Magnetic resonance imaging fingerprints of status epilepticus: A case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Status epilepticus (SE) is frequently associated with peri-ictal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities (PMA). However, the anatomical distribution of these alterations has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to assess the localization patterns of PMA in patients with SE. METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, we compared the distribution and combinations of diffusion-restricted PMA to diffusion-restricted lesions caused by other neurological conditions. All patients of the SE group and the control group underwent MRI including a diffusion-weighted imaging sequence. Patients with SE were imaged within 48 h after its onset. RESULTS: We enrolled 201 patients (51 with SE and 150 controls). The most frequent locations of PMA in SE were cortex (25/51, 49%), followed by hippocampus (20/51, 39%) and pulvinar of thalamus (10/51, 20%). In the control group, the cortex was involved in 80 of 150 (53%), white matter in 53 of 150 (35%), and basal ganglia in 33 of 150 (22%). In the control group, the pulvinar of thalamus was never affected and hippocampal structures were rarely involved (7/150, 5%). Involvement of the pulvinar of thalamus and the hippocampus had high specificity for SE at 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98-100) and 95% (95% CI = 91-98), respectively. The sensitivity, however, was low for both locations (pulvinar of thalamus: 20%, 95% CI = 10-33; hippocampus: 39%, 95% CI = 26-54). SIGNIFICANCE: Diffusion-restricted MRI lesions observed in the pulvinar of thalamus and hippocampus are strongly associated with SE. These changes may help physicians in diagnosing SE-related changes on MRI in an acute setting, especially in cases of equivocal clinical and electroencephalographic manifestations of SE.

Post-hypoxic status epilepticus - A distinct subtype of status epilepticus with poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with possible and definitive post-hypoxic status epilepticus (SE) and to describe the SE types in patients with definitive post-hypoxic SE. METHODS: Patients with definitive or possible SE resulting from hypoxic brain injury after cardiac arrest (CA) were prospectively recruited. Intermittent EEG was used for the diagnosis of SE according to clinical practice. Two raters blinded to outcome analyzed EEGs retrospectively for possible and definitive SE patterns and background features (frequency, continuity, reactivity, and voltage). Definitive SE was classified according to semiology (ILAE). Mortality and Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) score were evaluated 1 month after CA. RESULTS: We included 64 patients of whom 92% died. Among the survivors, only one patient had a good neurological outcome (CPC 1). No patient survived with a burst suppression pattern, low voltage, or electro-cerebral silence in any EEG. Possible or definitive SE was diagnosed in a median of 47 h (IQR 39-72 h) after CA. EEG criteria for definitive electrographic SE were fulfilled in 39% of patients; in 38% - for electroclinical SE and in 23% - for ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). The outcome did not differ significantly between the three groups. The only patient with good functional outcome belonged to the IIC group. Comatose non-convulsive SE (NCSE) without subtle motor phenomenon occurred in 20% of patients with definitive electrographic SE and outcome was similar to other types of SE. SIGNIFICANCE: Possible or definitive SE due to hypoxic brain injury is associated with poor prognosis. The outcome of patients with electrographic SE, electroclinical SE, and IIC did not differ significantly. Outcome was similar in patients with definitive electrographic SE with and without prominent motor features.

Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion-Restricted Lesions in a Differential Diagnosis of Status Epilepticus and Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Background and Purpose: Distinction between acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and status epilepticus (SE) on MRI can be challenging as restricted diffusion may occur in both conditions. In this study, we aimed to test a tool, which could help in differentiating AIS from SE when restricted diffusion was present on MRI. Materials and Methods: In diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with a b-value of 1,000 and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, we compared the ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side in patients with AIS and SE. Patients were recruited prospectively between February 2019 and October 2021. All patients underwent MRI and EEG within the first 48 h of symptom onset. Results: We identified 26 patients with SE and 164 patients with AIS. All patients had diffusion-restricted lesions with a hyperintensity in DWI and ADC signal decrease. Diffusion restriction was significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to patients with SE. The median ratios of intensities of gray values of diffusion-restricted lesions to the healthy mirror side for DWI were 1.42 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.32-1.47) in SE and 1.67 (IQR 1.49-1.90) in AIS (p < 0.001). ADC decrease was more significant in AIS as compared to SE with median ratios of 0.80 (IQR 0.72-0.89) vs. 0.61 (IQR 0.50-0.71), respectively (p < 0.001). A cutoff value for ratios of DWI signal was 1.495 with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 85%. Values lower than 1.495 were more likely to be associated with SE and higher values were with AIS. A cutoff value for ADC ratios was 0.735 with a sensitivity of 73% and a specificity of 84%. Values lower than 0.735 were more likely to be associated with AIS and higher values were with SE. Conclusion: Diffusion restriction and ADC decrease were significantly more intense in patients with AIS as compared to SE. Therefore, quantitative analysis of diffusion restriction may be a helpful tool for differentiating between AIS and SE when restricted diffusion is present on MRI.