Impact of frailty on risk of long-term functional decline following vascular surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Frailty is a clinical syndrome associated with slow recovery after vascular surgery. However, the degree and length of functional impairment frail patients experience after surgery is unclear. The objective of this study was to prospectively measure changes in functional status among frail and non-frail patients undergoing a spectrum of different vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: Patients consented to undergo elective minor and major vascular surgery procedures at an academic medical center between May 2018 and March 2019 were prospectively identified. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent provider assessment of frailty using the validated Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), as well as baseline assessment of functional status using the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) index and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) index. These same instruments were used to evaluate each patient's functional status at 2-weeks, 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year time points following surgery. Changes in iADL and ADL scores among frail (CFS ≥5) and non-frail patients were compared using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were assessed before and after minor (55%) and major (45%) vascular procedures, of which 43 patients (34%) were determined to be frail prior to surgery. Frail patients were older and more likely than non-frail patients to have medical comorbidities including chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or diabetes (all P < .05). When compared with the non-frail cohort, frail patients had significantly lower ADL and iADL scores before surgery and experienced a greater decline in ability to independently complete ADL and iADL activities after surgery that was sustained at 2 years (P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). After risk-adjustment, frailty was associated with an increased likelihood of decline in ADLs (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-15.4; P < .05) and iADLs (odds ratio, 6.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-15.1; P < .001) at 2 years following surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients experience a significant decline in ability to perform ADL and iADLs that persists 2 years following vascular surgery. These data highlight the degree of functional decline occurring immediately following surgery, as well as risk for long-term, sustained impairment that should be shared with frail patients before undergoing a procedure.

Long-Term Functional Decline Following Vascular Surgery Among Vulnerable Adults.

BACKGROUND: Identification of high-risk patients that may experience functional decline following surgery poses a challenge to healthcare providers. The Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13) is a patient-reported tool designed to identify risk for health deterioration based on age, self-rated health, physical function, and functional disabilities. This study was designed to determine whether VES-13 could predict long-term functional decline among patients undergoing vascular surgery procedures. METHODS: Vascular surgery patients at an academic hospital were administered VES-13 between May 2018 and March 2019, and those scoring ≥3-points were classified as vulnerable. Each patient's functional status was assessed using the Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (iADL) indices preoperatively and at 2-week, 1-month, and 1-year postoperative time points. Logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of functional decline. RESULTS: 126 patients (59% male) were assessed before and after minor (56%) and major (44%) vascular procedures, with 55 (43%) meeting criteria for vulnerability. Vulnerable patients were older, had lower baseline functional status, and were more likely than non-vulnerable patients to experience declines in ADLs and iADLs at all time-points (P < 0.05 for all time points). These findings were confirmed in risk-adjusted regression models where vulnerability was associated with an increased likelihood of decline in ADLs (OR:3.3; 95%CI:1.0-10.6; P < 0.05) and iADLs (OR:2.6; 95%CI:1.0-6.6; P = 0.05) at 1-year following surgery. CONCLUSION: The patient-reported VES-13 survey identifies vulnerable patients who are at risk for long-term functional decline following vascular surgery. This quick preoperative screening tool can allow surgeons to prepare older patients and caretakers for postoperative functional limitations.

Patient-Surgeon Agreement in Assessment of Frailty, Physical Function, & Social Activity.

BACKGROUND: The shared decision-making process between surgical providers and patients relies on a joint understanding about the risks of different treatment options based on a patient's individual health state. However, it is unclear whether a patient's perception of their own condition is congruent with the health state assigned by their surgical providers. This study was designed to compare provider assessment of frailty versus patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of their own frailty status, physical function, and social activity level. METHODS: We prospectively assessed patients presenting to a vascular surgery clinic at an academic institution between May 2018 and June of 2019. Before clinic examination, patients completed PROs of their frailty status (Frail Non-Disabled survey), physical function (patient-reported outcome measurement information system [PROMIS] v1.2), and social activity level (PROMIS v2.0). Next, each patient's frailty status and overall health were scored by a surgical provider using the 9-point Clinical Frailty Scale, a validated frailty assessment tool that incorporates their functional status and level of activity. The correlation between the provider and PROs for frailty, physical function, and social activity was determined using the Spearman rank test, sensitivity/specificity tests, and receiver operating curves. Logistic regression models were used to predict 1-y mortality after assessment. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were evaluated in clinic (50% male with mean age of 60 y), including 35 (30%) who were categorized as being frail by the surgical provider. In comparison, the same patients were much more likely to self-report as having low physical function (73%), being frail or disabled (79%), and/or unable to engage in social activities (78%). Although there was high sensitivity (89%) between a provider's and PROs for frailty, the specificity was low (26%) resulting in a receiver operating curve area of 0.57. Overall, there was low correlation between PROs for frailty (r = 0.16), physical function (r = 0.21), and social activities (r = 0.21) when compared with a provider's assessment of patient frailty. Models using PROs for frailty had better discrimination for predicting 1-y mortality (c-statistic: 0.72) than those using the Clinical Frailty Scale (c-statistic: 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are more likely to self-report being frail, having low physical function, and limited social activity than what is detected by their surgical providers. These findings suggest that low levels of patient activity and its associated risk may often be underappreciated by surgical providers. Efforts are needed to improve how PROs are incorporated into surgical decision-making and outcome assessment.

Customizable interdental splinting for repair of pediatric mandibular fractures in children with mixed dentition: A novel technique.

OBJECTIVE: Repair of pediatric mandibular fractures (PMFs) can be challenging due to the lack of permanent dentition for immobilization, and the presence of unerupted teeth and growth plates in the mandible limiting the space for fixation. Interdental splinting (IDS) has been advocated to provide temporary fixation without the need for mandibular plating; however, there is sparse description of the surgical methodology, and data on long term outcomes are even more limited. The aim of this study is to present our technique and outcomes using a novel technique for IDS repair of pediatric mandible fractures. STUDY DESIGN: Observational retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric hospital. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Pediatric patients requiring operative repair for mandibular fracture at our tertiary care institution between 2004 and 2021 were included. Patients over 18 years of age, those who died due to associated injuries, or those who underwent non-IDS repairs were excluded. Subjects with at least 3 months of follow-up were assessed for efficacy of surgical repair and short-term adverse outcomes, and at least 1 year for long-term adverse events. Descriptive statistics were obtained. RESULTS: Twenty-three children were included in the study with an average age of 7.4 years (range 2-17 years). Fifty-two percent (52.2%) were female. The most common fracture site was the condyle, occurring in 16 children (70%). The indication for operative repair in all cases was malocclusion. The average duration of maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) with the novel IDS was 21 days (range 12-42 days). The average length of follow up was 1.6 years (range 3 months-11 years). All children had restored, functional occlusion at follow up with none requiring further orthodontic or dental intervention. Three children of the total cohort (13.0%) had prolonged hospitalization beyond 48 h for poor oral intake. Five children (21.7%) experienced minor long-term complications including persistent temporomandibular joint pain (n = 1, 4.3%), infection (n = 2, 8.7%), hypertrophic scar (n = 1, 4.3%) and exposure of hardware (n = 1, 4.3%). CONCLUSION: PMFs resulting in malocclusion are safely and effectively managed with operative repair utilizing a customizable IDS, with few observed short- and long-term complications.

Comparison of International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision Codes With Electronic Medical Records Among Patients With Symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Importance: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes are used to characterize coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related symptoms. Their accuracy is unknown, which could affect downstream analyses. Objective: To compare the performance of fever-, cough-, and dyspnea-specific ICD-10 codes with medical record review among patients tested for COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients who underwent quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 at University of Utah Health from March 10 to April 6, 2020. Data analysis was performed in April 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of ICD-10 codes for fever (R50*), cough (R05*), and dyspnea (R06.0*) were compared with manual medical record review. Performance was calculated overall and stratified by COVID-19 test result, sex, age group (<50, 50-64, and >64 years), and inpatient status. Bootstrapping was used to generate 95% CIs, and Pearson χ2 tests were used to compare different subgroups. Results: Among 2201 patients tested for COVD-19, the mean (SD) age was 42 (17) years; 1201 (55%) were female, 1569 (71%) were White, and 282 (13%) were Hispanic or Latino. The prevalence of fever was 66% (1444 patients), that of cough was 88% (1930 patients), and that of dyspnea was 64% (1399 patients). For fever, the sensitivity of ICD-10 codes was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.24-0.29), specificity was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), PPV was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97), and NPV was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.39-0.43). For cough, the sensitivity of ICD-10 codes was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.42-0.46), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.84-0.92), PPV was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.95-0.97), and NPV was 0.18 (95% CI, 0.16-0.20). For dyspnea, the sensitivity of ICD-10 codes was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.22-0.26), specificity was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.98), PPV was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96), and NPV was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.40-0.44). ICD-10 code performance was better for inpatients than for outpatients for fever (χ2 = 41.30; P < .001) and dyspnea (χ2 = 14.25; P = .003) but not for cough (χ2 = 5.13; P = .16). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that ICD-10 codes lack sensitivity and have poor NPV for symptoms associated with COVID-19. This inaccuracy has implications for any downstream data model, scientific discovery, or surveillance that relies on these codes.