Who Bears the Burden? Understanding the Socioeconomic Patterns of Educational Debt in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Candidates.

BACKGROUND: Educational debt is commonly observed among applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, an understanding of the debt burden among minority and nonminority applicants is not well established. Thus, this study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by examining the extent of and factors shaping educational debt among orthopaedic surgery applicants. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the educational debt burden among orthopaedic surgery residency applicants? (2) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, what factors are independently associated with increasing levels of educational debt? (3) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, are individuals classified as an underrepresented minority or those with educational debt and socioeconomic disadvantage less likely to match in orthopaedic surgery? METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of orthopaedic surgery residency application data from the American Association of Medical Colleges was analyzed from 2011 to 2021. The American Association of Medical Colleges database was selected because every residency applicant must register and apply through the American Association of Medical Colleges. Therefore, these data exist for every residency applicant, and the sample was comprehensive. Self-reported data including premedical, medical, and total educational debt burden as well as classification as socioeconomically disadvantaged and application fee waiver use were collected. Applicants were dichotomously categorized as an underrepresented minority or a not underrepresented minority based upon self-identified race and ethnicity. Monetary values were reported in USD and inflation-adjusted to 2021 using the Consumer Price Index. We performed t-tests and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Significance was considered at p < 0.05. In all, 12,112 applicants were available in the initial cohort, and 67% (8170 of 12,112) of applicants with complete data were included from 2011 to 2021 in the final study cohort. Of these, 18% (1510 of 8170) were women, 14% (1114 of 8170) were classified as underrepresented minorities, and 8% (643 of 8170) were classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged. Sixty-one percent (4969 of 8170) of applicants reported receiving at least one scholarship, 34% (2746 of 8170) had premedical school debt, and 72% (5909 of 8170) had any educational debt including medical school. Among all applicants, the median (IQR) educational debt was USD 197,000 (25,000 to 288,000). Among those with scholarships, the median amount was USD 25,000 (9000 to 86,000). RESULTS: After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and socioeconomic disadvantage, classification as an underrepresented minority applicant was independently associated with higher scholarship amounts than applicants characterized as not underrepresented minorities (ß = USD 20,908 [95% confidence interval (CI) 15,395 to 26,422]; p < 0.001), whereas underrepresented minority classification was not independently associated with a difference in total educational debt (ß = USD 3719 [95% CI -6458 to 13,895]; p = 0.47). After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and classification as an underrepresented minority, socioeconomic disadvantage was independently associated with higher scholarship amounts (ß = USD 20,341 [95% CI 13,300 to 27,382]; p < 0.001) and higher total educational debt (ß = USD 66,162 [95% CI 53,318 to 79,006]; p < 0.001) than applicants not classified as socioeconomically disadvantaged. After controlling for the potentially confounding variables of gender and classification as an underrepresented minority, socioeconomic disadvantage was independently associated with decreased match rates (OR 0.62 [95% CI 0.52 to 0.74]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the need for comprehensive scholarship initiatives to ensure equitable financial accessibility for applicants from all backgrounds. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the future, orthopaedic surgery may benefit from research comparing the effectiveness of various initiatives aiming to improve fairness in the burden of debt among applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs.

Open Access Publication in Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Social Media Attention, but Is Not Associated With Increased Citations.

BACKGROUND: Open access (OA) publication is growing in total joint arthroplasty literature. While OA manuscripts are free to view, these publications require a fee from authors. This study aimed to compare social media attention and citation rates between OA and non-OA publications in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) literature. METHODS: There were 9,606 publications included, with 4,669 (48.61%) as OA articles. The TKA articles were identified from 2016 to 2022. Articles were grouped as OA or non-OA and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS), a weighted count of social media attention, and the Mendeley readership were analyzed using negative binomial regressions while adjusting for days since publication. RESULTS: The OA articles had greater mean AAS (13.45 versus 8.42, P = .012) and Mendeley readership (43.91 versus 36.72, P < .001). OA was not an independent predictor of number of citations when compared to non-OA articles (13.98 versus 13.63, P = .914). Subgroup analysis of studies in the top 10 arthroplasty journals showed OA was not an independent predictor of AAS (13.51 versus 9.53, P = .084) or number of citations (19.51 versus 18.74, P = .495) but was an independent predictor of Mendeley readership (49.05 versus 40.25, P < .003). CONCLUSION: The OA publications in the TKA literature were associated with increased social media attention, but not overall citations. This association was not observed among the top 10 journals. Authors may use these results to weigh the relative importance of readership, citations, and online engagement to the cost of OA publication.

Over the Past Decade, Preoperative Anemia Has Become a Greater Predictor of Transfusions After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With advancements in perioperative blood management and the use of tranexamic acid, the rate of transfusions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has substantially decreased. As these principles are refined, other modifiable risk factors, such as preoperative anemia, may play an increasingly important role in transfusion risk for patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: A multicenter, national database was utilized to identify patients undergoing TKA from 2010 to 2021. Anemia was defined by World Health Organization definitions as < 12 g/dL for women and < 13 g/dL for men. A predictive model was created using backwards elimination logistic regression to predict transfusion risk, controlling for demographic and medical covariates. The coefficient of anemia was then analyzed for each year. The trend over time was fitted with a best-fit linear regression equation. RESULTS: There were 509,117 patients who underwent TKA, and had a mean age of 67 years (range, 18 to 89). There were 57,716 (11%) patients who were anemic preoperatively, and 15,426 (3%) of patients required a transfusion. Rate of transfusion decreased from 10.6% in 2010 to 0.6% in 2021. The odds ratio associated with anemia as a predictor of transfusion increased from 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.1 to 4.6) in 2010 to 14.0 (95% confidence interval: 8.9 to 24) in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the importance of preoperative anemia as a predictor of transfusion has increased over the past decade as rates of transfusion have decreased. As perioperative blood management protocols improve, preoperative anemia should be considered an important focus of intervention to reduce the risk of transfusion prior to TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Routine Prescription of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Perioperative Period is Associated with Decreased Rates of 2-Year Revision Surgery after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are often prescribed in conjunction with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to their gastroprotective effects. In animal studies, it has been suggested that PPIs have immunosuppressive effects and impair fracture healing, however, the association between PPI use and adverse events following THA and TKA has not been well studied. METHODS: An administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent elective THA from 2010 to 2019. The experimental group consisted of patients who did not have a prior history of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and who received a PPI prescription in the perioperative period. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create control cohorts of patients who did not have any PPI prescription filled, also matching for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity index. This same cohort selection and matching procedure was then repeated for patients undergoing elective TKA. In total, 11,450 patients were studied (3,103 TKA+PPI, 2,622 THA+PPI, 3,103 TKA Controls, and 2,622 THA Controls). The mean age was 64 years (range, 38 to 94), and 57% were women. Significance was considered at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Perioperative PPI prescription in TKA patients was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause revision (3.0 versus 4.1%, P < 0.01) and periprosthetic joint infection (1.0 versus 1.8%, P < 0.01). In THA patients, PPI prescription was associated with a lower all-cause revision rate (2.8 versus 4.0%, P = 0.02). No significant differences were found between PPI and non-PPI groups for aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, gastrointestinal bleeding, or surgical site infection in either cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving routine PPI prescriptions in the perioperative period surrounding TKA and THA have a lower risk of all-cause revision surgery, and perioperative PPI use is associated with a decreased risk of PJI in patients undergoing TKA. As these results conflict with the few previous studies performed on this topic, additional controlled studies are warranted to fully elucidate the relationship between PPI use and adverse events after THA and TKA.

Publishing on Topical Subjects in Total Joint Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Social Media Attention.

BACKGROUND: Social media platforms are often used for research dissemination and collaboration. Given the increased prevalence of online-only publications, understanding what drives research dissemination is important. Here, we analyzed factors associated with increased social media attention among peer-reviewed publications in total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We analyzed publications about total knee arthroplasty, total hip arthroplasty, or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from 2010 to 2022 using a national database. We analyzed a weighted count of social media mentions, using negative binomial regressions adjusting for days since publication. Publications on "hot topics" in arthroplasty were examined including navigation/robotics, COVID-19, race/ethnicity, body mass index, and reimbursement. There were 9,542 publications included, 4,216 (44%) were open access (OA), 338 (3.5%) included navigation, 32 (0.34%) discussed race/ethnicity, 20 (0.2%) discussed COVID-19, 3,840 (40%) were randomized studies, 30 (0.3%) discussed reimbursement, and 2,867 (30%) were in top-10 orthopaedic journals. RESULTS: Factors associated with higher weighted score included studies about COVID-19 (50 versus 6.0, P < .001), race/ethnicity (15.8 versus 6.0, P < .001), OA status (6.3 versus 5.8, P = .001), and randomized studies (6.5 versus 5.7, P < .001). Studies from top-10 journals had a lower score (5.8 versus 6.2, P = .025), as did studies about body mass index (3.4 versus 6.1, P = .001). Studies about navigation and reimbursement did not have significantly different scores. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on COVID-19, race/ethnicity, randomized studies, and OA publication were associated with increased social media while those in top-10 orthopaedic journals had lower scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Prognostic Study.

Decreased Risk of Readmission and Complications With Preoperative GLP-1 Analog Use in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable interest in the use of GLP-1 receptor analogs (GLP-1 RAs) for weight optimization in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty. As there is limited data regarding the implications of their use, our study aimed to evaluate the association between preoperative GLP-1 RA use and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: The TrinetX research network was queried to identify all patients undergoing primary THA or TKA between May 2005 and December 2023 across 84 health care organizations. Patients were stratified based on preoperative GLP-1 RA use. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to account for baseline differences in demographics, laboratory investigations, and comorbidities. Subsequently, risk ratios were evaluated for postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 268,504 and 386,356 patients underwent THA and TKA, of which 1,044 and 2,095 used preoperative GLP-1 RAs. After matching, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a decreased 90-day risk of periprosthetic joint infection (2.1 versus 3.6%, RR = 0.58, P = .042) and readmission (1.1 versus 2.0%, RR = 0.53, P = .017) following THA and TKA, respectively. There was no difference in the risk of all other outcomes between comparison groups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative GLP-1 RA use is associated with a 42% decreased risk of periprosthetic joint infection and 47% decreased risk of readmission in the 90-day postoperative period following THA and TKA, respectively, with no difference in other risks, including aspiration. Our findings indicate that GLP-1 RAs may be safe to use in patients undergoing elective arthroplasty; however, further studies are warranted to inform the routine use of GLP-1 RAs for weight management in THA and TKA patients.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Resurgence-Who, When, Where, and How?

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics, but there is still debate over the optimal fixation method for long-term durability: cement versus cementless bone ingrowth. Recent improvements in implant materials and technology have offered the possibility of cementless TKA to change clinical practice with durable, stable biological fixation of the implants, improved operative efficiency, and optimal long-term results, particularly in younger and more active patients. METHODS: This symposium evaluated the history of cementless TKA, the recent resurgence, and appropriate patient selection, as well as the historical and modern-generation outcomes of each implant (tibia, femur, and patella). Additionally, surgical technique pearls to assist in reliable, reproducible outcomes were detailed. RESULTS: Historically, cemented fixation has been the gold standard for TKA. However, cementless fixation is increasing in prevalence in the United States and globally, with equivalent or improved results demonstrated in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cementless TKA provides durable biologic fixation and successful long-term results with improved operating room efficiency. Cementless TKA may be broadly utilized in appropriately selected patients, with intraoperative care taken to perform meticulous bone cuts to promote appropriate bony contact and biologic fixation.

Can You Pay Your Way to Readership? Free to Publish Open Access Formats Receive Greater Readership and Citations Than Paid Open Access Formats in Total Knee Arthroplasty Literature.

BACKGROUND: As publishing with open access is becoming increasingly popular within orthopaedics, understanding the types of publishing options available and what each may deliver is critically important. Hybrid articles require a high article processing charge. Open journal articles have a lower fee, while closed license articles are freely accessible at no charge. Open repository articles are peer-reviewed manuscripts posted freely online. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between article type and resulting citations, social media attention, and readership in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) literature. METHODS: Open access TKA journal articles published since 2016 were found using the Altmetric Explorer Database. Data gathered included the Altmetric Attention Score (attention), Mendeley Readership Score (readership), and citations per article. Articles were grouped by type: open journal, hybrid, closed license, and open repository. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Tukey's analysis; α = 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 9,606 publications were included. The open repository had the greatest mean citations (14.40), while open journal (9.55) had fewer than all other categories (P < .001). Hybrid had the greatest mean attention (10.35), and open journal (6.16) had a lower mean attention than all other categories (P ≤ .002). Open repository had the greatest mean readership (44.68), and open journal (34.00) had a lower mean readership than all other categories (P ≤ .012). The mean publication fee for paid publication options was $1,792 United States dollars. CONCLUSIONS: In open access TKA literature, free-to-publish open repositories had the greatest mean citations and readership. Free publication options, open repositories and closed licenses, had greater readership compared to paid publication options.

The Definition of Anemia Matters When Using Preoperative Hemoglobin as a Screening Tool Prior to Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is common in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several definitions of anemia have been described, with no clear consensus on the optimal one for preoperative screening. We hypothesized that depending on the definition used preoperatively, the proportion of anemic patients identified who would require a postoperative allogeneic blood transfusion would vary significantly. METHODS: A total of 681,141 patients were identified in a national database who underwent either THA or TKA. Preoperative anemia was classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definition, Cleveland Clinic (CC) definition, or race, age, and sex-specific definition described by Beutler et al in 2006. The optimal preoperative (OP) hemoglobin thresholds to predict perioperative transfusions were also calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: When using the WHO definition, 18% of anemic patients required a transfusion versus 14% (OP definition), 12% (CC definition), and 16% (Beutler definition). Similarly, 0.69% of anemic patients sustained a periprosthetic joint infection within 30 days using the WHO definition versus 0.59% (OP definition), 0.60% (CC definition), or 0.66% (Beutler definition). Using the WHO definition, 5.3% of patients would have sustained a major complication versus 4.5% (OP definition), 4.4% (CC definition), and 5.0% (Beutler definition). CONCLUSIONS: Variation in the definition of anemia for preoperative screening in THA and TKA results in substantial differences in discriminative ability to predict perioperative transfusions. The WHO definition identified the largest proportion of patients who ultimately received a perioperative transfusion.

Preoperative Anemia is an Independent Risk Factor for Increased Complications and Mortalities After Total Knee Arthroplasty Regardless of Postoperative Transfusions.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative anemia is associated with adverse events following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It remains unknown if this effect is due to comorbid conditions, adverse events associated with transfusions, or the anemia itself. We used propensity-score matching to isolate the effect of anemia on postoperative complications following TKA, regardless of blood transfusions. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2020 without receiving a perioperative blood transfusion, were identified using a large national database. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create cohorts of anemic and nonanemic patients matched on Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, age, sex, and prevalence of bleeding disorders. There were 43,370 patients were included in each group (mean age 68 [range, 29 to 99; 44% male]). The 1:1 matching yielded groups with similar CCI, ASA classification, age, sex, and prevalence of bleeding disorders (all, P > .9). RESULTS: Anemic patients had a higher incidence of major complications (4.1 versus 2.8%; P < .001), 30-day mortality rate (0.2 versus 0.1%; P < .001), and extended lengths of stay (LOS) (8.3 versus 6.6%; P < .001). Anemic patients also had increased 30-day rates of wound infection requiring hospital admission, renal failure, reintubation, myocardial infarction, and pneumonia (all, P < .001). CONCLUSION: In matched cohorts of anemic versus nonanemic patients undergoing TKA, all who had no postoperative blood transfusion, anemic patients had higher rates of complications, extended LOS, and mortalities. Thus, anemia should be considered an independent risk factor for complications following TKA.

Body Mass Index and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Does Cause for Revision Vary by Underweight or Obese Status?

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) impacts risk for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but the relationship between BMI and cause for revision remains unclear. We hypothesized that patients in different BMI classes would have disparate risk for causes of rTKA. METHODS: There were 171,856 patients who underwent rTKA from 2006 to 2020 from a national database. Patients were classified as underweight (BMI < 19), normal-weight, overweight/obese (BMI 25 to 39.9), or morbidly obese (BMI > 40). Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, payer status, hospital geographic setting, and comorbidities were used to examine the effect of BMI on risk for different rTKA causes. RESULTS: Compared to normal-weight controls, underweight patients were 62% less likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 40% less likely due to mechanical complications, 187% more likely due to periprosthetic fracture, 135% more likely due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Overweight/obese patients were 25% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 9% more likely due to mechanical complications, 17% less likely due to periprosthetic fracture, and 24% less likely due to PJI. Morbidly obese patients were 20% more likely to undergo revision due to aseptic loosening, 5% more likely due to mechanical complications, and 6% less likely due to PJI. CONCLUSION: Mechanical reasons were more likely to be the cause of rTKA in overweight/obese and morbidly obese patients, compared to underweight patients, for whom revision was more likely to be infection or fracture related. Increased awareness of these differences may promote patient-specific management to reduce complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery Adult Reconstruction Fellowships From 2007 to 2021.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery has seen improvement in its representation of women, whereas the representation of racial/ethnic minorities has remained stagnant over the past decade. Overall, the surgical field lags behind other specialties in sex and racial/ethnic parity. Although demographic disparities within orthopaedics have been analyzed for both residents and faculty members, information for adult reconstruction fellows remains limited. METHODS: Sex and race/ethnicity demographics for adult reconstruction orthopaedic fellowship matriculants were collected via a database published by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) from 2007 to 2021. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics and significance testing, were performed. RESULTS: During the 14-year time frame, men trainees remained high with an overall average percentage of 88% and demonstrated increasing representation (P trend = .012). White non-Hispanics, Asians, Blacks, and Hispanics represented on average 54%, 11%, 3%, and 4%, respectively. White non-Hispanics (P trend = .039) and Asians (P trend = .030) saw increasing and decreasing representation, respectively. Women, Blacks, and Hispanics remained relatively stagnant throughout the observation period as no trends were appreciable (P trend >.05, each). CONCLUSION: Using publicly available demographic data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) from 2007 to 2021, we found relatively limited progress in the representation of women and those from traditionally marginalized groups seeking additional training in adult reconstruction. Our findings mark an initial step in measuring the demographic diversity among adult reconstruction fellows. Further research is needed to ascertain specific factors likely to attract and retain members from minoritized groups into orthopaedics.

Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts - What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior-stabilized (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) have been the most common tibial designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Ultra-congruent (UC) inserts are becoming popular because they preserve bone without relying on the posterior cruciate ligament balance and integrity. Despite increasing use, there is no consensus on how UC inserts perform versus PS and CR designs. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of 5 online databases was performed for articles from January 2000 to July 2022 comparing the kinematic and clinical outcomes of PS or CR tibial inserts to UC inserts. There were nineteen studies included. There were 5 studies comparing UC to CR and 14 comparing UC to PS. Only one randomized controlled trial (RCT) was rated "good quality". RESULTS: For CR studies, pooled analyses showed no difference in knee flexion (n = 3, P = .33) or Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores (n = 2, P = .58). For PS studies, meta-analyses showed better anteroposterior stability (n = 4, P < .001) and more femoral rollback (n = 2, P < .001) for PS but no difference in knee flexion (n = 9, P = .55) or medio-lateral stability (n = 2, P = .50). There was no difference with WOMAC (n = 5, P = .26), Knee Society Score (n = 3, P = .58), Knee Society Knee Score (n = 4, P = .76), or Knee Society Function Score (n = 5, P = .51). CONCLUSION: Available data demonstrates there are no clinical differences between CR or PS and UC inserts in small short-term studies ending around 2 years after surgery. More importantly, high-quality research comparing all inserts is lacking, demonstrating a need for more uniform and longer-term studies beyond 5 years after surgery to justify increased UC usage.

Increased Patient-Level Payment After Removal of Total Knee Arthroplasty From the Inpatient-Only List.

BACKGROUND: In January 2018, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services removed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient Only (IPO) list. This study aimed to compare patient-level payments in TKA cases with a length of stay (LOS) <2 midnights before and after removal of TKA from IPO list. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all Medicare patients who received a primary elective TKA from 2016-2019 with a LOS <2 midnights at an academic tertiary center were identified. Total and itemized charges and patient-level payments were compared between eligible TKA cases performed in 2016-2017 and those in 2018-2019. There were 351 eligible TKA cases identified: 151 in 2016-2017 and 200 in 2018-2019. RESULTS: The percentage of patients making any out-of-pocket payment increased in 2018-2019 from 2016-2017 (51.0% versus 10.6%), as did median patient-level payment ($7.30 [range, $0.00-$3,389] versus $0.00 [range, $0.00-$1,248], P < .001 for both). A greater proportion of patients in 2018-2019 paid $1-$50 than in 2016-2017 (37.5% versus 1.3%, P < .001) with no change in the proportion of patients who made payments >$50. Total charges were less in 2018-2019 than in 2016-2017 (P = .001). Charges for drugs, laboratory tests, admissions/floor, and therapies decreased in 2018-2019, whereas charges for the operating room and radiology increased (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION: Patients receiving outpatient TKA in 2018-2019 were more likely to have out-of-pocket payments than patients with comparable hospital stay who were designated as inpatients, although most of these payments were less than $50.

Effects of Ramelteon on the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: The RECOVER Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative delirium, associated with negative consequences including longer hospital stays and worse cognitive and physical outcomes, is frequently accompanied by sleep-wake disturbance. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and short-term safety of ramelteon, a melatonin receptor agonist, for the prevention of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. DESIGN: A quadruple-masked randomized placebo-controlled trial (Clinical Trials.gov NCT02324153) conducted from March 2017 to June 2019. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 65 years or older, undergoing elective primary or revision hip or knee replacement. INTERVENTION: Ramelteon (8 mg) or placebo MEASUREMENTS: Eighty participants were randomized to an oral gel cap of ramelteon or placebo for 3 consecutive nights starting the night before surgery. Trained research staff conducted delirium assessments for 3 consecutive days starting on postoperative day (POD) 0, after recovery from anesthesia, and on to POD2. A delirium diagnosis was based upon DSM-5 criteria determined by expert panel consensus. RESULTS: Of 80 participants, five withdrew consent (one placebo, four ramelteon) and four were excluded (four ramelteon) after randomization. Delirium incidence during the 2 days following surgery was 7% (5 of 71) with no difference between the ramelteon versus placebo: 9% (3 of 33) and 5% (2 of 38), respectively. The adjusted odds ratio for postoperative delirium as a function of assignment to the ramelteon treatment arm was 1.28 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-7.93; z-value 0.27; p-value = 0.79). Adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In older patients undergoing elective primary or revision hip or knee replacement, ramelteon was not efficacious in preventing postoperative delirium.

A Fall Within 3 Months Before Total Joint Arthroplasty is Associated With Adverse Outcomes in Elderly Patients.

BACKGROUND: Falls are associated with morbidity and death in the elderly. The consequences of falls after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are known, but the consequences of preoperative falls are unclear. We assessed associations between preoperative fall history and hospital readmission rates and discharge disposition after primary TJA. METHODS: We queried the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Geriatric Pilot Project for cases of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) (n = 3671) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 6194) performed between 2014 and 2018 for patients aged ≥65 years. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, functional status indicators, and 30-day outcomes were compared among patients with falls occurring within 3 months, from >3 to 6 months, and from >6 to 12 months before surgery, and patients with no falls in the year before surgery. The timing of falls was assessed for independent associations with hospital readmission and discharge to a skilled care facility (SCF). Alpha = 0.05. RESULTS: Patients who fell within 3 months before surgery had greater odds of SCF discharge (for THA, odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-3.4; for TKA, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3) and hospital readmission (for THA, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.0; for TKA, OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.6-3.5) compared with the no-fall cohort. No such associations were observed for the other two fall cohorts. CONCLUSION: Falls within 3 months before primary TJA are associated with SCF discharge and readmission for patients aged ≥65 years. Fall history screening should be included in preoperative evaluation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

An Analysis of Online Ratings of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Patients continue to utilize physician review websites (PRWs) to assist in their selection of a health care provider. Studies on PRWs and how they affect patient care have recently become popular in the literature. This study analyzes PRW ratings of a previously unexamined subspecialty, pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-nine randomly selected Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America member's PRW ratings were examined from May 4, 2020 to July 18, 2020. Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, RateMDs.com, and Google.com were reviewed. Number of ratings and average ratings (0 to 5.0) were recorded. Provider sex, years in practice (0 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21+), practice type (academic, private), geographic location (Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, West), degree (Medical Doctor, Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine), and fellowship training (yes, no) were recorded. Kruskal-Wallis testing was performed to determine factors affecting positive surgeon ratings. RESULTS: 98.5% (393) of Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America surgeons were rated on a PRW at least once and were highly rated with an average rating of 4.14 of 5.0. Surgeons in practice 1 to 10 years had higher ratings than those in practice 11 to 20 and 21+ years, on Healthgrades.com (P=0.049) and RateMDs.com (P=0.011). Academic surgeons were found to have higher ratings than those in private practice on Google.com (P=0.007). Sex, region of practice, degree type, and fellowship training status did not have an effect on online ratings across all PRWs. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric orthopaedic surgeons are frequently and highly rated, similar to other orthopaedic subspecialties. Surgeons in practice 1 to 10 years were found to have statistically higher ratings on some websites. Academic surgeons were found to have statistically higher ratings on some websites.

Routine Basic Metabolic Panels Are Not Needed in All Patients After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Opportunity for Cost Reduction.

BACKGROUND: As the incidence of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) increases, identifying methods for cost reduction is essential. Basic metabolic panels (BMPs) are obtained routinely after TJA. We aimed at assessing the prevalence of intervention secondary to abnormal BMPs after primary TJA and at identifying predictors of the need for postoperative BMPs. METHODS: We reviewed 802 cases (758 patients) of primary lower-extremity TJA performed from January 1 through December 31, 2018, at our tertiary care medical center. Patient characteristics, preoperative and postoperative BMPs, comorbidities, current medications, and in-hospital interventions were recorded. Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (AA-CCI) values were calculated. Institutional costs of 1 BMP and of all BMPs not prompting intervention were calculated. We used multiple regression to identify independent predictors of in-hospital interventions secondary to abnormal postoperative BMPs. RESULTS: Our institutional BMP cost was $36. A total of 1032 postoperative BMPs were ordered; 958 (93%) prompted no intervention. This equated to $34,488 of avoidable BMP costs. We identified 27 cases (3.4%) requiring intervention secondary to abnormal BMPs. Independent predictors of intervention were preoperative renal dysfunction (ie, abnormal creatinine or glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min) (odds ratio [OR], 7.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-22), number of current nephrotoxic medications (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.9), and AA-CCI value (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.5). CONCLUSION: Routine postoperative BMPs are unwarranted for most patients undergoing primary TJA. Testing may be reserved for those with renal dysfunction, those taking multiple nephrotoxic medications, or those with a high AA-CCI value.

Moving Forward in Osteonecrosis: What Research Is Telling Us.

Osteonecrosis may afflict over 20 million patients worldwide. Prevention and treatment of osteonecrosis is dependent on a better understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease. Treatments range from observation with behavior modification to total joint replacement. As osteonecrosis patients are often relatively young, treatment options sparing the joint and reducing or delaying the need for joint replacement are essential. The results of joint sparing procedures are generally better if performed at early, precollapse stages. Approaches to treatment of early-stage disease are based upon the clinician's acceptance of one of the many hypotheses regarding the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms involved. These mechanisms have been categorized as direct effects on cells or tissues, vascular interruption, intravascular occlusion, and intraosseous extravascular compression. While there has been a substantial increase in research regarding osteonecrosis, many questions remain to be answered concerning risk factors, pathophysiology, and nonsurgical and surgical interventions.

An Analysis of Online Ratings of Hip and Knee Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Public domain physician review websites (PRWs) and personal websites are extremely popular measures that patients use to evaluate physicians before receiving care. Few studies have examined how orthopedic surgeons are rated on PRWs and personal websites. This study examines the online ratings of hip and knee replacement subspecialists. METHODS: The American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) fellow's ratings were examined from October 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2018, on Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, RateMDs.com, Google.com, and personal websites. Number of responses and average ratings (0.0-5.0) were recorded, along with provider gender, years in practice (0-10, 11-20, and 21+), practice type (academic, private), geographic region (NE, SE, MW, SW, W), degree (MD, DO), and fellowship training (yes, no). The Kruskal-Wallis testing was performed to determine factors affecting positive surgeon ratings. RESULTS: 98.3% (483) of 490 AAHKS surgeons were rated at least once. No significant differences in average ratings were identified between websites. Surgeons in practice 1-10 years had significantly higher ratings than those in practice 11-20 and 21+ years (P < .01). Fellowship-trained surgeons in practice 1-10 years also showed significantly higher ratings. No differences in average ratings were found between gender, practice type, and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: AAHKS surgeons have high average ratings and are rated online frequently. Surgeons in practice 1-10 years had statistically higher overall average ratings. Adult reconstruction fellowship training was also associated with higher average ratings for surgeons in practice 1-10 years. Public domain PRWs and personal websites showed no difference in average ratings.