Disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels. Implications for drug dosage regimens (Part I).

Many diseases appear to lead to a decrease of drug plasma binding due either to hypoalbuminaemia or to a modification of albumin structure. In other diseases, the binding of a drug may increase due to elevated concentrations of alpha 1-acid glycoprotein or lipoproteins. However that may be, the free fraction of a drug may vary in different pathologies. But an increase or decrease of the drug free fraction does not automatically mean an increase or decrease of the free drug concentration. Whatever the drug, a variation in the volume of distribution more or less proportional to the variation in the plasma free fraction can be expected. With respect to the clearance, the problem is much more complex and depends on the hepatic extraction ratio of drug. If the extraction is related to the free fraction (fu) of drug, a variation in fu will lead to a variation in the total drug concentration but no variation in the free drug concentration and no change in the pharmacological effect. If the extraction of a drug is dependent on hepatic flow, a variation in fu will lead to a change in the free drug concentration (with no change in the total drug concentration) and hence changes in the pharmacological effect. The aim of this article is to review the literature concerning disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels during the past 10 years. Finally, possible implications for drug dosage regimens are discussed generally from examples studies in the literature.

Disease-induced variations in plasma protein levels. Implications for drug dosage regimens (Part II).

Part I of this article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, discussed the implications of variations in plasma protein levels in a number of diseases: hepatic and renal disease, acute myocardial infarction, burns, cancer, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia and inflammatory diseases. In Part II the authors continue their review with a further range of disease states, and consider their import for drug dosages.

Albumin binding and brain uptake of 6-fluoro-DL-tryptophan: competition with L-tryptophan.

We investigated potential competition between L-tryptophan (TRP) and 6-fluoro-DL-tryptophan (6-F-TRP) for binding to albumin and for passage through the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In experiments based on equilibrium dialysis, albumin (600 microM) bound about 80% of TRP and 50% of 6-F-TRP with affinity constants (Ka) of 3.7 +/- 0.04 x 10(4) and 0.62 +/- 0.01 x 10(4) M-1, respectively. Competitive inhibition was assessed as the decrease in the apparent Ka (K' a) of TRP in the presence of 6-F-TRP, with no modification of the N value. Competition between TRP, 6-F-TRP and L-valine (VAL) for passage across the BBB was demonstrated using two approaches. When administered concomitantly with TRP or 6-F-TRP to rats, VAL decreased brain uptake of TRP and 6-F-TRP and reversed their action on serotonin. In Oldendorf's model, 6-F-TRP and VAL decreased the brain uptake of TRP.

Evidence for isoxicam binding to site I as a primary site and to site II as a secondary site of human serum albumin.

Isoxicam binding to HSA was studied using equilibrium dialysis and fluorescence methods. It was shown that this drug binds to or near site I (warfarin or azapropazone site) and to site II (the diazepam site) as a secondary site, although it is generally considered that their respective drug structural requirements are often exclusive. The binding parameters were calculated with different mathematical models; a site oriented model with or without fixing the number of binding sites as integer values and a stoichiometric model. The relevant results are in good agreement under the selected experimental conditions. The stoichiometric method indicates that no positive cooperativity occurred during the binding process but other interactions between the two sites cannot be excluded.

Binding of indapamide to serum proteins and erythrocytes.

The binding of indapamide to isolated serum proteins and erythrocytes was studied in order to understand its blood distribution. In serum, indapamide was mainly bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein with a high affinity (K = 73.4/mM), and to albumin and lipoproteins. Indapamide was bound to erythrocytes via a saturable process with a high affinity (K = 385/mM and N = 57 microM for an hematocrit value of 0.48), and erythrocytes were the main binding component in blood (more than 80% of indapamide was associated to erythrocytes in blood). The binding to serum proteins affected indapamide distribution in blood, and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein was shown to be the more effective protein in decreasing the amount of indapamide associated to erythrocytes.

The genetic variant A of human alpha 1-acid glycoprotein limits the blood to brain transfer of drugs it binds.

The objective of this work was to check the effects of alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AAG) and of its components, A and F1/S genetic variants, on the brain transfer of drugs they bind in plasma. The relevant extractions of six basic drugs, highly bound to AAG, were measured. We chose three drugs selectively bound to the A variant, disopyramide, imipramine and methadone, one drug mainly bound to the mixture F1/S, mifepristone, and two drugs which were simultaneously bound to the variant A and the mixture F1/S, propranolol and chlorpromazine. Their brain extraction were investigated in rats using the carotid injection technique and the capillary depletion method. Injected drugs were dissolved either in buffer, either in native AAG containing the three variants (A, F1 and S), either in variant A or in variant F1/S solutions. Brain extractions of disopyramide, imipramine and methadone were significantly reduced by native AAG and by variant A. Drug's plasma retention was related to their preferential and almost exclusive binding to A variant, both of them exhibiting the same decrease in brain transfer as compared to a buffered solution. At the opposite, there were no significative differences between the extraction either in buffer, either in AAG or in F1/S solutions, of drugs both bound to A variant and F1/S mixture (chlorpromazine and propranolol) or to the F1/S mixture (mifepristone). In serum, the retentional effect of the A variant on the extraction of disopyramide and imipramine was counteracted by the presence of albumin and lipoproteins, which simultaneously bind these two drugs at a high extent and act as permissive binders. We conclude that AAG binding decreases brain drug transfer when the A variant is mainly and almost exclusively involved in the binding. On the contrary, the entire fraction of the tested drugs when bound exclusively or partly to the mixture F1/S is available for transfer into the brain.

Measurement of free drug in phase I: is it useful?

Early investigation of protein binding of a new drug is mandatory. The following questions have to be answered: is unbound fraction constant over tested concentrations? Which proteins are involved? What are the binding parameters? Can the drug compete with other therapeutic agents for the binding sites or in other words can drug displacements be predicted? What is the interindividual variability in protein binding? Is the binding stereoselective? All this information is necessary in predicting the pharmacokinetic behaviour of the drug and in assisting in the design of future pharmacokinetic protocols in phases II and III. The use of free drug concentration should also be considered when comparing the bioavailability of regular vs sustained release dosage forms of drugs exhibiting concentration-dependent binding and when studying concentration-effect relationships.

Drug transfer across the blood-brain barrier and improvement of brain delivery.

The blood-brain barrier is formed by the endothelial cells of the brain capillaries. Its primary characteristic is the impermeability of the capillary wall due to the presence of complex tight junctions and a low endocytic activity. Essential nutrients are delivered to the brain by selective transport mechanisms, such as the glucose transporter and a variety of amino acid transporters. Although most drugs enter the brain by passive diffusion through the endothelial cells depending on their lipophilicity, degree of ionization, molecular weight, relative brain tissue and plasma bindings, some others can use specific endogenous transporters. In such cases, binding competition on the transporter with endogenous products or nutrients can occur and limits drug transfer. The blood-brain barrier can be a major impediment for the treatment of diseases of the central nervous system, since many drugs are unable to reach this organ at therapeutic concentrations. Various attempts have been made to overcome the limiting access of drugs to the brain, e.g. chemical modification, development of more hydrophobic analogs or linking an active compound to a specific carrier. Transient opening of the blood-brain barrier in humans has been achieved by intracarotid infusion of hypertonic mannitol solutions or of bradykinin analogs. Another way to increase or decrease brain delivery of drugs is to modulate the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) whose substrates are actively pumped out the cell into the capillary lumen. Many P-gp inhibitors or inducers are available to enhance the therapeutic effects of centrally acting drugs or to decrease central adverse effects of peripherally active drugs.

How chronically administered valproate increases chlordiazepoxide transfer through the blood-brain barrier.

Sodium valproate (VPA) is a drug widely used in the treatment of epileptics often in association with benzodiazepines. Recent animal studies have shown that the addition of valproate increases diazepam levels in the cortex and the cerebellum (Hariton et al, 1985). The aim of our study was to determine the effect of VPA on the transfer of benzodiazepines through the blood-brain barrier. They were investigated using the intracarotid injection technique in rats as described by Oldendorf (1971). Our results show that the 14C-chlordiazepoxide brain extraction is significantly higher in rats on prolonged valproate treatment than in controls. With regard to plasma protein binding effects on chlordiazepoxide transport, our data indicate that a fraction of the protein-bound chlordiazepoxide could transfer from the intracapillary space to the brain tissue space because of enhanced drug dissociation from albumin in the brain microcirculation (Kd in vitro = 74.1 microM; Kd in vivo = 793.7 microM). Two distinct mechanisms can be deduced from this study: 1) chlordiazepoxide is displaced from HSA by valproate, 2) in addition, this fatty acid could increase drug permeation through the blood brain barrier (PS/F (chlordiazepoxide) = 0.60 in controls, PS/F (chlordiazepoxide) = 0.97 in treated rats). On the contrary, the washout of the benzodiazepine from the rat brain does not seem to be modified by the addition of valproate.

Blood distribution of tenoxicam in humans: a particular HSA drug interaction.

Blood binding of tenoxicam was studied in vitro by equilibrium dialysis. Isolated human plasma proteins and blood cells were checked, and the distribution of the bound form was then calculated. The results showed that tenoxicam is mainly bound to HSA and that binding percentages are not different when measured in plasma (98.4%) and in an HSA solution at physiological concentration (704 microM, 98.15%). In these conditions, within the range of 1-150 microM, the tenoxicam binding percentage remained constant, evidence of a nonsaturable process. When a lower HSA concentration (10 microM) was used, the binding parameters of the tenoxicam interaction were calculated by using the same equilibrium dialysis data, by 3 methods of analysis- a stoichiometric method and site-oriented methods, fixing or not the number of HSA binding sites (n) as integer values. The best fit was observed with the first method, suggesting that two main interactions occurred. The site-oriented method gave lesser fits, the better being observed when n was not fixed. Its value, 1.77, suggest the possibility of two binding sites, one of them not preformed. The effects of known markers of site I, warfarin and apazone, of site II, diazepam and ibuprofen and of palmitic acid showed that tenoxicam is bound simultaneously to both sites I and II. The binding capacity of site I for tenoxicam is enhanced by diazepam: as this compound alone is bound to site II, this result suggests that the two HSA binding sites are not independent.

Blood binding and tissue uptake of drugs. Recent advances and perspectives.

The free drug hypothesis, which states that only the unbound moiety of drug in blood is available for tissue diffusion, is discussed according to recent investigations. In some experimental conditions, it must be assumed that part of the protein-bound drug in plasma is extracted during a single passage through the organ studied. The mechanisms underlying these observations are not unequivocal and remain hypothetical. In the liver, high-affinity binding sites for serum albumin have been demonstrated, and they would explain the high extraction by liver of endogenous and exogenous compounds. However, these experiments measure the unidirectional transfer of a drug from the vascular to the extravascular space in non-steady-state conditions. Hence, in steady-state conditions, the free drug hypothesis cannot be ruled out because it is supported by numerous pharmacokinetic studies.

A re-evaluation of the HSA-piroxicam interaction.

Piroxicam binding to HSA was studied using equilibrium dialysis and fluorescence methods. It was shown that this drug, like its analogs isoxicam and tenoxicam, binds to the apazone locus (site I area) and to a lesser extent to the diazepam site (site II). The piroxicam binding to HSA can be modulated by various specific ligands--apazone, warfarin, diazepam, ibuprofen--and these drug interactions have to be considered not only as potential displacement from the HSA binding sites but also in terms of induced allosteric effects.

[Rational posology and drug dosage]. / Posologie rationnelle et dosage des médicaments.

Serum level monitoring of drugs allows an optimal drug therapy, because it can take into account individual pharmacokinetic (and metabolic) variations. Some special conditions in drugs and in patients are highly suggestive of drug monitoring. These include mainly physiological but also pharmacological situations and apply to drugs with low therapeutic indices. However, for some drugs, highly bound to proteins or to blood cells, another more specific measurements will take in the future the place of serum level monitoring.

[Mechanisms of nutrient and drug transfer through the blood-brain barrier and their pharmacological changes]. / Mécanismes de transfert à travers la barrière hémato-encéphalique des nutriments et des médicaments et leurs modifications pharmacologiques.

The blood-brain barrier is formed by the endothelial cells of the brain capillaries. Its primary characteristic is the impermeability of the capillary wall due to the presence of complex tight junctions and a low endocytic activity. Essential nutrients are delivered to the brain by selective transport mechanisms, such as glucose transporter and a variety of amino acid transporters. Although most drugs enter the brain by passive diffusion through the endothelial cells depending of their lipophilicity, degree of ionization, molecular weight, relative brain tissue and plasma bindings--some of them can use specific endogenous transporters. In these cases, binding competition on the transporter with endogenous products or nutrients can occur and limit the drug transfer. The blood-brain barrier can be a major impediment for the treatment of diseases of the central nervous system, since many drugs are unable to reach this organ at therapeutic concentrations. Various attempts have been made to overcome the limiting access of drugs to the brain: chemical modification of drugs, development of more hydrophobic analogs or linking an active compound to a specific carrier. Transient opening of the blood-brain barrier has been achieved by intracarotid infusion of hypertonic mannitol solutions or of bradykinin analogs in humans. Another way to increase or decrease brain delivery of drugs is to modulate the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) whose substrates are actively pumped out the cell into the capillary lumen. We actually dispose of many P-gp inhibitors or inducers in order to enhance the therapeutic effects of centrally acting drugs or to decrease central adverse effects of peripheric drugs.