Cerebral Oximetry During Adult Cardiac Surgery Is Associated With Improved Postoperative Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association/effect of intraoperative cerebral oximetry (CeOx) on major organ morbidity and mortality (MOMM) after adult cardiac surgery. DESIGN: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study. SETTING: Patients treated at any hospital within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between July 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016, with a 30-day postoperative follow-up. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals ≥18 years old undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or valve repair or replacement, or any combination of procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative CeOx. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: MOMM includes operative mortality, stroke, renal failure, prolonged mechanical ventilation, deep sternal wound infection, or reoperation for any reason within 30 days. Of 1.19 million patients who met inclusion criteria within 1,180 facilities, ∼30% (n = 361,124) received CeOx versus nonrecipients (n = 838,675) with similar baseline patient characteristics. Using a propensity score-based 1:1 greedy matching method, 99.7% of CeOx recipients (n = 360,285) were matched with nonrecipients. The rates of MOMM were lower with versus without CeOx. The absolute risk reduction translated to a number needed to treat of 227 patients (95% CI: 166-363, p < 0.0001). In sensitivity analyses of prespecified subgroups, the benefit was strongest among patients undergoing aortic valve repair or replacement ± CABG (more than 7 fewer MOMM events per 1,000, p < 0.0001). However, intensive care unit stay >72 hours was higher with CeOx. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative cerebral oximetry is associated with less major organ morbidity and mortality after adult cardiac surgery. A large-scale clinical trial is warranted, given that desaturation is common and correctable.

Concomitant aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency and implantation of left ventricle mechanical support.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe aortic valve insufficiency (AI) in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a significant complication which occurs in up to 10.7% of patients in the INTERMACS database and has profound consequences for survival. Preoperative Impella use is associaed with greater post-LVAD AI. CASE PRESENTATION: 56 y/o Caucasian female with acute exacerbation of chronic congestive heart failure who needed urgent Impella placement followed by elective Heartmate III LVAD. CONCLUSION: Patients who have aortic valve regurgitation at the time of implantation have been handled by several methods, including aortic valve leaflets approximation, to aortic valve replacement or even valve closure. We report a case of geometric ring annuloplasty for repair of a regurgitant aortic valve during destination LVAD implantation.

Initial Application of a Bicuspid Aortic Annuloplasty Ring in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

Aortic stenosis and aortic insufficiency (AI) are common valvular conditions that may necessitate repair or replacement of the aortic valve. Aortic valve replacement is associated with higher long-term complications and thus, a consistent, reliable method of repair is needed. This is especially true in the pediatric population where lifelong anticoagulation and development of recurrent aortic stenosisor aortic insufficiency are especially problematic. The Hemispherical Aortic Annuloplasty Reconstruction Technology ring has been developed and used for annular stabilization in adults with success, though its efficacy in the pediatric population has yet to be demonstrated. Herein, we discuss the use of a geometric ring in aortic valve repair for the pediatric patient.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons voluntary public reporting initiative: the first 4 years.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate participant characteristics and outcomes during the first 4 years of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) public reporting program. BACKGROUND: This is the first detailed analysis of a national, voluntary, cardiac surgery public reporting program using STS clinical registry data and National Quality Forum-endorsed performance measures. METHODS: The distributions of risk-adjusted mortality rates, multidimensional composite performance scores, star ratings, and volumes for public reporting versus nonreporting sites were studied during 9 consecutive semiannual reporting periods (2010-2014). RESULTS: Among 8929 unique observations (∼1000 STS participant centers, 9 reporting periods), 916 sites (10.3%) were classified low performing, 6801 (76.2%) were average, and 1212 (13.6%) were high performing. STS public reporting participation varied from 22.2% to 46.3% over the 9 reporting periods. Risk-adjusted, patient-level mortality rates for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting were consistently lower in public reporting versus nonreporting sites (P value range: <0.001-0.0077). Reporting centers had higher composite performance scores and star ratings (23.2% high performing and 4.5% low performing vs 7.6% high performing and 13.8% low performing for nonreporting sites). STS public reporting sites had higher mean annualized coronary artery bypass grafting volumes than nonreporting sites (169 vs 145, P < 0.0001); high-performing programs had higher mean coronary artery bypass grafting volumes (n = 241) than average (n = 139) or low-performing (n = 153) sites. Risk factor prevalence (except reoperation) and expected mortality rates were generally stable during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: STS programs that voluntarily participate in public reporting have significantly higher volumes and performance. No evidence of risk aversion was found.

Concomitant Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines support concomitant management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. To assess real-world adoption and outcomes, this study evaluated Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with surgical ablation (SA) or left atrial appendage obliteration (LAAO) or both procedures in combination (SA + LAAO). METHODS: The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services inpatient claims database identified all patients with AF who underwent isolated CABG from 2018 to 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases-10th revision procedure codes defined covariates for doubly robust risk adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 19,524 patients with preoperative AF who underwent isolated CABG were stratified by SA + LAAO (3475 patients; 17.8%), LAAO only (4541 patients; 23.3%), or no AF treatment (11,508 patients; 58.9%). After doubly robust risk adjustment, longitudinal analysis highlighted that concomitant AF treatment with SA + LAAO (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; P = .049) or LAAO alone (HR, 0.75; P = . 031) was associated with a significant reduction in readmission for stroke at 3 years compared with no AF treatment. Furthermore, SA + LAAO (HR, 0.86; P = .016) but not LAAO alone (HR, 0.97; P = .573) was associated with improved survival compared with no AF treatment. Finally, SA + LAAO was associated with a superior composite outcome of freedom from stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone (HR, 0.86;, P = .033) or no AF treatment (HR, 0.81; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF who underwent isolated CABG, concomitant AF treatment was associated with reduced 3-year readmission for stroke. SA + LAAO was associated with superior reduction in stroke or death at 3 years compared with LAAO alone or no AF treatment.

Surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Recent approval of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients at low surgical risk has resulted in a rapid real-world expansion of TAVR in patients not otherwise examined in recent low-risk trials. We sought to evaluate the outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) versus TAVR in low-risk Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries undergoing isolated SAVR (n = 33,210) or TAVR (n = 77,885) (2018-2020). International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes were used to define variables and frailty was defined by the validated Kim index. Doubly robust risk adjustment was performed with inverse probability weighting and multilevel regression models, as well as competing-risk time to event analysis. A low-risk cohort was identified to simulate recent low-risk trials. RESULTS: A total of 15,749 low-risk patients (8144 SAVR and 7605 TAVR) were identified. Comparison was performed with doubly robust risk adjustment accounting for all factors. TAVR was associated with lower perioperative stroke (odds ratio, 0.62; P < .001) and hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.16; P < .001) compared with SAVR. However, risk-adjusted longitudinal analysis demonstrated TAVR was associated with higher late risk of stroke (hazard ratio, 1.65; P < .001), readmission for valve reintervention (hazard ratio, 1.88; P < .001), and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.54; P < .001) compared with SAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Among low-risk Medicare beneficiaries younger than age 75 years undergoing isolated AVR, SAVR was associated with higher index morbidity and mortality but improved 3-year risk-adjusted stroke, valve reintervention, and survival compared with TAVR.

Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite prospective randomized evidence supporting concomitant treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) during mitral valve (MV) surgery, variation in surgical management of AF remains. We sought to assess longitudinal outcomes following surgical treatment of persistent or paroxysmal AF during MV surgery in Medicare Beneficiaries. METHODS: All Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of AF undergoing MV surgery (2018-2020) were evaluated. Patients were stratified by no AF treatment versus Left Atrial Appendage Obliteration (LAAO) alone versus LAAO and Surgical Ablation (SA+LAAO). Doubly robust risk-adjustment and subgroup analysis by persistent or paroxysmal AF were performed. RESULTS: A total of 7,517 patients with preoperative AF underwent MV surgery (32.1% no AF treatment, 23.1% LAAO alone, 44.7% SA+LAAO). After doubly robust risk-adjustment, AF treatment with SA+LAAO or LAAO alone was associated with lower 3-year readmission for stroke or bleeding. However, SA+LAAO was associated with reduced 3-year mortality, and readmission for AF or heart failure, compared to no AF treatment or LAAO alone. Compared to no AF treatment or LAAO alone, SA+LAAO was associated with lower composite endpoint of stroke or death at 3 years (HR 0.75 and HR 0.83, respectively). Subgroup analysis identified similar longitudinal benefits of SA+LAAO in patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF. CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF undergoing MV surgery, SA+LAAO was associated with improved longitudinal outcomes compared to LAAO alone or no AF treatment in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. These contemporary real-world data further clarify the benefit of SA+LAAO during mitral valve surgery across all types of AF.

Atrial Fibrillation Management During Surgical vs Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Societal guidelines support atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment during surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Recently, many patients with AF at low to intermediate risk are managed by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Therefore, we evaluated longitudinal outcomes in these populations. METHODS: The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database was evaluated for all beneficiaries with AF undergoing TAVR or SAVR with/without AF treatment (2018-2020). Treatment of AF included concomitant left atrial appendage obliteration, with/without surgical ablation, or endovascular appendage occlusion and/or catheter ablation at any time. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes defined procedures with doubly robust risk adjustment across each group. RESULTS: A total of 24,902 patients were evaluated (17,453 TAVR; 7,449 SAVR). Of patients undergoing SAVR, 3176 (42.6%) underwent AF treatment (SAVR+AF). Only 656 TAVR patients (4.5%) received AF treatment. Comparing well-balanced SAVR+AF vs SAVR vs TAVR, there were no differences in the in-hospital incidence of renal failure, bleeding, or stroke, but increased pacemaker requirement (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; P < .0001) and vascular injury (OR, 9.09; P < .0001) were noted in TAVR and higher hospital mortality (OR, 4.02; P < .0001) in SAVR+AF. SAVR+AF was associated with lower readmission for stroke compared with SAVR alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; P = .029) and TAVR (HR, 0.68; P < .0001) and with improved survival vs TAVR (HR, 0.79; P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with AF requiring aortic valve replacement, SAVR+AF was associated with improved longitudinal survival and freedom from stroke compared with TAVR. SAVR+AF treatment should be considered first-line therapy for patients with AF requiring aortic valve replacement.

Techniques of autologous pericardial leaflet replacement for bicuspid aortic valve endocarditis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Valvular endocarditis constitutes high-risk cardiac surgery, with worse early and late results than for other disorders. Current data suggest that repairing endocarditis valves may produce better outcomes, but bicuspid endocarditis has been difficult to repair. Given the excellent early and late results now being achieved with autologous pericardial leaflet replacement, the present study involved complete pericardial leaflet replacement, a procedure that could facilitate the autologous reconstruction of bicuspid valves. METHODS: Four patients with endocarditis of bicuspid valves, each exhibiting variations in anatomy and presentation, were included. All four patients had received antibiotics preoperatively and had been converted to culture-negative. All had infection of the fused leaflet, and three had retention of their normal non-fused leaflets for the repair. Using glutaraldehyde-fixed autologous pericardium, all damaged leaflets were fully replaced, employing bileaflet repairs in three patients and a trileaflet repair in one patient. One patient required both bicuspid leaflets to be replaced with two autologous pericardial leaflets because of concurrent calcification. RESULTS: All four patients recovered uneventfully, and had fully competent valves with minimal gradients. All were subsequently managed without anticoagulation, and during up to two years of follow up the reconstructed valves functioned normally. None of the patients experienced any valve-related complications. CONCLUSION: In an anatomic spectrum of bicuspid endocarditis, the preservation of normal leaflets and complete replacement of damaged leaflets with autologous pericardium has provided an excellent reparative solution. This method could allow a stable autologous reconstruction in the majority of patients, although more experience and follow up will be necessary to fully validate the procedure.

Risk-adjusted survival after tissue versus mechanical aortic valve replacement: a 23-year assessment.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Detailed analyses of risk-adjusted outcomes after mitral valve surgery have documented significant survival decrements with tissue valves at any age. Several recent studies of prosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR) also have suggested a poorer performance of tissue valves, although analyses have been limited to small matched series. The study aim was to test the hypothesis that AVR with tissue valves is associated with a lower risk-adjusted survival, as compared to mechanical valves. METHODS: Between 1986 and 2009, primary isolated AVR, with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), was performed with currently available valve types in 2148 patients (1108 tissue valves, 1040 mechanical). Patients were selected for tissue valves to be used primarily in the elderly. Baseline and operative characteristics were documented prospectively with a consistent variable set over the entire 23-year period. Follow up was obtained with mailed questionnaires, supplemented by National Death Index searches. The average time to death or follow up was seven years, and follow up for survival was 96.2% complete. Risk-adjusted survival characteristics for the two groups were evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model with stepwise selection of candidate variables. RESULTS: Differences in baseline characteristics between groups were (tissue versus mechanical): median age 73 versus 61 years; non-elective surgery 32% versus 28%; CABG 45% versus 35%; median ejection fraction 55% versus 55%; renal failure 6% versus 1%; diabetes 18% versus 7% (p<0.01). Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly lower with tissue than mechanical valves; however, after risk adjustment for the adverse profiles of tissue valve patients, no significant difference was observed in survival after tissue or mechanical AVR. Thus, the hypothesis did not hold, and risk-adjusted survival was equivalent, of course qualified by the fact that selection bias was evident. CONCLUSION: With selection criteria that employed tissue AVR more frequently in elderly patients, tissue and mechanical valves achieved similar survival characteristics across the spectrum of patient risk. Further studies of the relative outcomes of mechanical versus tissue valves across the spectrum of patient age seem indicated.

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is associated with improved survival compared with appendage obliteration alone: An analysis of 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE: Societal guidelines support the concomitant surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Recent evidence has highlighted the stroke reduction of left atrial appendage obliteration with or without surgical ablation in similar populations. To inform clinical decision-making, we evaluated real-world outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery by comparing no atrial fibrillation management with left atrial appendage obliteration alone versus surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration. METHODS: By using the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or mitral/aortic/tricuspid valve repair or replacement between January 2018 and December 2020. Diagnosis-related group and International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision procedure codes were used to define variables. Risk adjustment was performed with regression analysis using inverse probability weighting of propensity scores and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses stratified patients by primary operation and paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: A total of 103,382 patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation were stratified by surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (10,437; 10.1%), left atrial appendage obliteration alone (12,901; 12.5%), or no atrial fibrillation management (80,044; 77.4%). Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (21,076; 20.4%) received the highest proportion of surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (4661 19.4%) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (3%724%; 15.4%) versus no atrial fibrillation management (15,688; 65.2%). Likewise, patients undergoing open atrial operations (mitral/tricuspid; 17,204; 16.6%) had higher proportions of atrial fibrillation treatment (surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration 5267 30.6%; left atrial appendage obliteration alone 4259 24.8%; no atrial fibrillation management 7678 44.6%). After robust risk adjustment, surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was independently associated with reduced 3-year mortality compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment (hazard ratio, 0.68, P < .001) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P < .001). Compared with no atrial fibrillation treatment, readmissions for embolic stroke were lower with both surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration (hazard ratio, 0.77, P = .009) and left atrial appendage obliteration alone (hazard ratio, 0.73, P < .001). Reduction in 3-year composite mortality or stroke after surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration was superior to left atrial appendage alone (hazard ratio, 0.90, P = .035). CONCLUSIONS: In Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery, the surgical management of atrial fibrillation was associated with lower 3-year mortality and readmission for stroke, with surgical ablation + left atrial appendage obliteration being associated with higher survival compared with left atrial appendage obliteration alone.

Robotic-assisted cryothermic Cox maze for persistent atrial fibrillation: Longitudinal follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is recommended as a stand-alone therapy for patients refractory to medical or catheter-based treatment, or as a concomitant therapy when associated with structural disease. We report a single-therapy robotic approach to the Cox maze with longitudinal follow-up. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent robotic biatrial cryothermic Cox maze for nonparoxysmal AF between November 2016 and January 2022 were examined at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia was assessed with 24-hour continuous electrocardiogram or pacemaker interrogation in all patients after 6 months. Mean follow-up was 17 ± 14.5 months (range, 1-60 months). Time to event analysis with competing risks was used to determine risk-adjusted associations with late outcomes. RESULTS: Patients (n = 135) had a median AF duration of 4.0 years (interquartile range, 0.8-7.0), with 29.6% in whom 1 or more catheter ablations had failed. Stand-alone maze was performed in 25.2%, whereas 61.4% underwent concomitant robotic mitral valve surgery, 7.4% tricuspid valve repair, and 4.4% aortic valve replacement. No patients were discharged in AF. There were 3 operative mortalities (2.2%), none in stand-alone patients. One patient required catheter ablation at 8 months postoperatively, and one had a nonembolic stroke at 18 months. There were 9 late deaths. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia and antiarrhythmic drugs at 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months was 97.0%, 96.7%, 98.1%, 97.1%, and 100%, respectively. Lower ejection fraction and need for concomitant mitral valve replacement and/or aortic valve replacement were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: For persistent AF, robotic biatrial cryothermic Cox maze offered greater than 90% 1-year longitudinal freedom from stroke, oral anticoagulation, repeat ablation, and recurrent AF without the need for antiarrhythmic drugs.

Contemporary Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting vs Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Interpretation of recent alterations to the guideline priority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multivessel disease contests historical data and practice. To reevaluate contemporary outcomes, a large contemporary analysis was conducted comparing CABG with multivessel PCI among Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: The United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database was evaluated all beneficiaries with acute coronary syndrome undergoing isolated CABG or multivessel PCI (2018-2020). Risk adjustment was performed using multilevel regression analysis, Cox proportional hazards time to event models, and inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity scores. RESULTS: A total of 104,127 beneficiaries were identified undergoing CABG (n = 51,389) or multivessel PCI (n = 52,738). Before risk adjustment, compared with PCI, CABG patients were associated with younger age (72.9 vs 75.2 years, P < .001), higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (5.0 vs 4.2, P < .001), more diabetes (48.5% vs 42.2%, P < .001), higher cost ($54,154 vs $33,484, P < .001), and longer length of stay (11.9 vs 5.8 days, P < .001). After inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score adjustment, compared with PCI, CABG was associated with lower hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.74; P < .001), fewer hospital readmissions at 3 years (odds ratio, 0.85; P < .001), fewer coronary reinterventions (hazard ratio, 0.37; P < .001), and improved 3-year survival (hazard ratio, 0.51; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary real-world data from Medicare patients with multivessel disease reveal that CABG outcomes were superior to PCI, providing important longitudinal data to guide patient care and policy development.

Use of aortic wall patches as leaflet replacement material during aortic valve repair.

Objectives: Aortic valve repair can be limited by inadequate leaflet tissue for proper coaptation. Various kinds of pericardium have been used for cusp augmentation, but most have failed because of tissue degeneration. A more durable leaflet substitute is needed. Methods: In this report, 8 consecutive cases are presented in which autologous ascending aortic tissue was used to augment inadequate native cusps during aortic valve repair. Biologically, aortic wall is a living autologous tissue that could have exceptional durability as a leaflet substitute. Techniques for insertion are described in detail, along with procedural videos. Results: Early surgical outcomes were excellent, with no operative mortalities or complications, and all valves were competent with low valve gradients. Patient follow-up and echocardiograms to a maximum of 8 months' postrepair remain excellent. Conclusions: Because of superior biologic characteristics, aortic wall has the potential to provide a better leaflet substitute during aortic valve repair and to expand patient categories amenable to autologous reconstruction. More experience and follow-up should be generated.

An interrupted suture technique for ascending aortic replacement concomitant to aortic valve repair.

While running suture anastomoses represent the mainstay of thoracic aortic surgery, advantages may exist for interrupted techniques in selected cases, especially with ascending aortic replacement and concomitant aortic valve repair. Interrupted suture anastomoses precisely reconstruct the sinotubular geometry in dissections, and allow the proximal suture line to be placed close to the coronary arteries and aortic valve posts. With aneurysm extension into the aortic arch, interrupted suture techniques allow hemi-arch replacement without the need for aortic clamp removal and circulatory arrest. By 'sandwiching' all layers of the aortic wall between a Dacron graft on the inside and a Teflon strip on the outside, quite hemostatic anastomoses can be performed, even with poor-quality tissues. Any tearing of the aortic wall adjacent to individual sutures will not loosen the entire suture line, and can be repaired simply by extra suture placement. Thus, in selected situations, interrupted suture methods can be useful for ascending aortic replacement.

Robotic Aortic Valve Replacement: First 50 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Existing management challenges in selecting transcatheter vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) include bicuspid stenosis, low clinical risk, horizontal valve position, aortic insufficiency (AI), and need for concomitant procedures or mechanical valves. To address these gaps, we present our early experience with fully robotic-assisted aortic valve replacement (RAVR). METHODS: Between January 2020 and February 2021, 50 consecutive RAVR operations were performed using a 3- to 4-cm lateral mini-thoracotomy 3-port technique with transthoracic aortic clamping, similar to our robotic mitral platform. Conventional SAVR prostheses were implanted with interrupted braided sutures in all cases. RESULTS: The 50 patients were a median age of 67.5 years, body mass index was 29 kg/m2, calcified bicuspid disease was present in 28 (56%), and severe AI in 8 (16%). Ejection fraction was 0.55 ± 0.08 (mean ± SD), and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality was 1.54% ± 0.7%. Mechanical prostheses were used in 16 of 50 (32%), and 7 required concomitant procedures, including Cox maze in 3, aortic root enlargement in 2, and left atrial appendage clipping, mitral repair, and left atrial myxoma excision in 1 each. Median times (minutes) were 166 for cardiopulmonary bypass, 117 for cross-clamp, 4 for valvectomy, 20 for annular sutures, and 31 for aortotomy closure. All times plateaued after the initial 5 cases. Extubation occurred in 42 of 50 patients (84%) in the operating room, and within 4 hours in the remaining 8 (16%). There was no 30-day operative mortality or stroke. All had 30-day echocardiography demonstrating no valvular or perivalvular abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: RAVR appears to have procedural safety and short-term outcomes to rival alternatives. Incremental experience may facilitate the safe performance of concomitant procedures as deemed necessary.

Multiple-valve Repair Facilitated by Aortic Ring Annuloplasty.

Early and late outcomes of patients undergoing multiple-valve procedures are better if all valves are repaired. Aortic/mitral multiple-valve repair has been limited by an inability to repair the more complex forms of aortic valve insufficiency. With the development of aortic ring annuloplasty 90% to 95% of aortic valve insufficiency pathologies now can be repaired, which opens most aortic/mitral multiple-valve procedures to the better repair outcomes. This report illustrates 4 cases of aortic/mitral ± tricuspid valve disease managed by multiple-valve repair.

Aortic valve repair for isolated right coronary leaflet prolapse.

Objectives: Isolated right coronary leaflet prolapse is a common cause of nonaneurysmal aortic insufficiency, but can rarely occur in patients with proximal aortic aneurysms. Standardized techniques for routine autologous repair of this disorder are presented. Methods: Most aortic valve leaflet prolapse is isolated to the right coronary leaflet, with hypertension and annular dilatation being contributory. Echocardiographically, a posteriorly eccentric aortic insufficiency jet together with "fracture" of the right leaflet tip are diagnostic. Primary repair includes internal geometric ring annuloplasty to downsize and reshape the annulus, together with central plication of the prolapsing leaflet. Thickened, scarred, or retracted noduli are released using an ultrasonic aspirator. The goal is to achieve equivalent coaptation heights of ≥8 mm for all 3 leaflets. Results: Three videos of 6 cases are provided to illustrate these techniques. In the first, 3 patients are shown with classic isolated right leaflet prolapse. In the second and third videos, alternative pathologies are presented for contrast. Applying the reconstructive approaches of geometric ring annuloplasty, leaflet plication, and ultrasonic nodular release, excellent early and late repair outcomes are obtainable in most patients. Conclusions: The combination of aortic ring annuloplasty, central leaflet plication, and ultrasonic nodular release allows routine and standardized repair of right coronary leaflet prolapse, either isolated or concomitant with aneurysm surgery.

Early Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Neoaortic Valve Repair Incorporating Geometric Ring Annuloplasty.

OBJECTIVES: During congenital heart surgery, the pulmonary valve and root may be placed into the systemic position, yielding a "neoaortic" valve. With the stress of systemic pressure, the pulmonary roots can dilate, creating aneurysms and/or neoaortic insufficiency (neoAI). This report analyzes the early outcomes of patients undergoing neoaortic valve repair incorporating geometric ring annuloplasty. METHODS: Twenty-one patients underwent intended repair at six centers and formed the study cohort. Thirteen had previous Ross procedures, five had arterial switch operations, and three Fontan physiology. Average age was 21.7 ± 12.8 years (mean ± SD), 80% were male, and 11 (55%) had symptomatic heart failure. Preoperative neoAI Grade was 3.1 ± 1.1, and annular diameter was 30.7 ± 6.5 mm. RESULTS: Valve repair was accomplished in 20/21, using geometric annuloplasty rings and leaflet plication (n = 13) and/or nodular release (n = 7). Fourteen had neoaortic aneurysm replacement (13 with root remodeling). Two underwent bicuspid valve repair. Six had pulmonary conduit changes, one insertion of an artificial Nodulus Arantius, and one resection of a subaortic membrane. Ring size averaged 21.9 ± 2.3 mm, and aortic clamp time was 171 ± 54 minutes. No operative mortality or major morbidity occurred, and postoperative hospitalization was 4.3 ± 1.4 days. At discharge, neoAI grade was 0.2 ± 0.4 (P < .0001), and valve mean gradient was ≤20 mm Hg. At average 18.0 ± 9.1 months of follow-up, all patients were asymptomatic with stable valve function. CONCLUSIONS: Neoaortic aneurysms and neoAI are occasionally seen late following Ross, arterial switch, or Fontan procedures. Neoaortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty, leaflet reconstruction, and root remodeling provides a patient-specific approach with favorable early outcomes.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2021 Adult Cardiac Surgery Risk Models for Multiple Valve Operations.

BACKGROUND: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Quality Measurement Task Force has developed risk models and composite performance measures for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR), isolated mitral valve replacement or repair (MVRR), AVR+CABG, and MVRR+CABG. To further enhance its portfolio of risk-adjusted performance metrics, STS has developed new risk models for multiple valve operations ± CABG procedures. METHODS: Using July 2011 to June 2019 STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database data, risk models for AVR+MVRR (n = 31,968) and AVR+MVRR+CABG (n = 12,650) were developed with the following endpoints: Operative Mortality, major morbidity (any 1 or more of the following: cardiac reoperation, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, stroke, prolonged ventilation, and renal failure), and combined mortality and/or major morbidity. Data were divided into development (July 2011 to June 2017; n = 35,109) and validation (July 2017 to June 2019; n = 9509) samples. Predictors were selected by assessing model performance and clinical face validity of full and progressively more parsimonious models. Performance of the resulting models was evaluated by assessing discrimination and calibration. RESULTS: C-statistics for the overall population of multiple valve ± CABG procedures were 0.7086, 0.6734, and 0.6840 for mortality, morbidity, and combined mortality and/or morbidity in the development sample, and 0.6953, 0.6561, and 0.6634 for the same outcomes, respectively, in the validation sample. CONCLUSIONS: New STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database risk models have been developed for multiple valve ± CABG operations, and these models will be used in subsequent STS performance metrics.