RESUMEN
The dietary inflammatory index (DII) is a new tool to assess the inflammatory potential of the diet. In the present study, we aimed to determine the association between the DII and BMI, waist circumference and waist:height ratio (WHtR). We conducted a cross-sectional study of 7236 participants recruited into the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea trial. Information from a validated 137-item FFQ was used to calculate energy, food and nutrient intakes. A fourteen-item dietary screener was used to assess adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MeDiet). Sex-specific multivariable linear regression models were fitted to estimate differences (and 95 % CI) in BMI, waist circumference and WHtR across the quintiles of the DII. All nutrient intakes, healthy foods and adherence to the MeDiet were higher in the quintile with the lowest DII score (more anti-inflammatory values) except for intakes of animal protein, saturated fat and monounsaturated fat. Although an inverse association between the DII and total energy was apparent, the DII was associated with higher average BMI, waist circumference and WHtR after adjusting for known risk factors. The adjusted difference in the WHtR for women and men between the highest and lowest quintiles of the DII was 1·60 % (95 % CI 0·87, 2·33) and 1·04 % (95 % CI 0·35, 1·74), respectively. Pro-inflammatory scores remained associated with obesity after controlling for the effect that adherence to a MeDiet had on inflammation. In conclusion, the present study shows a direct association between the DII and indices of obesity, and supports the hypothesis that diet may have a role in the development of obesity through inflammatory modulation mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Dieta Mediterránea , Promoción de la Salud , Política Nutricional , Obesidad/etiología , Cooperación del Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Ingestión de Energía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/dietoterapia , Obesidad/inmunología , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Circunferencia de la Cintura , Relación Cintura-EstaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between the carbohydrate quality index (CQI) and weight change or incident overweight/obesity (body mass index ⩾25 kg/m(2)) in the 'Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN)' cohort. SUBJECTS/METHODS: A total of 8741 participants who were initially free of overweight/obesity were followed up for a median of 7.9 years. We evaluated at baseline the CQI according to four criteria: dietary fiber intake, glycemic index, whole grains/total grains ratio and solid carbohydrates/total carbohydrates ratio. Subjects were classified into quintiles according to CQI. Weight was recorded at baseline and updated every 2 years during follow-up. RESULTS: Increasing CQI of diet was not significantly associated with lower weight gain, although participants in the highest quintile had the lowest average crude weight gain (+211 g/year). We observed 1862 incident cases of overweight/obesity during follow-up. CQI was significantly associated (P for trend 0.006) with a lower risk of overweight/obesity; adjusted odds ratio for the fourth and fifth quintiles were 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66-0.99) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.60-0.92), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this Mediterranean cohort, CQI showed a significant inverse association with the incidence of overweight/obesity, which highlights that carbohydrate intake guidelines related to obesity prevention should be focused on improving the CQI of the diet.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Fibras de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Grano Comestible , Índice Glucémico , Obesidad/prevención & control , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Dieta/normas , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/clasificación , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/farmacología , Carbohidratos de la Dieta/normas , Fibras de la Dieta/farmacología , Grano Comestible/clasificación , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/etiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Sobrepeso , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect on cognition of a controlled intervention testing Mediterranean diets (MedDiet). DESIGN: Randomized trial after 6.5 years of nutritional intervention. SETTING: Eight primary care centers affiliated to the University of Navarra. PARTICIPANTS: A random subsample of 285 participants (95 randomly allocated to each of 3 groups) of the PREDIMED-NAVARRA trial. All of them were at high vascular risk (44.8% men, 74.1±5.7 years at cognitive evaluation). INTERVENTIONS: Nutritional intervention comparing two MedDiets (supplemented with extra-virgin olive oil [EVOO] or mixed nuts) versus a low-fat control diet. Participants received intensive education to increase adherence to the intended intervention. Participants allocated to the MedDiet groups received EVOO (1 l/week) or 30 g/day of mixed nuts. Dietary habits were evaluated using a validated 137-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Additionally, adherence to MedDiet was appraised using a 14-item questionnaire both at baseline and yearly thereafter. MEASUREMENTS: Cognitive performance as a main outcome and cognitive status (normal, mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia) as a secondary outcome were evaluated by two neurologists blinded to group assignment after 6.5 years of nutritional intervention. RESULTS: Better post-trial cognitive performance versus control in all cognitive domains and significantly better performance across fluency and memory tasks were observed for participants allocated to the MedDiet+EVOO group. After adjustment for sex, age, education, apolipoprotein E genotype, family history of cognitive impairment/dementia, smoking, physical activity, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, diabetes, alcohol and total energy intake, this group also showed lower MCI (OR=0.34 95% CI: 0.12-0.97) compared with control group. Participants assigned to MedDiet+Nuts group did not differ from controls. CONCLUSION: A long-term intervention with an EVOO-rich MedDiet resulted in a better cognitive function in comparison with a control diet. However, non-significant differences were found for most cognitive domains. Participants allocated to an EVOO-rich MedDiet had less MCI than controls.