Phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx) in combination with cyclophosphamide and vincristine as second-line treatment of patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite chemotherapy and radiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients die within 2 years. Response rates for second-line chemotherapy are 15-25%, with a median survival of 5 months. Caelyx, a pegylated liposomal formulation of doxorubicin, may be better tolerated and has activity in SCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a phase II study of intravenous Caelyx (35 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2) and vincristine (1.2 mg/m2) every 21 days as second-line therapy in SCLC for up to six cycles. RESULTS: Thirty patients were evaluable for response, with a response rate of 10%. Another two had an unconfirmed response. Stable disease (SD) for >or=2 cycles was seen in an additional 53%. Grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity was seen in 17 (55%) patients (26 [22%] cycles) and included fatigue, mucositis, plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia, rash and neuropathy. Twelve patients required transfusions. All patients on study have now expired, with a median survival of 28 weeks (7 months). For patients with SD or partial response, median time to progression was 15 weeks. CONCLUSION: The combination of Caelyx, cyclophosphamide and vincristine, despite cyclophosphamide and Caelyx dose reductions, has modest activity in relapsed SCLC with acceptable toxicity.

Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8.

PURPOSE: This phase III study was performed to determine the superiority of doxorubicin (DOX) and vinorelbine (VNB) (arm 1) versus DOX alone (arm 2) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred three patients were randomized to DOX 50 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VNB 25 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8 (arm 1) or DOX 70 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 (arm 2). Both regimens were given every 3 weeks until a cumulative DOX dose of 450 mg/m(2). After 16 of the first 65 randomized patients experienced febrile neutropenia (FN), the doses were reduced to DOX 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 and VNB 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 versus DOX 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. Eligible patients were vinca alkaloid and anthracycline naive. Chemotherapy was first-line or second-line for MBC. RESULTS: Three patients were ineligible. Thus, 300 patients were assessable for toxicity and to determine time to disease progression (TTP), TTF, and OS. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were assessable for response, and 99 responders were assessable for response duration (RD). The response rates, QOL, and median RD, TTP, and TTF were not significantly different between the arms. Median OS was 13.8 months for arm 1 versus 14.4 months for arm 2 (P =.4). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was equivalent in both arms but more grade 3/4 neurotoxicity, mild venous toxicity, and FN were seen on arm 1. CONCLUSION: The survival with DOX and VNB is not superior to DOX alone in MBC.

The importance of dose scheduling with mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in metastatic breast cancer.

We have studied a mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin chemotherapy regimen in metastatic breast cancer. 8 patients received mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and 5-FU 300 mg/m2 on days 1-5 by intravenous bolus every 28 days in a pilot study. Grades 3-4 granulocytopenia followed 55% of the courses, with 2 patients admitted for febrile neutropenia. Only a 29% objective response rate was seen in a subsequent phase II trial using reduced mitoxantrone doses. Comparison with other trials suggested that 5-day bolus 5-FU administration adversely affects the combination's therapeutic index.

Phase I studies of fluorouracil, doxorubicin and vinorelbine without (FAN) and with (SUPERFAN) folinic acid in patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Site Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada - Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) undertook two parallel phase I studies to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of vinorelbine in combination with doxorubicin and fluorouracil (with or without folinic acid) in metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Cohorts of five patients were to receive: (a) fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 3 weeks (FAN regimen), or (b) fluorouracil 340 mg/m2 and folinic acid 200 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, doxorubicin 40 mg/m2 on day 1 only and escalating doses of vinorelbine (15, 20, 25, 30 mg/m2) on day 1 and again on day 5 every 4 weeks (SUPERFAN regimen). Eligibility included measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer and having received neither previous chemotherapy for metastatic disease nor anthracycline-containing adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Of 26 and 12 patients enrolled in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens, 26 and 12 were evaluable for toxicity and 21 and 9 for response, respectively. Median ages were 60.3 years (41-71 years) and 64.2 years (51-73 years). Both regimens required amendment after the first cohort with an original day- 15 vinorelbine dose omitted from the FAN regimen and more prolonged nadir granulocyte counts allowed. Myelosuppression was dose limiting. MTDs in the FAN and SUPERFAN regimens were vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2. Other toxicities included mucositis, septicemia and febrile neutropenia. Peripheral neuropathy and constipation were mild. Of the 21 FAN patients evaluable for response, 3 (14%) had complete responses and 7 (33%) had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 48%; 9 (43%) had stable disease and 2 (9%) had progressive disease as their best response. Of the nine SUPERFAN patients evaluable for response, none had a complete response. There were two (22%) with partial responses, and six (67%) had stable disease and one (11%) had progressive disease as their best response. CONCLUSIONS: The SUPERFAN regimen was too toxic to pursue even at the lowest dose. The recommended phase II starting dose for the FAN regimen was vinorelbine 20 mg/m2. Although these were phase I studies response rates in evaluable patients were less than expected and toxicity did not allow the use of as much vinorelbine in the combinations as had been anticipated. The limited response data from our study would imply that combining vinorelbine with more toxic agents may not enhance response rates and may defeat the advantage of tolerability, especially in elderly patients.

A phase II trial of prednisone, oral etoposide, and novantrone (PEN) as initial treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in elderly patients.

This phase II study was designed to improve the outcome of elderly patients with advanced aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL's) by employing a novel chemotherapy regimen PEN (prednisone, oral etoposide and mitoxantrone), as initial treatment. Between July 1991 and September 1993, 43 patients (14 male, 29 female) aged 66-82 years (median 74) received 1-8 (median 4) courses of PEN (total 192) q28 days (prednisone 50 mg od x 14 days, oral etoposide 50 mg od x 14 days and mitoxantrone 8 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) in the ambulatory setting. Pathologies of patients' tumors classified by the Working Formulation (WF) included C = 4, D = 2, E = 1, F = 7, G = 25, H = 4. Eighteen patients (42%) had stage IV, 15 (35%) stage III, 9 (21%) stage II and 1 (2%) stage I disease. Nineteen patients (44%) had B symptoms, 7 (16%) primarily extranodal disease and 15 (35%) bone marrow involvement. Patients with congestive heart failure, current anti-failure medication or pretreatment Muga left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of < 45% (median pretreatment 60%) were excluded from PEN. After a median follow-up of 8.5 months (range 1-30), 14 of 33 evaluable patients (42%) have achieved CR of their disease for 8+ months (range 4-19) and 6 (18%) PR for 6+ months (range 5-10), giving an overall response rate of 61%. Ten (30%) patients did not respond to PEN and 10 were not evaluable for response. Response to PEN was not predicted by any pretreatment characteristic.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)