RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic performance of an ultrasound-based algorithm that includes the deceleration time (DT) of early mitral filling to establish a diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) in patients who come to an emergency department because of dyspnea. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective analysis in a convenience sample of patients who came to a hospital emergency department with acute dyspnea. The algorithm included ultrasound findings and 4 echocardiographic findings as follows: mitral annular plane systolic excursion, Doppler mitral flow velocity, tissue Doppler imaging measure of the lateral annulus, and the DT of early mitral filling. The definitive diagnosis was made by 2 physicians blinded to each other's diagnosis and the ultrasound findings. RESULTS: A total of 166 adult patients with a mean (SD) age of 76 (13) years were included; 79 (48%) were women. AHF was the definitive diagnosis in 62 patients (37%). Diagnostic agreement was good between the 2 physicians (κ = 0.71). The algorithm classified all the patients, and there were no undetermined diagnoses. Diagnostic performance indicators for the ultrasound-based algorithm integrating early DT findings were as follows: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.86-0.96); sensitivity, 87% (95% CI, 76%-94%); specificity, 95% (95% CI, 89%-98%); positive likelihood ratio, 18.1 (95% CI, 7.7-42.8); and negative likelihood ratio, 0.14 (95% CI, 0.07-0.26). CONCLUSION: The ultrasound-based algorithm integrating the DT of early mitral filling performs well for diagnosing AHF in emergency patients with dyspnea. The inclusion of early DT allows all patients to be diagnosed.
OBJETIVO: Analizar el rendimiento diagnóstico de un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el tiempo de desaceleración precoz del flujo mitral (TD) para establecer el diagnóstico de insuficiencia cardiaca aguda (ICA) en pacientes que consultan en un servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) por disnea. METODO: Análisis prospectivo de una muestra de conveniencia de pacientes que consultan por disnea aguda en un SUH. El algoritmo ecográfico incluyó la ecografía pulmonar y cuatro parámetros ecocardiográficos, se midió MAPSE (desplazamiento sistólico del plano del anillo mitral), medidas doppler de flujo mitral, medidas doppler tisular en el anillo mitral lateral y TD. El diagnóstico final fue asignado por 2 médicos ciegos entre sí y a los hallazgos ecográficos. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 166 pacientes adultos, la edad media fue de 76 años (DE 13) y 79 eran mujeres (48%). Hubo 62 pacientes (37%) con un diagnóstico final de ICA. La concordancia entre asignadores fue buena para el diagnóstico de ICA (κ = 0,71). El algoritmo clasificó a todos los pacientes, no hubo ningún diagnóstico indeterminado. El rendimiento diagnóstico del algoritmo mostró un área bajo la curva de 0,91 (IC 95%: 0,86-0,96), sensibilidad del 87% (IC 95%: 76%-94%), especificidad del 95% (IC 95%: 89%-98%), razón de verosimilitud positiva del 18,1 (IC 95%: 7,7-42,8), razón de verosimilitud negativa del 0,14 (IC 95%: 0,07-0,26). CONCLUSIONES: Un algoritmo ecográfico que incluye el TD tiene un buen rendimiento para el diagnóstico de ICA en pacientes que acuden a SUH por disnea. Además, el uso de TD permite clasificar a todos los pacientes.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Masculino , Ultrasonografía , Algoritmos , Disnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Disnea/etiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Following the reintroduction of aprotinin into the European market, the French Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesiologists recommended its prophylactic use at half-dose for high-risk cardiac surgery patients. We examined whether the use of aprotinin instead of tranexamic acid could significantly reduce severe perioperative bleeding. METHODS: This multicentre, retrospective, historical study included cardiac surgery patients treated with aprotinin or tranexamic acid between December 2017 and September 2020. The primary efficacy end point was the severe or massive perioperative bleeding (class 3-4 of the universal definition of perioperative bleeding). The safety secondary end points included the occurrence of thromboembolic events and all-cause mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among the 693 patients included in the study, 347 received aprotinin and 346 took tranexamic acid. The percentage of patients with severe or massive bleeding was similar in the 2 groups (42.1% vs 43.6%, Adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.62-1.23, P = 0.44), as was the perioperative need for blood products (81.0% vs 83.2%, ORadj = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.48-1.17, P = 0.20). However, the median (Interquartile range) 12 h postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the aprotinin group (383 ml [241-625] vs 450 ml [290-730], P < 0.01). Compared to tranexamic acid, the intraoperative use of aprotinin was associated with increased risk for thromboembolic events (adjusted Hazard ratio 2.30 [95% Cl: 1.06-5.30]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Given the modest reduction in blood loss at the expense of a significant increase in thromboembolic adverse events, aprotinin use in high-risk cardiac surgery patients should be based on a carefully considered benefit-risk assessment.