RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prognosis for Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients with medulloblastoma (MB) is poor. Comprehensive clinical data for this patient group is lacking, challenging the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we present clinical and molecular data on a retrospective cohort of pediatric LFS MB patients. METHODS: In this multinational, multicenter retrospective cohort study, LFS patients under 21 years with MB and class 5 or class 4 constitutional TP53 variants were included. TP53 mutation status, methylation subgroup, treatment, progression free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS), recurrence patterns, and incidence of subsequent neoplasms were evaluated. RESULTS: The study evaluated 47 LFS individuals diagnosed with MB, mainly classified as DNA methylation subgroup "SHH_3" (86%). The majority (74%) of constitutional TP53 variants represented missense variants. The 2- and 5-year (y-) PFS were 36% and 20%, and 2- and 5y-OS were 53% and 23%, respectively. Patients who received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) (2y-PFS: 44%, 2y-OS: 60%) or chemotherapy before RT (2y-PFS: 32%, 2y-OS: 48%) had significantly better clinical outcome then patients who were not treated with RT (2y-PFS: 0%, 2y-OS: 25%). Patients treated according to protocols including high-intensity chemotherapy and patients who received only maintenance-type chemotherapy showed similar outcomes (2y-PFS: 42% and 35%, 2y-OS: 68% and 53%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: LFS MB patients have a dismal prognosis. In the presented cohort use of RT significantly increased survival rates, whereas chemotherapy intensity did not influence their clinical outcome. Prospective collection of clinical data and development of novel treatments are required to improve the outcome of LFS MB patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Cerebelosas , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni , Meduloblastoma , Niño , Humanos , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/complicaciones , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/genética , Síndrome de Li-Fraumeni/terapia , Meduloblastoma/terapia , Meduloblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/terapia , Neoplasias Cerebelosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rhabdoid tumors (RTs) of the liver are rare, aggressive and nonsecreting malignancies occurring mainly during the first year of life. Definition of RT relies on characteristic morphology and on the inactivation of the SMARCB1 tumor suppressor gene. The aim of this study was to analyze clinical data, treatments and outcomes in our patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 6 cases of patients treated in our institution for RT of the liver between January 2007 and January 2015 are reported. Variables examined included age at diagnosis, tumor stage, treatment and long-term survival. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 5months (range: 4-23). Normal for age serum AFP levels was observed in all patients. No patient presented with metastasis at diagnosis. The diagnosis of RT based on the loss of SMARCB1 was made early in 4 patients. The 2 others were initially diagnosed as nonsecreting hepatoblastomas. Median follow-up was 6years (range: 2-9). All patients received chemotherapy, with variable regimens depending on initial diagnosis, followed by surgical resection. Three patients (50%) died of disease. Two of them were mistaken for nonsecreting hepatoblastomas at diagnosis and had recurrence shortly after completion of treatment. The third one presented a cardiac right atrium thrombus. Three patients (50%) are long-term survivors; they received multimodal therapy including chemotherapy according to protocol EpSSG NRSTS consisting of doxorubicin and surgical removal of the tumor performed within 3months after diagnosis. One patient had adjuvant radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: According to our results, search of SMARCB1 mutation or alternatively immunohistochemical assay for SMARCB1 in nonsecreting hepatoblastomas is mandatory to exclude RT. Chemotherapy according to EpSSG NRSTS protocol together with a surgical treatment seems justified to improve long-term survival. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.