One-Year Clinical Outcomes With SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: In the initial PARTNER trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for high-risk (HR) and inoperable patients, mortality at 1 year was 24% in HR and 31% in inoperable patients. A recent report of the 30-day outcomes with the low-profile SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve replacement system demonstrated very low rates of adverse events, but little is known about the longer-term outcomes with this device. METHODS: Between October 2013 and September 2014, 583 HR (65%) or inoperable (35%) patients were treated via the transfemoral (84%) or transapical/transaortic (16%) access route at 29 US sites. Major clinical events at 1 year were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee, and echocardiographic results were analyzed by a core laboratory. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics included age of 83 years, 42% female, and median Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.4%. At the 1-year follow-up, survival (all-cause) was 85.6% for all patients, 87.3% in the HR subgroup, and 82.3% in the inoperable subgroup. Survival free of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the transfemoral patients from the HR cohort was 87.7% and 93.3%, respectively. There was no severe paravalvular leak. Moderate paravalvular leak (2.7%) was associated with an increase in mortality at 1 year, whereas mild paravalvular leak had no significant association with mortality. Symptomatic improvement as assessed by the percentage of patients in New York Heart Association class III and IV (90.1% to 7.7% at 1 year; P<0.0001) and by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (improved from 46.9 to 72.4; P<0.0001) was marked. Multivariable predictors of 1-year mortality included alternative access, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and disabling stroke. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, adjudicated registry of SAPIEN 3 HR and inoperable patients, the very low rates of important complications resulted in a strikingly low mortality rate at 1 year. Between 30 and 365 days, the incidence of moderate paravalvular aortic regurgitation did not increase, and no association between mild paravalvular leak and 1-year mortality was observed, although a small increase in disabling stroke occurred. These results, which likely reflect device iteration and procedural evolution, support the use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement as the preferred therapy in HR and inoperable patients with aortic stenosis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01314313.

A Novel Technique for Performing Transfemoral Transcatheter Self-Expanding Aortic Valve Replacement With No Contrast Which Minimizes Acute Kidney Injury.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) treats severe aortic stenosis. However, patients with limited renal function may be ineligible for contrast use during valve deployment. We evaluate TAVR via transfemoral approach using 2-wire technique and no contrast injection. Primary endpoints are acute kidney injury and procedural success. Safety analysis includes mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, coronary obstruction, and more. Forty-six patients were included; most with preserved ejection fraction. Baseline creatinine was 1.63 ± 0.68 and post-TAVR was significantly better (1.47 ± 0.64, P < 0.01). No statistical difference existed between creatinine at baseline and 30 days. After TAVR, 91% had no paravalvular leak (PVL). Peak-velocity post-TAVR was 1.32 ± 0.33 and mean-gradient was 7 ± 4. No valve repositioning during deployment was required. No mortality at 30 days without incidence of stroke, myocardial infarction or coronary obstruction. One patient had retroperitoneal bleeding requiring transfusion. The noncontrast technique for self-expanding valve deployment is feasible and safe in patients who cannot tolerate contrast.

Catheter-based therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a national unmet need.

Early reperfusion therapy for acute stroke, similar to acute myocardial infarction, has the best opportunity to reduce morbidity and mortality. Treatment options include intravenous (IV) thrombolysis therapy and/or catheter-based therapy (CBT). Catheter-based therapies include local intra-arterial thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and angioplasty techniques. Intravenous thrombolysis is limited to the first three hours after symptom onset, which excludes many patients with disabling stroke deficits. Catheter-based therapy is effective up to seven hours after onset, but availability is limited by the lack of neurointerventionalists available around the clock to provide this care. To increase the number of providers for acute stroke reperfusion therapy, we have formed a multidisciplinary team to take advantage of cardiologists' carotid stent placement experience to provide continuous coverage for emergency reperfusion therapy. We present two cases of acute stroke treated with CBT by interventional cardiologists.

Intravascular gamma radiation for in-stent restenosis in saphenous-vein bypass grafts.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary radiation therapy is effective in reducing the recurrence of in-stent stenosis in native coronary arteries. We examined the effects of intravascular gamma radiation in patients with in-stent restenosis of saphenous-vein bypass grafts. METHODS: A total of 120 patients with in-stent restenosis in saphenous-vein grafts, the majority of whom had diffuse lesions, underwent balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, additional stenting, or a combination of these procedures. If the intervention was successful, the patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to intravascular treatment with a ribbon containing either iridium-192 or nonradioactive seeds. The prescribed dose, delivered at a distance of 2 mm from the source, was 14 to 15 Gy in vessels that were 2.5 to 4.0 mm in diameter and 18 Gy in vessels with a diameter that exceeded 4.0 mm. The primary end points were death from cardiac causes, Q-wave myocardial infarction, revascularization of the target vessel, and a composite of these events at 12 months. RESULTS: Revascularization and radiation therapy were successfully accomplished in all patients. At six months, the restenosis rate was lower in the 60 patients assigned to the iridium-192 group than in the 60 assigned to the placebo group (21 percent vs. 44 percent, P=0.005). At 12 months, the rate of revascularization of the target lesion was 70 percent lower in the iridium-192 group than in the placebo group (17 percent vs. 57 percent, P<0.001), and the rate of major cardiac events was 49 percent lower (32 percent vs. 63 percent, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study support the use of gamma-radiation therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis in patients with bypass grafts.

Three-year follow-up after intravascular gamma-radiation for in-stent restenosis in saphenous vein grafts.

The Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial in Saphenous Vein Grafts (SVG WRIST) demonstrated safety and efficacy of intravascular radiation therapy (IRT) for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) in SVG at 12 months. In this study, we aimed to examine whether the safety and efficacy of IRT is durable up to 36 months. One hundred twenty patients with diffuse ISR in SVG underwent balloon angioplasty, laser or atherectomy ablation, and/or additional stenting. After successful intervention, patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to intravascular treatment with a ribbon containing either iridium (Ir)-192 (n = 60) or nonradioactive seeds (n = 60). The prescribed dose at 2 mm from the source was either 14 or 15 Gy in vessels 2.5-4.0 mm or 18 Gy in vessels > 4.0 mm in diameter. At 36 months, target lesion revascularization (TLR; 43% vs. 66%; P = 0.02) and target lesion revascularization-major adverse cardiac event (TLR-MACE; 49% vs. 71%; P = 0.02) rates continued to be lower in the IRT group, but both target vessel revascularization (TVR; 59% vs. 71%; P = 0.17) and TVR-MACE (63% vs. 77%; P = 0.11) rates were not. In SVG WRIST, patients with ISR treated with IRT had a marked reduction in the need for repeat TLR at 36 months, with sustained clinical benefit at 3 years despite late recurrences, which were more pronounced in the radiation group.

Vascular brachytherapy in renal artery restenosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As renal artery stenting becomes more commonly performed, the prevalence of renal artery in-stent restenosis will increase. Intracoronary brachytherapy is the only adjuvant therapy that has been shown to reduce the incidence of recurrent restenosis. This review addresses the mechanisms that make brachytherapy an effective tool for restenosis and its application to renal arteries. RECENT FINDINGS: To date, the literature on renal artery brachytherapy for restenosis consists of several singular case reports and two case series. The first series of 13 patients had a 20% restenosis rate 1 year after brachytherapy, when Doppler ultrasound was used for follow-up monitoring. A report of a series of 5 patients, published this year, used surrogate markers for assessing efficacy as endpoints and found a similar restenosis rate. SUMMARY: These series and case reports demonstrate that renal brachytherapy is feasible and safe. Comments on efficacy must await a randomized trial or accumulation of more anecdotal data.

Rheolytic thrombectomy in the management of limb ischemia: 30-day results from a multicenter registry.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of rheolytic thrombectomy (RT) with the AngioJet catheter for treatment of lower extremity ischemia due to arterial/graft thrombotic occlusion. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter review was performed of 99 consecutive patients (52 men; mean age 67 +/- 13 years, range 30-90) who underwent RT for thrombotic occlusions in native arteries (n=80) or bypass grafts (n=19). Pre- and postprocedural limb ischemia and in-hospital events were evaluated. Amputation and mortality rates at 30 days were determined. RESULTS: The majority of patients (78.8%) presented within 14 days of symptom onset. RT resulted in substantial to complete thrombus removal in 70 (70.7%) patients and partial in 22 (22.2%); there was no angiographic change in 7 (7.1%). Adjunctive post RT thrombolysis was used in 37 patients. Underlying stenoses found in 81 limbs were treated with one or more of the following procedures: balloon angioplasty (n=62), stenting (n=35), or nonemergent surgical revision (n=5). In-hospital complications included 2 major amputations, 5 cases of minor tissue loss, 7 rethromboses, and 3 cases of transient renal insufficiency. Four (4.0% patients died in-hospital; the 95 surviving patients all had viable limbs at discharge. Mortality and amputation rates at 30 days were 7.1% and 4.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous treatment of thrombotic occlusions with RT, followed by definitive treatment of the underlying stenosis, is a promising therapeutic option for patients with limb-threatening ischemia.