Exposing human epithelial cells to zoledronic acid can mediate osteonecrosis of jaw: an in vitro model.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a chronic complication of bisphosphonate therapy, mainly when intravenous, in cancer patients with bone metastases and myeloma. Its pathophysiology is not yet fully elucidated; in particular, the molecular/cellular events triggering ONJ remain unclear. This complication could result from the effect of bisphosphonates released from bone into the soft-tissues, or from osteolysis induced by soft-tissues directly exposed to bisphosphonates. This research investigated the possibility that ONJ may be evocated by changes induced in osteoblast activity by factors released by soft-tissue cells exposed to zoledronic acid. METHODS: An 'in vitro' model was used, in which human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells were grown in medium conditioned by human keratinocytes NCTC 2544, exposed or not to zoledronic acid (5 or 50 µM); 5 µM zoledronic acid was also directly administered to MG-63 cells. RESULTS: In NCTC 2544 cells, zoledronic acid decreased proliferation via decreased hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase, suggesting that a decrease in healing capability can occur in case of injury. An increased pro-inflammatory potential was also observed. Osteoblasts grown in medium conditioned in the presence of zoledronic acid showed decreased proliferation and osteogenic properties, and increased ability to induce osteoclast differentiation and inflammatory process. Zoledronic acid directly administered to MG-63 modulated only some parameters and in a lesser extent. CONCLUSIONS: The research evidenced, for the first time, the direct involvement of epithelial cells in zoledronic acid-triggered molecular mechanisms leading to osteonecrosis of the jaw, by modulating both osteoblast and osteoclast properties.

4-Hydroxyhexenal and 4-hydroxynonenal are mediators of the anti-cachectic effect of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on human lung cancer cells.

Cachexia, the most severe paraneoplastic syndrome, occurs in about 80% of patients with advanced cancer; it cannot be reverted by conventional, enteral, or parenteral nutrition. For this reason, nutritional interventions must be based on the use of substances possessing, alongside nutritional and energetic properties, the ability to modulate production of the pro-inflammatory factors responsible for the metabolic changes characterising cancer cachexia. In light of their nutritional and anti-inflammatory properties, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), and in particular n-3, have been investigated for treating cachexia; however, the results have been contradictory. Since both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs can affect cell functions in several ways, this research investigated the possibility that the effects of both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs could be mediated by their major aldehydic products of lipid peroxidation, 4-hydroxyhexenal (HHE) and 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE), and by their anti-inflammatory properties. An "in vitro" cancer cachexia model, consisting of human lung cancer cells (A427) and murine myoblasts (C2C12), was used. The results showed that: 1) both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs reduced the growth of lung cancer cells without causing cell death, increased lipid peroxidation and Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPAR)α, and decreased TNFα; 2) culture medium conditioned by A427 cells grown in the absence of PUFAs blocked myosin production and the differentiation of C2C12 muscle cells; conversely, muscle cells grown in culture medium conditioned by the same cells in the presence of PUFAs showed myosin expression and formed myotubes; 3) adding HHE or HNE directly to C2C12 cells maintained in culture medium conditioned by A427 cells in the absence of PUFAs stimulated myosin production and myotube formation; 4) putative consensus sequences for (PPARs) have been found in genes encoding fast isoforms of myosin heavy chain, by a bioinformatics approach. The overall results show, first, the ability of both n-3 and n-6 PUFAs and their lipid peroxidation products to prevent the blocking of myosin expression and myotube formation caused in C2C12 cells by medium conditioned by human lung tumour cells. The C2C12 cell differentiation can be due to direct effect of lipid peroxidation products, as evidenced by treating C2C12 cells with HHE and HNE, and to the decrease of pro-inflammatory TNFα in A427 cell culture medium. The presence of consensus sequences for PPARs in genes encoding the fast isoforms of myosin heavy chain suggests that the effects of PUFAs, HHE, and HNE are PPAR-mediated.

Colonization by human fibroblasts of polypropylene prosthesis in a composite form for hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Abdominal wall hernia is one of the commonest surgical disorders worldwide, and there is no single gold-standard operative technique to repair it. In an effort to improve techniques and technologies to reinforce hernia repair, synthetic meshes are employed. In this study, a new prosthesis (named composite) formed of two polypropylene layers, one macroporous (named mesh) and one transparent (named film), was examined to evaluate its capability to enable cell proliferation without inducing cell death. Inflammatory processes were also examined. METHODS: Human fibroblasts BJ were seeded on multiwells, on which composite or film had been placed. After 7, 14, and 21 days, cell growth and viability, deposition of collagen, and release of IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α were evaluated. RESULTS: The "in vitro" protocol showed the composite to be colonized by human fibroblasts on the polypropylene macroporous mesh side; no cell growth occurred on the film. The slowdown of cell growth observed between 14 and 21 days was accompanied by an increase in type I collagen deposition and marked fibroblast activity. Inflammatory cytokines initially increased, followed by their reduction beginning at 14 days. CONCLUSIONS: The new prosthesis comprising two polypropylene layers of differing morphologies can be colonized by fibroblasts on the side facing the abdominal wall, whereas no cell growth occurs on the side facing the viscera. The transient inflammation, observed at early experimental times, is probably important for the healing process.

Aldehyde dehydrogenases and cell proliferation.

Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) oxidize aldehydes to the corresponding carboxylic acids using either NAD or NADP as a coenzyme. Aldehydes are highly reactive aliphatic or aromatic molecules that play an important role in numerous physiological, pathological, and pharmacological processes. ALDHs have been discovered in practically all organisms and there are multiple isoforms, with multiple subcellular localizations. More than 160 ALDH cDNAs or genes have been isolated and sequenced to date from various sources, including bacteria, yeast, fungi, plants, and animals. The eukaryote ALDH genes can be subdivided into several families; the human genome contains 19 known ALDH genes, as well as many pseudogenes. Noteworthy is the fact that elevated activity of various ALDHs, namely ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3, ALDH1A7, ALDH2*2, ALDH3A1, ALDH4A1, ALDH5A1, ALDH6, and ALDH9A1, has been observed in normal and cancer stem cells. Consequently, ALDHs not only may be considered markers of these cells, but also may well play a functional role in terms of self-protection, differentiation, and/or expansion of stem cell populations. The ALDH3 family includes enzymes able to oxidize medium-chain aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes, such as peroxidic and fatty aldehydes. Moreover, these enzymes also have noncatalytic functions, including antioxidant functions and some structural roles. The gene of the cytosolic form, ALDH3A1, is localized on chromosome 17 in human beings and on the 11th and 10th chromosome in the mouse and rat, respectively. ALDH3A1 belongs to the phase II group of drug-metabolizing enzymes and is highly expressed in the stomach, lung, keratinocytes, and cornea, but poorly, if at all, in normal liver. Cytosolic ALDH3 is induced by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons or chlorinated compounds, such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, in rat liver cells and increases during carcinogenesis. It has been observed that this increased activity is directly correlated with the degree of deviation in hepatoma and lung cancer cell lines, as is the case in chemically induced hepatoma in rats. High ALDH3A1 expression and activity have been correlated with cell proliferation, resistance against aldehydes derived from lipid peroxidation, and resistance against drug toxicity, such as oxazaphosphorines. Indeed, cells with a high ALDH3A1 content are more resistant to the cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of lipidic aldehydes than are those with a low content. A reduction in cell proliferation can be observed when the enzyme is directly inhibited by the administration of synthetic specific inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides, or siRNA or indirectly inhibited by the induction of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) with polyunsaturated fatty acids or PPARγ transfection. Conversely, cell proliferation is stimulated by the activation of ALDH3A1, whether by inhibiting PPARγ with a specific antagonist, antisense oligonucleotides, siRNA, or a medical device (i.e., composite polypropylene prosthesis for hernia repair) used to induce cell proliferation. To date, the mechanisms underlying the effects of ALDHs on cell proliferation are not yet fully clear. A likely hypothesis is that the regulatory effect is mediated by the catabolism of some endogenous substrates deriving from normal cell metabolism, such as 4-hydroxynonenal, which have the capacity to either stimulate or inhibit the expression of genes involved in regulating proliferation.

Importance of inverse correlation between ALDH3A1 and PPARγ in tumor cells and tissue regeneration.

Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) enzymes are involved in maintaining cellular homeostasis by metabolizing both endogenous and exogenous reactive aldehydes. They modulate several cell functions including proliferation, differentiation, survival as well as cellular response to oxidative stress. We previously reported that ALDH3A1 expression is inversely correlated with the activation of PPARs (Peroxisome Proliferators-Activated Receptors), a category of orphan nuclear hormone receptors, in both rat and human cells. PPARγ is involved in cell proliferation. In this study, we have used PPARγ transfection and inhibition to examine the relationship between ALDH3A1 and PPARγ and their role as regulators of cell proliferation. Induction of PPARγ in A549 and NCTC 2544 cells by transfection caused a decrease in ALDH3A1 and inhibition of cell proliferation, a result we obtained previously using ligands that induce PPARγ. A reduction of PPARγ expression using siRNA increased ALDH3A1 expression and cell proliferation. In cells induced to proliferate in a model of tissue regeneration, ALDH3A1 expression increased during the period of proliferation, whereas PPARγ expression decreased. In conclusion, through modulation of PPARγ or ALDH3A1, it may be possible to reduce cell proliferation in tumor cells or stimulate cell proliferation in normal cells during tissue regeneration.

Involvement of PPARs in Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Human Colon Cancer Specimens and in Normal and Cancer Cell Lines.

PPAR involvement in cell growth was investigated "in vivo" and "in vitro" and was correlated with cell proliferation and apoptotic death. "In vivo" PPARgamma and alpha were evaluated in colon cancer specimens and adjacent nonneoplastic colonic mucosa. PPARgamma increased in most cancer specimens versus mucosa, with a decrease in c-Myc and in PCNA proteins, suggesting that colon cancer growth is due to increased cell survival rather than increased proliferation. The prevalence of survival over proliferation was confirmed by Bcl-2 or Bcl-X(L) increase in cancer versus mucosa, and by decreased PPARalpha. "In vitro" PPARgamma and PPARalpha were evaluated in human tumor and normal cell lines, treated with natural or synthetic ligands. PPARgamma was involved in inhibiting cell proliferation with a decrease in c-Myc protein, whereas PPARalpha was involved in inducing apoptosis with modulation of Bcl-2 and Bad proteins. This involvement was confirmed using specific antagonists of two PPARs. Moreover, the results obtained on treating cell lines with PPAR ligands confirm observations in colon cancer: there is an inverse correlation between PPARalpha and Bcl-2 and between PPARgamma and c-Myc.