Changes in total skin electron beam therapy modalities for mycosis fungoides: A single-centre study.

BACKGROUND: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is a highly radiosensitive disease. Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) is an effective option that may allow prolonged response for several months. Recently, a low-dose regimen (12 Gy) has been reported more frequently, with less complete response than for standard doses (36 Gy) but better safety. Our aim was to compare patients treated with 12-Gy and 36-40-Gy TSEBT regimens at our centre for efficacy and safety. METHODS: This retrospective, monocentric study in Bordeaux University Hospital included all MF patients treated with 12-Gy or 36-40-Gy TSEBT between 2011 and 2020. RESULTS: Patients presented with MF at the following stages: 15 T2, including 9 folliculotropic MF; 2 T3, including 1 folliculotropic; 8 T4, including 2 Sézary syndromes. The mean follow-up time after TSEBT was 43.5 months [range: 2-128] for the 36-40-Gy group and 25.2 months [range: 4-45] for the 12-Gy group. The 3-month overall response rate (ORR) was similar for both groups (84.6% for 36-40 Gy and 91.7% for 12 Gy), but there was a tendency to more complete response in the 36-40-Gy group (30.8% vs 8.3%, P=0.35). Progression-free survival (PFS) tended to be better in the 36-40-Gy group than in the low-dose group (15.7 months vs 5.3 months; P=0.28). Patients treated with low-dose TSEBT had a lower incidence of radiation dermatitis (16.7% vs 38.4%, P=0.42). CONCLUSION: We confirm that TSEBT is an effective option, including at lower doses. Differences between low- and standard-dose regimens were not significant in our series. Although a low-dose regimen seemed to result in lower complete response and long-term efficacy rates in comparison with a standard dose, treatment at lower doses presents the advantage of repeatability, with fewer and weaker side effects, in the event of disease recurrence. Second-line treatments were mostly skin-directed in this group.

[Synergistic effect of anti-PD1 immunotherapy then radiotherapy in advanced basal cell carcinoma]. / Synergie de la séquence immunothérapie par anti-PD1 et radiothérapie au cours d'un carcinome basocellulaire avancé.

INTRODUCTION: Vismodégib is the first-line treatment for non-operable or metastatic locally advanced basal cell carcinomas (LABCC), although complete response is rare and adverse effects are common. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are currently being evaluated in this indication. Herein we report a case of LABCC that responded dramatically to sequenced "immunotherapy then radiotherapy". OBSERVATION: A 47-year-old male presented peri- and intra-orbital infiltrative LABCC that had been present for more than 10 years. After an initial response to vismodégib, further disease progression resulted in the introduction of successive lines of treatment (radiotherapy, platinum salts and itraconazole) without any significant response. Compassionate treatment with pembrolizumab was initiated. After eight courses, major clinical progression occurred with intraoral extension responsible for respiratory discomfort. Following withdrawal of pembrolizumab, high-energy radiotherapy was started with a spectacular response, both clinically and in terms of imaging. DISCUSSION: The efficacy of "radiotherapy-immunotherapy" sequencing in melanoma has been reported, due in particular to the abscopal effect and radiosensitisation. In our case, where the sequence was inverted, immunotherapy may have enhanced the effects of radiotherapy through "immunosensitisation", whereas radiotherapy alone had previously been ineffective. This observation underlines the potential value of these treatments, either combined or in sequence, and their synergistic effects and optimal association require further evaluation.

[Primary localized cutaneous nodular amyloidosis: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge]. / Amylose cutanée nodulaire primitive localisée: un défi diagnostique et thérapeutique.

BACKGROUND: Nodular primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA) is a rare subtype of localized cutaneous amyloidosis in which amyloid protein is derived from immunoglobulin light chains. Follow-up for progression to systemic amyloidosis or autoimmune disease is mandatory. No consensus exists regarding treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report a case of nodular PLCA in a 49-year-old man, presenting as an asymptomatic nodule of the nose. Skin biopsy revealed diffuse deposition of amyloid associated with plasmocyte proliferation. Monotypic kappa light-chain restriction was observed. Extensive systemic evaluation, including bone marrow biopsy and PET scan, was negative. Protein electrophoresis and immunofixation in serum and urine were normal. The nodule was treated with radiotherapy but there was no response. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) was performed with no recurrence at 6 months of follow-up. No systemic progression was observed one year after the initial diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Since nodular PLCA may have a cutaneous presentation similar to that of primary systemic amyloidosis, evaluation for systemic amyloidosis is necessary. Treatment of amyloidosis is difficult. Radiotherapy appears ineffective in treating this type of primary cutaneous amyloidosis, and surgical treatment, where possible, is a good option, especially with MMS, which allows both controlled excision and minimal margins.