A systematic review and meta-analysis on overall survival, failure-free survival and safety outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with new anti-androgens.

OBJECTIVE: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with new antiandrogens have shown to improve the outcomes of patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of these agents in this specific scenario. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials (RCT) were identified after systematic searching of databases. A random-effect model was used to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival according to the inverse-variance method. The Mantel-Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade 3 or higher. Heterogeneity was determined using the Tau 2 and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Seven trials were included in this meta-analysis ( n = 7544). The addition of ADT plus new-generation anti-androgens, specifically: abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide was associated with improved OS (pooled HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.71; P < 0.00001) with no significant heterogeneity detected among trials. (Tau 2 = 0; I2 = 0%; P = 0.88). Failure-free survival was significantly longer in the combination-therapy group than in the control group (pooled HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.39-0.47; P < 0.00001) This effect was consistent among trials (Tau 2 = 0; I2 = 27%; P = 0.22). The overall OR of AEs grade 3 or higher was significantly increased with the use of the combination therapy (pooled OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.13-1.74; P = 0.002), with significant heterogeneity among trials (Tau 2 = 0.07; I2 = 82%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The addition of either abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide to ADT improves OS and failure-free survival in hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer, albeit an increase in AEs.

Comparison among three predictive models for cancer-associated thromboembolism in a hispanic population.

In this study we aimed to evaluate and compare the overall performance of the Khorana, PROTECHT, and CONKO scores as predictive scores for the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory Hispanic patients with solid tumors. We included all outpatients with newly diagnosed solid tumors receiving systemic chemotherapy in Hospital San Juan Dios, San José, Costa Rica, from January to December 2021. For each patient the Khorana, PROTECHT, and CONKO scores were calculated at the beginning of treatment. The sixth-month cumulative incidence of VTE was estimated using the Fine & Gray competing risk model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the performance of each predictive tool through the analysis of the c-statistic, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 708 patients were included in the research. After a median follow-up of 8.13 months, the cumulative VTE incidence at six months was 4.45% (95%CI: 3.25-6.91%) for the overall population. At the conventional positivity threshold of 3 points, these scores classified from 17.7 to 32.5% of all patients as high-risk for VTE. Patients belonging to the high-risk category of the Khorana, PROTECHT, and CONKO scores had significantly higher risk of VTE in comparison to low-risk patients (Khorana score: Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.66; 95%CI:1.20-5.89; p = 0.042; PROTECHT score: HR: 3.44; 95%CI:1.63-7.21; p = 0.001; CONKO score HR: 3.68; 95%CI:1.72-7.85; p = 0.001). The c-statistic of the ROC curve was: 0.62 (95%CI: 0.52-0.72), 0.62 (95%CI: 0.52-0.73), and 0.65 (95%CI: 0.56-0.76) for the Khorana, PROTECHT, and CONKO scores, respectively; with similar sensitivity (range: 67-70%) and specificity (range: 52-62%) among them. For Hispanic patients with solid tumors the Khorana, PROTECHT, and CONKO scores accurately categorize their risk of VTE. However, the overall discriminatory performance of these models remains poor (c-statistic from 0.62 to 0.65) for predicting all patients at risk for thromboembolic events.

C677T and A1298C MTHFR gene polymorphisms and response to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in Mestizo patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between C677T and A1298C methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and response to first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A total of 68 patients were prospectively followed up in San Juan de Dios Hospital (San José, Costa Rica) from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients received first-line therapy with capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Germline and somatic DNA was extracted from blood samples and paraffin-embedded tissue, respectively. Overall response rate (partial response + complete response) was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Cox regression models were performed to identify the effect of MTHFR C677T and A1298C SNPs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (NCT registration number: 03852290). RESULTS: Patients harboring one or both T alleles of the MTHFR C677T SNP had better overall response than homozygous wild-type individuals [odds ratio (OR): 3.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05-9.81; P = 0.03]. No association was found between the MTHFR A1298C genotypes and overall response (OR: 0.75; 95% CI, 0.26-2.20; P = 0.60). Patients with the MTHFR 677 TT and CT genotypes had longer PFS than CC individuals (hazard ratio: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; P = 0.045), even after adjustment for confounders (hazard ratio: 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.98; P = 0.04). We found no association between the MTHFR A1298C SNP and PFS (hazard ratio: 1.35; 95% CI, 0.72-2.55; P = 0.34). None of the SNPs was associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Patients carrying at least one mutant allele of the MTHFR C677T SNP had a better overall response and longer PFS than wild-type homozygous patients.

Barriers to lung cancer referral, diagnosis, and treatment in Central America and the Caribbean: the health professionals' perspectives.

PURPOSE: To identify the perspectives from healthcare providers about the limitations in referral, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer (LC) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study through an Internet-based survey was addressed to physicians of multidisciplinary teams in charge of LC patients from Cuba, Curacao, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Panama, and Trinidad and Tobago. The questions focused on physicians' perspectives concerning waiting times and the availability of diagnostic and staging procedures in their settings, as well as the access to systemic therapies and continuous medical education (CME). RESULTS: A total of 152 physicians responded to the online questionnaire (response rate 24.9%). Delays in biopsy results were the main barrier for LC diagnosis as identified by 48.2% of the respondents, followed by patients not being referred in time (31.3%), delays for staging procedures (11.4%), and time taken for biopsy (9%). Almost one-half of physicians perceived that patients are diagnosed in advanced stages. A total of 29 respondent physicians (19.1%) reported limited access to immunohistochemical or genetic analysis for common mutations. Although 73 physicians (48.0%) confirmed that their centers provided radiotherapy and systemic therapy for their patients, immunotherapy was not available in the institutions of 30 physicians (19.7%). A total of 42 practitioners (27.6%) reported that they did not have access to CME on LC topics due to working or budget restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed among respondents the main barriers for an appropriate management of LC patients in the Central American and Caribbean Region. Further studies must validate these findings.

Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Monotherapy or in Combination With Nonbiologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Latin American Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) in Latin American patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response to previous csDMARDs. METHODS: ML28700 was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial. Previously treated RA patients who had not received treatment with TCZ or any biological agent (n = 284) and with a baseline Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) of 3.2 or greater were assigned to receive subcutaneous TCZ (162 mg/wk) in association with csDMARD for 24 weeks. Patients who achieved remission (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at week 24 continued with TCZ as monotherapy until week 52; otherwise, they continued with their assigned treatment. The primary efficacy end point was remission rate (DAS28-ESR <2.6) at weeks 24 and 52. Secondary objectives included disease activity scores, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: At week 24, a total of 169 patients (59.5%; 95% confidence interval, 53.5%-65.3%) achieved remission, 91 patients (32.0%) had low disease activity, and 46 patients (8.4%) were not responders. Sustained remission at week 52 was achieved by 80.8% (n = 126) of patients who continued with TCZ monotherapy versus 44.6% (n = 37) of those on combination therapy. A total of 241 patients (84.9%; 95% confidence interval, 80.2%-88.8%) had at least 1 adverse event during follow-up. Adverse events led to drug modification in 32 patients (11.3%) or discontinuation in 21 patients (7.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous TCZ is an efficacious therapy with long-lasting results and tolerable adverse events in Latin American patients with RA.Trial registration no.: NCT02011334 Tozura Study Program.

Latin American Consensus for the Evaluation and Treatment of Patients With Metastatic/Locally Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Urothelial cancer accounts for approximately 3% of new cancer cases worldwide, with a high burden of disease in countries with medium and low human development indexes where its incidence and mortality are increasing. The purpose of this consensus is to develop statements on the evaluation and treatment of locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma that would further guide the clinical practice in Latin America. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted by an independent team of methodologists. Then, a modified Delphi method was developed with clinical specialists from different Latin American countries. RESULTS: Forty-two consensus statements, based on evidence, were developed to address the staging, the evaluation (suitability for chemotherapy, risk assessment, and biomarkers), and systemic treatment (first-line and subsequent therapies) of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. The statements made in this consensus are suggested practice recommendations in the Latin American context; however, the importance of a complete and individualized patient evaluation as a guide for therapeutic selection is highlighted. The availability and affordability of support tools for the evaluation of the disease, as well as specific therapies, may limit the application of the best practices suggested. RECOMMENDATIONS: Therapeutic decisions need to be tailored to the context-specific clinical setting and availability of resources. Local research is promoted to improve outcomes for patients with this challenging cancer in Latin America.

Taxanes for the treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy: an international cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is considered standard of care in the treatment of breast cancer. However, there are insufficient data regarding the safety of taxanes during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of obstetric and neonatal adverse events associated with the use of taxane-containing chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of breast cancer during pregnancy. METHODS: This is a multicenter, international cohort study of breast cancer patients treated with taxanes during pregnancy. A descriptive analysis was undertaken to synthetize available data. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were included, most of whom were treated with paclitaxel and anthracyclines given in sequence during gestation (90.1%). The median gestational age at taxane initiation was 28 weeks (range = 12-37 weeks). Grade 3-4 adverse events were reported in 7 of 103 (6.8%) patients. The most common reported obstetric complications were intrauterine growth restriction (n = 8 of 94, 8.5%) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (n = 5 of 94, 5.3%). The live birth rate was 92 of 94 (97.9%), and the median gestational age at delivery was 37 weeks (range = 32-40 weeks). Admission to an intensive care unit was reported in 14 of 88 (15.9%) neonates, and 17 of 70 (24.3%) live births resulted in small for gestational age neonates. Congenital malformations were reported in 2 of 93 (2.2%). CONCLUSION: Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after taxane exposure during pregnancy were generally favorable and did not seem to differ from those reported in the literature with standard anthracycline-based regimens. This study supports the use of taxanes during gestation when clinically indicated.

Using the Khorana risk score to predict venous thromboembolism and overall survival in a cohort of Hispanic patients with solid malignancies.

Background: The Khorana risk score (KRS) for prognosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) has been rarely explored in Hispanic populations. Objective: To determine the value of the KRS for prediction of VTE and overall survival (OS) among Hispanic individuals with cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all outpatients with newly diagnosed solid tumours receiving systemic chemotherapy in Hospital San Juan Dios, San José, Costa Rica, from January to December 2021. The 6-month cumulative VTE incidence according to the KRS categories was estimated using the Fine & Gray competing risk model. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare OS among KRS categories. The Cox regression analysis was performed to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the optimal cutoff value to predict VTE during follow-up. Results: A total of 708 patients were included in the analysis. After a median follow-up of 8.13 months, the cumulative incidence of VTE at 6 months was 1.56% (95% CI: 0.83%-6.82%), 4.83% (95% CI: 2.81%-7.66%) and 8.84% (95% CI: 4.30%-15.42%) for low-, intermediate- and high-risk Khorana score categories, respectively (Gray's p value: 0.0178). The optimal cutoff for the KRS to predict VTE was 2 (area under the ROC curve: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.756). The KRS was independently associated with overall mortality (HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.46-2.29; p < 0.001, for the comparison of 'high-risk' and 'low-risk' KRS). Conclusions: The KRS is a valid tool to predict VTE and mortality in a cohort of Hispanic outpatients with newly diagnosed solid tumours.

BRAF Testing in Melanoma and Colorectal Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities.

The incidence of colorectal cancer in Argentina and Brazil has reached levels comparable to those in higher-income countries. Similarly, the incidence of melanoma in Latin America has increased during the past decades. BRAFmutation is seen frequently in melanomas and colorectal cancer. Discovering the expression of this specific biomarker in both cancers has unleashed the potential for targeted molecular therapies.In patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, adopting a combined targeted treatment approach has shown a dramatic increase in overall survival. However, several barriers impede the development of early BRAF testing in Latin America, jeopardizing the potential for personalized therapies and care. To address this, the Americas Health Foundation convened a virtual meeting of Latin American oncologists to address the barriers to BRAF testing in melanoma and colorectal cancer. During a three-day conference, expert oncologists used literature reviews and personal experience to detail the barriers to early BRAF testing in their region. They proposed actionable steps to overcome the barriers identified, which included deficiencies in knowledge, treatment options, equitable distribution, timely results, and local data on BRAF mutations. Oncologists proposed several actions to overcome barriers, including raising public and healthcare awareness about the importance of BRAF testing, expanding treatment options in clinics across the region, developing centers in underserved areas, and increasing affordable treatment options for patients who test positive for BRAF mutations.

Correction: BRAF Testing in Melanoma and Colorectal Cancer in Latin America: Challenges and Opportunities.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31972.].

Effectiveness of intravenous tocilizumab in routine clinical practice in a cohort of Costa Rican patients with rheumatoid arthritis. / Efectividad del tocilizumab intravenoso en la práctica clínica usual de una cohorte de pacientes costarricenses con artritis reumatoide.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and the incidence of severe adverse events in a cohort of Costa Rican patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) treated with intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out in 45 patients that were unresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study included patients who received IV TCZ every 4 weeks (4mg/kg) along with methotrexate or leflunomide. Effectiveness was measured through the incidence of clinical remission according to a disease activity score - erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) less than 2.6. Safety was assessed by the incidence rate of serious adverse events. An univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of potential variables with the probability of achieving remission during the first 3 months of TCZ therapy. RESULTS: During the 3rd month of TCZ therapy, a total of 22 patients (48.9%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 34.3-63.5%) achieved remission. The cumulative incidence of patients with remission at month 12 was 75.0% (n=34) (95% CI: 62.3-87.6%). A total of 18 patients (40%; 95% CI: 25.7-54.3%) were switched to a 8mg/kg dose due to the absence of remission. The incidence rate of serious adverse events was .98 per 100 patients/year, all of them due to infectious diseases with no fatal events reported. Only basal DAS28-ESR was associated with the probability of achieving remission at month 3. CONCLUSIONS: IV TCZ (4mg/kg) is an effective and safe treatment for RA patients in a clinical setting in Costa Rica.

Association of C677T and A1298C MTHFR Polymorphisms and Fluoropyrimidine-induced Toxicity in Mestizo Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Enzymatic variants involved in fluoropyrimidine metabolism have been associated with adverse events (AEs). We assessed the association between C677T (rs1801133) and A1298 (rs1801131) methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms and AEs in patients with first-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were prospectively followed-up during the first 4 cycles of fluoropyrimidine-based treatment to assess AEs. Germline DNA was analyzed to determine the C677T and A1298C MTHFR polymorphisms. The associations between MTHFR polymorphisms and toxicity were examined. RESULTS: Individuals carrying at least one mutant allele of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism had increased risk to experience anemia (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.13-2.53, p=0.005), neutropenia (OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.47-3.42, p<0.001) thrombocytopenia (OR=1.91, 95% CI=1.30-2.70, p<0.001), neuropathy (OR=1.77, 95% CI=1.16-2.70, p=0.02), diarrhea (OR=1.69, 95% CI=1.13-2.53, p=0.005), and hand-foot syndrome (OR=1.56, 95% CI=1.08-2.27, p=0.013), compared to patients carrying the wild type alleles. The presence of the mutant allele C of the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism was associated with increased risk of anemia (OR=2.75, 95% CI=1.01-7.48, p=0.02) and thrombocytopenia (OR=3.14, 95% CI=1.01-9.78, p=0.03); however, the prevalence of this allele in the sample was quite low (20%). CONCLUSION: MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms predicted toxicity in a subset of Mestizo patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Cyclin­dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in combination with fulvestrant for previously treated metastatic hormone receptor­positive breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta­analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety profile of the combination of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors and fulvestrant versus fulvestrant alone in previously treated patients with advanced hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. METHODS: Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were retrieved from a systematic review of electronic databases. A random-effect model was employed to determine the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) using the inverse-variance method. The Mantel Haenszel method was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for treatment-related side effects. Heterogeneity was measured using the tau-squared and I2 statistics. RESULTS: Three phase III RCTs (n = 1916) were included in the systematic review. Use of abemaciclib, palbociclib, or ribociclib in combination with fulvestrant was significantly associated with longer PFS compared to use of fulvestrant alone (HR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.47-0.60; p<0.00001), with no significant heterogeneity found among trials. Similarly, OS was significantly longer for patients who received combination therapy in comparison with those allocated to receive fulvestrant alone (HR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.67-0.89; p<0.0004). The overall odds ratio of serious adverse events (AE) was not significantly increased with the use of the combination therapy (OR: 1.51; 95%CI: 0.74-3.08), with significant heterogeneity found among trials (tau2=0.34; I2=86%; p = 0.0006). CONCLUSION: The addition of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (either abemaciclib, palbociclib, or ribociclib) to fulvestrant significantly improved PFS and OS in comparison with fulvestrant alone in patients previously treated with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. No significant heterogeneity was found among CDK 4/6 inhibitors.

Evaluation of pharmacological therapies used in Costa Rica in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death worldwide. Surgery is regarded as the best curative treatment option for gastric cancer; however, a high proportion of cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, when tumors are unresectable. In the present study, we evaluated the impact of pharmacological therapies in the survival of 168 patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from Costa Rica, a country with very high incidence and mortality rates for this malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 168 clinical records of patients diagnosed with metastatic gastric cancer from January 2009 to January 2012 at four major hospitals in Costa Rica. The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for comparison of frequencies, while the ANOVA test was used for comparison of quantitative variables. OS and PFS analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses were used to calculate the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 46.5 months, the median survival difference between the two groups (pharmacological therapy vs. supportive care) was 5.6 months for PFS and 8.3 months for OS. Patients receiving triple therapy had 69% higher chance of progression than those receiving double therapy (HR =1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.73). The probability of dying is 88% higher for the patients receiving triple therapy than for those using double therapy (HR =1.88, 95% CI: 1.15-3.11). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that pharmacological therapies significantly increase the PFS and OS of those patients with metastatic gastric cancer in Costa Rica. The greatest benefit in terms of survival is observed with the use of duplets in comparison with the triplets in these patients.

Time spent on erythropoietin stimulating agents administration in hemodialysis centers in Panama: a time and motion study.

Objectives: There is a lack of data in Panama on the potential differences in total healthcare professional (HCP) time between routine administrations of short-acting erythropoietin simulating agents (ESAs) (i.e. epoetin alfa) and continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (CERA) (i.e. methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta). This study aimed to quantify the HCP time associated with a single administration of epoetin alfa and CERA for the treatment of anemic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis. Methods: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional study, using a time-and-motion methodology. Costs related to HCP time and consumables usage associated with administration of epoetin alfa and CERA were estimated. Results: Based on 60 administrations of either CERA or epoetin alfa, the estimated savings in mean total active HCP time were 2.34 (95% confidence interval = 1.87-2.81) min (-30%) per administration. When extrapolating to a full year's treatment with intravenous ESA, it would require a total of 20.3 (95% CI = 19.90-20.71) h of HCP time for epoetin alfa vs 1.1 (95% CI = 1.01-1.19) h for CERA per patient per year. Estimated savings in active HCP time per patient per year were 19.20 (95% CI = 19.20-19.21) h (-95%). This, in turn, translates into staff cost efficiency that favors Mircera with an estimated annual saving of $78.24 (95% CI = 78.24-78.28) (-95%) per patient. Conclusions: Data from a real-world setting showed that the adoption of CERA could potentially lead to a reduction in active HCP time. Highlights Few comparative data have explored the costs and potential savings of using long-acting erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) instead of short-acting ESAs to treat anemia in CKD patients on hemodialysis. This time-and-motion study shows that use of CERA reduces total healthcare professional time and could represent a save for an institution in a real-world setting in Panama.

Predictors of overall survival after surgery in gastric cancer patients from a Latin-American country.

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is one of the major causes of cancer-related deaths in several Latin-American countries, including Costa Rica. However, determinants of poor outcomes are fairly unknown for patients from this region. The aim of this study was to determine prognostic variables of overall survival (OS) in a cohort of Hispanic patients after curative-intent surgery for gastric cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical records of 236 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for advanced gastric cancer at four major hospitals in Costa Rica. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional models were used to assess the influence of age, sex, clinical stage, adjuvant therapy, type of dissection (D1 vs. D2), extent of gastrectomy (partial vs. total), margin status (R0 vs. R1/2), tumour differentiation, and tumour location on OS. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 46.5 months, median OS was 47.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 34.7-60.4]. There was no survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR): 1.18; 95% CI: 0.70-2.00; P=0.53] or postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.71-1.52; P=0.85) compared to surgery alone. After adjustment for potential confounders, the R0 status was associated with better OS (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.92; P=0.03). Similarly, clinical stage (III vs. I) (HR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.39-4.29; P=0.001), poor differentiated (HR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.22-2.76; P=0.03) and undifferentiated tumours (HR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.39-4.23; P=0.001) were associated with worse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical margin status, clinical stage, and tumour differentiation were predictor variables for OS in this cohort of gastric cancer patients.