Zinc transporter (ZnT)8(186-194) is an immunodominant CD8+ T cell epitope in HLA-A2+ type 1 diabetic patients.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Anti-zinc transporter (ZnT)8 autoantibodies are commonly detected in type 1 diabetic patients. We hypothesised that ZnT8 is also recognised by CD8(+) T cells and aimed to identify HLA-A2 (A*02:01)-restricted epitope targets. METHODS: Candidate epitopes were selected by ZnT8 plasmid DNA immunisation of HLA-A2/DQ8 transgenic mice and tested for T cell recognition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of type 1 diabetic, type 2 diabetic and healthy participants by IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot. RESULTS: White HLA-A2(+) adults (83%) and children (60%) with type 1 diabetes displayed ZnT8-reactive CD8(+) T cells that recognised a single ZnT8(186-194) (VAANIVLTV) epitope. This ZnT8(186-194)-reactive fraction accounted for 50% to 53% of total ZnT8-specific CD8(+) T cells. Another sequence, ZnT8(153-161) (VVTGVLVYL), was recognised in 20% and 25% of type 1 diabetic adults and children, respectively. Both epitopes were type 1 diabetes-specific, being marginally recognised by type 2 diabetic and healthy participants (7-12% for ZnT8(186-194), 0% for ZnT8(153-161)). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: ZnT8-reactive CD8(+) T cells are predominantly directed against the ZnT8(186-194) epitope and are detected in a majority of type 1 diabetic patients. The exceptional immunodominance of ZnT8(186-194) may point to common environmental triggers precipitating beta cell autoimmunity.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion allows tolerance induction and diabetes treatment in a type 1 diabetic child with insulin allergy.

AIM: Insulin allergy is a rare but serious and challenging condition in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This is a case report of an 8-year-old boy with T1D and an allergy to insulin. CASE REPORT: Three months after being diagnosed with T1D, the patient developed progressive skin reactions to insulin, characterized by small 1.5-cm pruritic wheals at injection sites that persisted for several days. Seven months after diagnosis, he experienced two episodes of generalized urticaria with systemic symptoms that were seen within a few seconds of insulin injection. Examination revealed lipoatrophy of the thighs. Intradermal skin tests were positive for protamine, glargine and lispro. The patient was started on a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) tolerance induction protocol, consisting of a very low basal rate that was progressively increased, with the first bolus given under medical supervision, and was well tolerated for 4 months. After this period of time, the skin wheals reappeared, localized to the infusion sites, but without urticaria or any other generalized reactions. Intradermal skin tests were repeated and were again positive. Serum insulin-specific IgE measured 30 months after the first allergic reactions were positive. After 3 years, pump therapy is ongoing and blood glucose control has remained relatively good (HbA1c 7.6%). CONCLUSION: In T1D children with insulin allergy, CSII can successfully be used to both induce insulin tolerance and allow diabetes insulin therapy, although insulin desensitization cannot always be fully achieved. The induction protocol was easily manageable partly due to the "honeymoon" period that the patient was still in, but it should nonetheless be used even when the patient has higher insulin requirements.