RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Maternal Mental Health in Canada, 2018/2019, survey reported that 18% of 7,085 mothers who recently gave birth reported "feelings consistent with postpartum depression" based on scores ≥7 on a 5-item version of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS-5). The EPDS-5 was designed as a screening questionnaire, not to classify disorders or estimate prevalence; the extent to which EPDS-5 results reflect depression prevalence is unknown. We investigated EPDS-5 ≥7 performance relative to major depression prevalence based on a validated diagnostic interview, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID). METHODS: We searched Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, PsycINFO, and the Web of Science Core Collection through June 2016 for studies with data sets with item response data to calculate EPDS-5 scores and that used the SCID to ascertain depression status. We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate pooled percentage of EPDS-5 ≥7, pooled SCID major depression prevalence, and the pooled difference in prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 3,958 participants from 19 primary studies were included. Pooled prevalence of SCID major depression was 9.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0% to 13.7%), pooled percentage of participants with EPDS-5 ≥7 was 16.2% (95% CI 10.7% to 23.8%), and pooled difference was 8.0% (95% CI 2.9% to 13.2%). In the 19 included studies, mean and median ratios of EPDS-5 to SCID prevalence were 2.1 and 1.4 times. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence estimated based on EPDS-5 ≥7 appears to be substantially higher than the prevalence of major depression. Validated diagnostic interviews should be used to establish prevalence.
Asunto(s)
Depresión Posparto/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/psicología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Madres/psicología , Canadá/epidemiología , Depresión Posparto/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración PsiquiátricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are prevalent during pregnancy, affecting 10% of women worldwide. To improve triage of a broad spectrum of mental disorders, we investigated the decision impact validity of: 1) a short set of currently used psychiatric triage items, 2) this set with the inclusion of some more specific psychiatric items (intermediate set), 3) this new set with the addition of the 10-item Edinburgh Depression Scale (extended set), and 4) the final set with the addition of common psychosocial co-predictors (comprehensive set). METHODS: This was a validation study including 330 urban pregnant women. Women completed a questionnaire including 20 psychiatric and 10 psychosocial items. Psychiatric diagnosis (gold standard) was obtained through Structured Clinical Interviews of DSM-IV axis I and II disorders (SCID-I and II). The outcome measure of our analysis was presence (yes/no) of any current mental disorder. The performance of the short, intermediate, extended, and comprehensive triage models was evaluated by multiple logistic regression analysis, by analysis of the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and through associated performance measures, including, for example, sensitivity, specificity and the number of missed cases. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance of the short triage model (1) was acceptable (Nagelkerke's R(2)=0.276, AUC=0.740, 48 out of 131 cases were missed). The intermediate model (2) performed better (R(2)=0.547, AUC=0.883, 22 cases were missed) including the five items: ever experienced a traumatic event, ever had feelings of a depressed mood, ever had a panic attack, current psychiatric symptoms and current severe depressive or anxious symptoms. Addition of the 10-item Edinburgh Depression Scale or the three psychosocial items unplanned pregnancy, alcohol consumption and sexual/physical abuse (models 3 and 4) further increased R(2) and AUC (>0.900), with 23 cases missed. Missed cases included pregnant women with a current eating disorder, psychotic disorder and the first onset of anxiety disorders. CONCLUSIONS: For a valid detection of the full spectrum of common mental disorders during pregnancy, at least the intermediate set of five psychiatric items should be implemented in routine obstetric care. For a brief yet comprehensive triage, three high impact psychosocial items should be added as independent contributors.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Triaje/métodos , Adulto , Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas/psicología , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Área Bajo la Curva , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/psicología , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Embarazo no Planeado/psicología , Trauma Psicológico/diagnóstico , Trauma Psicológico/psicología , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/psicología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Delitos Sexuales/psicologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Antenatal screening for depressive/anxiety symptoms could be biased by worries surrounding the first ultrasound (US). Therefore, we examined the potential influence of worries surrounding the first US on systematic screening for depressive/anxiety symptoms during pregnancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained data from 573 women screened consecutively in midwifery practices and hospitals in the Netherlands. Data included the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), having had an US, and its perceived influence on women's worries. RESULTS: In total, 18% had EDS scores ≥10 (n = 105). Among 392 women who underwent an US, currently existing worries, introduced or unaltered by the US, predicted depressive/anxiety symptoms (aOR: 3.41, P < 0.001). Among 181 women who did not undergo an US, expected continuation of existing worries after the US predicted depressive/anxiety symptoms (aOR: 18.84, P = 0.046), in contrast to worries which were expected to subside. DISCUSSION: In our cohort, depressive and/or anxiety symptoms were not associated with transient worries, reduced by a first US, suggesting no bias. If true, antenatal screening for anxiety/depressive symptoms should not depend on the timing of this US examination.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Madres/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/psicología , Adulto , Ansiedad/etiología , Sesgo , Depresión/etiología , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico por imagen , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Urban residence contributes to disparities in preterm birth (PTB) and birth weight. As urban and rural pregnant populations differ in individual psychopathological, psychosocial and substance use (PPS) risks, we examined the extent to which PTB and birth weight depend on the (accumulative) effect of PPS risk factors and on demographic variation. METHODS: Follow-up study from 2010 to 2012 among 689 urban and 348 rural pregnant women. Urbanity was based on the population density per ZIP code. Women completed the validated Mind2Care instrument questionnaire, which includes the Edinburgh Depression Scale, and demographic, obstetric and PPS questions. Pregnancy outcomes were extracted from medical records. With regression analyses we assessed crude and adjusted associations between residence and birth outcomes, adjusted for available confounding or mediating factors. RESULTS: PTB was significantly associated with segregation, maternal age (<25 and ≥ 35 years old), primiparity, smoking during pregnancy and the accumulation of risks, but not with residence (urban, 4%; rural, 7%; P = 0.16). Mean birth weight was significantly lower for urban babies (crude ß: -174; P < 0.001). Adjusting for potential confounders and mediators, non-Western ethnicity, parity and smoking during pregnancy significantly decreased birth weight besides residence. The accumulative effect of PPS risk factors significantly decreased birth weight (ß: -58 g per risk factor; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PTB was not associated with residence. The lower birth weight of urban babies remains significant after adjusting for urban risks, such as non-Western ethnicity and the PPS risk factor smoking. The accumulation of multiple (moderate) PPS risks accounts partly for the urban effect.
Asunto(s)
Peso al Nacer , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Madres/psicología , Nacimiento Prematuro , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Edad Materna , Paridad , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Población Rural , Fumar/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
To identify Psychopathology, Psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) as predictors of adverse pregnancy outcomes, two screen-and-advice instruments were developed: Mind2Care (M2C, self-report) and Rotterdam Reproductive Risk Reduction (R4U, professional's checklist). To decide on the best clinical approach of these risks, the performance of both instruments was compared. Observational study of 164 pregnant women who booked at two midwifery practices in Rotterdam. Women were consecutively screened with M2C and R4U. For referral to tailored care based on specific PPS risks, inter-test agreement of single risks was performed in terms of overall accuracy and positive accuracy (risk present according to both instruments). With univariate regression analysis we explored determinants of poor agreement (<90 %). For triage based on risk accumulation and for detecting women-at-risk for adverse birth outcomes, M2C and R4U sum scores were compared. Overall accuracy of single risks was high (mean 93 %). Positive accuracy was lower (mean 46 %) with poorest accuracy for current psychiatric symptoms. Educational level and ethnicity partly explained poor accuracy (p < 0.05). Overall low PPS prevalence decreased the statistical power. For triage, M2C and R4U sum scores were interchangeable from sum scores of five or more (difference <1 %). The probability of adverse birth outcomes similarly increased with risk accumulation for both instruments, identifying 55-75 % of women-at-risk. The self-report M2C and the professional's R4U checklist seem interchangeable for triage of women-at-risk for PPS or adverse birth outcomes. However, the instruments seem to provide complementary information if used as a guidance to tailored risk-specific care.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Resultado del Embarazo/etnología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional , Estudios Longitudinales , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etnología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Mujeres Embarazadas/etnología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etnología , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Autoinforme , Factores Socioeconómicos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Triaje/métodosRESUMEN
AIM: To demonstrate the results of routine screening and treatment for psychiatric problems, psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) among pregnant women in the Netherlands. This approach is advocated by the national program 'The first 1000 days', which focuses on a healthy start for (unborn) children in vulnerable situations. DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of a routine care dataset obtained from midwifery practices and hospitals throughout the Netherlands. All practices and hospitals applied systematic screening with Mind2Care. METHOD: Each Mind2Care screening results in either a negative result (no risk), an alert and/or a treatment advice based on local care pathways. Anonymous data on detected risk factors and subsequent alerts/advices from 22.141 pregnant women were analyzed. RESULTS: Of all women, 24% had at least one PPS risk factor. Accumulation of risks was present in 10% of women. Thirty-one percent of all pregnant women received at least one specific advice (15% alerts, 24% treatment advices, including overlap). CONCLUSION: One in four pregnant women has psychiatric problems, psychosocial problems and/or substance use for which guideline care is available. Implementation of Mind2Care is demanding to the obstetrical system, and requires multidisciplinary care processes of medical and social caregivers. Despite the lack of a scientific evidence on the added value of systematic detection and treatment of PPS-risks in all pregnancies, this programmatic approach is increasingly acknowledged on the national attention level as the way forward to a healthy start for every child, even if born under vulnerable conditions.
Asunto(s)
Partería , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/prevención & control , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: depressive symptoms during pregnancy are associated with preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA). Depressive symptoms and PTB and SGA, however, share similar demographic and psychosocial risk factors. Therefore, we investigated whether depressive symptomatology is an independent risk factor, or a mediator in the pathway of demographic and psychosocial risks to PTB and SGA. DESIGN: multicentre follow-up study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: pregnant women (n=1013) from midwifery practices, secondary hospitals and a tertiary hospital in three urban areas in the Netherlands. MEASUREMENTS: initial risk factors and depressive symptoms were assessed with the Mind2Care instrument, including Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) during early pregnancy. Pregnancy outcomes were extracted from medical records. A formal mediation analysis was conducted to investigate the role of depressive symptoms in the pathway to PTB and SGA. FINDINGS: a univariate association between depressive symptoms and PTB (OR:1.04; 95% CI:1.00-1.08) was observed. After adjusting for the risk factors educational level and smoking in the mediation analysis, this association disappeared. One educational aspect remained associated: low education OR: 1.06; 95%-CI:1.02-1.10. KEY CONCLUSIONS: depressive symptomatology appeared no mediator in the pathway of demographic and psychosocial risks to PTB or SGA. The presumed association between depressive symptoms and PTB seems spurious and may be explained by demographic and psychosocial risk factors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: for the prevention of PTB and SGA, interventions directed at demographic and psychosocial risk factors are likely to be of primary concern for clinicians and public health initiatives. As depressive symptoms and PTB and SGA share similar risk factors, both will profit.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/etiología , Conducta Materna/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido Pequeño para la Edad Gestacional/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Embarazo , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Psychopathology, psychosocial problems and substance use (PPS) commonly occur in pregnant women, and can have a negative impact on the course of pregnancy and the healthy development of the child. As PPS often remains undetected and untreated during pregnancy, we developed and implemented a four-step screen-and-treat protocol in routine obstetric care, with: (i) screening including triage and subsequent confirmation, (ii) indication assessment, (iii) transfer towards care and (iv) utilization of care. Adherence to the protocol and risk factors associated with dropout were examined for 236 Dutch pregnant women in a deprived urban area. Seventy-nine percent of women accepted the screening, 21% dropped out during triage, 15% during confirmation, 3% during transfer and 8% thereafter. Provided reasons for dropout were lack of time and lack of perceived benefit. In particular, smokers, multiparous women, and women of non-Western ethnicity dropout on the way towards mental and psychosocial care. For a successful implementation of the protocol in the future, with improved adherence of pregnant women to the protocol, education of women on PPS risks, motivational skills and compulsory treatment are worth investigation.
Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo , Servicios de Salud Materna/métodos , Complicaciones del Embarazo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Protocolos Clínicos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Países Bajos , Cooperación del Paciente/etnología , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/educación , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/psicología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/organización & administración , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/psicología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/terapia , Mujeres Embarazadas , Psicología/educación , Psicología/métodos , Psicopatología , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Increased adverse pregnancy outcomes related to psychiatric and psychosocial problems can be observed for urban areas when compared to national averages. We developed a personal digital assistant (PDA)-based self-report screening model that produces tailored intervention advices. After having adapted the model to local care pathways, we tested the reliability, validity and feasibility of the model in routine antenatal care. METHODS: Observational study among pregnant women in a Dutch urban area included women with a booking visit. Women answered questions posed by the PDA-tool while waiting for their appointment. If the tool suggested specific interventions (screen result), this was discussed during booking visit. A randomly selected subsample of participants completed the questionnaire again at a subsequent pregnancy check (retest). After the study was conducted, prenatal caregivers and assistants were interviewed for feasibility judgments. Psychometric and diagnostic performance of this approach was established. RESULTS: Response rate among invited pregnant women was 94% on weighted average (n=621). Internal reliability ranged 0.88-0.90, test-retest reliability ranged 0.64-1.00. Positive predictive value was 86% and negative predictive value was 97%. No interpractice psychometrical differences were observed. Migrant women more often received an intervention advice than native women (p<0.001). The approach was well accepted among prenatal caregivers for its time efficiency and patient-friendliness. CONCLUSION: Psychometric properties of our screen-and-advice tool were favorable under routine conditions, and the feasibility of this integral approach appeared good. The technical flexibility renders the model suitable for broader application. Local care pathways can easily be incorporated. We suggest implementation of this model in prenatal care in urbanized settings in order to make tailored mental healthcare broadly available.