Perampanel enhances the cardiovagal tone and heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: The temporal lobe plays a central role in the regulation of the "Central Autonomic Network" and cardiovascular functions. The blockade of glutamatergic pathways in the temporal lobe affects cardio-autonomic control. Perampanel (PER) is a non-competitive agonist of the AMPA receptor. This study evaluated PER effects on cardiac autonomic control in patients affected by drug-resistant TLE (DRTLE). METHODS: We enrolled 40 adults with DRTLE treated with PER as add-on therapy (PER group) and 32 DRTLE age, sex, and seizure-frequency matched controls treated with different additional anti-seizure medication (ASM) as add-on therapy (No-PER group). HRV analysis was performed on 5-minute EKG recording in resting state before and 6-months after the introduction of add-on ASM. Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were used to analyzed HRV variables according to time (baseline and 6-months follow-up) and groups. RESULTS: At baseline no differences were detected between PER group and No-PER group according to time-domain and frequency-domain HRV parameters. At the follow-up, in PER group a multiplicative effect for the interaction between treatment and time was observed for MeanRR (ms) (p=0.03), LnRMSSD (ms) (p=0.04), LnHF (ms2) (p<0.001), HF n.u. (p=0.001), HF% (p=0.002) with increased values, and for LnLF (ms2) (p=0.001), LF n.u. (p=0.001), LF% (p=0.01), and LF/HF (p<0.001) with reduced values. The change in seizure frequency after add-on therapy was comparable between the two groups (p=0.81) CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the notion that PER increases the vagal tone in DRTLE. This activity may exert a cardioprotective effect by reducing the risk of developing cardiac arrhythmias. Furthermore, given the correlations between HRV modifications and the occurrence of SUDEP, future studies will need to test the protective effects of PER on SUDEP.

Intravenous brivaracetam in status epilepticus: A multicentric retrospective study in Italy.

PURPOSE: to evaluate the use, effectiveness, and adverse events of intravenous brivaracetam (BRV) in status epilepticus (SE). METHODS: a retrospective multicentric study involving 24 Italian neurology units was performed from March 2018 to June 2020. A shared case report form was used across participating centres to limit biases of retrospective data collection. Diagnosis and classification of SE followed the 2015 ILAE proposal. We considered a trial with BRV a success when it was the last administered drug prior the clinical and/or EEG resolution of seizures, and the SE did not recur during hospital observation. In addition, we considered cases with early response, defined as SE resolved within 6 h after BRV administration. RESULTS: 56 patients were included (mean age 62 years; 57 % male). A previous diagnosis of epilepsy was present in 21 (38 %). Regarding SE etiology classification 46 % were acute symptomatic, 18 % remote and 16 % progressive symptomatic. SE episodes with prominent motor features were the majority (80 %). BRV was administered as first drug after benzodiazepine failure in 21 % episodes, while it was used as the second or the third (or more) drug in the 38 % and 38 % of episodes respectively. The median loading dose was 100 mg (range 50-300 mg). BRV was effective in 32 cases (57 %). An early response was documented in 22 patients (39 % of the whole sample). The use of the BRV within 6 h from SE onset was independently associated to an early SE resolution (OR 32; 95 % CI 3.39-202; p = 0.002). No severe treatment emergent adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: BRV proved to be useful and safe for the treatment of SE. Time to seizures resolution appears shorter when it is administered in the early phases of SE.