Salicylic Acid Is Not the Translocated Signal Responsible for Inducing Systemic Acquired Resistance but Is Required in Signal Transduction.

Infection of plants by necrotizing pathogens can induce broad-spectrum resistance to subsequent pathogen infection. This systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is thought to be triggered by a vascular-mobile signal that moves throughout the plant from the infected leaves. A considerable amount of evidence suggests that salicylic acid (SA) is involved in the induction of SAR. Because SA is found in phloem exudate of infected cucumber and tobacco plants, it has been proposed as a candidate for the translocated signal. To determine if SA is the mobile signal, grafting experiments were performed using transgenic plants that express a bacterial SA-degrading enzyme. We show that transgenic tobacco root-stocks, although unable to accumulate SA, were fully capable of delivering a signal that renders nontransgenic scions resistant to further pathogen infection. This result indicated that the translocating, SAR-inducing signal is not SA. Reciprocal grafts demonstrated that the signal requires the presence of SA in tissues distant from the infection site to induce systemic resistance.

Inhibition of proliferative activity of pulmonary fibroblasts by tetrandrine.

Tetrandrine, an herbal drug, has been employed in China to treat pulmonary fibrosis. To date, the mechanisms governing the antifibrotic action of tetrandrine are unknown. The present study employs a fibroblast mitogenic assay to determine whether tetrandrine directly inhibits the ability of fibroblasts to respond to stimulation by growth factors. The data indicate that tetrandrine blocks proliferation and the incorporation of tritiated thymidine into DNA by fibroblasts stimulated with human serum, PDGF plus plasma, FGF plus plasma, or TNF plus plasma. Since tetrandrine inhibits the response to a variety of growth factors, its action does not appear to involve the blockade of a specific stimulatory receptor. Tetrandrine is effective in inhibiting thymidine incorporation when added up to 6 hr after stimulation of quiescent cells, suggesting either that tetrandrine does not block the attainment of competence by fibroblasts or that its activity is not limited to blocking the attainment of competence by these cells. Growth factor-induced mitogenesis is also inhibited by nitrendipine, a calcium channel blocker, and by cytochalasin B, a microfilament blocker. However, tetrandrine treatment of fibroblasts neither results in the changes of morphology seen with cytochalasin B nor is limited to the early events of stimulus-response coupling. Therefore, the mechanism of action for tetrandrine is not identical to that for either cytochalasin B or nitrendipine. In summary, these results suggest that the antifibrotic action of tetrandrine may be mediated in part by direct inhibition of fibroblast proliferation normally associated with the development and progression of silicosis.