Clinical Outcomes Following Urgent vs. Elective Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair.

AIM: To examine procedural and clinical outcomes among patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) within an admission for acute-decompensated heart failure (ADHF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective registry of all consecutive patients with symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) grade 3+ or 4+ who underwent PMVR our centre and classified in 2 groups: elective group and urgent PMVR group (within the index admission for ADHF). Echocardiographic, procedural and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. 85 patients (median age 77.0 [67.8-83.4] years, 64.7% male) were treated within the recruitment period. Among them, 17 (20%) underwent urgent MitraClip®. Urgent PMVR were at a higher risk for conventional surgery (p = 0.002) and had worse estimated prognosis according to HF risk scores (p < 0.001). Overall technical success was 100%, without differences between groups. At 30 days, no differences were found in mortality, MR reduction and in NYHA functional improvement between groups. Cumulative estimated survival free from all-cause death was 92.9% (82.4% vs. 95.6%), 89.4% (82.4% vs. 91.1%), 76.3% (82.4 vs. 74.9%) at 6 months, 1-year and 2-years, respectively, with no significant differences between urgent or elective PMVR (p = 0.769). CONCLUSION: MitraClip® implantation can be considered as an urgent therapy during admission for ADHF.

Incidence and prognostic implications of late bleeding events after percutaneous mitral valve repair.

OBJECTIVES: MitraClip is an established therapy for patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) that are considered of high-risk or inoperable. However, late bleeding events (BE) after hospital discharge and their impact on prognosis in this cohort of patients have been poorly investigated. Our purpose is to address the incidence, related factors and clinical implications of BE after hospital discharge in patients treated with MitraClip. METHODS: Prospective registry of all consecutive patients (n = 80) who underwent MitraClip implantation in our Institution between June 2014 and December 2017. BE were defined according to MVARC definitions. A combined clinical end-point including admission for heart failure (HF) and all-cause mortality was established to analyze prognostic implications of BE. RESULTS: During a median follow up of 523.5 days, 41 BE were reported in 21 patients. Atrial fibrillation (AF, HR 4.54, CI95% 1.20-17.10) and combined antithrombotic therapy at discharge (HR 3.52, CI95% 1.03-11.34) were independently associated with BE. In the study period, 15 (18.8%) patients died, 20 (25%) were admitted for HF and 29 (36.3%) presented the combined end-point. After multivariable adjustment BE remained independently associated with an adverse outcome (HR 3.80, CI 95% 1.66-8.72). In the subgroup of patients with AF, HAS-BLED score was higher among subjects with BE (3.1 ±â€¯1.3 vs 2.1 ±â€¯0.9, p = 0.003). HAS-BLED score had a significant discrimination power for the occurrence BE (AUC: 0.677 [0.507-0.848]) in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: BE are common after MitraClip and are associated with an impaired outcome. Strategies to reduce bleeding events are paramount in this cohort of patients.