A Possible Distinct Molecular Subtype (Quintuple-Wildtype) of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in First-Line Anti-EGFR Therapy with Cetuximab Plus FOLFIRI - Palliative Precision Therapy and a Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach: Interim Analysis of the IVOPAK II Trial with Early Results.

OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to prospectively evaluate a new molecular biomarker panel (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, and ERBB2) for palliative first-line treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC), including a multidisciplinary treatment approach. The rate of secondary metastasis resections was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with definitively nonresectable metastatic CRC were enrolled from 10 centers before the interim analysis (June 2019) of the IVOPAK II trial (Interdisciplinary Care with Quality Control in Palliative Treatment of Colorectal Cancer). After determination of 5 molecular biomarkers in the tumor (KRAS, exons 2-4; NRAS, exons 2-4; BRAF V600E; PIK3CA; and ERBB2), patients in the IVOPAK II study received FOLFIRI plus cetuximab for all-RAS/quintuple-wildtype disease and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the case of RAS mutations. The current article presents the early description of the clinical outcome of the interim analysis of IVOPAK II comparing the all-RAS/quintuple-wildtype and RAS-mutations populations, including a multidisciplinary-treated case report of a quintuple-wildtype patient. RESULTS: The quintuple-wildtype population treated with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in first-line exhibited a significantly higher response rate and enhanced early tumor shrinkage in the interim analysis than the RAS-mutations population, as well as a high rate of secondary metastatic resections. CONCLUSION: Initial results of this new biomarker panel (quintuple-wildtype) are promising for anti-EGFR therapy with cetuximab plus doublet chemotherapy (FOLFIRI) in first-line treatment of metastatic CRC. These results warrant confirmation with higher case numbers in the IVOPAK II trial.

Palliative first-line therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil and sodium folinic acid as a 24-hour infusion (AIO regimen) combined with weekly irinotecan in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction followed by secondary metastatic resection after downsizing.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as 24-h infusion (AIO regimen) plus irinotecan in patients with histologically proven metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (UICC stage IV). MATERIAL/METHODS: From 08/1999 to 12/2008, 76 registered, previously untreated patients were evaluable. Treatment regimen: irinotecan (80 mg/m²) as 1-h infusion followed by 5-FU (2000 mg/m²) combined with FA (500 mg/m²) as 24-h infusion (d1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, qd 57). RESULTS: Median age: 59 years; male/female: 74%/26%; ECOG ≤1: 83%; response: CR: 1%, PR: 16%, SD: 61%, PD: 17%, not evaluable in terms of response: 5%; tumor control: 78%; median OS: 11.2 months; median time-to-progression: 5.3 months; 1-year survival rate: 49%; 2-year survival rate: 17%; no evidence of disease: 6.6%; higher grade toxicities (grade 3/4): anemia: 7%, leucopenia: 1%, ascites: 3%, nausea: 3%, infections: 12%, vomiting: 9%, GI bleeding of the primary tumor: 4%, diarrhea: 17%, thromboembolic events: 4%; secondary metastatic resection after downsizing: 16 patients (21%), R-classification of secondary resections: R0/R1/R2: 81%/6%/13%, median survival of the 16 patients with secondary resection: 23.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Combined 5-FU/FA as 24-h infusion plus irinotecan may be considered as an active palliative first-line treatment accompanied by tolerable toxicity; thus offering an alternative to cisplatin-based treatment regimens. Thanks to efficient interdisciplinary teamwork, secondary metastatic resections could be performed in 16 patients. In total, the patients who had undergone secondary resection had a median survival of 23.7 months, whereas the median survival of patients without secondary resection was 10.1 months (p≤0.001).

Palliative first-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as 24h-infusion and gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer (UICC IV).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxic side effects of combined gemcitabine plus weekly high-dose 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) as 24h-infusion in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (UICC IV) as validation group of an earlier phase II study. Primary endpoints were to assess the response and tumour control rate. MATERIAL/METHODS: This study comprised 60 prospectively registered patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (UICC IV). A locally advanced disease was defined as exclusion criteria. The treatment schedule was weekly gemcitabine (1.000 mg/m(2)) as a 0.5h-infusion combined with 5-FU (2.000 mg/m(2)) as a 24h-infusion on day 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days. RESULTS: Response rate (CR+PR) was achieved in 7% of the patients, tumour control rate (CR+PR+SD) was achieved in 59%. Median time-to-progression was 4 months, median overall survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 5.4-9.1). The median survival of patients with normal CEA value was 10.6 months (95% CI 7.8-13.4); with a normal CA 19-9 median survival was 10.1 months (95% CI 4.6-15.7) and with ECOG performance status 0 median survival was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.6-15.3). As higher grade toxicity (grade 3/4) leukopenia (15%), anaemia (10%) and thrombopenia (5%) were observed. Nausea and diarrhea (grade 3/4) occurred in 5% of the patients and vomiting in 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of gemcitabine and 5-FU as a 24h-infusion is feasible and offers good tumour control rate accompanied by tolerable toxicity. The subgroup of patients with a good performance status (ECOG 0) and tumour markers within the normal range benefit from the gemcitabine combination therapy.

Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil as a 24-h infusion and sodium folinic acid (AIO regimen) plus irinotecan in patients with locally advanced nonresectable and metastatic adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus: a phase II trial.

In the majority of patients with oesophageal carcinoma, curative treatment proves to be impossible when diagnosis was established; therefore, most of the patients are candidates for palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (AIO regimen) plus irinotecan in patients with locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the oesophagus. The methods used a prospective phase II trial, start: November 2002; patients: n=25; chemotherapy: irinotecan (80 mg/m2) as a 1-h infusion and 5-fluorouracil (2000 mg/m2) with sodium folinic acid (500 mg/m2) as a 24-h infusion on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36, repeated on day 57. Last date of evaluation: 28 February 2007; n=24; adenocarcinoma: n=13, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC): n=11; UICC III/IV: 3/21; grading G1/G2/G3/G4: 0/8/12/4; median age: 58 years (range 44-75); men/women: 19/5; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group index 0/1/2: 3/17/4; applications: 460. Higher-grade toxicity: grade 3 diarrhoea: n=2, grade 4 diarrhoea: n=1, grade 4 vomiting: n=1, grade 4 nausea: n=1, grade 3 fatigue: n=1, grade 3 hyponatraemia: n=2, grade 4 elevation of creatinine: n=1, thrombosis of the vena subclavia: n=1, ischaemic lesion of the brain stem: n=1. Three patients died after two chemotherapeutic applications because of high tumour burden. Evaluable for response: n=19. Partial response: n=8 (33%), stable disease: n=9 (38%), progressive disease: n=2 (8%), not evaluable: n=5 (21%). Time-to-progression: 6.6 months (range 1.6-24.6). Total median survival: 13.6 months (median survival of adenocarcinoma: 20.3 months, median survival of SCC: 10.0 months). Secondary resection (R0): n=3. In oesophageal carcinomas, the AIO regimen plus irinotecan is excellently manageable as an outpatient treatment and shows efficacy in adenocarcinomas and SCCs of the oesophagus.

Weekly High-dose 5-Fluorouracil as 24-hour Infusion Combined with Sodium Folinic Acid (AIO regimen) Plus Irinotecan in Second-line and Sequential Therapy of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (CRC).

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this work was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a 24-hour infusion (24-h inf.) combined with sodium folinic acid (FA) (AIO-regimen) plus irinotecan (Iri.) after pretreatment with AIO-regimen plus oxaliplatin (L-OHP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-resectable distant CRC metastases were enrolled in a prospective phase II study for palliative second-line treatment after previous progression of first-line treatment in accordance with the AIO-regimen plus oxaliplatin. On an outpatient basis, the patients received a treatment regimen comprising of weekly 80 mg/m2 irinotecan in the form of a 1-hour i.v. infusion and 2,000 mg/m2 5-FU combined with 500 mg/m2 sodium folinic acid administered as a 24-h infusion i.v. once weekly. RESULTS: During second-line treatment, a total of 59 patients received 520 chemotherapy applications. As the main higher-grade symptom of toxicity, diarrhea (NCI-CTC-toxicity grade 3) presented in 8 patients (13.6%, 95%CI=5.1-23.7), followed by leukocytopenia (CTC grade 3) in 3 patients (5.1%, 95%CI=0-11.9), followed by thrombocytopenia (CTC grade 3) in 1 patient (1.7%, 95%CI=0-5.1). Fifty-nine patients were evaluable for treatment response. The remission data can be summarized as follows: complete remission (CR); n=0; partial remission (PR); n=6 (10%; 95%CI=3.4-18.6); stable disease (SD); n=31 (53%; 95%CI=39.0-64.4); progressive disease (PD); n=19 (33%; 95%CI=20.3-44.1). The median progression-free survival (PFS) rate (n=59) was 4.2 months (range=3.8-5.8 months). The median survival time counted from the start of second-line treatment (n=59) 14.2 months (range 8.2-17.3 months) and the median survival time counted from the start of first-line therapy (n=59) 25 months (range 19-27 months). CONCLUSION: Palliative second-line treatment according to the AIO regimen plus irinotecan offers both a favourable toxicity profile and promising efficacy in second-line and palliative sequential therapy.

Successful Multidisciplinary Treatment with Secondary Metastatic Liver Resection after Downsizing by Palliative Second-Line Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Curative Option.

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic outcome following progression after palliative first-line treatment for patients suffering from metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma is generally poor. Long-term relapse-free survival with palliative second-line treatment may be achieved in only a limited number of individual cases. CASE REPORT: A 37-year-old patient presented with bilobar liver metastases of colon cancer confirmed by histology with wild-type K-RAS (exon 2). Due to progressive disease after eight cycles of first-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, second-line chemotherapy with modified FOLFOX4 (mFOLFOX4) plus bevacizumab was initiated. During four cycles of mFOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab (2 months), no higher-grade toxicity occurred. Liver MRI with contrast medium revealed downsizing of the segment II/III metastases, as well as regressive, small, faint, hardly definable lesions in segments VI and IVb. The interdisciplinary tumor board of the University of Erlangen thus decided to perform resection of the liver metastases. Segments II and III were resected, and the liver metastases in segments IVa and VI were excised (R0). Histopathology confirmed three of the R0-resected metastases to be completely necrotic, with residual scarring. As perioperative therapy, four additional cycles of mFOLFOX4 plus bevacizumab were administered postoperatively. No higher-grade toxicity was observed. Three years after the initial diagnosis, the patient is relapse free, professionally fully reintegrated, and has an excellent performance status. CONCLUSION: Patients suffering from metastatic colorectal cancer may benefit from multidisciplinary treatment with secondary metastatic liver resection after downsizing by palliative second-line treatment. In individual cases, patients may even have a curative treatment option, provided that close interdisciplinary collaboration exists.