Structured Reporting of CT Angiography Runoff Examinations of the Lower Extremities.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of structured reporting of computed tomography angiography (CTA) runoff studies on clarity, completeness, clinical relevance, usefulness of the radiology reports, further testing, and therapy in patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease. METHODS: Conventional reports (CRs) and structured reports (SRs) were generated for 52 patients who had been examined with a CTA runoff examination of the lower extremities. The sample size was based on power calculations with a power of 95% and a significance level of .007 (adjusted for multiple testing). CRs were dictated in a free text form; SRs contained a consistent ordering of observations with standardised subheadings. CRs were compared with SRs. Two vascular medicine specialists and two vascular surgeons rated the reports regarding their satisfaction with clarity, completeness, clinical relevance, and usefulness as well as overall satisfaction. Additionally, they made hypothetical decisions on further testing and therapy. Median ratings were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and generalised linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: SRs received higher ratings for satisfaction with clarity (median rating 9.0 vs. 7.0, p < .0001) and completeness (median rating 9.0 vs. 7.5, p < .0001) and were judged to be of greater clinical relevance (median rating 9.0 vs. 8.0, p < .0001) and usefulness (median rating 9.0 vs. 8.0, p < .0001). Overall satisfaction was also higher for SRs (median rating 9.0 vs. 7.0, p < .0001) than CRs. There were no significant differences in further testing or therapy. CONCLUSION: Referring clinicians perceive SRs of CTA runoff examinations of the lower extremities as offering superior clarity, completeness, clinical relevance, and usefulness than CRs. Structured reporting does not appear to alter further testing or therapy in patients with known or suspected peripheral arterial disease.

Structured reporting of x-rays for atraumatic shoulder pain: advantages over free text?

BACKGROUND: To analyse structured and free text reports of shoulder X-ray examinations evaluating the quality of reports and potential contributions to clinical decision-making. METHODS: We acquired both standard free text and structured reports of 31 patients with a painful shoulder without history of previous trauma who received X-ray exams. A template was created for the structured report based on the template ID 0000154 (Shoulder X-ray) from radreport.org using online software with clickable decision trees with concomitant generation of structured semantic reports. All reports were evaluated regarding overall quality and key features: content, information extraction and clinical relevance. RESULTS: Two experienced orthopaedic surgeons reviewed and rated structured and free text reports of 31 patients independently. The structured reports achieved significantly higher median ratings in all key features evaluated (P < 0.001), including facilitation of information extraction (P < 0.001) and better contribution to subsequent clinical decision-making (P < 0.001). The overall quality of structured reports was significantly higher than in free text report (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive structured template may be a useful tool to assist in clinical decision-making and is, thus, recommended for the reporting of degenerative changes regarding X-ray examinations of the shoulder.

Structured reporting of CT examinations in acute pulmonary embolism.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of structured reporting of CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) studies on the content, clarity and clinical usefulness of radiology reports in acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Conventional and structured reports were generated for 41 patients with a CTPA positive for acute PE. Conventional reports were dictated in a free-text form using speech recognition; structured reports contained a consistent ordering of observations with standardized subheadings. Conventional reports were compared to standardized structured reports. Two general internists and two pulmonologists rated their satisfaction with the clarity and content of the report and its clinical usefulness and hypothetically assigned the patients to a suitable disposition and therapy. RESULTS: Overall, structured reports received higher ratings for content (median rating 10.0 vs. 8.5, p < 0.0001) and clarity (median rating 10.0 vs. 8.0). The increase in satisfaction with clarity was significant for both subgroups (p < 0.0001), while the increase in satisfaction with content was significant for pulmonologists only (p < 0.0001). The clinical utility of radiology reports improved with structured reporting overall (p = 0.004) and for pulmonologists (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in the patient disposition or therapy. CONCLUSION: Referring clinicians perceive structured CTPA reports as superior in clarity. Pulmonologists also appreciate structured reports as providing better content and clinical utility. Structured reporting does not appear to alter patients' management in acute PE.

Effect of endoleaks on changes in aortoiliac volume after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in aortoiliac volume after endovascular repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with and without endoleaks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 137 patients who underwent EVAR for AAA. We manually measured the aortoiliac volume on pre-procedural baseline CT angiograms (CTAs) and post-procedural follow-up CTAs. All post-procedural CTAs were evaluated for the presence of endoleaks. Follow-up examinations were grouped into five time points relative to the date of the EVAR procedure and mean aortoiliac volume changes from the baseline were calculated. RESULTS: In 51 patients (37.2%), endoleaks were detected during follow-up. In patients without any endoleaks, mean aortoiliac volume decreased by 21.1% from the pre-interventional baseline examination to the last follow-up examination. In patients with any endoleak during follow-up aortoiliac volume increased by 12.2% and in patients with only transient, post-procedural endoleaks (n = 18), aortoiliac volume decreased by 13.4% over the same time period. CONCLUSION: After EVAR for AAA, aortoiliac volume on CT angiography decreases by approximately 20% over time in the absence of endoleaks and increases in the presence of endoleaks. Transient post-procedural endoleaks, however, do not influence long-term volume regression.