Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Reprod Infant Psychol ; 35(1): 65-76, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29517291

RESUMEN

The aims of the present study were to map French laypersons' views regarding the acceptability of maternal surrogacy and to delineate the circumstances under which surrogacy is considered, by different groups of people, as especially problematic. Participants (N = 236) were presented with a number of scenarios depicting the circumstances in which a couple has contracted with a surrogate mother and were asked to indicate the extent to which such a contract may present a moral problem. The scenarios were created by varying four factors: the type of surrogacy (traditional or gestational), the surrogate mother's level of autonomy, the family context in which the surrogate mother lives, and whether surrogacy was commercial or altruistic. Three qualitatively different personal positions were found: (a) a majority group for which surrogacy always (30%) or often (34%) presents a moral problem, (b) a minority group (14%) for which maternal surrogacy does not systematically present a moral problem, and


Asunto(s)
Actitud , Contratos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Principios Morales , Madres Sustitutas/legislación & jurisprudencia , Madres Sustitutas/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Altruismo , Contratos/economía , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
2.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 20(3): 158-69, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25545288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Are people's views on abortion as polarised as is suggested by the 'marches for life' that regularly take place in Paris and other capitals? Objective To map French people's positions regarding the acceptability of induced abortion. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-nine participants were presented with stories composed according to a three within-subject design: Reason for abortion (e.g., the woman's life is endangered) × Gestational age × Woman's age. They assessed the extent to which abortion would be, in each case, an acceptable medical/surgical procedure. RESULTS: Five qualitatively different positions were identified: (i) always acceptable, irrespective of circumstances (31% of the sample), (ii) strictly depends on the reason for abortion (27%), (iii) legalist (23%), (iv) depends on the reason and on the gestational age (18%), and (v) always unacceptable (1%). CONCLUSIONS: Only one-fifth of the participants agreed with the part of the French law that permits abortion on request when gestational age does not exceed ten weeks. The others disagreed either because they thought that abortion on demand should never be permitted or because they thought that the age limit should be extended. This divide in people's opinions guarantees that the debate over induced abortions will continue.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido/psicología , Aborto Legal/psicología , Servicios de Planificación Familiar/organización & administración , Opinión Pública , Salud de la Mujer , Aborto Inducido/legislación & jurisprudencia , Aborto Legal/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adulto , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Comienzo de la Vida Humana , Política de Planificación Familiar/legislación & jurisprudencia , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Estigma Social , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA