Onset and duration of action of single doses of formoterol inhaled via Turbuhaler.

The aim of the study was to investigate the time of onset and the duration of the bronchodilating effect of different doses of formoterol administered via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate asthma. Thirty-one patients (five women) with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 1.97 +/- 0.54 1 and a mean reversibility of 31 +/- 14% of baseline were included in this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled and cross-over study. The patients inhaled single doses of placebo, i.e. 6, 12, 24, or 48 micrograms formoterol fumarate, on 5 separate days. Serial measurements of specific airways conductance (SGAW) and FEV1 were performed at regular time intervals for 12 h. The majority of the patients had at least a 50% increase in SGAW within 1-4 min after administration of all active treatments. The maximum increase in FEV1 over placebo was dose-dependent: 12% (6 micrograms), 18% (12 micrograms), 19% (24 micrograms), and 26% (48 micrograms) (P < 0.001). Twelve hours after administration of 6, 12, 24, and 48 micrograms formoterol, the mean increase in FEV1 was still 7%, 15%, 18%, and 27%, respectively, above the value following placebo. Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event in all treatments including placebo. After inhalation of 48 micrograms, three patients experienced mild tremor lasting for less than 1 h; likewise, one patient experienced the same event for 3 h after placebo. Formoterol administered via Turbuhaler10 gave a rapid and dose-related bronchodilating effect lasting for 12 h and was well tolerated.

Low-dose formoterol Turbuhaler (Oxis) b.i.d., a 3-month placebo-controlled comparison with terbutaline (q.i.d.).

This study compared the efficacy of a low dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 6 micrograms b.i.d. (F) with that of terbutaline 0.5 mg q.i.d. (T), and placebo (P) from Turbuhaler. After a 2-week run-in, 397 adults with mild to moderate asthma were randomly allocated to one of the treatments for 12 weeks. During run-in, the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 360 (F), 368 (T) and 367 1 min-1 (P). F was better than T (P = 0.014) and P (P = 0.0001) in improving morning PEF [mean changes from run-in: 20 (F), 9 (T), and 21 min-1 (P)]. F was statistically significantly more effective than either T or P in reducing asthma symptoms. F gave also statistically significantly higher evening PEF and less use of rescue medication than P. Bronchodilator response to study drugs and additional 1.25 mg terbutaline was similar before and after the 12-week treatment period. There were no adverse effects of clinical relevance. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler, 6 micrograms b.i.d. was more effective in improving PEF and offered better asthma control than either terbutaline Turbuhaler, 0.5 mg q.i.d. or placebo. Regular use of formoterol did not reduce the bronchodilator response to additional terbutaline. There were no clinically relevant adverse effects.

Comparable effects of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide on the HPA-axis in adult asthmatic patients.

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre cross-over study compared the effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis of fluticasone propionate (750 microg twice daily given via the Diskus) and budesonide (800 microg twice daily given via the Turbuhaler). Two treatment periods of 2 weeks each were preceded by a 2-week run-in period and separated by a 2-week washout period. During run-in and washout, patients received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) or budesonide at a constant dose of 1500-1600 microg day(-1). Sixty patients aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe asthma not fully controlled by treatment with 1500-1600 microg day(-1) budesonide or BDP entered run-in and 45 completed the study. HPA axis suppression was assessed by morning serum cortisol (area under the curve from 08.00 to 10.30 hours) and 12-h nocturnal urinary cortisol excretion, measured at the end of run-in (baseline 1), at the end of washout (baseline 2), and at the end of each treatment period. Neither budesonide nor fluticasone produced significant suppression of either parameter compared to baselines. Only a few patients had serum-cortisol and urinary cortisol values below the normal range, before and after treatment. This shows that the patients did not have adrenal suppression before entering the study. The ratio between the AUC serum cortisol measured after fluticasone treatment and after budesonide treatment was 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.06), indicating equivalent effects on the HPA axis. This result was achieved after having omitted two patients' results, due to their very sensitive reaction to budesonide, but not to fluticasone. Two exacerbations of acute asthma occurred during budesonide treatment and none during fluticasone treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, budesonide 1600 microg day(-1) via Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate 1500 microg day(-1) via Diskus had no clinical effects on the HPA axis in patients with moderate to severe asthma.

Evaluation of different inhaled combination therapies (EDICT): a randomised, double-blind comparison of Seretide (50/250 microg bd Diskus vs. formoterol (12 microg bd) and budesonide (800 microg bd) given concurrently (both via Turbuhaler) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy safety and cost of Seretide (salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (Salm/FP), 50/250 microg bd) via Diskus with formoterol (Form; 12 microg bd) and budesonide (Bud; 800 microg bd) given concurrently (Form+Bud) via Turbuhaler in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma who were uncontrolled on existing corticosteroid therapy. The study used a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design, consisting of a 2-week run-in period on current corticosteroid therapy (1000-1600 microg/day of BDP or equivalent) and a 12-week treatment period. Symptomatic patients (n = 428) with FEV1 of 50-85% predicted and increased symptom scores or reliever use during run-in were randomly allocated to receive either Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd) via a single Diskus inhaleror Form+Bud (12+800 microg bd) via separate Turbuhalers. Clinic, diary card and asthma-related health-care resource utilisation data were collected. Improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEFam was similar in the Salm/FP and Form+Bud groups. Both PEFam and mean evening PEF (PEFpm) increased by a clinically significant amount (>20 L/min) from baseline in both treatment groups. The mean rate of exacerbations (mild, moderate or severe) was significantly lower in the Salm/FP group (0.472) compared with the Form+Bud group (0.735) (ratio = 0.64; P < 0.001), despite the three-fold lower microgram inhaled corticosteroid dose in the Salm/FP group. Patients in the Salm/FP group also experienced significantly fewer nocturnal symptoms, with a higher median percentage of symptom-free nights (P = 0.04), nights with a symptom score <2 (P = 0.03), and nights with no awakenings (P = 0.02). Total asthma-related health-care costs were significantly lower in the Salm/FP group than the Form+Bud group (P<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar low incidence of adverse events. This study showed that in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, Salm/FP (50/250 microg bd), administered in a single convenient device (Diskus), was at least as effective as an approximately three-fold higher microgram corticosteroid dose of Bud (800 microg bd) given concurrently with Form (12 microg bd) in terms of improvement in PEFam, and superior at reducing exacerbations and nights with symptoms or night-time awakenings. Salm/FP was also the less costly treatment due primarily to lower hospitalisation and drug costs.

The salmeterol/fluticasone combination is more effective than fluticasone plus oral montelukast in asthma.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SFC) with fluticasone propionate (FP) plus oral montelukast (M) over 12 weeks in symptomatic asthma patients. The study was a multinational, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group design in patients aged > or = 15 years. After a 4-week run-in during which all patients received FP 100 microg twice daily, patients were randomised to inhaled SFC (50/100 microg) twice daily or inhaled FP 100 microg twice daily and oral M 10 mg once daily. Patients kept daily records of their peak expiratory flow (PEF) symptom scores and use of rescue medication. Over the 12-week treatment period, the adjusted increase in mean morning PEF was significantly greater in the SFC group (36 l/min) than the FP/M group (19 l/min; P < 0.001). The improvement in FEV1 was also significantly greater in the SFC group (mean treatment difference 0.11 l; P < 0.001). SFC provided significantly better control of daytime and night-time symptoms and there were fewer exacerbations. Patients in the SFC group were also significantly more likely to have a rescue-free day. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. Combination therapy with FP plus salmeterol (SFC) produced significantly greater improvements in lung function and asthma control than the addition of montelukastto FP.

Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg) administered via combination Diskus inhaler: as effective as when given via separate Diskus inhalers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of a new combination Diskus inhaler containing both salmeterol 50 mg and fluticasone propionate 250 mg (Seretide) with the two drugs delivered via separate Diskus inhalers. DESIGN: A multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study. Three hundred and seventy-one symptomatic asthma patients (age range 13 to 75 years, mean 42 years) receiving inhaled corticosteroids were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: 28 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/250 microg bid) via a single Diskus inhaler (combination) and placebo bid via another Diskus inhaler, or salmeterol 50 microg bid via one Diskus inhaler and fluticasone propionate 250 microg bid via another (concurrent). Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and symptoms were measured for the first 12 weeks and safety data were collected throughout the study. RESULTS: Over weeks 1 to 12, adjusted mean improvements in morning PEFR were 43 and 36 L/min for combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The difference between the two treatment arms was 6 L/min (90% CI -13 to 0 L/min; P=0.114), which was within the predefined criteria for clinical equivalence. Adjusted mean improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline for week 28 were also similar between the two therapies. Thirty-five per cent of patients receiving combination inhaler and 31% of those receiving concurrent therapy had a mean daytime symptom score of zero over weeks 1 to 12 compared with 1% and 2%, respectively, at baseline. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two treatment arms. Mean serum cortisol levels were similar, and no differences in frequency of abnormal results were noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in a single inhaler is as efficacious in achieving asthma control and as well tolerated over a 28-week period as the two drugs administered individually.

Nematic textures in colloidal dispersions of Na-fluorohectorite synthetic clay.

We have studied stable strata of gravity-induced phase separation in suspensions of synthetic Na-fluorohectorite clay in saline solutions. We have observed how the strata depend on clay concentration as well as on salt content. The mass distribution and density variation at the isotropic-nematic interface indicate that existing models and assumptions in existing simulations are able to relatively well account for the observed behavior. We suggest that discrepancies could be due to the high polydispersity and the irregular shape of our Na-fluorohectorite particles, as well as diffusive double-layer effects, which could result in a competition between nematic ordering and gelation. The dependence on ionic strength displays three main regimes irrespective of clay concentration. At low ionic strength (approximately 0.1-5 mM NaCl), the Debye screening length is longer than the van der Waals force range. In this regime, the particles repel each other electrostatically and entropy-driven Onsager-type nematic ordering may occur, although gelation effects could also play a role. For ionic strengths above about 5 mM, we believe that the van der Waals force comes into play and that particles attract each other locally according to the classical Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek (DLVO) model of colloid interactions, resulting in a small-domain regime of attractive nematiclike ordering. In the third regime, for ionic strengths above approximately 10 mM, the clay particles aggregate into larger assemblies, due to the dominant van der Waals force, and the observed birefringency is reduced. We have studied the nematic phase in detail between crossed polarizers and have found textures showing nematic Schlieren patterns. By rotating the polarizers as well as the samples, we have observed examples of disclinations of strengths -1, -1/2, and +1.

Comparison of the acceptability of the Ventolin metered-dose inhaler and the Bricanyl Turbuhaler.

One hundred fifty-nine asthmatic patients aged 19 to 76 years completed an open crossover-designed study comparing the acceptability of the Bricanyl Turbuhaler (BTH) and the Ventolin metered-dose inhaler (VMDI). The doses given were presumed to be equiactive. Each treatment period lasted for 14 days. Patients registered morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) before and five minutes after medication. Asthma symptoms as well as adverse events were registered on diary cards. After each study period a questionnaire containing acceptability questions was completed. At the end of the study the patients indicated their preference for one of the two treatments. The two treatments were equal concerning bronchodilation and asthma symptoms. There was an overall preference for the Bricanyl Turbuhaler.

Comparison of addition of salmeterol to inhaled steroids with doubling of the dose of inhaled steroids.

A study was done to compare the efficacy and safety of the coprescription of salmeterol 50 microgram twice daily or 100 microgram twice daily with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 500 micrograms twice daily (SALM 50 and SALM 100) with BDP 1,000 microgram twice daily (BDP 1,000) in patients with asthma not controlled by BDP 500 microgram twice daily (or the equivalent). Following a run-in period, 738 patients at 72 centers were randomized to treatment for 24 wk in a double-blind, parallel-group study during which they maintained a daily record of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) and symptom scores. At about 40 of the centers, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to histamine was measured during and at 3 and 14 d after stopping treatment. Both groups taking salmeterol showed an improvement of more than 45 L/min in their morning PEFR and 30 L/min in their evening PEFR, compared with respective improvements of 16 L/min and 6 L/min in the group taking BDP 1,000. Both the SALM 50 and SALM 100 groups had a significantly increased percentage of symptom-free and rescue-free days and nights compared with the BDP 1,000 group, and there was no difference between the two salmeterol groups. None of the treatments altered BHR. Exacerbation rates did not differ among the three groups. We conclude that in this selected group of symptomatic patients taking BDP 500 micrograms twice daily, the addition of salmeterol provides better improvement in lung function and symptom control, without altering BHR or increasing exacerbation rates, than does doubling the dose of BDP.

A comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in adult asthma.

A total of 261 patients with symptomatic, mild to moderate asthma were randomized to treatment in this 4-week, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/d with beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d. Improvements from both treatments were seen in diary card data. Morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) improved from 375 to 390 and 371 to 382 l/min with fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate, respectively. Symptom scores, percentage of symptom-free days and nights, and use of rescue beta 2-agonist medication also improved, as did clinical lung function. With the exception of percentage of rescue-free days, which was greater for beclomethasone dipropionate, none of the differences between the groups were statistically significant. There was a significant difference between treatments in the number of rescue-free days over days 1-28; however, there was no difference between treatments in the number of rescue-free days over days 1-14, nor was there any difference in the number of inhalations of rescue medication used throughout the study. Very few adverse effects were reported. Although all mean plasma cortisol values were within the normal range, they were significantly different between treatments, rising from 402 to 429 nmol/l with fluticasone propionate, and falling from 435 to 394 nmol/l with beclomethasone dipropionate (P = 0.006). Mean stimulated cortisol levels 30 min after tetracosactin injection were also significantly greater with fluticasone propionate (P = 0.024). In conclusion, fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/d is as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/d with less effect on plasma cortisol levels.

Equivalence of asthma control with new CFC-free formulation HFA-134a beclomethasone dipropionate and CFC-beclomethasone dipropionate.

The study was designed to test for equivalence of asthma control between a new aerosol formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) incorporating a chlorofluorocarbon-(CFC) free, hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-134a) and the conventional beclomethasone aerosol formulated in CFC propellants. Sixty-eight asthmatic patients entered an eight-week, randomised, double-blind crossover study. All patients, previously stabilised on BDP, were randomised to receive the same dose of BDP from each of the study treatments. Statistically significant equivalence was demonstrated between HFA-BDP and CFC-BDP for asthma control parameters: FEV1, morning and evening PEF, sleep disturbance, wheeze and cough, morning breathlessness and bronchodilator use. Such equivalence was also demonstrated for safety parameters. To conclude, it has been demonstrated that HFA-BDP achieves a level of asthma control that is clinically and statistically equivalent to CFC-BDP in terms of efficacy and safety, at total daily doses ranging from 200 micrograms to 600 micrograms in asthma patients previously stabilised on inhaled CFC-BDP.

A 3-month comparison of formoterol with terbutaline via turbuhaler. A placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Oxis Turbuhaler is a new dry powder formulation of long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol. This study compared the efficacy and safety of regular use of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol and the short-acting terbutaline for 3 months in patients with asthma. METHOD: After 1-week run-in, 343 patients received either formoterol 12 microg bid (F) (delivered dose of 9 microg), terbutaline 500 microg qid (T) or placebo qid, in a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized manner. They had a mean of 61% of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and a mean reversibility of 26%. Eighty-nine percent used inhaled corticosteroids. RESULTS: During run-in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF L/min) for F was 366 and 348 for T, and 344 for placebo (P). The F group improved morning PEF significantly compared with P (P = .0022) and T (P = .0001). Changes from run-in were + 18, -1.5, and +5 L/min after F, T, and P, respectively. The F group was statistically significantly better than P and T in increasing evening PEF and in reducing night-time asthma. The F and T statistically significantly reduced the use of rescue medication compared with P. The bronchodilating response to the study drug and to an additional 1.25 mg terbutaline was of the same magnitude before and throughout the study. No statistically significant treatment-by-time interaction was observed (P > .20). There were no adverse effects of clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: Formoterol Turbuhaler, 12 microg bid, was more effective than terbutaline Turbuhaler, 0.5 mg qid, and placebo. Regular use of formoterol or terbutaline did not significantly influence the response to additional inhalation of terbutaline.

A blinded comparison of fluticasone propionate with budesonide via powder devices in adult patients with moderate-to-severe asthma: a clinical evaluation.

In Vitro and in vivo data have demonstrated that there are detectable differences between inhaled corticosteroids commonly used to treat asthma. However, controversy still remains as to whether these differences translate into clinical benefits. This 12-week, international, randomized, doubleblind, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) 800 mug daily, administered as a powder via the Diskhaler((R)), and budesonide (BUD) 1600 mug daily, administered using the Turbuhaler((R)), in adult patients with moderate-tosevere asthma. A total of 518 patients participated in the study, 256 of whom received FP and 262 BUD. Assessment of mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over the 12-week treatment period revealed a statistically significant difference in efficacy between FP 800 mug daily and BUD 1600 mug daily in favour of FP (p = 0.003), with an overall improvement of 20.9 l/min with FP compared with 12.4 l/min on BUD. Statistically significant differences in favour of FP were seen over the 12 weeks for mean evening PEF (p = 0.04), diurnal PEF variation (p = 0.03) and percentage predicted PEF (p = 0.003), as well as forced expiratory volume (p = 0.008), forced vital capacity (p = 0.02) and PEF (p = 0.005) measured at clinic visits. The median percentage of symptom-free nights increased over the 12-week study period in both treatment groups, with similar changes seen for the median percentage of days with symptom score < 2, rescue medication use and exacerbations of asthma. The incidence of adverse events was found to be comparable in the two treatment groups. The geometric mean ratios of serum cortisol levels were found to be 1.03 for FP, indicating no mean hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression from baseline, and 0.93 for BUD (p = 0.0002 compared with FP). In summary, FP 800 mug daily showed a greater efficacy/safety ratio in the treatment of moderate-to-severe asthma than BUD 1600 mug daily.

Extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate breath-actuated inhaler (400 micrograms/day) versus budesonide dry powder inhaler (800 micrograms/day) in asthma.

Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol breath-actuated inhaler (Qvar Autohaler; BDP-AH) provides an alternative to chlorofluorocarbon metered dose inhalers or dry powder inhalers (DPIs). The aim of this six-week, open-label study was to determine whether BDP-AH demonstrates equivalent asthma control to twice the dose of budesonide (BUD)-DPI (Pulmicort Turbuhaler). Adults with symptomatic asthma inadequately controlled on BUD-DPI 400 micrograms/day and beta-agonist were enrolled. Patients (n = 193) were randomised to receive 400 micrograms/day BDP-AH (n = 98) (two puffs of 100 micrograms/actuation inhaler twice daily) or 800 micrograms/day BUD-DPI (n = 95) (two puffs of 200 micrograms/actuation inhaler twice daily). Both groups showed a statistically significant change from baseline in morning (a.m.) peak expiratory flow (PEF) at weeks 5-6 (p < 0.01), indicating study treatment improved a.m. PEF over prestudy 400 micrograms/day BUD. Changes from baseline in a.m. PEF at weeks 5-6 were 15.9 l/min for BDP-AH and 14.2 l/min for BUD-DPI; the groups were statistically equivalent (90% CI -7.02-10.44; p < -0.001 [equivalence = within +/- 25 l/min]). Other efficacy assessments (evening PEF, FEV1, asthma symptoms, beta-agonist use) confirmed the treatments were clinically equivalent. Thirty-nine (40%) patients on BDP-AH and 35 (37%) on BUD-DPI experienced at least one adverse event (p = 0.767). Four (4%) patients on BDP-AH and 3 (3%) on BUD-DPI reported increased asthma symptoms. BDP-AH at half the daily dose provided equivalent asthma control to BUD-DPI; both treatments were well tolerated.

Bambuterol: a new long acting bronchodilating prodrug.

Bambuterol, a carbamate prodrug of terbutaline as a 5, 10, or 20-mg tablet, was given once every evening to patients with asthma in a randomized double-blind crossover study. Twenty milligrams improved pulmonary functions over 24 hours; 5 and 10 mg did not. Few side effects were observed.

A placebo-controlled dose-response study of enprofylline in the maintenance therapy of asthma.

We assessed the efficacy and side effects of oral enprofylline in the maintenance therapy of 206 asthmatics 19 to 71 yr of age. After a 1-wk placebo run-in, patients were randomized to receive in double-blind fashion one of three doses of slow-release enprofylline tablets (150 mg, 300 mg, or 450 mg twice daily) or matching placebo for 4 wk. At baseline, mean (SD) peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was 62 (19)% of predicted normal values. The mean increase in morning PEFR 12 h after dosing was: for 450 mg, 14(17)%; for 300 mg, 8(23)%; for 150 mg, 2(11)%, for placebo 0(10)%. The increases over baseline for 450 mg and 300 mg compared with 150 mg and placebo were statistically significant. The mean asthma symptoms score (scale zero to 3) exhibited a dose-related reduction. Significantly less beta 2-receptor agonist inhalations were used in the 450-mg group than in the placebo group. There was a statistically significant increase in headache and nausea with the doses 450 mg and 300 mg given twice daily during the first treatment week compared with 150 mg and placebo. Subsequent to the first week, there were no differences between the active treatments and placebo with respect to the incidence of these and other side effects. We conclude that oral enprofylline, in a dosage of 300 to 450 mg twice daily is an effective and well-tolerated drug that may be useful in the maintenance therapy of asthma.