Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Planning Techniques for Distal Femoral Osteotomies and Proximal Tibial Osteotomies.

Preoperative planning is important for accurate intraoperative execution in many surgical fields. Planning for distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs) and proximal tibial osteotomies (PTOs) consists of choosing the level of the osteotomy, measuring the angle of the osteotomy based on hip-knee-ankle alignment, and choosing a proper osteotomy wedge size. Medical imaging IT solutions company Sectra has implemented a new osteotomy tool in their radiographic system that is simpler than the accepted standard of modified center of rotation of angulation (mCORA) technique, yet unvalidated. In this study, we aim to compare the Sectra osteotomy tool versus the mCORA technique to measure the osteotomy angles as well as wedge sizes in both DFOs and PTOs to validate this new tool.We enrolled n = 30 consecutive patients with DFOs and n = 30 PTOs from the last year. The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) along with descriptive statistics was used to evaluate for similarity between the two techniques. We also compared interobserver and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).The PCC for osteotomy angles in DFOs and PTOs were both 0.998 (p < 0.001 for both). For wedge sizes, the PCC in DFOs was 0.993 and 0.980 in PTOs (p < 0.001 for both). ICCs were high for both interobserver measurements in osteotomy angles and wedge sizes (range: 0.989-0.999) as well as intraobserver measurements (0.994-0.999).The Sectra osteotomy tool is a validated tool for preoperative measurements of DFOs and PTOs. It is reliable and simpler than the current practice of the mCORA technique. We suggest future studies to analyze this Sectra osteotomy tool in other settings as to incorporate it into widespread clinical use.

A Staged Approach to Combined Extra-articular Limb Deformity Correction and Total Ankle Arthroplasty for End-Stage Ankle Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) in the setting of a concomitant extra-articular limb deformity pose a challenging problem that has not yet been described in the literature. We describe a case series of patients treated with external and internal fixation techniques followed by total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) in a staged approach to treat this complex presentation. METHODS: Eight patients with limb deformity and end-stage ankle OA who underwent staged deformity correction and TAA from 2016 to 2019 at our institution were retrospectively identified. Average age was 58.5 (range, 49-68) years, with an average follow-up of 2.6 (range, 0.8-4.2) years. All patients underwent limb reconstruction with either tibial osteotomy with a circular frame (n=6) or intramedullary nail (n=2). Limb deformities consisted of the following: posttraumatic tibial malunion (2), limb length discrepancy (1), acquired tibial deformity (1), genu varum (2), or genu valgum (2). Radiographic parameters were assessed pre- and postoperatively on 51-inch standing and ankle radiographs: limb length discrepancy (LLD), genu varum/valgum deformity, recurvatum deformity, mechanical axis deviation, medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal tibial angle, anterior distal tibial angle, and tibiotalar alignment. Pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were assessed using 2 metrics, the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores (Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Global Physical Function, and Global Mental Function). RESULTS: Following staged limb deformity correction and TAA, all patients achieved correction of LLD and angular deformities of the lower limb, along with restoration of normal alignment of the ankle joint. There was significant mean improvement in all patient-reported LD-SRS and PROMIS domains, except for LD-SRS mental health. LD-SRS function improved from 2.6 (±0.7) to 4.6 (±0.2), P = .008; pain improved from 2.9 (±0.9) to 4.8 (±0.2), P = .012; self-image improved from 2.9 (±0.4) to 4.7 (±0.3), P < .001; and total LD-SRS improved from 3.3 (±0.4) to 4.8 (±0.2), P = .002. Average satisfaction was 4.9 (±0.3). PROMIS physical function improved from 32.3 (±6.8) to 51.3 (±5.3), P = .008; pain interference improved from 66.0 (±9.1) to 41.3 (±6.2), P = .004; pain intensity improved from 60.0 (±13.3) to 33.1 (±5.3), P = .007; global physical health improved from 39.3 (±6.8) to 60.7 (±5.1), P = .002; global mental health improved from 54.8 (±5.9) to 65.6 (±2.8), P = .007. There was one incidence of pin site infection and one reoperation. CONCLUSION: Deformity correction with either external frame or intramedullary nail fixation followed by TAA in a staged approach was a viable surgical option in the treatment of end-stage ankle OA with concurrent extra-articular limb deformity. This unique approach was capable of achieving deformity correction with improved patient-reported outcomes, minimal complications, and good patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Patients With Lower Limb Deformity Report Worse Quality of Life Than Control Subjects Regardless of Degree of Deformity.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine how Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) scores differ between patients with different types and degrees of limb deformity compared with control subjects. METHODS: Patients who were >17 years and scheduled for reconstructive surgery for limb lengthening or angular deformity with internal and/or external fixation and healthy control subjects were prospectively enrolled. Patients completed the LD-SRS preoperatively. Mechanical axis deviation (MAD) and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were recorded preoperatively. Participants were stratified into five groups based on their diagnosis. ANOVA was used to test for associations between LD-SRS scores and diagnosis as well as mechanical axis deviation. RESULTS: Patients with LLD, angular deformity, or combined LLD and angular deformity reported significantly worse scores than control subjects in LD-SRS Function/Activity, Pain, Self-Image/Appearance, and total score (P < 0.001 for all). Patients with short stature reported significantly worse LD-SRS Self-Image/Appearance (P < 0.001) and total score compared with control subjects (P = 0.015). There was a significant correlation between LLD and LD-SRS Self-Image/Appearance in the LLD and angular deformity group (r = -0.359, P = 0.043). DISCUSSION: Although LD-SRS scores were worse in patients with limb deformity compared to controls, LD-SRS scores were not related to the degree of deformity in most patients, indicating that patient self-perception may be a construct unrelated to objective radiographic or clinical findings.