Dysphagia-optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus standard intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer (DARS): a phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Most newly diagnosed oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal cancers are treated with chemoradiotherapy with curative intent but at the consequence of adverse effects on quality of life. We aimed to investigate if dysphagia-optimised intensity-modulated radiotherapy (DO-IMRT) reduced radiation dose to the dysphagia and aspiration related structures and improved swallowing function compared with standard IMRT. METHODS: DARS was a parallel-group, phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial done in 22 radiotherapy centres in Ireland and the UK. Participants were aged 18 years and older, had T1-4, N0-3, M0 oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer, a WHO performance status of 0 or 1, and no pre-existing swallowing dysfunction. Participants were centrally randomly assigned (1:1) using a minimisation algorithm (balancing factors: centre, chemotherapy use, tumour type, American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour stage) to receive DO-IMRT or standard IMRT. Participants and speech language therapists were masked to treatment allocation. Radiotherapy was given in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Dose was 65 Gy to primary and nodal tumour and 54 Gy to remaining pharyngeal subsite and nodal areas at risk of microscopic disease. For DO-IMRT, the volume of the superior and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscle or inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle lying outside the high-dose target volume had a mandatory 50 Gy mean dose constraint. The primary endpoint was MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) composite score 12 months after radiotherapy, analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population that included only patients who completed a 12-month assessment; safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one fraction of radiotherapy. The study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN25458988, and is complete. FINDINGS: From June 24, 2016, to April 27, 2018, 118 patients were registered, 112 of whom were randomly assigned (56 to each treatment group). 22 (20%) participants were female and 90 (80%) were male; median age was 57 years (IQR 52-62). Median follow-up was 39·5 months (IQR 37·8-50·0). Patients in the DO-IMRT group had significantly higher MDADI composite scores at 12 months than patients in the standard IMRT group (mean score 77·7 [SD 16·1] vs 70·6 [17·3]; mean difference 7·2 [95% CI 0·4-13·9]; p=0·037). 25 serious adverse events (16 serious adverse events assessed as unrelated to study treatment [nine in the DO-IMRT group and seven in the standard IMRT group] and nine serious adverse reactions [two vs seven]) were reported in 23 patients. The most common grade 3-4 late adverse events were hearing impairment (nine [16%] of 55 in the DO-IMRT group vs seven [13%] of 55 in the standard IMRT group), dry mouth (three [5%] vs eight [15%]), and dysphagia (three [5%] vs eight [15%]). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that DO-IMRT improves patient-reported swallowing function compared with standard IMRT. DO-IMRT should be considered a new standard of care for patients receiving radiotherapy for pharyngeal cancers. FUNDING: Cancer Research UK.

Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach.

BACKGROUND: TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients. METHODS: HPV status was ascertained using p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV RNA and DNA in situ hybridisation. Survival by stage in a cohort of OPSCC patients was evaluated using TNM7/TNM8 staging. Survival of p16+/HPV- patients was compared to p16 status. RESULTS: TNM8 staging was found to improve on TNM7 (log rank p = 0·0190 for TNM8 compared with p = 0·0530 for TNM7) in p16+ patients. Patients who tested p16+ but were HPV- (n = 20) had significantly reduced five-year survival (33%) compared to p16+ patients (77%) but not p16- patients (35%). Cancer stage was reduced in 95% of p16+/HPV- patients despite having a mortality rate twice (HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.37-5.15]) that of p16+/HPV+ patients under new TNM8 staging criteria. CONCLUSION: Given the significantly poorer survival of p16+/HPV- OPSCCs, these data provide compelling evidence for use of an HPV-specific test for staging classification. This has particular relevance in light of potential treatment de-escalation that could expose these patients to inappropriately reduced treatment intensity as treatment algorithms evolve.

DARS: a phase III randomised multicentre study of dysphagia- optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard intensity- modulated radiotherapy (S-IMRT) in head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Persistent dysphagia following primary chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancers can have a devastating impact on patients' quality of life. Single arm studies have shown that the dosimetric sparing of critical swallowing structures such as the pharyngeal constrictor muscle and supraglottic larynx can translate to better functional outcomes. However, there are no current randomised studies to confirm the benefits of such swallow sparing strategies. The aim of Dysphagia/Aspiration at risk structures (DARS) trial is to determine whether reducing the dose to the pharyngeal constrictors with dysphagia-optimised intensity- modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) will lead to an improvement in long- term swallowing function without having any detrimental impact on disease-specific survival outcomes. METHODS/DESIGN: The DARS trial (CRUK/14/014) is a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) for patients undergoing primary (chemo) radiotherapy for T1-4, N0-3, M0 pharyngeal cancers. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either standard IMRT (S-IMRT) or Do-IMRT. Radiotherapy doses will be the same in both groups; however in patients allocated to Do-IMRT, irradiation of the pharyngeal musculature will be reduced by delivering IMRT identifying the pharyngeal muscles as organs at risk. The primary endpoint of the trial is the difference in the mean MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) composite score, a patient-reported outcome, measured at 12 months post radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include prospective and longitudinal evaluation of swallow outcomes incorporating a range of subjective and objective assessments, quality of life measures, loco-regional control and overall survival. Patients and speech and language therapists (SLTs) will both be blinded to treatment allocation arm to minimise outcome-reporting bias. DISCUSSION: DARS is the first RCT investigating the effect of swallow sparing strategies on improving long-term swallowing outcomes in pharyngeal cancers. An integral part of the study is the multidimensional approach to swallowing assessment, providing robust data for the standardisation of future swallow outcome measures. A translational sub- study, which may lead to the development of future predictive and prognostic biomarkers, is also planned. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial register, ISRCTN25458988 (04/01/2016).

Quality assurance of dysphagia-optimised intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for head and neck cancer.

This study aimed to assess the impact of the margin applied to the clinical target volume, to create the planning target volume, on plan quality of a novel dysphagia-optimised intensity modulated radiotherapy technique developed within a head and neck cancer multicentre randomised controlled trial. Protocol compliant plans were used for a single benchmark planning case. Larger margins were associated with higher doses to adjacent organs at risk, particularly the inferior pharyngeal constrictor muscle, but coincided with some improved low dose target coverage. A 3 mm margin is recommended for this technique if local practices allow.

Comparison of Molecular Assays for HPV Testing in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinomas: A Population-Based Study in Northern Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Determination of human papillomavirus (HPV) status has become clinically relevant for patient stratification under UICC TNM8 staging. Within the United Kingdom, a combination of p16 IHC and HPV DNA-ISH is recommended for classifying HPV status. This study will assess a series of clinically applicable second-line molecular tests to run in combination with p16 IHC to optimally determine HPV status. METHODS: The ability of HPV RNA-ISH, HPV DNA-ISH, and HPV DNA-PCR to identify p16-positive/HPV-positive patients was investigated in a population-based oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) cohort of patients diagnosed in Northern Ireland from 2000 to 2011. RESULTS: Only 41% of the Northern Irish OPSCC patient population was associated with HPV-driven carcinogenesis. Both ISH assays were more specific than the DNA-PCR assay (100% and 95% vs. 67%) and were less likely to be affected by preanalytic factors such as increasing block age. A pooled HPV genotype probe for RNA-ISH was found to be the most accurate molecular assay assessed (95% accuracy) when compared with p16 positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the advantage of tissue-based molecular assays when determining HPV status in retrospective samples. Specifically, we demonstrate the enhanced sensitivity and specificity of ISH techniques compared with PCR-based methodology when working with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, and found HPV RNA-ISH to be the most effective assay for determining HPV status. IMPACT: As p16 IHC is a relatively inexpensive, accessible, and sensitive test for stratifying patients by HPV status, this study finds that more patients would benefit from first-line p16 IHC followed by specific HPV testing using HPV RNA-ISH to confirm HPV status.

Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer reduces the requirement for rescans during treatment due to spinal cord dose.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with radiotherapy for head and neck (H&N) cancer often experience anatomical changes. The potential compromises to Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage or Organ at Risk (OAR) sparing has prompted the use of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) for these patients. However, implementation of ART is time and resource intensive. This study seeks to define a clinical trigger for H&N re-plans based on spinal cord safety using kV Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) verification imaging, in order to best balance clinical benefit with additional workload. METHODS: Thirty-one H&N patients treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) who had a rescan CT (rCT) during treatment were included in this study. Contour volume changes between the planning CT (pCT) and rCT were determined. The original treatment plan was calculated on the pCT, CBCT prior to the rCT, pCT deformed to the anatomy of the CBCT (dCT), and rCT (considered the gold standard). The dose to 0.1 cc (D0.1cc) spinal cord was evaluated from the Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs). RESULTS: The median dose increase to D0.1cc between the pCT and rCT was 0.7 Gy (inter-quartile range 0.2-1.9 Gy, p < 0.05). No correlation was found between contour volume changes and the spinal cord dose increase. Three patients exhibited an increase of 7.0-7.2 Gy to D0.1cc, resulting in a re-plan; these patients were correctly identified using calculations on the CBCT/dCT. CONCLUSIONS: An adaptive re-plan can be triggered using spinal cord doses calculated on the CBCT/dCT. Implementing this trigger can reduce patient appointments and radiation dose by eliminating up to 90% of additional un-necessary CT scans, reducing the workload for radiographers, physicists, dosimetrists, and clinicians.

Increased superoxide production in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus: role of nitric oxide synthase.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and diabetes are important independent risk factors for increased oxidative stress and increased cardiovascular risk. The combination of hypertension and diabetes results in a dramatic increase in cardiovascular risk. Enhanced oxidative stress in hypertension and diabetes is linked to decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability because of its interaction with vascular superoxide (O(2)(*-)), derived predominantly from NAD(P)H-dependent oxidases. When uncoupled from essential cofactors, NO synthase III (NOS III) can also produce O(2)(*-). We studied platelet superoxide production in patients with hypertension alone and in patients with coexistent diabetes mellitus, investigating the contribution of NOS III uncoupling to platelet superoxide production. METHODS AND RESULTS: Gel-filtered platelets were obtained and were stimulated with Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and O(2)(*-) production was detected using lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence. Superoxide production was significantly higher in patients with diabetes and hypertension (6.4 +/- 1.6 pmol/min/10(8) platelets) than in patients with hypertension (1.6 +/- 0.6 pmol/min/10(8) platelets) (P < .04). After incorporation of N(omega)-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 1 mmol/L), O(2)(*-) detection increased in 40% of patients with diabetes and hypertension and in 87% of patients with hypertension. This expected response results from L-NAME inhibition of NO production preventing NO scavenging of O(2)(*-). A reduction in O(2)(*-) production in response to L-NAME occurred in the remaining patients and indicates O(2)(*-) production by the uncoupled NOS III enzyme. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides first published evidence that NOS III can reside in the uncoupled state in patients with hypertension and, to a greater extent, in patients with coexisting hypertension and diabetes, and that it contributes significantly to increased superoxide production in these disease states.

Impaired endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation in elderly patients with chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilator responses in chronic heart failure (CHF) have been well described. Previous studies involved younger patients and omitted medications prior to study. AIMS: We explored if new therapeutic interventions would restore vasodilator responses in typical patients with chronic heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: 24 patients and 15 controls were recruited, patients were maintained on their usual medications. Forearm blood flow responses were measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in response to incremental doses of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) (6, 9 and 12 nmol/min), acetylcholine (ACH) (120, 180 and 240 nmol/min), angiotensin II (AII) (1, 10 and 100 nmol/min) and N(g)-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (1, 2 and 4 nmol/min) infused into the non-dominant brachial artery. FBF responses to SNP were impaired in patients compared with controls (13.7(9.9,17.4) vs. 24.8(18.6,30.9)) arbitrary units, P<0.001). Similarly FBF responses to ACH were reduced in patients compared with controls (7.5(4.2,10.9) vs. 24.8(16.4,33.2)) arbitrary units, P<0.001. Decreased FBF was noted in response to AII and L-NAME but was significant only for AII and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with CHF, endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilator responses were blunted compared with controls. Defects in nitric oxide bioavailability and smooth muscle responsiveness are not reversed by modern medical management of the heart failure syndrome.