RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recommendations for pharmacological treatments of major depression with specific comorbid psychiatric conditions are lacking. METHOD: The French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental developed expert consensus guidelines for the management of depression based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriatneness Method. Recommendations for lines of treatment are provided by the scientific committee after data analysis and interpretation of the results of a survey of 36 psychiatrist experts in the field of major depression and its treatments. RESULTS: The expert guidelines combine scientific evidence and expert clinician's opinion to produce recommendations for major depression with comorbid anxiety disorders, personality disorders or substance use disorders and in geriatric depression. CONCLUSION: These guidelines provide direction addressing common clinical dilemmas that arise in the pharmacologic treatment of major depression with comorbid psychiatric conditions.
Asunto(s)
Psiquiatría Biológica/normas , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Testimonio de Experto/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Psiquiatría/normas , Psicofarmacología/normas , Anciano , Trastornos de Ansiedad/epidemiología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Psiquiatría Biológica/métodos , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Testimonio de Experto/métodos , Femenino , Fundaciones/normas , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Personalidad/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/psicología , Trastornos de la Personalidad/terapia , Psicofarmacología/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clear guidance for successive antidepressant pharmacological treatments for non-responders in major depression is not well established. METHOD: Based on the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, the French Association for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology and the fondation FondaMental developed expert consensus guidelines for the management of treatment-resistant depression. The expert guidelines combine scientific evidence and expert clinicians' opinions to produce recommendations for treatment-resistant depression. A written survey comprising 118 questions related to highly-detailed clinical presentations was completed on a risk-benefit scale ranging from 0 to 9 by 36 psychiatrist experts in the field of major depression and its treatments. Key-recommendations are provided by the scientific committee after data analysis and interpretation of the results of the survey. RESULTS: The scope of these guidelines encompasses the assessment of pharmacological resistance and situations at risk of resistance, as well as the pharmacological and psychological strategies in major depression. CONCLUSION: The expert consensus guidelines will contribute to facilitate treatment decisions for clinicians involved in the daily assessment and management of treatment-resistant depression across a number of common and complex clinical situations.