RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Risk factors for developing pancreatitis due to thiopurines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are not clearly identified. Our aim was to evaluate the predictive pharmacogenetic risk of pancreatitis in IBD patients treated with thiopurines. METHODS: We conducted an observational pharmacogenetic study of acute pancreatitis events in a cohort study of IBD patients treated with thiopurines from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry biobank of GETECCU. Samples were obtained and the CASR, CEL, CFTR, CDLN2, CTRC, SPINK1, CPA1, and PRSS1 genes, selected based on their known association with pancreatitis, were fully sequenced. RESULTS: Ninety-five cases and 105 controls were enrolled; a total of 57% were women. Median age at pancreatitis diagnosis was 39 years. We identified 81 benign variants (50 in cases and 67 in controls) and a total of 35 distinct rare pathogenic and unknown significance variants (10 in CEL, 21 in CFTR, 1 in CDLN2, and 3 in CPA1). None of the cases or controls carried pancreatitis-predisposing variants within the CASR, CPA1, PRSS1, and SPINK1 genes, nor a pathogenic CFTR mutation. Four different variants of unknown significance were detected in the CDLN and CPA1 genes; one of them was in the CDLN gene in a single patient with pancreatitis and 3 in the CPA1 gene in 5 controls. After the analysis of the variants detected, no significant differences were observed between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: In patients with IBD, genes known to cause pancreatitis seem not to be involved in thiopurine-related pancreatitis onset.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Pancreatitis , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Femenino , Pancreatitis/inducido químicamente , Pancreatitis/genética , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/genética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Factores de Riesgo , Variación Genética , Mercaptopurina/efectos adversos , Mercaptopurina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Crohn's disease (CD) is a progressive disorder leading to cumulative bowel damage. The Lémann index is a validated tool that can help in monitoring the progression of the disease and evaluating the effectiveness of different therapies. Our aim was to describe the main radiological findings in incidentally diagnosed CD and to evaluate bowel damage in this subgroup compared to patients diagnosed at later stages. METHODS: Patients with an incidental diagnosis of CD during the colorectal cancer screening program were compared to controls with a CD cohort diagnosed after symptomatic onset and matched 1:1 by disease extent. All cross-sectional examinations were centrally read, performing a descriptive analysis of the main findings and calculation of Lémann index. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included: 19 with preclinical CD (median age 55 years (IQR, 54-62), 53% male, 74% non-smokers; 74% B1 and 26% B2) and 19 matched-controls with symptomatic CD. In those with preclinical CD, the most frequent transmural findings on MRE were contrast enhancement (79%), wall thickening (79%), followed by lymphadenopathy (68%), edema (42%), and increased vascularity (42%). Among those with strictures, controls showed a higher rate of preestenotic dilation (100% vs. 0%, p = 0.01). Bowel damage assessment revealed no statistically significant differences in the Lémann index between preclinical CD and controls (p = 0.95). A statistically significant higher score in the colonic/rectum score was observed (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Patients with preclinical CD demonstrate similar radiological findings and degree of bowel damage as new-onset symptomatic CD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Humanos , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Crohn/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Crohn/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estudios Transversales , Intestinos/patología , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestinos/irrigación sanguíneaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Primary non-response and secondary loss of response to anti-TNF agents are common in inflammatory bowel disease. Increasing drug concentrations are correlated to better clinical response and remission rates. Combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents could be an option in these patients. The objective of our study was to perform an in vitro assay to determine if the GMA device can lead to infliximab (IFX) adsorption. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A blood sample was obtained from a healthy control. It was incubated with three concentrations of IFX (3, 6, and 9µg/ml) at room temperature for 10min. At that time, 1ml was collected to determine the IFX concentration. Then, 10ml of each drug concentration was incubated with 5ml of cellulose acetate (CA) beads from the GMA device at 200rpm for 1h at 37°C to simulate physiological human conditions. A second sample of each concentration was collected and IFX levels were determined. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the IFX levels in the blood samples before and after incubation with the CA beads (p=0.41) and after repeated measurements (p=0.31). Mean change was 3.8µg/ml. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro combination of GMA and IFX did not change the circulating levels of IFX at the three concentrations tested, suggesting that there is no interaction between the drug and the apheresis device in vitro and that they might be safely combined with each other.
Asunto(s)
Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Infliximab , Monocitos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Granulocitos , Fármacos GastrointestinalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the characteristics and use of digital health tools (DHT) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: We performed a qualitative study based on a narrative literature review, a questionnaire and on the opinion of 3 expert gastroenterologists. Several searches were carried out until September 2022 through Medline to identify articles on the use of DHT in IBD by healthcare professionals. A structured questionnaire was designed to be answered by health professionals involved in the care of patients with IBD. The experts generated a set of recommendations. RESULTS: There are multiple DHT for IBD with different characteristics and contents. We received 29 questionnaires. Almost 50% of the participants were 41-50 years old, the majority were women (83%) and 90% were gastroenterologists. A total of 96% reported the use of several DHT, but 20% used them occasionally or infrequently. Web pages were found the most used (62%). DHT are mostly used to get information (80%), followed by clinical practice issues (70%) and educational purposes (62%). G-Educainflamatoria website is the best known and most used HDS (96% and 64%, respectively). The main barriers to the use of DHT in IBD were the lack of time (55%), doubts about the benefit of DHT (50%) and the excess of information (40%). CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare professionals involved in the care of patients with to IBD frequently use DHT, although actions are needed to optimize their use and to guarantee their efficient and safe use.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in treating ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to tofacitinib (TOFA) in patients with UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study including all patients with refractory UC who received GMA plus TOFA. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included (median 46 years [IQR, 37-58]; 67% female; 67% E3). Patients were mostly receiving TOFA 10mg bid (75%), and 33% also concomitant steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 7 (IQR, 5-7), and it decreased to a median of 2 (IQR, 0-3) and 0 (IQR, 0-3) after 1 and 6 months (p=0.027 and 0.020, respectively), while no differences were found in CRP and FC. Clinical remission was achieved by 6 patients both at 1 (50%) and 6 months (67%). CF values<250mg/kg were achieved by 2 and 4 patients at 1 and 6 months (data available in 5 and 7 patients, respectively). No patient required dose-escalation of TOFA, and one patient was able to de-escalate the drug. No patient required colectomy and all patients under steroids were able to stop them. CONCLUSION: The combination of GMA and TOFA can be effective in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Granulocitos , Monocitos , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/administración & dosificación , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Resultado del Tratamiento , Leucaféresis/métodos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) has shown to be safe and effective in ulcerative colitis (UC), also in combination with biologics, mainly with anti-TNF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining GMA after primary non-response (PNR) or loss of response (LOR) to ustekinumab (UST) in patients with UC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 12 IBD Units, including all patients with refractory UC or unclassified IBD (IBD-U) who received combined GMA plus UST. The number and frequency of GMA sessions, filtered blood volume and time of each session were registered. Efficacy was assessed 1 and 6 months after finishing GMA by partial Mayo score, C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FC). Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were included (15 UC, 2 IBD-U; median age 47 years [IQR, 35-61]; 59% male; 53% E3). Most patients (89%) had prior exposure to anti-TNF agents and 53% to vedolizumab; 65% were also receiving steroids at baseline. Median partial Mayo score at baseline was 6 (IQR, 5-7) and it significantly decreased after 1 and 6 months (p=0.042 and 0.007, respectively). Baseline FC significantly decreased after 6 months (p=0.028) while no differences were found in CRP. During follow-up, 18% patients started a new biologic therapy and 12% required surgery; 64% of patients under steroids were able to discontinue them. Adverse events were reported in one patient. CONCLUSION: GMA can recapture the response to UST in selected cases of UC after PNR or LOR to this drug.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care and education might differ around Europe. Therefore, we conducted this European Variation In IBD PracticE suRvey (VIPER) to investigate potential differences between countries. METHODS: This trainee-initiated survey, run through SurveyMonkey®, consisted of 47 questions inquiring basic demographics, IBD training, and clinical care. Results were compared according to gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, for which countries were divided into 2 groups (low/high income, according to the World Bank). RESULTS: The online survey was completed by 1,285 participants from 40 European countries, with a majority of specialists (65.3%) working in academic institutions (50.4%). Significant differences in IBD-specific training (55.9% vs. 38.4%), as well as availability of IBD units (58.4% vs. 39.7%) and multidisciplinary meetings (73.2% vs. 40.1%), were observed between respondees from high and low GDP countries (p < 0.0001). In high GDP countries, IBD nurses are more common (85.9% vs. 36.0%), also mirrored by more nurse-led IBD clinics (40.6% vs. 13.7%; p < 0.0001). IBD dieticians (33.4% vs. 16.5%) and psychologists (16.8% vs. 7.5%) are mainly present in high GDP countries (p < 0.0001). In the current COVID era, telemedicine is available in 73.2% versus 54.1% of the high/low GDP countries, respectively (p < 0.0001). Treat-to-target approaches are implemented everywhere (85.0%), though access to biologicals and small molecules differs significantly. CONCLUSION: Much variability in IBD practice exists across Europe, with marked differences between high and low GDP countries. Further work is required to help address some of these inequalities, aiming to improve and standardize IBD care and training across Europe.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Analgesics are widely used, but evidence regarding whether their use increases the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) flares or complications is unclear. Therefore, self-medication with analgesics in IBD is usually not recommended. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of self-medication with analgesics in a cohort of ulcerative colitis (UC) patients and to identify reasons and factors associated with self-medication. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included consecutive unselected adult patients with UC. Participants were asked to complete an anonymous web-based survey with multiple-choice questions and closed responses. No clinical data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 546 patients (61.2% women, mean age 39.9 years) completed the survey. The prevalence of self-medication with analgesics was 49.8% (272/546). Paracetamol (45.2%) and metamizole (21.2%) were the most frequently used drugs; frequencies of self-medication were <5% for other analgesics (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids). The most frequent reasons for self-medication were the need for quick symptom relief and that it had been agreed with/prescribed by the treating physician. Multivariable analysis identified female sex (odds ratio [OR]=1.9), sick leave (OR=2.2), treatment with intravenous drugs (OR=2.9), and emergency room visit (OR=2.3) as variables associated with self-medication, whilst follow-up by a nurse was associated with less self-medication (OR=0.6). CONCLUSION: The frequency of self-medication with analgesics in UC patients is high and appears to be associated with variables suggesting worse disease control. Closer follow-up, including a specialized nurse, could decrease self-medication. Strategies to improve disease control, including close monitoring of symptoms such as pain, are needed.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Adulto , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are currently in use and are recommended in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Data are scarce about the gastroenterologists and IBD patient's acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intention to get vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine among IBD patients from gastroenterologists and patient's perspective. METHODS: An online anonymous survey was sent to 8000 patients from ACCU-Spain and 1000 members of the GETECCU. Three invitations were sent between October-December 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed, comparing physicians and patients responses by standard statistical analyses. RESULTS: 144 gastroenterologists [63% female, mean age 43 years (SD 9.5)], and 1302 patients [72% female, mean age 43 years (SD 12)] responded to the survey. 95% of the physicians recommended SARS-CoV-2 vaccine for IBD patients and 87% consider that their vaccination strategies has not changed after the pandemic compared to 12% who considered that they currently refer more patients to vaccination. Regarding to IBD patients, only 43% of patients were willing to receive the vaccine and 43% were not sure. Male sex (p<0.001) and mesalazine treatment (p=0.021) were positively associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine acceptance. After multivariate analysis, only male sex was significantly associated with vaccination intent (OR=1.6; 95% confidence interval=1.2-2.0; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gastroenterologists and patient's perspective about SARS-CoV-2 are different. Future efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccine and decrease unfounded beliefs among IBD patients are needed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gastroenterólogos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicacionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: obscure gastrointestinal bleeding is defined as bleeding from a source that cannot be identified on upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and capsule endoscopy is the next step in these patients. Some patients may be unsuitable for conventional endoscopy and performing a capsule panendoscopic test as a first line procedure might potentially reduce the number of endoscopies and their subsequent risk. AIM: to analyze our experience with capsule endoscopy in the bleeding setting. METHODS: the first 100 panendoscopic capsule procedures performed in our center from August 2011 until December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: positive findings were observed in 61.2 % of patients; 46.26 % had a previous negative gastroscopy and the capsule detected small bowel lesions in 67.7 % and colonic findings in 80.64 %. Taking into consideration that our population were high-risk patients (mainly because of comorbidities) and that we used up to 45 ml of sodium phosphate, sodium, potassium and creatinine changes were analyzed before and after procedure. The mean "before" values were 140.68, 4.04 and 1.36, respectively. The mean "after" values were 140.28, 3.9 and 1.35 (p = n.s.). According to our findings, no other endoscopic studies would be needed in 64.5 % of patients with negative gastroscopy. According to capsule results, conventional endoscopy could have been avoided in 68.6 % of cases. CONCLUSION: panendoscopy with a capsule may be useful and safe in bleeding high-risk patients, by selecting those who need therapeutic endoscopy, avoiding up to 68.6 % of diagnostic endoscopies in our series.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Capsular , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Gastroscopía , Humanos , Intestino Delgado , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Patients with certain immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), have an increased risk of severe infectious diseases than the general population, which are mainly associated with the immunosuppressive treatments that they receive. These treatments act on the immune system through different mechanisms, causing different degrees of immunosuppression and a variable risk depending on whether the pathogen is a virus, bacteria or fungus. This article reviews the most relevant literature on the subject, which was selected and discussed by a panel of experts. The aim of this article is to review the risk of infections in patients with IBD and RA, and the potential preventive measures.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/terapia , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Virosis/prevención & control , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , COVID-19/etiología , Hepatitis A/prevención & control , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is no information regarding the outcome of Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) in non-referral hospitals, nor on the efficacy of EBD in ulcerative colitis (UC). We report herein the results of the largest series published to date. AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of EBD for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) stenosis performed in 19 hospitals with different levels of complexity and to determine factors related to therapeutic success. METHODS: We identified IBD patients undergoing EBD in the ENEIDA database. Efficacy of EBD was compared between CD and UC and between secondary and tertiary hospitals. Predictive factors of therapeutic success were assessed with multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Four-hundred dilations (41.2% anastomotic) were performed in 187 IBD patients (13 UC/Indeterminate colitis). Technical and therapeutic success per dilation was achieved in 79.5% and 55.3%, respectively. Therapeutic success per patient was achieved in 78.1% of cases (median follow-up: 40 months) with 49.7% requiring more than one dilation. No differences related to either diagnosis or hospital complexity was found. Technical success [OR 4.12 (95%CI 2.4-7.1)] and not receiving anti-TNF at the time of dilation [OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1-2.6)] were independently related to therapeutic success per dilation. A stricture length ≤ 2 cm [HR 2.43 (95% CI 1.11-5.31)] was a predictive factor of long-term success per patient. The rate of major complications was 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: EBD can be performed with similar efficacy and safety in hospitals with differing levels of complexity and it might be a suitable treatment for UC with short stenosis. To achieve a technical success and the short length of the stenosis seem to be critical for long-term therapeutic success.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Enfermedad de Crohn/cirugía , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Dilatación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Probabilidad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Javier P. Gisbert was listed incorrectly as Javier Pérez-Gisbert.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Aeromonas can cause several diseases in humans, with gastroenteritis accounting for most cases. The role of Aeromonas as a pathogen in human enterocolitis has been questioned in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of gastrointestinal infection caused by Aeromonas in our area and its possible relationship to inflammatory bowel disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. All adult patients with a positive stool culture for Aeromonas were identified between January 2015 and December 2017 at Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo (Vizcaya, Spain). RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were identified (median age 62 years; 51% women). Therefore, the incidence in our area was 32 cases per 105 inhabitants per year. Eleven per cent of them had been previously diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (four with ulcerative colitis and seven with Crohn's disease). Patients with inflammatory bowel disease more often received immunosuppressive therapy. Conversely, patients without inflammatory bowel disease suffered from more comorbidities. We also found comorbidity to be the risk factor most associated with Aeromonas infection. CONCLUSION: Aeromonas infection is a common gastrointestinal infection that may occur in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. Immunosuppression is a significant factor in inflammatory bowel disease patients, while comorbidity seems to confer a higher risk on patients without this disease.
Asunto(s)
Aeromonas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Coinfección/microbiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/microbiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Incidencia , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
COVID-19 is a disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which was described in China in late 2019. There are currently more than three million diagnosed cases, constituting a pandemic which has caused a worldwide crisis. The devastating effects of this infection are due to its highly contagious nature and although mild forms predominate, in absolute values, the rates for severe forms and mortality are very high. The information on the characteristics of the infection in inflammatory bowel disease is of special interest, as these patients have higher attendance at health centres, which may increase their risk of infection. Furthermore, the treatments used to control the inflammatory activity may modify the disease course of COVID-19. The Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis and the Spanish Nurses Working Group on Inflammatory Bowel Disease have prepared this document as a practical response to some common questions about the treatment of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Ansiedad/etiología , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Comorbilidad , Contraindicaciones de los Medicamentos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Diarrea/etiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/efectos adversos , Composición Familiar , Miedo , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Cuarentena , Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología , Vitamina B 12/administración & dosificación , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina B 12/etiología , Lugar de Trabajo , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
Pouchitis treatment is a complex entity that requires a close medical and surgical relationship. The elective treatment for acute pouchitis is antibiotics. After a first episode of pouchitis it is recommended prophylaxis therapy with a probiotic mix, nevertheless it is not clear the use of this formulation for preventing a first episode of pouchitis after surgery. First-line treatment for chronic pouchitis is an antibiotic combination. The next step in treatment should be oral budesonide. Selected cases of severe, chronic refractory pouchitis may benefit from biologic agents, and anti-TNF α should be recommended as the first option, leaving the new biologicals for multi-refractory patients. Permanent ileostomy may be an option in severe refractory cases to medical treatment.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Reservoritis/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Comités Consultivos , Algoritmos , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crónica , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Crohn , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Enema/métodos , Humanos , Ileostomía/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Reservoritis/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , EspañaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) diagnosis on clinical decision-making regarding treatment choice and maintenance of treatment over time in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: A cohort of patients who underwent MRE for IBD assessment between 2011 and 2014 was analyzed. From clinical records, we retrospectively retrieved their demographic data and clinical data on their IBD at the time of MRE, the results of MRE and the patient's clinical course. Medical management decisions made during the three months following MRE and at the 15-month follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 474 MREs were reviewed. In the first three-month period, MRE results led to changes in the medical management of 266 patients (56.1%). Of those, maintenance therapy was altered in 140 patients (68.3%) (90.7% step-up and 9.3% top-down strategy), 65 (24.4%) were prescribed a course of steroids and 61 (22.9%) underwent surgery. MRE confirmed a CD diagnosis in 14/41 patients (34.1%) previously diagnosed with indeterminate colitis or ulcerative colitis and in 4/18 patients (22.2%) with suspected IBD. At the 15-month follow-up, treatment remained unchanged in 289 patients (65.8%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that MRE is a diagnostic tool that provides valid information for the clinical-decision making process for patients with CD.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms can precede by many years the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) and these patients can show some degree of inflammation associated with abnormal aggregates of alpha-synuclein in the GI tract. The abnormal accumulation of alpha-synuclein and the spreading of the aggregates from the gut to the brain might be promoted by inflammation, rising the hypothesis of a possible relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and PD. Many population-based studies have explored this association, but they have found conflicting results. It is essential to clarify this hypothesis and to try to elucidate the milestones of this relationship. There is no clear concordance between the results and the interpretation of different previous findings, probably due to many confounding factors such as drugs with anti-inflammatory activity, surgery, genetic predisposition and also selection bias. If there is a real association between both diseases, gastroenterologists and neurologists should be able to detect possible triggers of the disease or on the other hand, protective factors, that may be considered in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Tracto Gastrointestinal/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Agregado de Proteínas , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Sistema Nervioso Entérico , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , alfa-Sinucleína/análisisRESUMEN
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis (GMA) after loss of response (LOR) to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents in ulcerative colitis (UC). Materials and methods: A retrospective, multicenter study was performed in 11 inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Units. Clinical remission was defined as a partial Mayo score ≤2. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated by the partial Mayo score and the rate of anti-TNF intensification, switch, swap or colectomy. Results: Forty-seven patients with ulcerative colitis were included (mean age 35 years, mean disease duration 52 months, 66% male and 59% extensive colitis). Twenty-three subjects were receiving infliximab, eighteen adalimumab and six golimumab. GMA was combined after a primary non-response (49%) or secondary loss of response (51%) to anti-TNF therapy. We observed a significant decrease in partial Mayo score and fecal calprotectin after GMA. Fifteen patients (32%) responded to the combination therapy without anti-TNF intensification, switch, swap or colectomy. Eight patients (17%) underwent colectomy. Two patients (4%) presented adverse events related to the technique. Conclusions: Combination of GMA and anti-tumor necrosis factor is a safe and effective treatment after the loss of response to these biologic agents, with a significant decrease of the clinical disease activity and biomarkers, in a population with limited therapeutic alternatives.
Asunto(s)
Eliminación de Componentes Sanguíneos/métodos , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Granulocitos/citología , Monocitos/citología , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody-targeting programmed cell death protein-1, is being increasingly used for the treatment of some advanced neoplasms. Several of its adverse effects are a result of the upregulation of T cells, with colitis as one of the most severe, and a challenging differential diagnosis with ulcerative colitis. However, few real-life clinical practice cases have been reported beyond trials. Our aim was to report a series of new cases, reviewing previously communicated endoscopic-proven nivolumab-induced colitis. METHOD: All patients treated with nivolumab in three university centers were identified and those who developed immune-mediated colitis (defined as the presence of diarrhea and evidence of colitis demonstrated by colonoscopy) were described. Additionally, a review of case reports of nivolumab-induced colitis reported in the literature up to March 2018 was performed. RESULTS: Six new cases of nivolumab-induced colitis and 13 previously reported cases out of randomized clinical trials are described. Colonoscopy showed a mucosal pattern mimicking ulcerative colitis in a large proportion of patients. Clostridium difficile superinfection was observed in two out of 19 cases. All but three patients definitively discontinued nivolumab therapy. Most patients were initially managed with oral or intravenous corticosteroids, but five of them required rescue therapy with infliximab. CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab-induced colitis may mimic ulcerative colitis. Steroid therapy (oral or intravenously) is often efficient, but one-fourth of patients need rescue therapy with anti-TNF. Intestinal superinfection with Clostridium difficile or cytomegalovirus should be ruled out before starting immunosuppressive therapy.