QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Adults (QUALAS-A): development and international validation of a novel health-related quality of life instrument.

PURPOSE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is important in spina bifida (SB) management. No clinically useful, comprehensive instrument incorporating bladder/bowel domains exists. We aimed to develop and validate a self-reported QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Adults (QUALAS-A). METHODS: We drafted the 53-question pilot instrument using a comprehensive item generation/refinement process. It was administered to an international convenience sample of adults with SB and controls recruited online via social media and in person at outpatient SB clinics (January 2013-September 2014). Final questions were determined by: clinical relevance, high factor loadings and domain psychometrics in an Internal Validation Sample randomly selected from United States participants (n = 250). External validity was evaluated in United States and International External Validation Samples (n = 165 and n = 117, respectively). Adults with SB completed the validated general WHOQOL-BREF and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ). RESULTS: Mean age of 532 participants was 32 years (32.7 % males, 85.0 % Caucasian), similar to 116 controls (p ≥ 0.08). There were 474 online and 58 clinical participants (61.1 % eligible). Face validity and content validity of the 3-domain, 15-question QUALAS-A were established by patients, families and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high for all domains (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.70, ICC ≥ 0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-A and WHOQOL-BREF were low (r ≤ 0.60), except for high correlations with Health and Relationships domain (0.63 ≤ r ≤ 0.71). Bladder and Bowel domain had a high correlation with ICIQ (r = -0.70). QUALAS-A scores were lower among adults with SB than without (p < 0.0001). QUALAS-A had good statistical properties in both External Validation Samples (Cronbach's alpha 0.68-0.77). CONCLUSIONS: QUALAS-A is a short, valid HRQOL tool for adults with SB.

Validation of QUALAS-T, a health-related quality of life instrument for teenagers with spina bifida.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to develop and validate a self-reported QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Teenagers (QUALAS-T). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We drafted a 46-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation/refinement process. A group of 13-17 years olds with spina bifida (SB) was recruited online via social media and in person at SB clinics (2013-2015). Healthy controls were recruited during routine pediatrician visits. Final questions were identified based on clinical relevance, factor analysis and domain psychometrics. Teenagers with SB completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. RESULTS: Median age of 159 participants was 15.2 years (42.0% male, 77.4% Caucasian), similar to 58 controls (p ≥ 0.06). There were 102 online and 57 clinic participants (82.8% of eligible). Patients, parents and an expert panel established face and content validity of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-T. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were high for the Family and Independence and Bladder and Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.76-0.78, ICC: 0.72-0.75). The Bladder and Bowel domain is the same for QUALAS-T , QUALAS-A for adults and QUALAS-C for children. Correlations between QUALAS-T domains were low (r = 0.34), indicating QUALAS-T can differentiate between distinct HRQOL components. Correlations between QUALAS-T and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤0.41). QUALAS-T scores were lower in teenagers with SB than without (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: QUALAS-T is a short, valid HRQOL tool for adolescents with SB, applicable in clinical and research settings. Since the Bladder & Bowel domains for all QUALAS versions are the same, Bladder and Bowel HRQOL can be measured on the same scale from age 8 through adulthood.

Quality of Life Assessment in Spina Bifida for Children (QUALAS-C): Development and Validation of a Novel Health-related Quality of Life Instrument.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a self-reported health-related QUAlity of Life Assessment in Spina bifida for Children (QUALAS-C). METHODS: We drafted a 27-question pilot instrument using a patient-centered comprehensive item generation and refinement process. It was administered to a sample of children 8-12 years old with spina bifida (SB) recruited online via social media and in person at an outpatient SB clinic (January 2013-September 2014). Healthy controls were recruited at routine pediatrician visits. Validation and final questions were determined based on clinical relevance, high loadings on factor analysis, and domain psychometrics. Children with SB also completed the validated generic Kidscreen-27 instrument. RESULTS: Median age of 150 participants was 9.6 years (60.7% male, 72.7% Caucasian), similar to 46 controls (P ≥ .10). There were 97 online and 53 clinic participants (89.0% and 84.2% of eligible, respectively). Face and content validities of the 2-domain, 10-question QUALAS-C were established by patients, parents, and experts. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was high for the Esteem & Independence and Bladder & Bowel domains (Cronbach's alpha: 0.72-0.76, ICC: 0.74-0.77). Correlations between QUALAS-C domains were low (r = 0.51), indicating that QUALAS-C can differentiate between two distinct health-related quality of life components. Correlations between QUALAS-C and Kidscreen-27 were also low (r ≤ 0.44). QUALAS-C scores were significantly lower in children with SB than without (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: QUALAS-C is a short, valid health-related quality of life tool for children with SB. It will be useful in clinical and research settings.