Pharmacokinetic and clinical monitoring through posologic changes in adalimumab intensification regimen from 40 mg every week to 80 mg every other week.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab dose escalation is often recommended for inflammatory bowel disease patients in cases of loss of response. The usual adalimumab intensification regimen was 40 mg every week. Recently the pharmaceutical companies commercialized the 80mg injection pen. In the biosimilars era, this pen was sold at the same price as the 40mg pen. Due to this and for patient comfort, we proposed that our stable intensified adalimumab patients on a 40mg every-week regimen, change to a dose of 80mg every-other-week. AIM AND METHODS: an observational study was performed to monitor outcome through this posologic change. Clinical, analytic parameters and adalimumab trough levels were prospectively obtained at baseline, 4 and 12 months after posologic change. The evolution of this cohort and calculates savings were described. RESULTS: 13 patients were included in the study and the median time of adalimumab intensification prior to posologic change to 80mg eow was 32 months (IQR 29-63). At 4 months, all patients maintained adalimumab 80mg every-other-week. After month 4, two patients returned to the previous regimen after mild worsening, without significant changes in CRP, calprotectin or adalimumab-trough-levels. At 1 year, adalimumab was stopped in one patient in remission with undetectable levels and positive adalimumab-antibodies. No significant differences in adalimumab-trough-levels were noted before and after the posologic change. Costs fell from 16276 €/patient/year of treatment to 8812.15 €/patient/year of treatment. CONCLUSION: In IBD patients with stable response to adalimumab intensification regimen of 40 mg every-week, changing to 80mg every-other-week seems to maintain response and similar adalimumab-trough-levels. Furthermore, it is cost-saving, although some patients may perceive mild symptoms.

Management of Everolimus and Voriconazole Interaction in Lung Transplant Patients.

BACKGROUND: To analyze the impact of voriconazole administration on everolimus dose, trough concentrations and concentration/dose (C0/D) ratio in order to determine the appropriate management of this interaction in lung transplant patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of 16 of consecutive lung transplant patients on a stable everolimus-based regimen to which oral voriconazole was added from January 2013 to February 2014. Everolimus blood levels were measured using the Thermo Scientific QMS Everolimus Immunoassay on an ARCHITECT-C8000 analyzer. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the exposure parameter variations before, during, and after azole withdrawal. A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19.0. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included. Voriconazole treatment led to a significant 8.7-fold increase in the everolimus C0/D ratio. Although initially the daily dose was reduced to 48.5% ± 20.5%, and subsequently to 79.5% ± 7.1%, the desired therapeutic levels were achieved in all patients when it was decreased to 86.6% ± 3.9%. After its withdrawal, the C0/D ratio returned to values similar to the baseline situation. The comparison of exposure parameters studied at stable moments, before and after the completion of azole treatment with the cotreatment period, revealed significant changes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral voriconazole is a strong inhibitor of everolimus metabolism, requiring a dose reduction of around 87%. At the time of azole withdrawal, the dose should be increased to achieve C0/D ratio values similar to the initial situation. In our clinical practice, for a safe coadministration, a preemptive decrease to 75% of everolimus dose with the first azole prescription is recommended. Close monitoring of the everolimus concentrations and corresponding dosage adjustments are necessary until the target levels are achieved during both periods.

Results of the implementation of a pharmacogenomics platform based on NGS technologies. Combining clinical and research approaches.

OBJECTIVE: As more genes are incorporated into pharmacogenomic care  processes and more importance is given to rare variants, the use of targeted  capture sequencing panels has been proposed as a very efficient alternative  due to their affordability, high throughput, and deep coverage, all of them  characteristics of high-quality next-generation sequencing data. The purpose of  this study is to describe the prevalence of clinically actionable  pharmacogenetic variants previously described in the scientific literature, as  well as that of new variants identified by next-generation sequencing  technologies, and to evaluate the drugs potentially affected by such variants. METHOD: A panel of 18 clinically actionable pharmacogenomics-related genes  was evaluated in 41 subjects diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing  neoadjuvant treatment. The prevalence of previously descri- bed clinically  actionable variants as well as of phenotypes classified according to current  interpretation standards was studied. The pharmacological treatments  potentially affected by the identified variants were also evaluated. An  estimation was made of the prevalence of not previously described, possibly  deleterious, variants selected using bioinformatics criteria. RESULTS: All subjects carried clinically actionable variants, with a mean of 4.02  genes affected by each variant per individual. VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP2C19,  CYP2D6 and CYP2B6 were the most polymorphic genes and were present with  actionable phenotypes in more than 50% of patients; 15-50% had actionable  phonotypes in UGT1A1, SLCO1B1, CYP2C9 and TPMT and 2-15% in HLA-B,  CYP3A5, HLA-A and DPYD. No actionable variants were identified in RYR1,  CACNA1S, G6PD, F5 and NUDT15. These variants had the potential to affect  response to 84% of the drugs described in the leading pharmacogenetic  guidelines. Possibly deleterious variants not previously described accounted for  11.4% of all clinically actionable variants and were present in 12.2% of  patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show a high prevalence of clinically actionable variants, both common, i.e., previously described in the  literature, and rare, i.e., not previously studied with conventional technological  approaches. The latter are candidates for a more exhaustive  molecular and/or clinical characterization.

OBJETIVO: A medida que se incorporan más genes a los procesos  farmacogenómicos asistenciales y se otorga más importancia a las variantes raras, el uso de paneles de secuenciación dirigida por captura se ha  propuesto como una alternativa muy eficiente atendiendo a sus costes, su  rendimiento y la cobertura profunda, característica de los datos de  secuenciación de nueva generación de alta calidad. El objeto de este trabajo es  describir la prevalencia de variantes farmacogenéticas clínicamente  procesables descritas previamente en la literatura científica, así como de  nuevas variantes identificadas mediante tecnologías de secuenciación de nueva  generación y evaluar los fármacos potencialmente afectados por estas  variantes.Método: Se evaluó un panel de 18 genes relacionados con la  farmacogenómica clínicamente procesables en 41 individuos con diagnóstico de  cáncer de mama que van a recibir tratamiento adyuvante y neoadyuvante.  Se estudió  la literatura científica, así como de los fenotipos farmacogenéticos  clasificados según los estándares de interpretación actuales. Asimismo, se  evaluaron los tratamientos farmacológicos potencialmente afectados por las  variantes identificadas. Se estimó la prevalencia de variantes posiblemente  deletéreas no descritas previamente seleccionadas con criterios  bioinformáticos. RESULTADOS: Todos los individuos fueron portadores de variantes clínicamente procesables, con una media de 4,02 genes afectados por alguna variante por individuo. Los genes VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 y CYP2B6 fueron los más polimórficos, con más de un 50% de  pacientes con fenotipos procesables; un 15-50% en UGT1A1, SLCO1B1,  CYP2C9 y TPMT y un 2-15% HLA-B, CYP3A5, HLA-A y DPYD. No se  identificaron variantes procesables en RYR1, CACNA1S, G6PD, F5 y NUDT15.  Estas variantes afectarían a la respuesta de un 84% de los fármacos descritos  en las principales guías de farmacogenética. Las variantes posiblemente  deletéreas no descritas previamente supusieron un 11,4% del total de  variantes clínicamente procesables y están presentes en un 12,2% de los  pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados obtenidos constatan una alta prevalencia de  variantes clínicamente procesables tanto comunes, previamente descritas en la  literatura, como raras, no estudiadas con abordajes tecnológicos convencionales y candidatas a una caracterización molecular y/o  clínica más exhaustiva.

PEG-Interferon-α ribavirin-induced HCV viral clearance: a pharmacogenetic multicenter Spanish study.

OBJECTIVE: Dual PEGylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin therapy has been the main hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment of the last decade. Current direct-acting antiviral agents have improved the outcome of therapy but also have increased the cost and management complexity of treatment. The current study analyzes host genetics, viral and clinical predictors of sustained viral response (SVR) to dual PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy in a representative Spanish population. METHODS: Observational prospective multicentre pharmacogenetic cohort study conducted in 12 different hospitals of 12 different Spanish regions. A total of 98 patients with SVR and 106 with non-SVR in response to PEG-IFN and ribavirin therapy were included. 33 single nucleotide polymorphisms located in 24 different genes related with inflammatory, immune and virus response were selected. Clinical and viral data were also analyzed as candidate of SVR predictors. RESULTS: IL-28B (rs12979860, rs7248668, rs8105790, rs8099917) and TNFRSF1B (rs1061622) genotypes, as well as TNFRSF1B/IL-10/TNFα (-308) non-TTG and TNFRSF1B/IL- 10/IL-4 non-TTC haplotypes together with lower age, lower basal HCV RNA load, higher basal serum LDL cholesterol values, VHC genotypes 2 and 3 and basal low grade fibrosis 0-2 were associated with a SVR in the univariate analysis. Independent predictors of SVR in the multivariate analysis were IL-28B rs12979860 CC, TNFRSF1B/IL-10/IL-4 non-TTC along with low baseline HCV RNA load and HCV genotypes 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: IL-28B rs12979860 CC, TNFRSF1B/ IL-10/ IL-4 non-TTC haplotype, low baseline HCV RNA load and HCV genotypes 2 and 3 may help to predict successful outcome to PEG-IFN/ribavirin therapy in Spanish population.

Objetivo: El interferon-pegilado (IFN-PEG) junto a ribavirina ha sido el principal tratamiento de la infeccion por el virus de la hepatitis C (VHC) de la ultima decada. Los agentes antivirales de accion directa actuales han mejorado los resultados de la terapia, pero tambien han aumentado el costo y la gestion de la complejidad del tratamiento. El presente estudio analiza factores geneticos de los pacientes, asi como predictores virales y clinicos de respuesta sostenida viral (RSV) al tratamiento con IFN-PEG y ribavirina en poblacion Espanola. Métodos: Estudio farmacogenetico, multicentrico, prospectivo, observacional de cohortes realizado en 12 hospitales diferentes de 12 comunidades autonomas diferentes. Se incluyeron un total de 98 pacientes con RVS y 106 sin SVR al tratamiento con IFNPEG y ribavirina. Se seleccionaron 33 polimorfismos de nucleotido unico ubicados en 24 genes diferentes relacionados con la respuesta inflamatoria, inmunologica y viral. Los datos clinicos y virales tambien se analizaron como candidatos predictores de RVS. Resultados: Los genotipos IL-28B (rs12979860, rs7248668, rs8105790, rs8099917) y TNFRSF1B (rs1061622), asi como los haplotipos TNFRSF1B / IL-10 / TNF(-308) no-TTG y TNFRSF1B / IL-10 / IL-4 no-TTC junto con la menor edad, menor carga de ARN-VHC basal, valores elevados de colesterol LDL en suero basal, genotipos VHC2 y 3 y bajo grado de fibrosis basal (0-2) se asociaron con una RVS en el analisis univariante. Los predictores independientes de RVS en el analisis multivariante fueron el genotipo IL-28B rs12979860 CC, el haplotipo TNFRSF1B / IL-10 / IL-4 no-TTC junto con los bajos niveles basales de VHCARN y los genotipos virales VHC2 y 3. Conclusiones: El genotipo IL-28B rs12979860 CC, el haplotipo TNFRSF1B / IL-10 / IL-4 haplotipos no-TTC, la carga viral basal baja y los genotipos del VHC2 y 3 pueden ayudar a predecir una buena respuesta a la terapia con IFN-PEG y ribavirina en poblacion espanola.

[Pharmacokinetic monitoring as a new tool to individualize anti-TNF therapy]. / La monitorización farmacocinética como nueva herramienta para individualizar la terapia anti-TNF.

-