RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the relationship of new eosinophilic folliculitis (EF) cases between June 30, 1994, and January 5, 2000, and antiretroviral therapy (ART) status and immune reconstitution. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Dermatology clinics at a county hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty-seven consecutive subjects with biopsy-proved EF from the pathology database. Subject groups were as follows: naïve to ART, receiving ART without protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and receiving ART containing protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Onset of EF, CD4 cell count and nadir at EF onset, and time of ART initiation. RESULTS: Among the 3 groups previously described, mean CD4 cell counts (86.26/microL vs 113.82/microL vs 145.65/microL, respectively [Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, P = .15]) and nadir (68.43/microL vs 66.18/microL vs 64.17/microL, respectively [Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test, P = .41]) at EF diagnosis were not statistically different. Fifty-two subjects (91%), regardless of treatment group, had a nadir below 200/microL. Of the subjects undergoing ART, 28 (82%) developed EF within 6 months of initiating ART; their average CD4 cell count increase was 108/microL. Of the 23 subjects receiving protease inhibitor/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-containing ART regimens, 17 (74%) were diagnosed as having EF within 3 months, with 4 additional subjects diagnosed as having EF within 6 months (a total of 21 [91%] of the 23 subjects). This is not significantly different from the 7 (64%) of 11 subjects diagnosed as having EF at 3 and 6 months of starting ART without protease inhibitors/nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (P = .07) (odds ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows an association between low nadir (66.28/microL) and low CD4 cell count (115.54/microL) and the development of EF, regardless of subjects' ART status. However, most subjects receiving ART were diagnosed as having EF within 3 to 6 months of ART initiation, regardless of the regimen.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirretrovirales/efectos adversos , Eosinofilia/inducido químicamente , Foliculitis/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/patología , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Estudios de Cohortes , Eosinofilia/patología , Femenino , Foliculitis/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Empirical use of beta-lactam antibiotics, the preferred agents for treating uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections, may no longer be appropriate for these infections because of the increasing prevalence of community strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Retrospective studies, however, suggest that outcomes are good even when beta-lactams are used. We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of 166 outpatient subjects comparing placebo to cephalexin at 500 mg orally four times for 7 days after incision and drainage of skin and soft tissue abscesses. The primary outcome was clinical cure or failure 7 days after incision and drainage. S. aureus was isolated from 70.4% of abscess cultures. Of the isolates tested 87.8% were MRSA, 93% of which were positive for Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes. Clinical cure rates were 90.5% (95% confidence interval, 0.82 to 0.96) in the 84 placebo recipients and 84.1% (95% confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.91) in the 82 cephalexin recipients (difference in the two proportions, 0.0006; 95% confidence interval, -0.0461 to 0.0472; P = 0.25). The 90.5% cure rate observed in the placebo arm and 84.1% cure rate observed in the cephalexin arm provide strong evidence that antibiotics may be unnecessary after surgical drainage of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue abscesses caused by community strains of MRSA.