RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Older patients with multimorbidity are under-represented in experimental research. OBJECTIVE: To explore the barriers and facilitators to general practitioner (GP) and older patient recruitment and retention in a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). METHOD: This descriptive study uses qualitative and quantitative data from a cluster RCT, designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a medicines optimization intervention. The SPPiRE cluster RCT enrolled 51 general practices and 404 patients aged ≥65 years and prescribed ≥15 medicines. Quantitative data were collected from all recruited practices and 32 additional practices who were enrolled, but unable to recruit sufficient participants. Qualitative data were collected from purposive samples of intervention GPs (18/26), patients (27/208), and researcher logs and analysed thematically using inductive coding. RESULTS: Enrolment rates for practices and patients were 37% and 25%, respectively. Barriers to GP recruitment were lack of resources and to patient recruitment were difficulty understanding trial material and concern about medicines being taken away. GPs' primary motivation was perceived importance of the research question, whereas patients' primary motivation was trust in their GP. All general practices were retained. Thirty-five patients (8.6%) were lost to follow-up for primary outcomes, mainly because they had died and 45% did not return patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). CONCLUSION: Patient retention for the primary outcome was high, as it was collected directly from patient records. Patient completion of PROM data was poor, reflecting difficulty in understanding trial material. Recruiting older patients with multimorbidity to clinical trials is possible but requires significant resource and planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN12752680.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often exclude older people with multiple medical conditions. The aim of this study was to explore how and why participants took part in a primary care based RCT that included 51 general practitioners (GPs) and 404 older patients prescribed ≥15 medicines. The RCT was designed to assess the usefulness of a supported medication review. The study team assessed information that was already collected as part of the RCT, to describe the process of inviting and enrolling GPs and older people. This included information on the numbers invited and enrolled and interviews from a smaller sample of GPs (18) and older people (27). The study successfully enrolled the required number of participants but it took 26 months more than planned. 37% of invited GPs and 25% of invited patients took part. GPs felt the research was important but they identified lack of time and resources as barriers to participation. Older people predominantly took part because they trusted their GP but some were wary of having medicines taken away and were put off by trial documentation. It is important that RCTs including older people with multiple medical conditions carefully plan recruitment and pay careful attention to trial documentation.
Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Multimorbilidad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Selección de PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Irish government agreed to accept up to 4000 Syrian refugees for resettlement in Ireland in 2016. Prior to their arrival in Ireland, health screening was carried out by the International Organisation for Migration. GP assessments to address immediate health needs and facilitate integration into local primary care were conducted on arrival. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a self-completed questionnaire among Syrian Refugees aged 16 years and older resident in emergency reception centres (EROCs) are reported along with data from GP assessments. The questionnaire, comprising validated instruments, was developed for a similar study in Norway. RESULTS: From the research questionnaires, two-thirds of the respondents reported their overall health status to be good or very good. The most common health condition was headache and the most common medications used were painkillers. Those experiencing chronic pain were three times less likely to rate their general health as good compared with those without pain. From the GP assessment data, we identified that 28% had high blood pressure, 61% were assessed to be in need of dental care and 32% of refugees were found to have an issue with their vision. DISCUSSION: Our findings were communicated to the Health Service Executive via the Partnership for Health Equity and informed a change in service provision in relation to dental services in EROCs. In terms of further action, we conclude that pain is an important symptom to consider in terms of diagnosis and treatment, and impact on health status.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Refugiados , Humanos , Irlanda , Siria , Estudios Transversales , Estado de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The SPPiRE cluster randomized controlled trial found that a general practitioner (GP)-delivered medication review that incorporated screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP), a brown bag review and a patient priority assessment, resulted in a significant but small reduction in the number of medicines and no significant reduction in PIP. This process evaluation aims to explore the experiences of GPs and patients and the potential for system-wide implementation. METHODS: The trial included 51 general practices and 404 participants with multimorbidity aged ≥65 years, prescribed ≥15 medicines. The process evaluation used mixed methods and ran parallel to the trial. Quantitative data was collected from the SPPiRE intervention website and analysed descriptively. Qualitative data on medication changes were collected from intervention GPs (18/26) and a purposive sample of intervention patients (27/208) via semi-structured telephone interviews. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis. Qualitative and quantitative data were integrated using a triangulation protocol. RESULTS: The analysis generated two themes, intervention implementation and mechanisms of action, and both were underpinned by the theme of context. Intervention delivery varied among practices and 45 patients (28%) had no review, primarily due to insufficient GP time. 80% of reviewed patients had ≥1 PIP identified, 59% had ≥1 problem identified during the brown bag review and 79% had ≥1 priority recorded. The brown bag review resulted in the most deprescription of medications. GPs and patients responded positively to the intervention but most GPs did not engage with the patient priority-setting process. GPs identified a lack of integration into practice software and resources as barriers to future implementation. CONCLUSION: The SPPiRE intervention had a small effect in reducing the number of medicines and this was primarily mediated through the brown bag review. The context of resource shortages and deep-seated views around medical decision-making influenced intervention implementation. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Qualitative data on the implementation of the medication review and their wider views on their medicines was collected from older people with multimorbidity through semi-structured telephone interviews. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SPPiRE trial was registered prospectively on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN12752680).
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Humanos , Anciano , Multimorbilidad , Polifarmacia , Revisión de Medicamentos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & controlRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: As a response to the humanitarian crisis in Syria, the Irish government agreed to accept up to 4000 refugees for resettlement in Ireland in 2016. Prior to their arrival in Ireland, health screening was carried out by the International Organisation for Migration. However, no population-level measurement of the health status or needs takes place in Ireland to inform policy or health services requirements. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from a self-completed questionnaire among 194 Syrian Refugees aged 16 years and older resident in reception centres in Ireland in 2017/2018 is reported upon. The questionnaire measured self-reported health including quality of life and all study material were available in English and Arabic. The data was examined applying descriptive statistics and regression analysis. RESULTS: Syrian Refugees in Ireland consist of a relatively young cohort; in this study the majority of participants were younger than 35 years (69.5%). Two-thirds of the respondents reported their overall health status to be good or very good. The most common health condition was found to be headache and the most common medications used were painkillers. Chronic pain was experienced by one quarter of respondents; 27.5% were considered as suffering from anxiety and 10.0% had symptoms compatible with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A significant relationship was observed between chronic pain and self-rated health, as well as between chronic pain and anxiety. Quality of life (QoL) scores were lowest for the QoL environment domain. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain is relatively widespread among these young and otherwise healthy refugees. Psychological distress and trauma are important factors in respondents' quality of life scores. Chronic pain is associated with one's mental health. Our findings and the literature suggests that the diagnosis and treatment of pain and providing care in a culturally sensitive manner should be a priority and included in the preparation and training of the relevant care providers. Additionally, the impact of living conditions on quality of life should not be underestimated.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Refugiados , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , SiriaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic conditions are responsible for significant mortality and morbidity among the population in Ireland. It is estimated that almost one million people are affected by one of the four main categories of chronic disease (cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and diabetes). Primary healthcare is an essential cornerstone for individuals, families, and the community and, as such, should play a central role in all aspects of chronic disease management. AIM: The aim of the project was to examine the extent of chronic disease coding of four chronic physical conditions in the general practice setting. METHODS: The design was a descriptive cross-sectional study with anonymous retrospective data extracted from practices. RESULTS: Overall, 8.8% of the adult population in the six participating practices were coded with at least one chronic condition. Only 0.7% of adult patients were coded with asthma, 0.3% with COPD, 3% with diabetes, and 3.3% with CVD. Male patients who visited their GP in the last year were more likely to be coded with any of the four chronic diseases in comparison with female patients. A significant relationship between gender and being coded with diabetes and CVD was found. CONCLUSIONS: For a likely multitude of reasons, diagnostic coding in Irish general practice clinics in this study is low and insufficient for an accurate estimation of chronic disease prevalence. Monitoring of information provided through diagnostic coding is important for patients' care and safety, and therefore appropriate training and reimbursement for these services is essential.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Medicina General , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Codificación Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: General practitioners are the gatekeepers of Irish healthcare and they offer continuity of care to patients. Irish general practice is therefore considered appropriate for preventing, diagnosing and managing most mental health problems. AIMS: This study sought to establish the coding frequency, consultation frequency, patient characteristics and pharmacological treatment of patients with severe mental disorders (SMDs) in Irish general practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional design was used. A finder tool embedded in the practice software assisted general practitioners (GPs) coding adult patients with SMDs. Eleven practices uploaded anonymous data on 2,203 patients. Variables analysed included disease code, consultations, prescriptions, sex, patient status and age. RESULTS: Overall, 2.9% (n = 2,337) of patients had ever been coded with a SMD, 2.4% (n = 1,964) coded with depressive disorder ever and 0.26% (n = 209) and 0.3% (n = 233) with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, respectively. Overall, 68.0% (n = 1,336) of patients with depressive disorder were female, and 74.0% (n = 171) of patients with schizophrenia were public patients. The median consultation rate in the previous 3 years was highest for schizophrenia patients at 24.5 visits. CONCLUSIONS: Coding of SMDs in Irish general practice appears incomplete. Patients with SMDs have high consultation rates. Patients with depressive disorder are more likely to be female and public patients. This research suggests that the improvement of coding in Irish general practice is the first practical step required to detecting prevalence rates.
Asunto(s)
Medicina General , Médicos Generales , Trastornos Mentales , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pharmaceutical industry invests heavily in promoting medications to physicians. This promotion may influence physicians' prescribing behaviour and lead to inappropriately increased prescribing rates. AIM: To understand GPs' experience of interacting with the pharmaceutical industry, and explore their views and perceptions of the impact of this interaction in general practice in Ireland. DESIGN & SETTING: A qualitative design was used, and GPs practicing in Ireland were eligible. METHOD: A combination of purposive and snowball sampling techniques was applied and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was used to develop themes from the data. RESULTS: Twenty-one GPs and one GP trainee participated. Five themes were developed: 1) GP and pharmaceutical industry interface; 2) the industry's methods of influence; 3) the uncomfortable relationship between GPs and industry; 4) GPs' perceptions of being unconsciously influenced; and 5) GPs' lack of knowledge of relevant regulations.Participants interacted with pharmaceutical representatives in their surgery and through continuing professional development (CPD). Reported methods of influence included biased information and the offer of gifts. Most participants felt their prescribing was unconsciously influenced. A minority felt that they were only influenced in a way that improved their prescribing. CONCLUSION: The study shows that there can be a lack of clarity among GPs about relevant regulations and about the potential impact on prescribing of interactions with the pharmaceutical industry. Education of trainees and GPs has the potential to address this. Restrictions on interactions with the pharmaceutical industry may also play a role, although alternative CPD funding sources would need to be established.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with enduring mental illness (EMI) have higher morbidity and mortality from chronic diseases than the general population, and this results in a signiï¬cantly reduced relative life expectancy-accounted for primarily by physical illness. This gap may be partly influenced by the reduced likelihood of access to and uptake of regular physical health screening. AIM: To establish Irish service providers' perspectives regarding the care of the physical health of people with EMI in an effort to inform future service developments aimed at improving the physical health of people with EMI. DESIGN AND SETTING: Qualitative study of healthcare providers-general practitioners (GPs) and members of the community mental health teams-in Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: GPs and mental health service providers. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 34 service providers. Thematic analysis was undertaken. RESULTS: Participants considered that the physical health of people with EMI is not currently regularly addressed by the patient's GP or the mental health team. Factors associated with this include patient compliance with attendance, time constraints in consultations to adequately support patient self-management, communication difficulties with the patient and between primary and secondary care, and lack of clarity as to whose responsibility it is to ensure physical health is monitored. In participants' view, a barrier to improvement is the present funding approach. CONCLUSION: The evidence from this study has the potential to form the basis for innovation and change in service delivery for people with an EMI in Ireland and internationally, specifically in countries where it is not clear who has the overall responsibility to monitor the physical health of patients with EMI. This role requires time and regular contact, and both the organisation and the funding of the health system need to support it.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Irlanda , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A lack of manpower and negative health statistics have increased the workload for Irish GPs. Consequently, recent GP graduates are considering emigration or part-time employment. AIM: To report on trends of the current status and future work intentions of recent GP graduates in Ireland. DESIGN & SETTING: Quantitative study based on online surveys in the Irish setting. METHOD: A 'career intentions' survey was emailed to all recent GP graduates in Ireland, in 2014, 2015, and 2017. The data presented includes GPs who graduated in the previous 4 years at each survey time point. The average response rate across the three surveys was 38.2%. RESULTS: The number of graduates who had already emigrated increased over the survey years, accounted for 16.9% in 2014, 17.4% in 2015, and 19.2% in 2017 survey. The majority of doctors who emigrated did so in the first 2 years after graduation (74.7%). 'Quality of life' became the most frequent reason for emigration over the survey years, accounting for 32.0% in the 2017 survey. In the 2014 survey, 47.3% of graduates stated that they intend to work part-time in 5 years; this rose to 51.2% in 2015, reaching 60.0% in 2017. Female participants were more than twice as likely to plan to work part time in 5 years compared to their male colleagues, across all three surveys. CONCLUSION: The first and second years after graduation were the most critical for emigration. Interventions in this period may reduce the 'brain drain' of Irish GPs. Part-time working is becoming more attractive and should be considered in future workforce planning.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to analyze hospital morbidity and mortality of adolescents in Vojvodina in 2004. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analyzed data for hospital morbidity were obtained from the Reports on diseases and conditions of hospitalized patients in the Service for stationary-hospital treatment. Hospital mortality was analyzed on the basis of Documentation tables of vital statistics of Republic of Serbia. In order to have better insight into the pathology, the adolescents were divided by sex and age (the younger ones from 10-14 years, and the older ones, from 15-19 years). RESULTS: The hospital morbidity of adolescents in Vojvodina in 2004 was 47/1,000 adolescents, while in 1983 it was 53/1,000 adolescents. The most frequent indications for hospitalization of the adolescents were respiratory, digestive diseases, and injuries, poisoning and consequences of an external factor influences. The overall mortality rate was 39.68/100,000 adolescents and in 1988 44.74/100,000 adolescents. Hospital mortality rate in Vojvodina in 2004 was 16.18/100,000 adolescents and in 1986 11.65/100,000 adolescents. The male adolescents most frequently died in hospitals because of tumors, and female ones because of injuries, poisoning and consequences of external factor influences. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Morbidity structure was not changed compared to the previous period. Older and female adolescents were more frequently hospitalized. There was a decrease in adolescent mortality for 15.5% compared to the previous 15 years. Hospital mortality rate was higher than before. Older adolescents had three times the death rate of younger. Mortality rates for male adolescents were three times rates for females. Programs for adolescents' health care must be implemented fully, with engagement of whole community services, in order to prevent and cure diseases adequately and to enhance quality of life.