Neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling for patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the safety and efficacy of clipping and coiling in patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) was conducted to identify comparative articles on endovascular coiling and surgical clipping in patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Nineteen studies, including 1983 patients, were included. The meta-analysis showed that neurosurgical clipping was associated with a lower incidence of retreatment (OR:0.28, 95% CI (0.11, 0.70), P = 0.006) than endovascular coiling, which seemed to be a result of incomplete occlusion (OR:0.22, 95% CI (0.11, 0.45), P < 0.001). Neurosurgical clipping was associated with lower mortality (OR:0.45, 95% CI (0.25, 0.82), P = 0.009) at short-term follow-up than endovascular coiling. However, neurosurgical clipping showed a higher incidence of ischemic infarction (OR:2.28, 95% CI (1.44, 3.63), P < 0.001) and a longer length of stay (LOS) (WMD:6.12, 95% CI (4.19, 8.04), P < 0.001) after surgery than endovascular coiling. Furthermore, the pooled results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding poor outcome, long-term mortality, rebleeding, vasospasm, and hydrocephalus. Evidence from this systematic review illustrates that neurosurgical clipping may be superior to endovascular coiling for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Large-scale RCTs should be conducted to verify these outcomes and provide results according to patient status.

An Orientational Harvesting Occipital Artery Technique via far Lateral Approach: A Cadaveric Study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide further information on the identification of the occipital artery (OA) and suggest an improved approach to its anterograde dissection technique for harvesting. METHODS: Six cadaveric specimens were prepared for surgical simulation, and the anterograde approach was used to harvest the OA; a hockey stick incision was made from the C2 spinous process through the nuchal ligament to the mastoid tip. By retracting the scalp flap from the posterior arch of C2 to the transverse process, the suboccipital triangle was reflected by a single myocutaneous flap from the inferior nuchal line. In addition, 70 head computed tomography angiography scans were assessed bilaterally (n = 140) to study the running pattern of the OA. RESULTS: The mean total length of the mobilized OA was 11.8 ± 0.7 cm, with a diameter of 1.5 ± 0.1-2.1 ± 0.2 mm at the suboccipital segment and 1.3 ± 0.1 mm at the upper edge of the surgical incision. The average distance of OA at the inferior nuchal line to the midline was 2.9 ± 0.3 cm, the average distance of OA at the superior nuchal line to midline was 4.1 ± 0.2 cm, the average distance of OA at incision edge to midline was 5.2 ± 0.3 cm. CONCLUSION: Orientational anterograde technique for OA harvesting is a fast and easy approach. This approach avoids critical neurovascular structures. The most important step is to identify the OA near the lateral edge of the superior oblique muscle. Subsequently, in conjunction with preoperative computed tomography angiography, an imaginary line that crosses the inferior and superior nuchal lines may be established to assist in the separation of the OA.

Microsurgical anatomical vascular study of the PICA-PICA bypass.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA)-PICA bypass possibility. METHODS: Fifteen adult cadaver heads were used for surgical simulation, and the far-lateral approach was used to expose the surgical field. The bilateral PICA course, diameter, and perforators were observed and measured to evaluate the possibility of a PICA-PICA bypass. RESULTS: The PICA-PICA bypass was performed in seven (46.7 %) of the 15 specimens; the procedure was performed easily in three specimens, a little difficult in two, and was difficult in two specimens because of the relationship between the tonsil and the short parallel length of the bilateral tonsillomedullary (p3) segment. In eight (53.3 %) of the 15 specimens, PICA-PICA bypass was not feasible for reasons including 1) the caliber of the bilateral p3 was unmatched for bypass, 2) the distance of bilateral p3 in the midline was > 7 mm, 3) the middle segment of p3 perforating direct arteries limited the buffer length, and 4) single caudal loops. CONCLUSION: The possibility of PICA-PICA bypass was determined by the proximity of the bilateral p3, caliber match, and mobilization of the bilateral caudal loop due to the perforators. The difficulty of the PICA-PICA bypass mainly depends on the relationship between the cerebellar tonsil and the parallel length of the bilateral PICA in the midline.