Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Allergy ; 54(6): 402-411, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38343206

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials showed the efficacy of 300 mg/4 weeks of omalizumab (OMA) during 6 months in patients with severe chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Nevertheless, in real life, many patients require higher doses and/or longer treatment. This study assesses the real-life performance of OMA in severe CSU and identifies factors associated with the response. METHODS: CSU patients eligible for OMA were recruited prospectively. Clinical data and a blood test were collected before OMA initiation. Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7) was calculated at baseline and every 3 months during OMA treatment. CSU control was defined as UAS7 <7 points. This work was partially sponsored by OMA manufacturer. RESULTS: Eighty-nine adults (19.1% males) with severe CSU were recruited. Median duration of CSU prior to OMA initiation was 2 years, and median severity by UAS7 at baseline was 24 points (range 10-42 points). OMA controlled 94.4% of patients, but 17.9% of responders required doses >300 mg/4 weeks. A blood basophil count >20 cells/µL (OR 13.33; 95% CI 3.32-52.63; p < .001) and the absence of hypothyroidism (OR 3.65; 95% CI 0.78-16.95; p = .099) were identified as predictive factors to achieve control with 300 mg/4 weeks. Twelve patients were able to stop OMA during the study (responders in remission, RR). RR had received OMA for a median of 29 months (12-53 months). Conversely, 32 patients had been on OMA for >29 months at the end of the study (active responders, AR). AR had received OMA for a median of 45 months (30-100 months). There were no significant differences in clinical or analytical factors between RR and AR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low blood basophil count and the presence of hypothyroidism might serve as biomarkers for the controller dose of OMA in severe CSU patients.


Asunto(s)
Antialérgicos , Biomarcadores , Urticaria Crónica , Omalizumab , Humanos , Omalizumab/administración & dosificación , Omalizumab/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Urticaria Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Urticaria Crónica/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto Joven , Estudios Prospectivos , Basófilos/inmunología
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28211343

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Individuals who develop drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to chemically unrelated nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are considered cross-hypersensitive. The hallmark for this classification is that the patient presents a reaction after intake of or challenge with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Whether patients react to 2 or more NSAIDs while tolerating ASA remains to be studied (selective reactions, SRs). Objective: To identify patients with SRs to 2 or more NSAIDs including strong COX-1 inhibitors. METHODS: Patients who attended the Allergy Service of Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain with DHRs to NSAIDs between January 2011 and December 2014 were evaluated. Those with 2 or more immediate reactions occurring in less than 1 hour after intake were included. After confirming tolerance to ASA, the selectivity of the response to 2 or more NSAIDs was demonstrated by in vivo and/or in vitro testing or by controlled administration. RESULTS: From a total of 203 patients with immediate DHRs to NSAIDs, 16 (7.9%) met the inclusion criteria. The patients presented a total of 68 anaphylactic or cutaneous reactions (mean [SD], 4.2 [2.1]). Most reactions were to ibuprofen and other arylpropionic acid derivatives and to metamizole. Two different NSAIDs were involved in 11 patients and 3 in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSAID-induced anaphylaxis or urticaria/angioedema should not be considered cross-hypersensitive unless tolerance to ASA is verified.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Angioedema/diagnóstico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Tolerancia Inmunológica , Pruebas Inmunológicas , Urticaria/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Angioedema/inducido químicamente , Angioedema/inmunología , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/inmunología , Aspirina/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , España , Urticaria/inducido químicamente , Urticaria/inmunología , Adulto Joven
3.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 25(6): 385-95, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26817135

RESUMEN

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used throughout the world to treat pain and inflammation; however, they can trigger several types of drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) in all age groups. Although most such reactions occur through activation of the leukotriene pathway without specific immunological recognition (cross-intolerance), a significant number of DHRs to NSAIDs are due to immunological mechanisms (selective reactions [SRs]). SRs are thought to be induced by specific IgE antibodies or by T cells. In this manuscript, we focus on SRs, which are of great concern in children and adolescents and comprise a heterogeneous set of clinical pictures ranging from mild entities such as urticaria/angioedema to potentially life-threatening conditions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most frequent elicitors of IgE-mediated SRs, although pyrazolones have also been implicated. T cell-mediated reactions are infrequent in children but have been associated with ibuprofen, naproxen, and dipyrone. In this review, we analyze the available literature on SRs in children and adolescents, with emphasis on epidemiological data, mechanisms, and drugs involved, as well as on diagnostic procedures.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Adolescente , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA