Corneal confocal microscopy for identification of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy: a pooled multinational consortium study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Small cohort studies raise the hypothesis that corneal nerve abnormalities (including corneal nerve fibre length [CNFL]) are valid non-invasive imaging endpoints for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP). We aimed to establish concurrent validity and diagnostic thresholds in a large cohort of participants with and without DSP. METHODS: Nine hundred and ninety-eight participants from five centres (516 with type 1 diabetes and 482 with type 2 diabetes) underwent CNFL quantification and clinical and electrophysiological examination. AUC and diagnostic thresholds were derived and validated in randomly selected samples using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Sensitivity analyses included latent class models to address the issue of imperfect reference standard. RESULTS: Type 1 and type 2 diabetes subcohorts had mean age of 42 ± 19 and 62 ± 10 years, diabetes duration 21 ± 15 and 12 ± 9 years and DSP prevalence of 31% and 53%, respectively. Derivation AUC for CNFL was 0.77 in type 1 diabetes (p < 0.001) and 0.68 in type 2 diabetes (p < 0.001) and was approximately reproduced in validation sets. The optimal threshold for automated CNFL was 12.5 mm/mm2 in type 1 diabetes and 12.3 mm/mm2 in type 2 diabetes. In the total cohort, a lower threshold value below 8.6 mm/mm2 to rule in DSP and an upper value of 15.3 mm/mm2 to rule out DSP were associated with 88% specificity and 88% sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: We established the diagnostic validity and common diagnostic thresholds for CNFL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Further research must determine to what extent CNFL can be deployed in clinical practice and in clinical trials assessing the efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for DSP.

Analysis of Prevalence, Magnitude and Timing of the Dawn Phenomenon in Adults and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Descriptive Analysis of 2 Insulin Pump Trials.

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the dawn phenomenon in type 1 diabetes, we sought to determine its prevalence, timing and magnitude in studies specifically designed to assess basal insulin requirements in patients using insulin pumps. METHODS: Thirty-three participants from 2 sensor-augmented insulin pump studies were analyzed. Twenty participants were obtained from a methodologically ideal semiautomated basal analysis trial in which basal rates were determined from repeated fasting tests (the derivation set) and 13 from an artificial pancreas trial in which duration of fasting was variable (the "confirmation" set). Prevalence was determined for the total cohort and for individual trials using the standard definition of an increase in insulin exceeding 20% and lasting ≥90 minutes. Among cases, time of onset and percent change in the magnitude of basal delivery were determined. RESULTS: Seventeen participants (52%) experienced the dawn phenomenon (11 of 20 [55%] in the derivation set and 6 of 13 [46%] in the confirmation set). Time of onset was 3 AM (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 4:15 AM) in the derivation set and 3 AM (IQR, 3 to 4 AM) in the confirmation set. The magnitude of the dawn phenomenon was a 58.1% (IQR, 28.8% to 110.6%) increase in insulin requirements in the derivation set and 65.5% (IQR, 45.6% to 87.4%) in the confirmation set. CONCLUSIONS: The dawn phenomenon occurs in approximately half of patients with type 1 diabetes; when present, it has predictable timing of onset (generally 3 AM) and a substantial, but highly variable, magnitude. These findings imply that optimization of glycemic control requires clinical emphasis on fasted overnight basal insulin assessment.

Agreement between automated and manual quantification of corneal nerve fiber length: Implications for diabetic neuropathy research.

AIMS: Quantification of corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) by in vivo corneal confocal microscopy represents a promising diabetic neuropathy biomarker, but applicability is limited by resource-intensive image analysis. We aimed to evaluate, in cross-sectional analysis of non-diabetic controls and patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes with and without neuropathy, the agreement between manual and automated analysis protocols. METHODS: Sixty-eight controls, 139 type 1 diabetes, and 249 type 2 diabetes participants underwent CNFL measurement (N=456). Neuropathy status was determined by clinical and electrophysiological criteria. CNFL was determined by manual (CNFLManual, reference standard) and automated (CNFLAuto) protocols, and results were compared for correlation and agreement using Spearman coefficients and the method of Bland and Altman (CNFLManual subtracted from CNFLAuto). RESULTS: Participants demonstrated broad variability in clinical characteristics associated with neuropathy. The mean age, diabetes duration, and HbA1c were 53±18years, 15.9±12.6years, and 7.4±1.7%, respectively, and 218 (56%) individuals with diabetes had neuropathy. Mean CNFLManual was 15.1±4.9mm/mm2, and mean CNFLAuto was 10.5±3.7mm/mm2 (CNFLAuto underestimation bias, -4.6±2.6mm/mm2 corresponding to -29±17%). Percent bias was similar across non-diabetic controls (-33±12%), type 1 (-30±20%), and type 2 diabetes (-28±16%) subgroups (ANOVA, p=0.068), and similarly in diabetes participants with and without neuropathy. Levels of CNFLAuto and CNFLManual were both inversely associated with neuropathy status. CONCLUSIONS: Although CNFLAuto substantially underestimated CNFLManual, its bias was non-differential between diverse patient groups and its relationship with neuropathy status was preserved. Determination of diagnostic thresholds specific to CNFLAuto should be pursued in diagnostic studies of diabetic neuropathy.

Validation of cooling detection threshold as a marker of sensorimotor polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes.

AIM: We aimed to validate the performance cooling detection thresholds (CDT) to detect diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty participants with type 2 diabetes underwent clinical and electrophysiological examinations including 3 small fiber function tests: CDT, heart rate variability (HRV) and LDIFLARE. Clinical DSP was defined by consensus criteria whereas preclinical DSP was defined by presence of at least one electrophysiological abnormality. Area under the curve (AUC) and optimal thresholds were determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Participants were aged 63 ± 11 years with mean HbA1c of 7.5 ± 1.6%. The 139 (63%) clinical DSP cases had mean CDT values of 18.3 ± 8.9°C; the 52 (24%) preclinical DSP cases had 25.3 ± 3.5°C; and the 29 (13%) controls had 27.1 ± 3.8°C; (p-value<0.02 for all comparisons). For identification of clinical DSP cases, AUCCDT was 0.79 which exceeded AUCHRV (0.60, p=<0.0001) and AUCLDI FLARE (0.69, p=0.0003), optimal threshold <22.8°C (64% sensitivity, 83% specificity). Preclinical DSP AUCCDT was 0.80, also exceeding the other 2 measures (p<0.02 for both comparisons), optimal threshold ≤27.5°C (83% sensitivity, 72% specificity). CONCLUSIONS: CDT had good diagnostic performance for identification of both clinical and preclinical neuropathy in type 2 diabetes. Its use as a non-invasive screening tool should be considered for research and clinical practice.

Reproducibility of In Vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy Using an Automated Analysis Program for Detection of Diabetic Sensorimotor Polyneuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: In vivo Corneal Confocal Microscopy (IVCCM) is a validated, non-invasive test for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) detection, but its utility is limited by the image analysis time and expertise required. We aimed to determine the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of a novel automated analysis program compared to manual analysis. METHODS: In a cross-sectional diagnostic study, 20 non-diabetes controls (mean age 41.4±17.3y, HbA1c 5.5±0.4%) and 26 participants with type 1 diabetes (42.8±16.9y, 8.0±1.9%) underwent two separate IVCCM examinations by one observer and a third by an independent observer. Along with nerve density and branch density, corneal nerve fibre length (CNFL) was obtained by manual analysis (CNFLMANUAL), a protocol in which images were manually selected for automated analysis (CNFLSEMI-AUTOMATED), and one in which selection and analysis were performed electronically (CNFLFULLY-AUTOMATED). Reproducibility of each protocol was determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and, as a secondary objective, the method of Bland and Altman was used to explore agreement between protocols. RESULTS: Mean CNFLManual was 16.7±4.0, 13.9±4.2 mm/mm2 for non-diabetes controls and diabetes participants, while CNFLSemi-Automated was 10.2±3.3, 8.6±3.0 mm/mm2 and CNFLFully-Automated was 12.5±2.8, 10.9 ± 2.9 mm/mm2. Inter-observer ICC and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were 0.73(0.56, 0.84), 0.75(0.59, 0.85), and 0.78(0.63, 0.87), respectively (p = NS for all comparisons). Intra-observer ICC and 95%CI were 0.72(0.55, 0.83), 0.74(0.57, 0.85), and 0.84(0.73, 0.91), respectively (p<0.05 for CNFLFully-Automated compared to others). The other IVCCM parameters had substantially lower ICC compared to those for CNFL. CNFLSemi-Automated and CNFLFully-Automated underestimated CNFLManual by mean and 95%CI of 35.1(-4.5, 67.5)% and 21.0(-21.6, 46.1)%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an apparent measurement (underestimation) bias in comparison to the manual strategy of image analysis, fully-automated analysis preserves CNFL reproducibility. Future work must determine the diagnostic thresholds specific to the fully-automated measure of CNFL.