Fetal cardiac left ventricle functional changes in pregnancies with maternal hypothyroidism.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate fetal cardiac function in cases with overt and subclinical hypothyroidism and to determine the effect of levothyroxine (LT4) treatment and Anti-thyroid peroxidase (Anti-TPO) antibody status on fetal cardiac functions in cases with subclinical hypothyroidism. METHODS: Within the scope of the study, fetuses of 23 overt hypothyroid, 52 subclinical hypothyroid and 250 control group pregnant women were evaluated. Fetal cardiac function was assessed via cardiac Doppler. RESULTS: Isovolumetric relaxation time (IRT) and myocardial performance index (MPI) values in the overt hypothyroid group were significantly higher than both the subclinical hypothyroid group (p: .006, p: .000, respectively) and the control group (p: .000, p: .000, respectively). In addition, both IRT and MPI were significantly higher in the subclinical hypothyroid group than in the control group (p: .000, p: .000, respectively). In the subclinical hypothyroid group, there was no significant difference in terms of cardiac function parameters in the fetuses of pregnant women who received LT4 therapy and those who did not. When pregnant women with subclinical hypothyroidism were evaluated according to their Anti-TPO antibody status, IRT and MPI values were found to be significantly higher in fetuses of Anti-TPO (+) pregnant women (respectively, p: .005, p: .019). CONCLUSION: In the presence of maternal overt or subclinical hypothyroidism, fetal cardiac functions may be affected as early as the second trimester. Anti-TPO antibody positivity in cases with subclinical hypothyroidism seems to negatively affect fetal cardiac functions.

Human Development Index and its association with staff spiritual care provision: a Middle Eastern oncology study.

BACKGROUND: Although staff spiritual care provision plays a key role in patient-centered care, there is insufficient information on international variance in attitudes toward spiritual care and its actual provision. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of the attitudes of Middle Eastern oncology physicians and nurses toward eight examples of staff provision of spiritual care: two questionnaire items concerned prayer, while six items related to applied information gathering, such as spiritual history taking, referrals, and encouraging patients in their spirituality. In addition, respondents reported on spiritual care provision for their last three advanced cancer patients. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventy responses were received from 14 countries (25% from countries with very high Human Development Index (HDI), 41% high, 29% medium, 5% low). Over 63% of respondents positively viewed the six applied information gathering items, while significantly more, over 76%, did so among respondents from very high HDI countries (p value range, p < 0.001 to p = 0.01). Even though only 42-45% overall were positively inclined toward praying with patients, respondents in lower HDI countries expressed more positive views (p < 0.001). In interaction analysis, HDI proved to be the single strongest factor associated with five of eight spiritual care examples (p < 0.001 for all). Significantly, the Middle Eastern respondents in our study actually provided actual spiritual care to 47% of their most recent advanced cancer patients, compared to only 27% in a parallel American study, with the key difference identified being HDI. CONCLUSIONS: A country's development level is a key factor influencing attitudes toward spiritual care and its actual provision. Respondents from lower ranking HDI countries proved relatively more likely to provide spiritual care and to have positive attitudes toward praying with patients. In contrast, respondents from countries with higher HDI levels had relatively more positive attitudes toward spiritual care interventions that involved gathering information applicable to patient care.

Correction to: Human Development Index and its association with staff spiritual care provision: a Middle Eastern oncology study.

Incorrect family name of Layth Mula-Hussain.

Training for awareness of one's own spirituality: A key factor in overcoming barriers to the provision of spiritual care to advanced cancer patients by doctors and nurses.

OBJECTIVE: When patients feel spiritually supported by staff, we find increased use of hospice and reduced use of aggressive treatments at end of life, yet substantial barriers to staff spiritual care provision still exist. We aimed to study these barriers in a new cultural context and analyzed a new subgroup with "unrealized potential" for improved spiritual care provision: those who are positively inclined toward spiritual care yet do not themselves provide it. METHOD: We distributed the Religion and Spirituality in Cancer Care Study via the Middle East Cancer Consortium to physicians and nurses caring for advanced cancer patients. Survey items included how often spiritual care should be provided, how often respondents themselves provide it, and perceived barriers to spiritual care provision.ResultWe had 770 respondents (40% physicians, 60% nurses) from 14 Middle Eastern countries. The results showed that 82% of respondents think staff should provide spiritual care at least occasionally, but 44% provide spiritual care less often than they think they should. In multivariable analysis of respondents who valued spiritual care yet did not themselves provide it to their most recent patients, predictors included low personal sense of being spiritual (p < 0.001) and not having received training (p = 0.02; only 22% received training). How "developed" a country is negatively predicted spiritual care provision (p < 0.001). Self-perceived barriers were quite similar across cultures.Significance of resultsDespite relatively high levels of spiritual care provision, we see a gap between desirability and actual provision. Seeing oneself as not spiritual or only slightly spiritual is a key factor demonstrably associated with not providing spiritual care. Efforts to increase spiritual care provision should target those in favor of spiritual care provision, promoting training that helps participants consider their own spirituality and the role that it plays in their personal and professional lives.

Comparison of two different frailty screening scales for predicting mortality due to all causes in older inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the relationship between two frailty screening tools and 90-day all-cause mortality in geriatric inpatients. METHODS: The study included patients aged ≥60 years who were admitted to the geriatrics unit of a university hospital between June 2021 and August 2022 and whose mortality status and duration of hospitalization data were obtained from the Health Ministry System. During hospitalization, the patients were screened using two different frailty scales: the Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale (sMFS) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Patients scoring ≥5 on the CFS and ≥3 on the sMFS were considered frail. RESULTS: A total of 84 participants with a mean age of 78.3±7.6 years were included in this study, of which 36.9% were male. Of the total, 60.7% and 89.3% were considered frail according to the CFS and sMFS, respectively, and the prevalence of all-cause mortality within 90 days was 19%. A univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier survival method revealed CFS scores to be statistically significantly related to 90-day all-cause mortality (p<0.001), while sMFS scores were not found to be statistically significant (p=0.849). Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was identified between CFS score and all-cause mortality in multivariate analysis with Cox regression analysis [(p<0.001), hazard ratio (HR): 3.078; (95% confidence interval: 1.746-5.425)]. CONCLUSION: An evaluation of frailty in hospitalized older adults using two different scales revealed the CFS to be superior to the sMFS in predicting all-cause mortality within 90 days.

Comparison of two different frailty screening scales for predicting mortality due to all causes in older inpatients

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study examines the relationship between two frailty screening tools and 90-day all-cause mortality in geriatric inpatients. METHODS: The study included patients aged ≥60 years who were admitted to the geriatrics unit of a university hospital between June 2021 and August 2022 and whose mortality status and duration of hospitalization data were obtained from the Health Ministry System. During hospitalization, the patients were screened using two different frailty scales: the Simpler Modified Fried Frailty Scale (sMFS) and the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS). Patients scoring ≥5 on the CFS and ≥3 on the sMFS were considered frail. RESULTS: A total of 84 participants with a mean age of 78.3±7.6 years were included in this study, of which 36.9% were male. Of the total, 60.7% and 89.3% were considered frail according to the CFS and sMFS, respectively, and the prevalence of all-cause mortality within 90 days was 19%. A univariate analysis using the Kaplan-Meier survival method revealed CFS scores to be statistically significantly related to 90-day all-cause mortality (p<0.001), while sMFS scores were not found to be statistically significant (p=0.849). Furthermore, a statistically significant relationship was identified between CFS score and all-cause mortality in multivariate analysis with Cox regression analysis [(p<0.001), hazard ratio (HR): 3.078; (95% confidence interval: 1.746-5.425)]. CONCLUSION: An evaluation of frailty in hospitalized older adults using two different scales revealed the CFS to be superior to the sMFS in predicting all-cause mortality within 90 days.

Identification of Symptom Clusters in Cancer Patients at Palliative Care Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients often experience a large number of symptoms together. The aim of this study is to determine the symptom clusters in cancer patients at palliative care clinic. METHODS: Hundred and seventy consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale was used for symptom assessment of the patients. RESULTS: The most experienced symptoms by the patients during the past week before hospitalization in palliative care clinic were lack of energy (95.4%), weight loss (91.2%), lack of appetite (89.4%), pain (88.2%), dry mouth (87.6%), feeling sad (87.6%), feeling nervous (82.9%), worrying (81.2%), and feeling irritable (80.6%). Five symptom clusters were defined. First cluster: pain, feeling nervous, dry mouth, worrying, feeling irritable, weight loss; second cluster: feeling drowsy, numbness/tingling in hands/feet, difficulty in sleeping, dizziness, constipation, I do not look like myself; third cluster: nausea, vomiting; fourth cluster: shortness of breath, difficulty in swallowing, cough, change in the way food tastes; and fifth cluster: feeling bloated, problems with urination, diarrhea, itching, mouth sores, hair loss, swelling of arm or legs, change in the skin. CONCLUSIONS: We encountered various symptom clusters in advanced cancer patients. Identification of symptom clusters and knowledge of cluster composition in oncological population may particularly contribute individualization of the treatment.

Epidural ropivacaine or sufentanil-ropivacaine infusions for post-thoracotomy pain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of continuous epidural infusions of ropivacaine and ropivacaine-sufentanil mixtures after thoracotomy. METHODS: Sixty-two patients scheduled for thoracic surgery were allocated in this prospective double-blinded randomised study. They received an epidural catheter inserted from thoracic 5-6 (Th(5-6)) interspace a day before surgery and were randomly assigned into two groups, sufentanil-ropivacaine group (Group SR, n=31) and ropivacaine group (Group R, n=31). Bolus dose of the study drugs, ropivacaine 0.2% or ropivacaine 0.2% and sufentanil 0.75 microg/ml calculated in ml according to the patient's height was given through the epidural catheter before surgery. One hour after anaesthesia induction, another bolus was given and the epidural infusion was started (4.5-8 ml). Whenever visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were > or =4 during function, the patients received additional boluses and the infusion rate was increased by 1 ml/h. If the pain was not relieved after administration of two boluses, the patient was excluded from the study. RESULTS: VAS at rest and during function was lower in ropivacaine-sufentanil group and the need for additional boluses and infusion rate increase was high in ropivacaine group (P<0.05). Ropivacaine-sufentanil infusion rate was decreased due to nausea and vomiting in two patients and due to CO(2) retention in one patient. There was no statistically significant difference between the incidences of side effects except pruritus significantly higher in Group SR. The total epidural solution volume was more in Group R (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine with sufentanil provided superior pain relief than ropivacaine alone without causing any severe side effect or post-operative pulmonary impairment.

Anterior spinal artery syndrome after thoracic surgery.

Spinal cord infarction is a rare complication following thoracic surgery. We present a case who developed paraplegia on the first postoperative day of thoracotomy. A 76-year-old man with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was operated for bronchial carcinoma. An epidural infusion of ropivacaine and sufentanil was used for postoperative pain. Eight hours after the surgery, he had an episode of hypotension and respiratory depression. One hour later, he described paraplegia and Ischemia of the spinal cord was found on MRI. There was no recovery during the follow-up.

The analgesic efficacy of two different approaches to the lumbar plexus for patient-controlled analgesia after total knee replacement.

This study assessed the efficacy of a patient-controlled regional analgesia technique for either psoas compartment block or femoral nerve block after total knee replacement in 68 patients who were randomly divided into these two groups. All patients received 40 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine via femoral or psoas catheters before general anesthesia, and then, as patient-controlled regional analgesia, 10-ml boluses of 0.125% bupivacaine, with a lockout time of 60 min over 48 h. Pain scores, sensory block, supplemental analgesia, bupivacaine consumption, and side effects were recorded. All measured parameters were comparable in the two groups. Both techniques achieved a good quality of analgesia and satisfaction without any major side effect.