Design of the Growth hormone deficiency and Efficacy of Treatment (GET) score and non-interventional proof of concept study.

BACKGROUND: The adverse effects of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) in adults (AGHD) on metabolism and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be improved with GH substitution. This investigation aimed to design a score summarising the features of GHD and evaluate its ability to measure the effect of GH substitution in AGHD. METHODS: The Growth hormone deficiency and Efficacy of Treatment (GET) score (0-100 points) assessed (weighting): HRQoL (40%), disease-related days off work (10%), bone mineral density (20%), waist circumference (10%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (10%) and body fat mass (10%). A prospective, non-interventional, multicentre proof-of-concept study investigated whether the score could distinguish between untreated and GH-treated patients with AGHD. A 10-point difference in GET score during a 2-year study period was expected based on pre-existing knowledge of the effect of GH substitution in AGHD. RESULTS: Of 106 patients eligible for analysis, 22 were untreated GHD controls (9 females, mean ± SD age 52 ± 17 years; 13 males, 57 ± 13 years) and 84 were GH-treated (31 females, age 45 ± 13 years, GH dose 0.30 ± 0.16 mg/day; 53 males, age 49 ± 15 years, GH dose 0.25 ± 0.10 mg/day). Follow-up was 706 ± 258 days in females and 653 ± 242 days in males. The GET score differed between the untreated control and treated groups with a least squares mean difference of + 10.01 ± 4.01 (p = 0.0145). CONCLUSIONS: The GET score appeared to be a suitable integrative instrument to summarise the clinical features of GHD and measure the effects of GH substitution in adults. Exercise capacity and muscle strength/body muscle mass could be included in the GET score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT number: NCT00934063 . Date of registration: 02 July 2009.

Gender-, age- and time-dependent dosing of growth hormone in adults - real-world data from a decade of clinical practice in Germany.

We evaluated treatment patterns and gender-dependent dosing of growth hormone (GH) substitution in adults with GH deficiency (AGHD). Data on GH dose were collected (2003-2013) from 509 GH-treated patients (mean age: 48.9 years; 47% female) enroled in the observational German NordiWin study (NCT01543880). The impact of gender, age, treatment duration and calendar year on GH treatment patterns was evaluated by multiple regression analysis. Mean (SD) baseline GH dose (mg/day) was similar between females (0.25 [0.19] and males (0.24 [0.15]), but increased with treatment duration (at year 10, 0.55 [0.48] and 0.31 [0.09] in females and males, respectively), reflecting patient dose titration. GH dose increased more in females than males during treatment; this was statistically significant in years 2-6 (p < 0.05). Over the 10-year study period, a time trend of an overall estimated GH dose increase by 0.06 mg/day (females) and decrease by 0.07 mg/day (males) was shown; this interaction of gender and calendar year was significant (p < 0.0001). In both genders, overall GH dose decreased with increasing age (p < 0.0001). Our study confirms that females and younger patients require higher GH doses compared with males and older patients.

Cervical cancer screening integrated in routine clinical care of women living with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if integrated cervical cancer screening (CCS) for women living with HIV (WLWH) in routine HIV care resulted in increased adherence to screening, and to describe the prevalence of Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-specific genotypes and the incidence of cellular abnormalities. DESIGN: Cohort study. METHODS: WLWH who accepted the offer of combined CCS and HIV care (Group 1), WLWH who declined the offer (Group 2), and WLWH not offered CCS within HIV care (Group 3) between 2013-2019 were included. Data was collected from The Danish HIV Cohort Study and The Danish Pathology Data Bank. Adherence to the CCS program was defined as fulfilled if WLWH were screened annually. RESULTS: A total of 804 WLWH were included. WLWH who accepted CCS within HIV care (group 1; n = 218) had significantly higher adherence to screening in all study years 22-99% compared to the WLWH who declined CCS (group 2; n = 232) 10-16% and WLWH who were not invited for CCS (group 3; n = 354) 11-25%. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of HPV-specific genotypes and incidence of cellular abnormalities among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Integrating CCS for WLWH in routine HIV care resulted in higher adherence to the CCS guidelines. Combined services thereby represent an opportunity to engage WLWH in HIV care into preventive services.