Conditioning intensity and peritransplant flow cytometric MRD dynamics in adult AML.

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), measurable residual disease (MRD) before or after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established independent indicator of poor outcome. To address how peri-HCT MRD dynamics could refine risk assessment across different conditioning intensities, we analyzed 810 adults transplanted in first or second remission after myeloablative conditioning (MAC; n = 515) or non-MAC (n = 295) who underwent multiparameter flow cytometry-based MRD testing before as well as 20 to 40 days after allografting. Patients without pre- and post-HCT MRD (MRDneg/MRDneg) had the lowest risks of relapse and highest relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Relative to those patients, outcomes for MRDpos/MRDpos and MRDneg/MRDpos patients were poor regardless of conditioning intensity. Outcomes for MRDpos/MRDneg patients were intermediate. Among 161 patients with MRD before HCT, MRD was cleared more commonly with a MAC (85 of 104; 81.7%) than non-MAC (33 of 57; 57.9%) regimen (P = .002). Although non-MAC regimens were less likely to clear MRD, if they did, the impact on outcome was greater. Thus, there was a significant interaction between conditioning intensity and "MRD conversion" for relapse (P = .020), RFS (P = .002), and OS (P = .001). Similar findings were obtained in the subset of 590 patients receiving HLA-matched allografts. C-statistic values were higher (indicating higher predictive accuracy) for peri-HCT MRD dynamics compared with the isolated use of pre-HCT MRD status or post-HCT MRD status for prediction of relapse, RFS, and OS. Across conditioning intensities, peri-HCT MRD dynamics improve risk assessment over isolated pre- or post-HCT MRD assessments in patients with AML.

Forehead location and large segmental pattern of facial port-wine stains predict risk of Sturge-Weber syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Children with forehead port-wine stains (PWSs) are at risk of Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS). However, most will not develop neurologic manifestations. OBJECTIVE: To identify children at greatest risk of SWS. METHOD: In this retrospective cohort study of children with a forehead PWS, PWSs were classified as "large segmental" (half or more of a contiguous area of the hemiforehead or median pattern) or "trace/small segmental" (less than half of the hemiforehead). The outcome measure was a diagnosis of SWS. RESULTS: Ninety-six children had a forehead PWS. Fifty-one had a large segmental PWS, and 45 had a trace/small segmental PWS. All 21 children with SWS had large segmental forehead PWSs. Large segmental forehead PWSs had a higher specificity (0.71 vs 0.27, P < .0001) and a higher positive predictive value (0.41 vs 0.22, P < .0001) for SWS than any forehead involvement by a PWS. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study at a referral center. CONCLUSION: Children with large segmental forehead PWSs are at highest risk of SWS.