothelioma.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the clinical value of CYFRA 21-1 tumor marker and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as diagnostic tools that are complementary to cytology in the diagnosis of malignant mesotheliomas. PATIENTS: We measured CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in the pleural effusions (PEs) and serum of 106 patients (benign lung disease, 34 patients; bronchogenic and metastatic carcinoma, 40 patients; mesothelioma, 32 patients). METHODS: CEA and CYFRA 21--1 levels were determined by means of two commercial enzyme immunoassays. RESULTS: The cutoff levels of CYFRA 21--1 and CEA in malignant PEs, selected on the basis of the best diagnostic efficacy, were 41.9 ng/mL and 5.0 ng/mL, respectively. In all neoplastic PEs, CYFRA 21--1 and CEA sensitivity was 78% and 30.6%, respectively, with a specificity of 80% and 91%, respectively. The sensitivity of CYFRA 21--1 and CEA in patients with mesothelioma was 87.5% and 3.1%, respectively. The results of the CYFRA 21--1 assay were positive in 17 of 19 cases of mesothelioma (89.5%) with a negative or uncertain cytology. The association of the tumor marker assay and the cytology allowed a correct diagnosis in 30 of 32 cases of mesothelioma (93.7%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CYFRA 21--1 would provide a useful parameter for the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant PE from mesothelioma when the result of cytology is negative or uncertain and the clinical context does not allow a more aggressive approach. Moreover, the association of CYFRA 21--1 with CEA could provide details for a differential diagnosis between mesotheliomas and carcinomas. In fact, an elevated CYFRA 21--1 level with a low CEA level is highly suggestive of mesothelioma, whereas high levels of CEA alone or high levels of both the markers suggest a diagnosis of malignant PE, excluding mesothelioma.

CA-125 monitoring in the management of ovarian cancer.

In 100 ovarian cancer patients serum CA-125 was monitored during treatment and follow-up to verify the prognostic value of its pre-surgery marker level and the usefulness of the test for disease monitoring. A low pre-operative CA-125 was not associated with improved survival or progression-free survival. A significant survival advantage was evident for patients in whom the marker had decreased during treatment, compared to patients in whom the antigen remained unchanged or increased. In 40 patients CA-125 was measured before second look laparotomy: the marker was negative in 100% of patients in, pathological complete response and in 53.5% of patients with residual disease at second look. A marker increase was evident in 32 of 41 patients with either progressive or recurrent disease, and in 17 patients the CA-125 increase was documented from 1 to 9 months before clinical evidence of progression. The pre-operative level of CA-125 did not appear to be of prognostic value. However, the monitoring of CA-125 during treatment and follow-up can provide a reliable method of assessing response and prognosis. CA-125 monitoring is particularly useful for early detection of recurrence.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in serum and bile of colorectal cancer patients with or without detectable liver metastases.

It has been suggested that bile CEA levels could represent a sensitive index for the detection of occult liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. We measured serum and gallbladder bile CEA concentrations in a control group, in a group of patients with benign disease of the biliary tree, and in patients with CRC at different stages. Neoplastic patients without evidence of liver metastases at the time of laparotomy, but with elevated biliary CEA levels, were selected for a follow-up study. Our results indicate that (a) bile CEA levels are falsely increased in several benign biliary diseases; (b) CRC patients with detectable liver metastases have elevated biliary CEA levels; (c) high biliary CEA levels do not represent a predictive parameter for the presence of occult liver metastases in CRC patients.

CA 19-9 assay in patients with extrahepatic cholestatic jaundice.

Serum concentrations of the CA 19-9 tumour marker were determined in 35 patients with histologically proven bilio-pancreatic malignancies associated with obstructive jaundice and in 35 patients with benign extrahepatic jaundice due to choledocholithiasis. At a cut-off level of 37 U/ml the sensitivity of this assay was 82.8%, but the specificity was very low (45.7%). Thus CA 19-9 can not be employed to differentiate between malignant and benign extrahepatic jaundice. Serial samples of CA 19-9 were achieved in 7 patients with benign and in 6 patients with malignant biliary obstruction, before and after the disappearance of jaundice. Serum concentrations of this tumour-antigen returned to normal concurrently with the bilirubin values only in patients with benign obstruction, remaining unchanged in all cases of malignancies. The data suggest that patients with extrahepatic jaundice should be evaluated by other examinations or by collecting serial samples for this assay.

Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis in patients with colorectal cancer.

The relationship between preoperative CEA, Dukes staging and disease recurrence, was analyzed in 92 patients with colon-rectal cancer, all who underwent curative surgery. Sixty-five of the 92 patients were followed for 36 months. A significant increase in disease recurrence risk is observable starting from a preoperative CEA value of greater than 7.5 ng/ml; corresponding values as such are verified by a significant fall in the actuarial survival curve in comparison to the progress of the curves of the other two groups with lower CEA values. A statistically significant correlation between preoperative CEA and staging was not observed, while both parameters result statistically very reliable (p less than 0.001) for prognosis; preoperative CEA values, less or greater than 7.5 ng/ml can help to stratify the Dukes tumours with respect to the probability of recurrence.

CA 19-9 and CA 50 in benign and malignant pancreatic and biliary diseases.

Serum concentrations of the CA 19-9 and CA 50 antigens were determined in 129 patients with malignant and benign biliary and pancreatic diseases. Values for the two markers were highly correlated (P less than 0.001). The concentrations of CA 19-9 and CA 50 were positive in 84.6% and 80.7% of patients with pancreatic cancer, respectively. The overall specificity of CA 19-9 (92.4%) was slightly higher than that of CA 50 (88.5%). The sensitivity of CA 50 (91.3%) was greater than that of CA 19-9 (73.9%) in patients with diseases of the biliary tract. Elevated concentrations of CA 19-9 (12.9%) and CA 50 (35.2%) were also found in a number of cases with benign disease, especially in patients with obstructive jaundice. These data suggest that both CA 19-9 and CA 50 can be useful markers of pancreatic cancer in nonjaundiced patients. The joint use of the two markers does not yield a better diagnostic resolution than the use of either one alone.

Evaluation of the ovarian cancer antigen, Ca-125, as a tumor marker.

The presence of the Ca-125 antigen was tested in the serum of 46 patients with ovarian cancer in order to determine the prognostic value of preoperative levels and its usefulness for monitoring the clinical response in longitudinal studies; survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) were also evaluated. In our series, the specificity of the assay in normal subjects and in patients with benign gynecological diseases is 99.3 and 73.2% respectively, and the sensitivity is 91.9%. Preoperative Ca-125 levels are not correlated with S and PFS, whereas an advantage in S and PFS is clearly shown for patients in whom the marker level decreases after treatment. Serial determinations of Ca-125 serum levels provide a reliable test to assess response to therapy and to predict disease progression.

LH-RH analogue treatment in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: a phase II study. Gruppo Ligure per lo Studio del Pancreas.

In this phase II study, we treated 7 patients, all males, with stage III or IV pancreatic cancer with goserelin (an LH-RH analogue). Goserelin was administered at a dose of 3.6 mg every 4 weeks. The tumour response was assessed by measuring lesions with US- or CT-scan studies, according to WHO criteria. No response was observed. The median survival was 8 months in locally unresectable tumours and 4 months in advanced disease. The accrual was actually stopped at 7 cases because there were no responses in either of our series or in those published during our study. The authors conclude that the treatment with LH-RH analogue alone cannot be recommended for further studies.

Serum CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA in breast cancer patients: a clinical evaluation.

With the aim of investigating the clinical usefulness of CEA, CA 15-3, and MCA serum levels, we studied 143 women whose breast cancer was submitted to serial tumor marker determinations: 79 women had stage I-II tumors and were undergoing follow-up after local and adjuvant treatment; 64 women presented metastatic lesions. Among the stage I-II patients, 63 women remained disease-free during the observation period and 16 developed metastases. In 13 out of 16 patients, tumor markers were elevated and in 11 out of 16 patients the increased tumor markers were the first sign of disease progression. Among metastatic patients, 49 presented increased tumor markers and 15 normal value. Moreover, we observed a decrease or normalization of tumor markers in patients responding to treatment and increased values in progressive disease. No correlation was noted between site of disease and tumor markers. We concluded that tumor markers are of clinical value in the detection of metastasis and may be useful in monitoring response to treatment in metastatic patients.