A follow-up study of immunotherapy-treated birch-allergic patients: effect on the expression of chemokines in the nasal mucosa.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only treatment producing lasting clinical improvement in patients with allergy. We investigated the long-term effect of SIT treatment on the expression of chemokines: eotaxin, RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted) and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), and their receptors CCR3 and CCR4 in biopsies of nasal mucosa from birch-allergic individuals. METHODS: Sixteen patients who completed a 3-year treatment programme 3-5 years ago, and 12 untreated, matched controls were included in the study. Patients recorded symptoms and use of rescue medication before and during the pollen season. Nasal mucosa samples obtained before and during the season were stained for eosinophil and mast cell markers and for eotaxin, RANTES, TARC, CCR3 and CCR4. RESULTS: During the pollen season, rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms increased in both SIT and control groups (P=0.001 and 0.002, respectively). However, SIT patients had 37% fewer symptoms than controls. Medication use increased in both groups (P=0.002) during the season but the SIT group used 28% less than the controls (P=0.02). The number of eosinophils in the nasal mucosa increased in the control group (P=0.01) and the difference between the groups was significant during the season (P=0.01). No seasonal increase in the numbers of mast cells was seen, but during the pollen season, more (P=0.02) AA(+) cells were found in the controls than in the SIT group. The number of eotaxin(+) and RANTES(+) cells increased in the control group (P=0.01 and 0.03, respectively) and the difference between groups during the season was significant (P=0.01 and 0.01, respectively). The TARC(+) cell numbers were lower in the SIT group during the season (P=0.003). The CCR3(+) cells increased only in the control group during the pollen season and remained unchanged in SIT patients, while CCR4(+) cell numbers increased in both the control (P=0.03) and SIT (P=0.02) groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that decreased numbers of eosinophils in the nasal mucosa is a long-lasting effect of birch SIT. SIT also prevented seasonal rises in the number of cells expressing the chemokines eotaxin and RANTES.

Increased expression of lipoxygenase enzymes during pollen season in nasal biopsies of pollen-allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: Exposure of patients sensitized to pollen triggers development of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms (SAR). Eicosanoids are a group of arachidonic acid metabolites contributing to the symptoms of SAR. The aim of this study was to investigate seasonal changes in the expression of enzymes of the eicosanoid pathway in the nasal mucosa of patients with SAR. METHODS: Twenty SAR patients allergic to birch or grass and eight healthy subjects were included in the study. Patients registered rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and use of rescue medication before and during the pollen season. Nasal biopsies were obtained before and around the peak of the season, sectioned and stained using markers for eosinophils, mast cells, T cells and neutrophils. Antibodies against the following enzymes were also used: cyclo-oxygenase (COX-1, COX-2), 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO), 5-lipoxygenase-activating factor (FLAP), LTA4 hydrolase (LTA4h) and LTC4 synthase (LTC4s). RESULTS: During the pollen season symptoms of rhinoconjunctivitis and medication score increased significantly (P=0.001; P=0.001 respectively). During the pollen season numbers of eosinophils (P=0.02) and cell positive 5-LO (P=0.02), LTC4s (P=0.04) and LTA4h (P=0.02) increased significantly. During season number of mast cells and cells expressing 5-LO and LTA4h were higher in SAR than in healthy controls group (P=0.02; P=0.01; P=0.03 respectively). CONCLUSION: In sensitized patients exposure to pollen allergen results in increased expression of enzymes of the eicosanoid pathway.

Cytokine production in peripheral blood cells during and outside the pollen season in birch-allergic patients and non-allergic controls.

BACKGROUND: The naturally occurring pollen season permits observation of the kinetic changes in the process of allergic inflammation. We examined cytokine production in peripheral blood (PB) T cells and monocytes obtained from birch-allergic patients both during and outside the pollen season. METHODS: PB from 16 patients and six healthy controls was obtained during the alder pollen season, at the beginning and the peak of the birch pollen season and outside the pollen season. Mononuclear cells (MNC) were stimulated with allergen and polyclonal activators. For flow cytometric analysis, MNC were stained with monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) against the cell surface markers CD3, CD8, CD14 and the intracellular cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IFN-gamma. RESULTS: In allergic patients, significant increases in clinical symptoms, use of medication, eosinophil numbers and birch-specific IgE were found during the pollen season. In vitro allergen stimulation increased the number of GM-CSF+ monocytes (P<0.01) and this increase was dependent on allergen exposure. The IL-4/IFN-gamma ratio rose (P<0.001) at the peak of birch pollen season and the ratio correlated with symptom scores during the birch season. In the CD4+ cell population, the numbers of GM-CSF+ cells were higher throughout the alder and birch seasons compared with outside the pollen season (P<0.05). No such changes were seen in the healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of our study was the increased percentage of GM-CSF+ monocytes in atopic subjects compared with healthy controls. In allergic patients, natural seasonal pollen exposure resulted in increased numbers of GM-CSF+ cells among both monocytes and CD4+ T cells. We have also shown that a seasonal change in Th2/Th1 cytokine ratio requires an adequate and prolonged allergen stimulation that is seen late in the pollen season.

The effect of specific immunotherapy on the expression of costimulatory molecules in late phase reaction of the skin in allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: Specific immunotherapy (SIT) modulates immune responses to allergens resulting in improvement of allergic symptoms. However, the mechanisms behind the clinical changes are not clear. Participation of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells and T cells in the process of antigen recognition is suggested to be of essential importance. The SIT effect on expression of costimulatory molecules has not been earlier examined. METHODS: Forty-one birch-allergic patients were treated with SIT or placebo. After 1 year of treatment skin biopsies were obtained 24 h following allergen challenge. Sections were stained with antibodies against: EG2 (eosinophils), CD4 (T cells), CD68 (macrophages), CD1a (Langerhans cells), CD28 (on T cells) and costimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86). RESULTS: Following allergen challenge number of the CD4(+) and CD68(+) cells increased significantly (P=0.002, 0.0001, respectively) in the placebo, but not in the SIT-treated patients. The difference between groups was significant (P=0.003, 0.01, respectively). The numbers of EG2(+) cells increased significantly in both groups. CD80(+) cell numbers increased in the placebo (P=0.01) but not in the SIT group. The number of CD86(+) cells increased in both groups (placebo, P=0.001; SIT, P=0.01) but significantly less in the SIT group (P=0.05). The numbers of CD28(+) cells increased in the placebo (P=0.001) but remained unchanged in the SIT group. The difference between the groups was significant (P=0.05). CONCLUSION: There were lower numbers of cells expressing costimulatory molecules in SIT-treated than in placebo-treated patients. Decreased costimulation may lead to diminished immune response following allergen exposure. This could be an important factor contributing to the clinical improvement after SIT.