The prognosis of fibrolamellar carcinoma versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma: a study based on propensity score matching.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) versus conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. Thus, this study aimed to compare the prognosis of FLC and HCC. METHODS: Patients with FLC and HCC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2015 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the clinical characteristics between FLC and HCC. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied to identify the effect of pathology in prognosis before and after match in the whole cohort, as well as in subgroups of fibrosis score, AJCC stage and therapy. RESULTS: A total of 213 patients with FLC and 33365 patients with HCC between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Before matching, the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were significantly better in FLC than HCC. After matching, FLC patients had better OS than HCC patients, but the CSS was similar between groups. Further analyses found that in patients at early stage (AJCC I-III) and/or accepted curative therapy, the prognosis was comparable between HCC and FLC. In patients without cirrhosis (F0), the HCC patients had similar prognosis with FLC patients. Prognosis benefit of FLC was observed in subgroups of AJCC stage IV and non-curative therapy, however, the concomitant diseases may affect the results. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of FLC was significantly better than HCC before matching. However, after matching for clinical characteristics, the CSS was comparable between FLC and HCC.

Clinical features and prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure in patients with recompensated cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies on acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in patients with recompensated cirrhosis. This study was aimed to investigate the clinical features of ACLF patients with recompensated cirrhosis. METHODS: A total of 461 ACLF patients were enrolled and divided into three groups: compensated, recompensated, and decompensated cirrhosis with ACLF. The baseline clinical data and 1-year survival rates were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: Compared with the decompensated group, in the recompensated group, the levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and serum sodium were significantly higher and the white blood cell count, international normalized ratio, and incidence of respiratory failure were significantly lower; there were no evident differences in other organ failures. The proportion of patients with ACLF grade 3 and 1-year survival rates significantly differed between the two groups. Conversely, compared with the compensated group, in the recompensated group, the platelet and total bilirubin levels were significantly lower and the proportion of patients with ACLF grade 1 was significantly higher. However, other clinical indicators or 1-year survival rates did not significantly differ between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients who developed ACLF with decompensated cirrhosis, those who developed ACLF with recompensated cirrhosis had a less severe condition, lower incidence of respiratory failure, and better 1-year prognosis. However, the baseline clinical features and prognosis were similar between ACLF patients with recompensated and compensated cirrhosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese clinical trials registry: ChiCTR1900021539.

Advanced achalasia: good candidate for peroral endoscopic myotomy.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been increasingly accepted as the first-line treatment of achalasia. However, laparoscopic Heller myotomy or esophagectomy still remains as the mainstay treatment for advanced achalasia featured with megaesophagus and/or sigmoid-shaped esophagus. Although the efficacy of POEM for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus has been described, little is known about the role of POEM for patients with megaesophagus. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM for advanced achalasia with megaesophagus. Patients who received initial examinations and underwent POEM in our hospital from June 2013 to December 2018 were identified and data were retrospectively analyzed. The advanced achalasia was defined as megaesophagus with a diameter of ≥6 cm. The primary outcome was clinical success. The secondary outcomes were technical success and adverse events. A total of 112 patients (50 females, 44.6%) were included with a mean age of 44.8 years. The median symptom duration was 6.5 years (IQR:3.0-13.0 years). Modified POEM techniques were used in 27.7% (31/112) of patients. Technical success rate was 99.1% (112/113) per procedure. Clinical success was seen in 93.1% patients with median Eckardt score decreasing from 8.0 to 1.0 (P < 0.001) during a median 31.0 months of follow-up. The mean LES pressure decreased from 29.5 mmHg to 14.2 mmHg after POEM (P < 0.05). Procedure-related adverse events occurred in 8.9% patients. Reflux disease was observed postoperatively in 26.7% of patients. POEM is also indicated for patients with advanced achalasia with a favorable safety and efficacy.

The outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors and the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection.

BACKGROUND: To compare the outcomes of modified endoscopic mucosal resection (m-EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and evaluate the value of endoscopic morphology classification in endoscopic resection (ER). METHODS: Patients with rectal NET diameters less than 2 cm who were treated between April 2007 and January 2019 were enrolled. The endoscopic morphology of rectal NETs was classified based on the endoscopic views. Patients who underwent ESD and m-EMR were compared. Baseline characteristics as well as en bloc resection, complete resection, the procedure time, adverse events and the risk factors associated with incomplete resection were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 429 patients with 449 rectal NETs were enrolled for the classification of endoscopic morphology and were classified into four types (Ia, IIb, II, and III). There were 79 patients in the m-EMR group and 259 patients in the ESD group before matching. Propensity score matching created 77 pairs between the two groups that were well balanced. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter for m-EMR than for ESD (9.1 ± 4.4 min vs 16.0 ± 7.9 min, P = 0.000). The rates of en bloc resection (98.7% vs 100%; P = 1.000), complete resection (90.9% vs 93.5%, P = 0.548) and adverse events (2.6% vs 2.6%, P = 1.000) were similar between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that histopathological grade and endoscopic morphology were associated with incomplete resection. CONCLUSION: Both ESD and m-EMR are effective and safe for the treatment of rectal NETs. Endoscopic morphology should be considered along with histopathological grade for ER.

Impact of Onset Time, Number, Type, and Sequence of Extrahepatic Organ Failure on Prognosis of Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure.

Background and Aims: The impact of the characteristics of extrahepatic organ failure (EHOF) including the onset time, number, type, and sequence on the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients remains unknown. This study aimed to identify the association between the characteristics of EHOF and the prognosis of ACLF patients. Methods: ACLF subjects enrolled at six hospitals in China were included in the analysis. The risk of mortality based on the characteristics of EHOF was evaluated. Survival of study groups was compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests. Results: A total of 736 patients with ACLF were included. EHOF was observed in 402 patients (54.6%), of which 295 (73.4%) developed single EHOF (SEHOF) and 107 (26.6%) developed multiple EHOF (MEHOF). The most commonly observed EHOF was coagulation failure (47.0%), followed by renal (13.0%), brain (4.9%), respiratory (4.3%), and circulatory (2.3%) failure. Survival analysis found that MEHOF or SEHOF patients with brain failure had a worse prognosis. However, no significant outcome was found in the analysis of the effect of onset time and sequence of failed organs on prognosis. Patients were further divided into three risk subgroups by the EHOF characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that risk stratification resulted in the differentiation of patients with different risks of mortality both in the training and validation cohorts. Conclusions: The mortality of ACLF patients was determined by the number and type, but not the onset time and sequence of EHOF. Risk stratification applicable to clinical practice was established.

The Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival and a Risk Stratification System for Patients with Primary Gastrointestinal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of our study was to develop and validate a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival and make a risk stratification system for primary gastrointestinal melanoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2018 were included and randomly divided into the training and validation cohort (8:2). A prediction nomogram of cancer-specific survival was constructed based on the risk factors identified in the multivariate Cox regression. Calibration curve, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic, and decision curve analysis were performed. Further, a risk stratification system was developed based on the nomogram. RESULTS: A total of 433 patients were included. The nomogram was constructed based on age, site, and tumor size, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) stage, and therapy. The area under the curves of the nomogram predicting 6-, 12-, and 18-month cancer-specific survival were 0.789, 0.757, and 0.726 for the internal validation and 0.796, 0.763, and 0.795 for the external validation. Calibration curves and decision curve analysis were performed. Further, patients were divided into 2 risk subgroups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test showed that the risk stratification made well differentiation of patients with different risks of cancerspecific survival. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a practical prediction model of cancer-specific survival and a risk stratification system for patients with primary gastrointestinal melanoma, which might be available in clinical practices.

Development and Validation of Nomogram for Predicting Survival of Primary Liver Cancers Using Machine Learning.

Background and Aims: Primary liver cancer (PLC) is a common malignancy with poor survival and requires long-term follow-up. Hence, nomograms need to be established to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) from different databases for patients with PLC. Methods: Data of PLC patients were downloaded from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. The Kaplan Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare differences in OS and CSS. Independent prognostic factors for patients with PLC were determined by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Two nomograms were developed based on the result of the multivariable analysis and evaluated by calibration curves and receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: OS and CSS nomograms were based on age, race, TNM stage, primary diagnosis, and pathologic stage. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.777, 0.769, and 0.772 for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS. The AUC was 0.739, 0.729 and 0.780 for 1-, 3- and 5-year CSS. The performance of the two new models was then evaluated using calibration curves. Conclusions: We systematically reviewed the prognosis of PLC and developed two nomograms. Both nomograms facilitate clinical application and may benefit clinical decision-making.