RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is little and controversial information about changes in plasma concentrations (PCs) or clinical events during coadministration of antiseizure medications (ASMs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to explore possible determinants of dosage class among DOACs trough PCs when ASMs are co-administered and the relative risks. We also provided some clinical examples of patients' management. METHODS: Data on adult patients concomitantly treated with ASMs (grouped in enzyme-inducing [I-ASMs], non-inducing [nI-ASMs], and levetiracetam [LEV]) and DOACs with at least one measurement of DOACs' PC were retrospectively collected. The role of DOAC-ASM combinations in predicting PC class (ranging from I at ischemic/thromboembolic risk to IV at increased bleeding risk) was investigated by an ordered logit model, and the marginal probabilities of belonging to the four dosage classes were calculated. RESULTS: We collected 46 DOACs' PCs out of 31 patients. There were 5 (10.9%) determinations in class I (4 out of 5 with concomitant I-ASMs) and 5 (10.9%) in class IV. The rivaroxaban/I-ASM combination was associated with lower DOAC dosages than rivaroxaban/LEV (OR: 0.00; 95% CI: 0.00-0.62). Furthermore, patient's probability of being in class I was approximately 50% with the rivaroxaban/I-ASM combination, while apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban had the highest cumulative probability of being in class II or III despite the ASM used. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results confirm the reduction of DOAC's PC by I-ASMs and suggest a better manageability of apixaban, dabigatran, and edoxaban independently from the concomitant ASM, whereas rivaroxaban seems the most liable to PC alterations with I-ASMs.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Humanos , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Administración Oral , Probabilidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of brivaracetam (BRV) according to baseline seizure frequency and past treatment history in subjects with focal epilepsy who were included in the Brivaracetam Add-On First Italian Network Study (BRIVAFIRST). METHODS: BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicenter study including adults prescribed adjunctive BRV. Study outcomes included sustained seizure response (SSR), sustained seizure freedom (SSF), and the rates of treatment discontinuation and adverse events (AEs). Baseline seizure frequency was stratified as <5, 5-20, and >20 seizures per month, and the number of prior antiseizure medications (ASMs) as <5 and ≥6. RESULTS: A total of 994 participants were included. During the 1-year study period, SSR was reached by 45.8%, 39.3%, and 22.6% of subjects with a baseline frequency of <5, 5-20, and >20 seizures per month (p < .001); the corresponding figures for the SSF were 23.4%, 9.8%, and 2.8% (p < .001). SSR was reached by 51.2% and 26.5% participants with a history of 1-5 and ≥6 ASMs (p < .001); the corresponding rates of SSF were 24.7% and 4.5% (p < .001). Treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was more common in participants with >20 seizures compared to those with <5 seizures per month (25.8% vs. 9.3%, p < .001), and in participants with history of ≥6 prior ASMs compared to those with history of 1-5 ASMs (19.6% vs. 12.2%, p = .002). There were no differences in the rates of BRV withdrawal due to AEs and the rates of AEs across the groups of participants defined according to the number of seizures at baseline and the number of prior ASMs. SIGNIFICANCE: The baseline seizure frequency and the number of previous ASMs were predictors of sustained seizure frequency reduction with adjunctive BRV in subjects with focal epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsias Parciales , Adulto , Humanos , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The maintenance of seizure control over time is a clinical priority in patients with epilepsy. The aim of this study was to assess the sustained seizure frequency reduction with adjunctive brivaracetam (BRV) in real-world practice. Patients with focal epilepsy prescribed add-on BRV were identified. Study outcomes included sustained seizure freedom and sustained seizure response, defined as a 100% and a ≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency that continued without interruption and without BRV withdrawal through the 12-month follow-up. Nine hundred ninety-four patients with a median age of 45 (interquartile range = 32-56) years were included. During the 1-year study period, sustained seizure freedom was achieved by 142 (14.3%) patients, of whom 72 (50.7%) were seizure-free from Day 1 of BRV treatment. Sustained seizure freedom was maintained for ≥6, ≥9, and 12 months by 14.3%, 11.9%, and 7.2% of patients from the study cohort. Sustained seizure response was reached by 383 (38.5%) patients; 236 of 383 (61.6%) achieved sustained ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency by Day 1, 94 of 383 (24.5%) by Month 4, and 53 of 383 (13.8%) by Month 7 up to Month 12. Adjunctive BRV was associated with sustained seizure frequency reduction from the first day of treatment in a subset of patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsias Parciales , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Libertad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The study assessed the clinical response to add-on brivaracetam (BRV) in real-world practice by means of time-to-baseline seizure count methodology. Patients with focal epilepsy who were prescribed add-on BRV were identified. Primary endpoint was the time-to-baseline seizure count defined as the number of days until each patient experienced the number of focal seizures that occurred in the 90 days before BRV initiation. Subgroup analysis was performed according to levetiracetam (LEV) status (naive vs prior use). Three-hundred eighty-seven patients were included. The overall median time-to-baseline seizure count was 150 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 130-175) days. The median time-to-baseline seizure count was 198 (lower limit of 95% CI = 168) days for LEV-naive patients, 126 (95% CI = 105-150) days for patients with prior LEV use and withdrawal due to insufficient efficacy, and 170 (95% CI = 128-291) days for patients who discontinued LEV due to adverse events (P = .002). The number of prior antiseizure medications (adjusted hazard ratio [adj HR] = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.02-1.13, P = .009) and baseline monthly seizure frequency (adj HR = 1.004, 95% CI = 1.001-1.008, P = .028) were independently associated with the primary endpoint. Add-on BRV improved seizure control in LEV-naive and LEV-prior patients. The time-to-baseline seizure count represents an informative endpoint alongside traditional study outcomes and designs.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Epilepsy in brain tumors (BTE) may require medical attention for a variety of unique concerns: epileptic seizures, possible serious adverse effects of antineoplastic and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), physical disability, and/or neurocognitive disturbances correlated to tumor site. Guidelines for the management of tumor-related epilepsies are lacking. Treatment is not standardized, and overall management might differ according to different specialists. The aim of this document was to provide directives on the procedures to be adopted for a correct diagnostic-therapeutic path of the patient with BTE, evaluating indications, risks, and benefits. A board comprising neurologists, epileptologists, neurophysiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, neuropsychologists, and patients' representatives was formed. The board converted diagnostic and therapeutic problems into seventeen questions. A literature search was performed in September-October 2017, and a total of 7827 unique records were retrieved, of which 148 constituted the core literature. There is no evidence that histological type or localization of the brain tumor affects the response to an AED. The board recommended to avoid enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs because of their interference with antitumoral drugs and consider as first-choice newer generation drugs (among them, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and topiramate). Valproic acid should also be considered. Both short-term and long-term prophylaxes are not recommended in primary and metastatic brain tumors. Management of seizures in patients with BTE should be multidisciplinary. The panel evidenced conflicting or lacking data regarding the role of EEG, the choice of therapeutic strategy, and timing to withdraw AEDs and recommended high-quality long-term studies to standardize BTE care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/complicaciones , Epilepsia/etiología , Epilepsia/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Perampanel is a novel noncompetitive selective antagonist at the postsynaptic ionotropic alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazoleproprionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor, which is approved as an adjunctive agent for the treatment of partial-onset seizure with or without secondary generalization and for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizure in patients with epilepsy who are at least 12 years of age. Limited information is available about the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring of perampanel and therapeutic ranges are so far not established. Therefore, perampanel titration should be performed especially in case of insufficient success of the drug. METHODS: The authors developed a selective and sensitive LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) assay to monitor perampanel concentrations in plasma, which was compared to a commercially available high-performance liquid chromatography kit with fluorescent detection. Perampanel and the internal standard were extracted from plasma samples by a simple protein precipitation. The method allows the simultaneous quantification of perampanel and several other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). RESULTS: Data were evaluated according to EMA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. Extraction recovery of perampanel from human plasma was consistently above 98%. No matrix effect was found. Analytical interferences by other AEDs were not observed. The method was linear in the range from 2.5 to 2800 ng/mL. Intra-assay and interassay reproducibility analyses demonstrated accuracy and precision within acceptance criteria. Data collected from 95 patients, given perampanel as their maintenance antiepileptic therapy, showed a very strong correlation between the 2 methods. CONCLUSIONS: The assay allows for highly sensitive and selective quantification of perampanel and concomitant AEDs in patient plasma samples and can be easily implemented in clinical settings. Our findings are in agreement with previously published data in patients comedicated with enzyme inducer AEDs, but seem to indicate a possible interaction in patients treated with the enzyme inhibitor drug valproic acid.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Piridonas/sangre , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Epilepsia/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant epileptic patients account for 40 % of cases of epilepsy. Consequently, specific therapeutic options could be surgical resection or, if not indicated, deep brain stimulation (DBS). The aim of this study is to review data from patients affected by drug-resistant complex partial epilepsy with or without generalization treated by anterior thalamic nucleus (AN) DBS to evaluate the efficacy and potential future applications of this approach as a standard method for palliative seizure control. METHODS: Six patients affected by drug-resistant complex partial seizures underwent AN DBS from March 2007 to February 2011. The preoperative tests consisted of electroencephalography (EEG), video EEG, morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), non-acute positron emission tomography (PET), neuropsychological evaluation, Liverpool seizure scale, and Quality Of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE). These tests and a seizure diary were also administered during a follow-up of at least 3 years. RESULTS: The improvement in terms of decrease of seizures was more than 50 % in patients affected by complex partial seizures strictly related to limbic system origin. The amelioration was unsatisfactory for patients having anatomical lesions outside the limbic structures with evidence of late diffusion in limbic areas. One patient died 40 days after surgery for reasons not concerned with DBS. CONCLUSIONS: Although the limited number of enrolled patients limits the reliability of data, the results are in accordance with those found in the recent literature and deserve to be considered for further studies regarding real efficacy, indications, stimulation parameters, side effects, and complications.
Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Epilepsia Refractaria/terapia , Epilepsia Generalizada/terapia , Adulto , Núcleos Talámicos Anteriores/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite new anti-seizure medications (ASMs) being introduced into clinical practice, about one-third of people with epilepsy do not reach seizure control. Cenobamate is a novel tetrazole-derived carbamate compound with a dual mechanism of action. In randomized controlled trials, adjunctive cenobamate reduced the frequency of focal seizures in people with uncontrolled epilepsy. Studies performed in real-world settings are useful to complement this evidence and better characterize the drug profile. METHODS: The Italian BLESS ("Cenobamate in Adults With Focal-Onset Seizures") study is an observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of adjunctive cenobamate in adults with uncontrolled focal epilepsy in the context of real-world clinical practice. The study is ongoing and conducted at 50 centers in Italy. This first interim analysis includes participants enrolled until June 2023 and with 12-week outcome data available. RESULTS: Forty participants with a median age of 36.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 26.0-47.5) years were included. The median monthly seizure frequency at baseline was 6.0 (IQR 2.5-17.3) seizures and 31 (77.5%) participants had failed four or more ASMs before cenobamate. At 12 weeks from starting cenobamate, the median reduction in monthly seizure frequency was 52.8% (IQR 27.1-80.3%); 22 (55.0%) participants had a ≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency and six (15.0%) reached seizure freedom. The median number of concomitant ASMs decreased from 3 (IQR 2-3) at baseline to 2 (IQR 2-3) at 12 weeks and the proportion of patients treated with > 2 concomitant ASMs decreased from 52.5% to 40.0%. Seven (17.5%) patients reported a total of 12 adverse events, 11 of which were considered adverse drug reactions to cenobamate. CONCLUSION: In adults with uncontrolled focal seizures, the treatment with adjunctive cenobamate was well tolerated and was associated with improved seizure control and a reduction of the burden of concomitant ASMs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05859854 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier).
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Nearly half of people with epilepsy (PWE) are expected to develop seizure clusters (SC), with the subsequent risk of hospitalization. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use, effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) brivaracetam (BRV) in the treatment of SC. METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study of patients with SC (≥ 2 seizures/24 h) who received IV BRV. Data collection occurred from January 2019 to April 2022 in 25 Italian neurology units. Primary efficacy outcome was seizure freedom up to 24 h from BRV administration. We also evaluated the risk of evolution into Status Epilepticus (SE) at 6, 12 and 24 h after treatment initiation. A Cox regression model was used to identify outcome predictors. RESULTS: 97 patients were included (mean age 62 years), 74 (76%) of whom had a history of epilepsy (with drug resistant seizures in 49% of cases). BRV was administered as first line treatment in 16% of the episodes, while it was used as first or second drug after benzodiazepines failure in 49% and 35% of episodes, respectively. On the one hand, 58% patients were seizure free at 24 h after BRV administration and no other rescue medications were used in 75 out of 97 cases (77%) On the other hand, SC evolved into SE in 17% of cases. A higher probability of seizure relapse and/or evolution into SE was observed in patients without a prior history of epilepsy (HR 2.0; 95% CI 1.03 - 4.1) and in case of BRV administration as second/third line drug (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.1 - 9.7). No severe treatment emergent adverse events were observed. SIGNIFICANCE: In our cohort, IV BRV resulted to be well tolerated for the treatment of SC and it could be considered as a treatment option, particularly in case of in-hospital onset. However, the underlying etiology seems to be the main outcome predictor.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Generalizada , Epilepsia , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirrolidinonas/efectos adversos , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/inducido químicamente , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: to assess the burden of epilepsy as the underlying or contributory cause of death, to investigate time trends in mortality with epilepsy, and to examine the main associated comorbidities. METHODS: All deaths from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2019 with any mention of epilepsy were retrieved from the mortality register of the Veneto Region (Italy). The average annual percent change (AAPC) in age-standardized mortality rates was estimated by log-linear models. The association between mention of epilepsy and of selected disease categories in death certificates was assessed by conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Any mention of epilepsy was reported in 5,907 death certificates; of these, epilepsy was selected as the underlying cause in 1,020 decedents. Deaths with epilepsy represented 0.8% of total mortality in 2008-2011, increasing to 1.3% in 2016-2019. The AAPC was 4.7% for males (95% CI 3.0-6.4, p<0.001) and 6.2% for females (95% CI 4.5-7.9, p<0.001). A strong association was found between mention of epilepsy and meningitis/encephalitis, congenital anomalies/cerebral palsy and other paralytic syndromes, central nervous system tumours, cerebrovascular diseases, and dementia/Alzheimer. CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis from Southern Europe confirms recent reports limited to the UK and the US on increasing epilepsy-related mortality rates. aging of the population and the growing prevalence of neurological disorders are among long-term causes of this unfavorable trend; further studies on mortality data and other health archives are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Causas de Muerte , Comorbilidad , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , MasculinoRESUMEN
Neurological complications (NCs) represent a diagnostic and clinical challenge in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) patients. We retrospectively analyzed NC incidence, etiology, timing, characteristics, outcome, and long-term effects in 2384 adult patients transplanted in seven Italian institutions between January 2007 and December 2019. Ninety-three (3.9%) patients were affected by 96 NCs that were infectious (29.2%), immune/inflammatory (26%), drug-related (12.5%), cerebrovascular (5.2%), metabolic (3.1%), related to central nervous system disease relapse (11.5%) and malignancy (3.1%), or undefined (9.4%). Six patients (6.4%) had neurological manifestations of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). NCs occurred on average at day +128 (from -5 to +4063). Early (< day +120) and late NCs had similar frequencies (46.9% vs 53.1%, p = 0.39). Thirty-one patients (33.3%) were affected by acute or chronic GVHD at the NC onset. With a median follow-up of 25.4 (0.4-163) months, the overall mortality due to NCs was 22.6%. The median time between NC onset and death was 36 (1-269) days. Infectious NCs were the main cause (61.9%) of NC-related mortality. A persistent neurological impairment occurred in 20.4% patients, 57.9% of whom being affected by immune/inflammatory NCs. This study highlights the rare, yet severe impact of alloHSCT-associated NCs on patient survival and long-term functional ability.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Adulto , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Central/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/epidemiología , Enfermedad Injerto contra Huésped/etiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante Homólogo/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In randomized controlled trials, add-on brivaracetam (BRV) reduced seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Most real-world research on BRV has focused on refractory epilepsy. The aim of this analysis was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV when used as early or late adjunctive treatment in patients included in the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). METHODS: BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of sustained seizure response, sustained seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs. Data were compared for patients treated with add-on BRV after 1-2 (early add-on) and ≥ 3 (late add-on) prior antiseizure medications. RESULTS: A total of 1029 patients with focal epilepsy were included in the study, of whom 176 (17.1%) received BRV as early add-on treatment. The median daily dose of BRV at 12 months was 125 (100-200) mg in the early add-on group and 200 (100-200) in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). Sustained seizure response was reached by 97/161 (60.3%) of patients in the early add-on group and 286/833 (34.3%) of patients in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). Sustained seizure freedom was achieved by 51/161 (31.7%) of patients in the early add-on group and 91/833 (10.9%) of patients in the late add-on group (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 29 (16.5%) patients in the early add-on group and 241 (28.3%) in the late add-on group discontinued BRV (p = 0.001). Adverse events were reported by 38.7% and 28.5% (p = 0.017) of patients who received BRV as early and late add-on treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: Brivaracetam was effective and well tolerated both as first add-on and late adjunctive treatment in patients with focal epilepsy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of epilepsy in older adults has become part of daily practice because of an aging population. Older patients with epilepsy represent a distinct and more vulnerable clinical group as compared with younger patients, and they are generally under-represented in randomized placebo-controlled trials. Real-world studies can therefore be a useful complement to characterize the drug's profile. Brivaracetam is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A and approved as adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adults with epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive brivaracetam in older patients (≥65 years of age) with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting. METHODS: The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a 12-month retrospective multicenter study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive brivaracetam. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events and the incidence of adverse events. Data were compared for patients aged ≥65 years of age ('older') vs those aged <65 years ('younger'). RESULTS: There were 1029 patients with focal epilepsy included in the study, of whom 111 (10.8%) were aged ≥65 years. The median daily dose of brivaracetam at 3 months was 100 [interquartile range, 100-175] mg in the older group and 100 [100-200] mg in the younger group (p = 0.036); it was 150 [100-200] mg in both groups either at 6 months (p = 0.095) or 12 months (p = 0.140). At 12 months, 49 (44.1%) older and 334 (36.4%) younger patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50% (p = 0.110), and the seizure freedom rates were 35/111 (31.5%) and 134/918 (14.6%) in older and younger groups, respectively (p < 0.001). During the 1-year study period, 20 (18.0%) patients in the older group and 245 (26.7%) patients in the younger group discontinued brivaracetam (p = 0.048). Treatment withdrawal because of insufficient efficacy was less common in older than younger patients [older: n = 7 (6.3%), younger: n = 152 (16.6%); p = 0.005]. Adverse events were reported by 24.2% of older patients and 30.8% of younger patients (p = 0.185); the most common adverse events were somnolence, nervousness and/or agitation, vertigo, and fatigue in both study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive brivaracetam was efficacious, had good tolerability, and no new or unexpected safety signals emerged when used to treat older patients with uncontrolled focal seizures in clinical practice. Adjunctive brivaracetam can be a suitable therapeutic option in this special population.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Italia , Pirrolidinonas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is one of the most common causes of acquired epilepsy and accounts for about 10-15% of all newly diagnosed epilepsy cases. However, evidence about the clinical profile of antiseizure medications in the PSE setting is currently limited. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a rationally developed compound characterized by high-affinity binding to synaptic vesicle protein 2A. The aim of this study was to assess the 12-month effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in patients with PSE treated in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of patients with PSE included in the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk Study (BRIVAFIRST). The BRIVAFIRST was a 12-month retrospective, multicentre study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), seizure-freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes included the rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and the incidence of AEs. RESULTS: Patients with PSE included in the BRIVAFIRST were 75 and had a median age of 57 (interquartile range, 42-66) years. The median daily doses of BRV at 3, 6, and 12 months from starting treatment were 100 (100-150) mg, 125 (100-200) mg and 100 (100-200) mg, respectively. At 12 months, 32 (42.7%) patients had a reduction in their baseline seizure frequency by at least 50%, and the seizure freedom rates was 26/75 (34.7%). During the 1-year study period, 10 (13.3%) patients discontinued BRV. The reasons of treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy in 6 (8.0%) patients and poor tolerability in 4 (5.3%) patients. Adverse events were reported by 13 (20.3%) patients and were rated as mild in 84.6% and moderate in 15.4% of cases. SIGNIFICANCE: Adjunctive BRV was efficacious and generally well-tolerated when used in patients with PSE in clinical practice. Adjunctive BRV can be a suitable therapeutic option for patients with PSE.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Adulto , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epilepsia/inducido químicamente , Epilepsia/etiología , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), like other forms of idiopathic generalized epilepsy, shows a marked female predominance. However, few studies have specifically addressed the role of sex in its long-term prognosis. We performed a systematic review of the literature relevant to JME prognosis, focusing on sex-based differences in prognostic factors and outcome. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed and Scopus databases was performed, considering all articles up to April 2020 in which long-term prognosis in JME had been explored and sex differences in outcome or prognostic factors were specified. RESULTS: We included 25 articles published between 1984 and 2020. Sex differences in epilepsy outcome were explored by 21 of the 25 studies, but only three reported different outcomes in male vs female patients. All three found female sex to be associated with a later response to antiseizure medications, worse seizure control, and a higher risk of relapse in their entire study samples, which included JME patients. Eight studies found sex-based differences in possible predictors of long-term outcome: prolonged epileptiform EEG runs and the presence of eye closure sensitivity, both more frequent in women, were factors possibly linked to a poorer prognosis, as were praxis induction and generalized EEG asymmetric changes, which instead were more common in men. Valproate use, more frequent in men, was associated with a better outcome. CONCLUSION: Most studies do not highlight sex differences in JME prognosis. However, some sex specificities do emerge, especially with regard to particular reflex traits and EEG abnormalities. Finally, sex may condition therapeutic choices, and thus have a possible impact on long-term outcome.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil/diagnóstico , Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Mioclónica Juvenil/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Convulsiones , Caracteres SexualesRESUMEN
Following recent European Medication Agency restrictions on valproate (VPA) use in girls and women of childbearing potential (WOCP), the Commission on Epilepsy and Gender of the Italian League against Epilepsy integrated current literature and legislative data in order to provide clinicians with guidance on antiseizure medication (ASM) prescription for Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsies (IGEs) in this population, avoiding VPA. We reviewed the updated literature on ASMs and examined the teratogenicity of those showing efficacy in IGEs. For all relevant ASMs, we considered the indications for use and the pregnancy and contraception-related recommendations given in the Italian Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and on the websites of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and other European Union (EU) countries' regulatory agencies. With the exception of absence seizures, the literature lacks high quality studies on ASMs in IGEs. In girls and WOCP, levetiracetam and lamotrigine should be considered the first-choice drugs in Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures Alone and in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy, lamotrigine in Juvenile Absence Epilepsy, and ethosuximide in Childhood Absence Epilepsy. Although supported by the literature, several ASMs are off label, contraindicated or burdened by special warnings in pregnancy. Some discrepancies emerged between the various SmPC warnings for different brands of the same active principle. We provided a therapeutic algorithm for each IGE syndrome and highlighted the need for revised prescription rules, consistent with the latest literature data, uniformity of SmPC warnings for the same active principle, and more data on the efficacy of new ASMs in IGEs and their safety in pregnancy.
Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Generalizada , Phthiraptera , Animales , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Niño , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Embarazo , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical data regarding use of newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in an older population are limited. In randomized-controlled, placebo-controlled trials, older patients are under-represented, and protocols deviate markedly from routine clinical practice, limiting the external validity of results. Studies performed in a naturalistic setting are a useful complement to characterize the drug profile. Perampanel is a third-generation ASM and the first and only non-competitive alfa-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionate receptor antagonist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive perampanel over a 1-year period in a population of older patients with epilepsy treated in a real-world setting. METHODS: Older (≥ 65 years of age) patients prescribed add-on perampanel at 12 Italian epilepsy centers were retrospectively identified. Seizure occurrence, adverse events (AEs), and drug withdrawal were analyzed. Effectiveness outcomes included the rates of seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline monthly seizure frequency), seizure freedom, and treatment discontinuation. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the rate of treatment discontinuation due to AEs and the incidence of AEs. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients with a median age of 69 (range 65-88) years were included. The median daily dose of perampanel at 12 months was 6 mg (interquartile range 4-6 mg). At 12 months, 53 (57.6%) patients were seizure responders, and 22 (23.9%) patients were seizure free. Twenty (21.7%) patients discontinued perampanel; the reasons for treatment withdrawal were insufficient efficacy (n = 6/20; 30.0%), AEs (n = 12/20; 60.0%), and a combination of both (n = 2/20; 10%). The most common AEs included irritability (8.7%), somnolence (4.3%), and dizziness/vertigo (4.3%). The rate of behavioral and psychiatric AEs was higher in patients with history of psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.044). There were no differences in the occurrence of behavioral and psychiatric AEs according to the concomitant use of levetiracetam (p = 0.776) and history of cognitive decline (p = 0.332). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive perampanel was associated with improvement in seizure control and good tolerability in a real-life setting and can represent a viable therapeutic option in older patients with epilepsy.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia , Nitrilos/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In randomized controlled trials, add-on brivaracetam (BRV) reduced seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Studies performed in a naturalistic setting are a useful complement to characterize the drug profile. OBJECTIVE: This multicentre study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in a large population of patients with focal epilepsy in the context of real-world clinical practice. METHODS: The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a retrospective, multicentre study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Patients with focal epilepsy and 12-month follow-up were considered. Main outcomes included the rates of seizure-freedom, seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), and treatment discontinuation. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also considered. Analyses by levetiracetam (LEV) status and concomitant use of strong enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EiASMs) and sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1029 patients with a median age of 45 years (33-56) was included. At 12 months, 169 (16.4%) patients were seizure-free and 383 (37.2%) were seizure responders. The rate of seizure freedom was 22.3% in LEV-naive patients, 7.1% in patients with prior LEV use and discontinuation due to insufficient efficacy, and 31.2% in patients with prior LEV use and discontinuation due to AEs (p < 0.001); the corresponding values for ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction were 47.9%, 29.7%, and 42.8% (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in seizure freedom and seizure response rates by use of strong EiASMs. The rates of seizure freedom (20.0% vs. 16.6%; p = 0.341) and seizure response (39.7% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.006) were higher in patients receiving SCBs than those not receiving SCBs; 265 (25.8%) patients discontinued BRV. AEs were reported by 30.1% of patients, and were less common in patients treated with BRV and concomitant SCBs than those not treated with SCBs (28.9% vs. 39.8%; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: The BRIVAFIRST provided real-world evidence on the effectiveness of BRV in patients with focal epilepsy irrespective of LEV history and concomitant ASMs, and suggested favourable therapeutic combinations.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Levetiracetam/administración & dosificación , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirrolidinonas/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To investigate whether peripheral immune abnormalities are associated with brain inflammation in multiple sclerosis, and whether differences in MRI activity are paralleled by changes in leukocyte composition, we conducted a prospective longitudinal study in patients at their clinical onset. Twenty patients presenting a first inflammatory event in the central nervous system suggestive of multiple sclerosis underwent, every 45 days for one year, immunophenotyping of 98 blood cell subsets together with brain MRI and clinical evaluation. Six patients showed intense MRI activity, six patients did not display MRI activity, while the remaining 8 patients had low (i.e. intermediate) MRI activity during the follow-up. Our results show that MRI-active and MRI-inactive patients display significant differences in ten lymphocyte subsets. Among these, there are both effector (CCR7-CD45RA-CD4+ alphabeta T cells, CCR5+ gammadelta T cells) and regulatory (DN CD28+ alphabeta T cells and CD25+CD8+ alphabeta T cells) lymphocytes pertaining to the innate and the acquired arms of the immune system. Moreover, these differences were, upon employment of a class prediction procedure based on "support vector machines" algorithm utilizing leave-one-out cross validation procedures, able to correctly assign patients to their respective MRI activity group. All 6 MRI-active and 6 MRI-inactive patients were correctly classified, and, upon application of a class prediction model in an unsupervised manner to the 8 patients with intermediate MRI activity, 6 were predicted as MRI-active and 2 as MRI-inactive patients. Also, when the mean values of the first three time points (T0, T1 and T2) were used for the prediction of all patients, the selected lymphocyte subsets correctly classified 90% of patients. Sensitivity was 91.7% and specificity was 87.5%. These results provide evidence showing that brain inflammation in multiple sclerosis is associated with distinct changes in peripheral lymphocyte subsets, and raise the possibility that the identified subsets may, after adequate validation, assist in the prediction of MRI activity in the early stages of multiple sclerosis.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/patología , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/inmunología , Esclerosis Múltiple/inmunología , Adulto , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Células Asesinas Naturales/inmunología , Recuento de Leucocitos , Estudios Longitudinales , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T alfa-beta/análisis , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T gamma-delta/análisis , Subgrupos de Linfocitos T/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Fifty secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) patients who had lost one or more EDSS points in the prior two years were selected to receive either cyclophosphamide (25 patients, 13 females, 12 males, F/M = 1.08; mean age: 42.4 years; mean disease duration: 13.3 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.7) or mitoxantrone (25 patients, 14 females, 11 males, F/M = 1.27; mean age: 38.2 years; mean disease duration: 11.5 years; mean EDSS at study entry: 5.5). SPMS patients were treated for two years with clinical evaluation (relapse rate, disability progression) every three months and radiological imaging (conventional magnetic resonance imaging) before therapy initiation and at the end of the first and second years of therapy. Safety profile and costs of the two therapeutic protocols were also analysed. In terms of clinical and radiological measures the drugs exerted a quite identical effect on both, and produced a significant reduction in both relapse rate (mitoxantrone Mito): p = 0.001, cyclophosphamide (Cy): p = 0.003) and disability progression (Mito: p = 0.01; Cy: p = 0.01). Subgroups of mitoxantrone- and cyclophosphamide-responding patients were identified (14/25 and 17/25, respectively) and were characterized by a significantly shorter duration of the secondary progressive phase of the disease. In these subgroups, the improvement in the EDSS score at the end of therapy was highly significant (p<0.0001 for Mito, p = 0.0004 for Cy). The safety profiles of both drugs were acceptable; however, the Cy-based therapy protocol was significantly less expensive. We conclude that Cy should be considered as a therapeutic option in rapidly deteriorating SPMS patients.