Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 28(3): 249-60, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17326014

RESUMEN

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association of Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating healthcare-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, APIC and SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) SHEA and APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) APIC and SHEA welcome efforts by healthcare consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and healthcare-associated infections. (4) SHEA and APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) APIC and SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Control de Infecciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Comités Consultivos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Medios de Cultivo , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Sociedades Médicas , Sociedades Científicas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 35(2): 73-85, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17327185

RESUMEN

Legislation aimed at controlling antimicrobial-resistant pathogens through the use of active surveillance cultures to screen hospitalized patients has been introduced in at least 2 US states. In response to the proposed legislation, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc., (APIC) have developed this joint position statement. Both organizations are dedicated to combating health care-associated infections with a wide array of methods, including the use of active surveillance cultures in appropriate circumstances. This position statement reviews the proposed legislation and the rationale for use of active surveillance cultures, examines the scientific evidence supporting the use of this strategy, and discusses a number of unresolved issues surrounding legislation mandating use of active surveillance cultures. The following 5 consensus points are offered. (1) Although reducing the burden of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), is of preeminent importance, the APIC and the SHEA do not support legislation to mandate use of active surveillance cultures to screen for MRSA, VRE, or other antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. (2) The SHEA and the APIC support the continued development, validation, and application of efficacious and cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infections caused by MRSA, VRE, and other antimicrobial-resistant and antimicrobial-susceptible pathogens. (3) The APIC and the SHEA welcome efforts by health care consumers, together with private, local, state, and federal policy makers, to focus attention on and formulate solutions for the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance and health care-associated infections. (4) The SHEA and the APIC support ongoing additional research to determine and optimize the appropriateness, utility, feasibility, and cost-effectiveness of using active surveillance cultures to screen both lower-risk and high-risk populations. (5) The APIC and the SHEA support stronger collaboration between state and local public health authorities and institutional infection prevention and control experts.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas , Control de Infecciones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus/aislamiento & purificación , Resistencia a la Vancomicina , Comités Consultivos , Medios de Cultivo , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Humanos , Illinois , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Maryland , Sociedades Médicas , Sociedades Científicas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(4): 371-80, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26832072

RESUMEN

The scope of a healthcare institution's infection prevention and control/healthcare epidemiology program (IPC/HE) should be driven by the size and complexity of the patient population served, that population's risk for healthcare-associated infection (HAI), and local, state, and national regulatory and accreditation requirements. Essential activities of all IPC/HE programs include but are not limited to the following: ∙ Surveillance.∙ Performance improvement to reduce HAI ∙ Acute event response, including outbreak investigation ∙ Education and training of both healthcare personnel and patients ∙ Reporting of HAI to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network as well as entities required by law.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Personal de Salud/educación , Control de Infecciones/normas , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Estados Unidos
6.
Am J Infect Control ; 40(2): 94-5, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22381221

RESUMEN

It is clear that the widespread and injudicious use of antimicrobials has greatly increased the presence of MDROs that threaten the health of all. There is worldwide acknowledgement that this threat is growing, and that prudent use of antimicrobials combined with infection prevention can prevent harm and improve patient safety. Antimicrobial stewardship programs must harness the talents of all members of the health care team to effectively identify the organism, determine its susceptibility, institute any precautions required, and prescribe the narrowest-acting antibiotic that will destroy it. IPs/HEs play a pivotal role in this approach, by assisting with early organism and infected patient identification, by promoting compliance with standard and transmission-based precautions and other infection prevention strategies such as care bundle practices, hand hygiene, and by educating staff, patients, and visitors.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Micosis/prevención & control , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Virosis/prevención & control , Antiinfecciosos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/legislación & jurisprudencia , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/organización & administración , Resistencia a Medicamentos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Profesionales para Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Micosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Micosis/microbiología , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Salud Pública/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Pública/normas , Virosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Virosis/virología
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(10): 901-13, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18808340
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA