Preoperative opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use is associated with increased postoperative hospital costs in colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioid (OPD), sedative (SDT), and antidepressant (ADM) prescribing has increased dramatically over the last 20 years. This study evaluated preoperative OPD, SDT, and ADM use on hospital costs in patients undergoing colorectal resection at a single institution. METHODS: This study was a retrospective record review. The local ACS-NSQIP database was queried for adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) undergoing open/laparoscopic, partial/total colectomy, or proctectomy from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016. Individual patient medical records were reviewed to determine preoperative OPD, SDT, and AD use. Hospital cost data from index admission were captured by the hospital cost accounting system and matched to NSQIP query-identified cases. All ACS-NSQIP categorical patient characteristic, operative risk, and outcome variables were compared in medication groups using chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests, and continuous variables were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: A total of 1185 colorectal procedures were performed by 30 different surgeons. Of these, 27.6% patients took OPD, 18.5% SDT, and 27.8% ADM preoperatively. Patients taking OPD, SDT, and ADM were found to have increased mean total hospital costs (MTHC) compared to non-users (30.8 vs 23.6 for OPD, 31.6 vs 24.4 for SDT, and 30.7 vs 23.8 for ADM). OPD and SDT use were identified as independent risk factors for increased MTHC on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Preoperative OPD and SDT use can be used to predict increased MTHC in patients undergoing colorectal resections.

Naloxone Continuous Infusion for Spinal Cord Protection in Endovascular Aortic Surgery Leads to Higher Opioid Administration and More Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Compare total perioperative opioid use in patients receiving naloxone continuousinfusion (NCI) for spinal cord ischemia prophylaxis, versus patients not receiving NCI, in endovascular aortic repair. DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective cohort review. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing elective thoracic, thoracoabdominal, or abdominal aortic endovascular repair. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were separated based on the use of naloxone continuous infusion as part of a spinal protection protocol. Primary endpoint was opioid requirements, in milligram morphine equivalents (MME), during the first 48 hours or during NCI. Secondary endpoints included: postoperative pain scores during the same interval; opioid requirements during hours 48 to 72; and pain scores during hours 48 to 72. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-five procedures were included; 43 received naloxone continuous infusion and 52 patients were in the non-naloxone group. Opioid use from a linear mixed model was elevated across the entire continuum in the naloxone group (18 MMEs, 95% CI 13-24), with the greatest difference seen at the 24-to-48-hour interval (51 MMEs, 95% CI 26-75) after adjustment for age, incisions, and prehospital opioid use. In the naloxone group, pain score estimates were elevated at each postoperative interval of evaluation, with similar adjustment. Across the continuum this was 0.7 higher (95% CI 0.2-1.3); the zero-six-hour and six-to-12-hour intervals were 0.9 (95% CI 0.4-1.4) and 1.2 higher (95% CI 0.7-1.7). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving anloxone continuous infusion to prevent spinal cord ischemia required greater quantities of opioids and had higher postoperative pain, compared with patients not requiring naloxone.

A Retrospective Review: Patient-Reported Preoperative Prescription Opioid, Sedative, or Antidepressant Use Is Associated with Worse Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use has been on the rise. The effect of these medications on outcomes in colorectal surgery has not been established. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative prescription opioid, sedative, and antidepressant use on postoperative outcomes following colorectal surgery. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective database and medical record review. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at University of Kentucky utilizing the local American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database. PATIENTS: All patients ≥18 years of age who underwent colorectal resection for all indications, excluding trauma, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Of 1201 patients, 30.2% used opioids, 18.4% used sedatives, and 28.3% used antidepressants preoperatively. Users of any medication class had higher ASA classification, rates of dyspnea, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than nonusers. Opioid users also had higher rates of ostomy creation, contaminated wound classification, prolonged operation time, and postoperative transfusion. Postoperatively, patients had higher rates of intra-abdominal infection (opioids: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009; sedatives: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01; antidepressants: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) and respiratory failure (opioids: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007; sedatives: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008; antidepressants: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Reported opioid or sedative users had a prolonged hospital length of stay of 2 days (p < 0.001) compared with nonusers. After adjustment for all predictors of poor outcome, opioid and sedative use was associated with increased 30-day morbidity and mortality following colorectal procedures (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.07-1.91 and OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.08). LIMITATIONS: This study was a retrospective review and a single-institution study, and it had unmeasured confounders. CONCLUSIONS: We identified that patient-reported prescription opioid and sedative use is associated with higher 30-day composite adverse outcomes in colorectal resections, highlighting the need for the evaluation of opioid and sedative use as a component of the preoperative risk stratification. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. REVISIÓN RETROSPECTIVA: EL USO DE OPIOIDES, SEDANTES O ANTIDEPRESORES EN EL PREOPERATORIO SE ASOCIAN CON MALOS RESULTADOS EN CIRUGÍA COLORECTAL: El uso de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores esta en aumento. No se ha establecido el efecto de estos medicamentos en los resultados de la cirugía colorrectal.Evaluar el impacto del uso preoperatorio de opioides, sedantes y antidepresores en los resultados después de una cirugía colorrectal.Base de datos retrospectiva y revisión de registros médicos.Este estudio se realizó en la Universidad de Kentucky utilizando la base de datos del Proyecto de Mejora de Calidad Quirúrgica Nacional del Colegio Estadounidense de Cirujanos.Todos los pacientes ≥ 18 años que se sometieron a una resección colorrectal por diversas indicaciones, excluyendo los traumas, entre el 1 de Enero de 2013 y el 31 de Diciembre de 2016.Tasas de morbilidad y mortalidad postoperatorias a los 30 días.De 1201 pacientes, 30.2% usaron opioides, 18.4% usaron sedantes y 28.3% usaron antidepresores antes de la cirugía. Los pacientes tratados con cualquiera de los medicamentos mencionados, presentaban un ASA mas elevado, tasas de disnea y EPOC mas graves en comparación con pacientes sin tratamiento previo. Los consumidores de opioides también tuvieron tasas más altas de creación de ostomías, clasificación mas alta de heridas contaminadas, un tiempo de operación prolongado y transfusión postoperatoria mayor. Después de la cirugía los pacientes que tuvieron tasas más altas de infección intraabdominal (opioides: 21.5% vs 15.2%, p = 0.009, sedantes: 23.1% vs 15.7%, p = 0.01, antidepresivos: 22.4% vs 15.0%, p = 0.003) e insuficiencia respiratoria (opioides: 11.0% vs 6.3%, p = 0.007, sedantes: 12.2% vs 6.7%, p = 0.008, antidepresivos: 10.9% vs 6.5%, p = 0.02). Los consumidores de opioides o sedantes tuvieron una estadía hospitalaria prolongada de más de 2 días (p <0.001) en comparación con los consumidores. Después de haber realizado el ajuste de todos los predictores de mal pronóstico, el uso de opioides y sedantes se asoció con una mayor morbilidad y mortalidad a los 30 días después de cirugía colorrectal (OR 1.43 [IC 95% 1.07-1.91] y OR 1.48 [IC 95% 1.05-2.08], respectivamente)Revisión retrospectiva, estudio de una sola institución, factores de confusión no evaluados.Identificamos que el consumo de opiáceos y sedantes recetados a los pacientes se asocian con resultados adversos complejos más allá de 30 días en casos de resección colorrectal, destacando la necesidad de su respectiva evaluación como componentes de la estratificación de riesgo preoperatorio. Consulte Video Resumen http://links.lww.com/DCR/B226. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

A Psychometric Analysis of CIWA-Ar in Acutely Ill and Injured Hospitalized Patients.

Alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS) manifests after alcohol-dependent individuals suddenly cease alcohol consumption. Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment-Alcohol, revised (CIWA-Ar) is a widely used tool to assess and guide treatment of AWS. CIWA-Ar was developed in voluntarily detoxification centers, and the reliability and validity of CIWA-Ar have been minimally evaluated in hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective chart review of 479 cases of screening and treatment of AWS using CIWA-Ar, of which 118 were admitted to a trauma/orthopedic (T/O) service and 361 to an internal medicine (IM) service. Exploratory factor analyses with varimax rotation were applied for each population, and reliability testing was performed on the determined subscales. Exploratory factor analyses yielded 2 unique structures, each explaining 56% of the variance of CIWA-Ar. The IM group had a 3-factor structure with the Physical Disturbances (23%), Anxiety (19%), and Confusion (14%) subscales. The T/O group had a 2-factor structure with the Neurological Disturbances (36%) and Physical Disturbances (20%) subscales. Overall, Cronbach's alphas were acceptable (0.74 and 0.82 for IM and T/O, respectively); however, Cronbach's alphas for the IM subscales were 0.66 and 0.69 for physical disturbances and anxiety, respectively. Cronbach's alpha for the Confusion subscale was not calculated because only 1 scale item loaded. The subscales of the T/O factor structure yielded Cronbach's alphas of 0.81 for neurological disturbances and 0.62 for physical disturbances. Our analyses did not support the reliability or validity of CIWA-Ar in acutely ill or injured patients, warranting further investigation and tool development for AWS management in the hospital setting.