RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare techniques for securing the aortic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cannula, using in vitro models. METHODS: Two models were studied: a tissue model using porcine aortas and a stand model replacing the aorta with a metal stand to study the system independent of the tissue. Interventions in each model were divided into three experimental groups: Group 1 (3-0 Prolene® + 20-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula EOPA™), Group 2 (4-0 Prolene® + 16-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula DLP Pediatric), and Group 3 (5-0 Prolene® + 8-French Medtronic Arterial Cannula DLP Pediatric). In separate experiments, both gradual and rapid forces were applied to the cannulas, starting with 9.8 Newtons and increasing exponentially if the cannula remained secured. Additionally, the method of securing the tourniquet and the number of ties securing the tourniquet to the cannula were evaluated. RESULTS: In the tissue model, even with a minimum force of 9.8 Newtons, the suture pulled through the aortic tissue, leaving sutures and ties intact. In the stand model, two purse-string sutures secured by two ligaclips held the cannula reliably and withstood higher total force. Dislodgement was prevented at forces close to 60 Newtons with only two hemostatic clips included in cannulation. CONCLUSIONS: The weakest part of the aortic ECMO cannulation system using in vitro experiments was the tissue. Assuming that these experiments translate in vivo, it is therefore critical to prevent any pull on the cannulas by securing ECMO cannulas and ECMO tubing to both the patient and the patient's bed. Sutures with a larger diameter withstand more force. Two medium hemostatic clips can secure Prolene® sutures within snares as safely as a mosquito hemostat. Two polypropylene purse-string sutures secured by two hemostatic clips were most reliable at greater forces. The rationale for publishing our experiments in this manuscript is to (1) communicate our quantification of possible contributing factors to this rare and likely catastrophic complication of unintended decannulation, (2) increase awareness about this potential complication, and (3) increase vigilance to assure prevention of this dreaded complication.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We reviewed our management strategy and outcome data for all 181 patients with pediatric or congenital heart disease who received 186 heart transplants from January 1, 2011, to March 1, 2022, and evaluated the impact of pretransplant ventricular assist device (VAD). METHODS: Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD); median [interquartile range] (range). Categorical variables are presented as number (percentage). Univariable associations with long-term mortality were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Impact of pretransplant VAD on survival was estimated with multivariable models. RESULTS: Pretransplant VAD was present in 53 of 186 transplants (28.5%). Patients with VAD were younger (years): 4.8 (5.6); 1 [0.5-8] (0.1-18) vs 12.1 (12.7); 10 [0.7-17] (0.1-58); P = .0001. Patients with VAD had a higher number of prior cardiac operations: 3.0 (2.3); 2 [1-4] (1-12) vs 1.8 (1.9); 2 [0-3] (0-8); P = .0003. Patients with VAD were also more likely to receive an ABO-incompatible transplant: 10 of 53 (18.9%) vs 9 of 133 (6.8%); P = .028. Univariable associations with long-term mortality included: In multivariable analysis, pretransplant VAD did not impact survival while controlling for each one of the factors shown in univariable analysis to be associated with long-term mortality. Kaplan-Meier 5-year survival (95% CI) was 85.8% (80.0%-92.1%) for all patients, 84.3% (77.2%-92.0%) without pretransplant VAD, and 91.1% (83.1%-99.9%) with pretransplant VAD. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-institution analysis of 181 patients receiving 186 heart transplants for pediatric or congenital heart disease over 11.25 years reveals similar survival in patients with (n = 51) and without (n = 130) pretransplant VAD. The presence of a pretransplant VAD is not a risk factor for mortality after transplantation for pediatric or congenital heart disease.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Non-atherosclerotic causes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are important contributors to a substantial number of acute ischemic coronary events. Syphilitic aortitis is a rare complication of tertiary cardiovascular syphilis that may result in ostial coronary artery stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and ascending aortic aneurysm. Methods: In this manuscript, we present two Case Reports of patients with bilateral syphilitic coronary artery ostial occlusion, and we review the associated literature. The immunofluorescent test was positive for syphilis in both patients. Results: Diagnostic coronary angiography revealed bilateral occlusions of the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and right coronary artery (RCA), which were successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stents (BMS). After deployment of the stents, arterial blood flow was re-established with TIMI flow grade 3. Discussion: The angiographic finding of bilateral coronary ostial lesions in young patients should raise the suspicion of cardiovascular syphilis. Options for revascularization should be discussed amongst the patient and the Heart Team. PCI may be an option for treatment of isolated syphilitic coronary stenosis in the setting of acute hemodynamic instability or chronic inflammation.