The Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Microsatellite Stable Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care, particularly in immune-inflamed tumors and tumors with a high mutational burden, like microsatellite instable colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their effectiveness in microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC is limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs in MSS CRC and explore promising combination strategies. A comprehensive search from the Web of Science, Medline, and Embase databases, for studies published until 14 November 2022, identified 53 clinical trials included in the review. ICI monotherapy or ICI-ICI combinations demonstrated limited clinical activity for patients with MSS CRC, with overall response rates below (ORR) 10% in most studies. The ICI and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) garnered ORRs ranging from 10% to 40% and indicated a higher benefit for patients, particularly those without active liver metastases. The combination of ICIs with anti-VEGF agents showed modest ORRs, especially in the earlier treatment lines and in combination with chemotherapy. While these combinations could lead to modest improvements, well-defined biomarkers for long-term benefit are yet to be delineated. Combinations involving BRAF inhibitors with ICIs were studied, showing promising responses with combination approaches in molecularly defined subgroups. In conclusion, while ICI monotherapy has limited efficacy in MSS CRC, combination strategies hold promise to enhance survival outcomes. Further research is necessary to identify optimal combination approaches, predictive biomarkers for treatment response, as well as enrollment according to tumor molecular characteristics.

Which Treatment for Which Patient: Rectal Cancer Management After PROSPECT Trial.

Determining treatment options for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after the PROSPECT trial data readout adds an important level to the decision-making process.

Who Should Receive Immunotherapy for Advanced Gastroesophageal Cancer?

OPINION STATEMENT: This paper shines a light on the exciting progress being made in using immunotherapy to treat advanced gastroesophageal cancers. The positive results from trials using drugs like Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab are certainly encouraging and open new possibilities for treating this challenging disease. However, it is clear that we still have a lot to learn about how to predict which patients will benefit most from these treatments. The exploration of combining therapies and using machine learning to guide treatment shows promise. Moving forward, it is crucial that researchers and healthcare professionals continue to work together, sharing knowledge and findings to continue the advancements in this important area.

BRAF Mutations Are Associated with Poor Survival Outcomes in Advanced-stage Mismatch Repair-deficient/Microsatellite High Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a unique disease entity with growing interest given the rise of young-onset CRC. Given its heterogeneous behavior and potential for highly effective treatment outcomes, we sought to identify the clinical and molecular features that offer prognostic value for MMR-D CRC. MATERIALS/METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with metastatic CRC with MMR-D or microsatellite instability in a real-world database. Overall survival (OS) was determined by the date of metastatic disease to date of death with stratification made based on factors including BRAF and RAS mutation status, age, and MMR protein loss type. RESULTS: There were 1101 patients in the study. Patients with BRAF mutations had worse OS compared with patients with wild-type BRAF with a median survival of 18.9 months versus 33.2 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-1.86, P < .001). Patients with age >50 were found to have decreased OS versus age ≤50 with a median survival of 21.4 months versus 38.7 months (HR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.33-2.07, P < .001). BRAF mutations and age >50 remained significant predictors of OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: BRAF mutations and age >50 are associated with worse survival outcomes for patients with MMR-D mCRC. RAS mutations and specific MMR alterations are not associated with survival outcomes.

Minimal Residual Disease-Directed Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer: CIRCULATE-US.

BACKGROUND: The ability to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a novel surrogate for minimal residual disease (MRD) for patients with solid tumors, has significantly evolved over the past decade. Several studies have shown that ctDNA may provide clinical insight into the biological dynamics of MRD. The CIRCULATE-US (NRG-GI008; NCT05174169) trial will aim to address the role of ctDNA for risk stratification to intensify and deintensify adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage colon cancer. METHODS: CIRCULATE-US, a prospective phase 2/3 randomized trial, is investigating the molecular dynamics and prognostic role of ctDNA (evaluated by Natera's Signatera assay) for patients with resected colon cancer. Patients with negative postoperative ctDNA will be enrolled in cohort A and randomized to receive either immediate treatment with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX6 or CAPEOX; Arm 1) or serial ctDNA surveillance with delayed adjuvant therapy (Arm 2). Patients randomized to Arm 2 with subsequent positive ctDNA results will be enrolled in cohort B for a second randomization to receive either FOLFOX6/CAPEOX (Arm 3) or 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX; Arm 4) for 6 months. Patients with positive postoperative ctDNA results will be directly enrolled in cohort B and randomized to receive either FOLFOX6/CAPEOX (Arm 3) or FOLFIRINOX (Arm 4). Patients with stage II or stage IIIC colon cancer with positive ctDNA results (tested as standard of care with commercial testing) will be eligible for enrollment in cohort B. The primary end point for cohort A is time to positive ctDNA status for phase 2 and disease-free survival for phase 3 with a noninferiority design. The primary end point for cohort B is disease-free survival for both phase 2 and phase 3 with a superiority design. DISCUSSION: CIRCULATE-US will aim to understand postoperative ctDNA dynamics in early-stage colon cancer and will investigate escalation and de-escalation approaches by using ctDNA status as a surrogate for MRD status.

The benefit of immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: A systemic review of the survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in phase III hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) trials was conducted. Methods: Meta-analyses were performed with the generic inverse-variance method with a fixed-effects model. Results: In 10 trials encompassing 6123 patients, ICI-based therapy (monotherapy/combination) improved overall survival (OS) compared with the control arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.70-0.84; p < 0.001). The survival benefit was consistent across variable treatment lines, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and AFP levels. While the OS benefit was more pronounced in hepatitis B-related HCC (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.63-0.77; p < 0.001), OS was improved in hepatitis C-related (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71-0.98) and nonviral HCC (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). Conclusion: ICI-based therapies should be the standard for all patients with advanced HCC.

Mismatch Repair (MMR) Gene Alteration and BRAF V600E Mutation Are Potential Predictive Biomarkers of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in MMR-Deficient Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is highly effective in metastatic mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D) colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we evaluated molecular and clinical predictors of ICI response in MMR-D CRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient databases at four cancer institutions were queried. The Fisher exact test was performed to test the association of clinical and molecular markers. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and compared by the log-rank test. Twelve- and 24-month PFS rates were compared by the Z test. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients with CRC with MMR-D/microsatellite instability-high who previously received ICIs were identified. Patients with liver metastasis had a lower overall response rate as compared with other sites of metastasis (36.4% vs. 68.7%; p = .081). Patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss had worse 1-year and 2-year PFS rates compared with patients with MSH2/MSH6 loss (84.2% vs. 57.8% and 78.2% vs. 54.2%, respectively; p < .001). There were improved 1-year and 2-year PFS rates in patients with wild-type BRAF when compared with patients with BRAF V600E mutation (73.3% vs. 40%, and 73.3% vs. 26.7%; respectively; p < .001). Patients aged >65 had significantly worse PFS rates as compared with patients aged ≤65 (p < .001). CONCLUSION: BRAF V600E mutation, MLH1 and/or PMS2 loss, as well as age >65 years and liver metastasis, may be predictive of duration of ICI response in patients with MMR-D CRC. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm our findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study reveal clinically important biomarkers that potentially predict immune checkpoint inhibitor response in patients with mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

Pancreatic cancer stem cells may define tumor stroma characteristics and recurrence patterns in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Herein, we investigate the relationship between pancreatic stem cell markers (PCSC markers), CD44, and epithelial-specific antigen (ESA), tumor stroma, and the impact on recurrence outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. METHODS: PDAC patients who underwent surgical resection between 01/2012-06/2014 were identified. CD44 and ESA expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Stroma was classified as loose, moderate, and dense based on fibroblast content. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups by log-rank test. The association between PCSC markers and stroma type was assessed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: N = 93 PDAC patients were identified. The number of PDAC patients with dense, moderate density, and loose stroma was 11 (12%), 51 (54%), and 31 (33%) respectively. PDAC with CD44+/ESA- had highest rate of loose stroma (63%) followed by PDAC CD44+/ESA+ (50%), PDAC CD44-/ESA+ (35%), CD44-/ESA- (9%) (p = 0.0033). Conversely, lack of CD44 and ESA expression was associated with the highest rate of moderate and dense stroma (91% p = 0.0033). No local recurrence was observed in patients with dense stroma and 9 had distant recurrence. The highest rate of cumulative local recurrence was observed in patients with loose stroma. No statistically significant difference in RFS and OS was observed among subgroups (P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate PCSCs may have an important role in stroma differentiation in PDAC. Our results further suggest that tumor stroma may influence the recurrence pattern in PDAC patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of MSI-H/MMR-D colorectal cancer and a perspective on resistance mechanisms.

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) with a mismatch repair-deficiency (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype carries unique characteristics such as increased tumour mutational burden and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. Studies have shown a sustained clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors with dramatic clinical improvement in patients with MSI-H/MMR-D CRC. However, the observed response rates range between 30% and 50% suggesting the existence of intrinsic resistance mechanisms. Moreover, disease progression after an initial positive response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment points to acquired resistance mechanisms. In this review article, we discuss the clinical trials that established the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with MSI-H/MMR-D CRC, consider biomarkers of the immune response and elaborate on potential mechanisms related to intrinsic and acquired resistance. We also provide a perspective on possible future therapeutic approaches that might improve clinical outcomes, particularly in patients with actionable resistance mechanisms.

Targeting KRAS Oncogene for Patients With Colorectal Cancer: A New Step Toward Precision Medicine.

KRAS mutations are common driver oncogenes associated with the development of several solid tumors. KRAS oncogene has been considered a highly challenging target for drug development because of structural features, including the lack of deep groove on its catalytic unit. However, by leveraging cysteine residues, covalent KRAS inhibitors irreversibly trap KRAS G12C mutants in their inactive GDP-bound state. These agents have resulted in significant clinical responses among patients with KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors, including patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Other allele-specific inhibitors of KRAS oncogene and panKRAS and panRAS inhibitors are also currently being investigated in clinical trials. This review article overviews recent clinical progress on KRAS G12C targeting for the management of patients with KRAS G12C-mutant CRC and provides an update on other RAS targeting approaches. We also discuss the unique biological features of RAS-mutant CRC, which require the combination of KRAS inhibitors and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy, and elaborate on resistance mechanisms and novel therapeutic avenues that may define future treatment paradigms of patients with RAS-mutant CRC.

Differential Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors are Governed by Diverse Mismatch Repair Gene Alterations.

PURPOSE: The response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer is variable. Here, we explored the differential response to ICIs according to different mismatch repair alterations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Colorectal cancer (N = 13,701) and endometrial cancer (N = 3,315) specimens were tested at Caris Life Sciences. Median overall survival (mOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier. The prediction of high-, intermediate-, and low-affinity epitopes by tumor mutation burden (TMB) values was conducted using R-squared (R2). RESULTS: Compared with mutL (MLH1 and PMS2) co-loss, the mOS was longer in mutS (MSH2 and MSH6) co-loss in all colorectal cancer (54.6 vs. 36 months; P = 0.0.025) and endometrial cancer (81.5 vs. 48.2 months; P < 0.001) patients. In ICI-treated patients, the mOS was longer in mutS co-loss in colorectal cancer [not reached (NR) vs. 36 months; P = 0.011). In endometrial cancer, the mOS was NR vs. 42.2 months; P = 0.711]. The neoantigen load (NAL) in mutS co-loss compared with mutL co-loss was higher in colorectal cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 25.5 vs. 19; q = 0.017, intermediate: 39 vs. 32; q = 0.004, low: 87.5 vs. 73; q < 0.001) and endometrial cancer (high-affinity epitopes: 15 vs. 11; q = 0.002, intermediate: 27.5 vs. 19; q < 0.001, low: 59 vs. 41; q < 0.001), respectively. R2 ranged from 0.25 in mutS co-loss colorectal cancer to 0.95 in mutL co-loss endometrial cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mutS co-loss experienced longer mOS in colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer and better response to ICIs in colorectal cancer. Among all explored biomarkers, NAL was higher in mutS co-loss and may be a potential driving factor for the observed better outcomes. TMB did not reliably predict NAL.

Prognostic indicators and treatment outcome in 94 cases of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma (FLHCC) is a rare variant of HCC. We report an analysis of the clinicopathologic features, treatment outcomes, and prognostic indicators of 94 cases. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinicopathologic and treatment outcome data from 94 FLHCC patients (48 males and 46 females). Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and survival rates were compared by the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used for univariate and multivariate estimation of hazard risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for factors that correlated with survival and disease recurrence after resection. RESULTS: Median age was 23 years (14-75); median OS was 57.2 months (95% CI, 36.4-77.9), and median RFS was 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.8-18.9). White race, female gender, early tumor stage, and tumor resection including metastasectomy were positively associated with longer OS, while female gender was the only significant positive predictor of longer RFS. Finally, the 5-fluorouracil-interferon combination was the most frequently used systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses indicate that surgical approaches including metastasectomy as the first-line treatment in FLHCC correlated with better outcome. Multimodality approaches, including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, prolonged patient survival.

Systemic Therapy for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Current Approaches and Opportunities for Novel Avenues Toward Precision Medicine.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a dismal prognosis with a 5-year overall survival of 11%. The disease is usually diagnosed at advanced stages, and systemic chemotherapy is the standard-of-care treatment for the majority of patients with PDAC. Although novel treatment options, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy, have achieved substantial progress leading to practice-changing results, with FDA approvals for several solid tumors so far, the progress achieved for PDAC is relatively limited. Recent studies uncovered potential therapeutic targets for patients with PDAC, and potential therapeutic opportunities are currently being further examined. Herein, we review recent advances in systemic therapy regimens, including cytotoxic agents, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and novel therapeutic options for managing patients with PDAC. We also elaborate on molecular profiling to guide treatment and existing therapeutic opportunities that may further advance the clinical care of patients with this devastating disease.

Next generation immuno-oncology biomarkers in gastrointestinal cancer: what does the future hold?

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers pose a significant health burden worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic and treatment approaches. One promising avenue is the utilization of next-generation biomarkers, which hold the potential to revolutionize GI cancer management. AREAS COVERED: This review explores the latest breakthroughs and expert opinions surrounding the application of next-generation immunotherapy biomarkers. It encompasses various aspects of the currently utilized biomarkers of immunotherapy in the context of GI cancers focusing on microsatellite stable cancers. It explores the promising research on the next generation of biomarkers addressing the challenges associated with integrating them into clinical practice and the need for standardized protocols and regulatory guidelines. EXPERT OPINION: Immune profiling, multiplex immunohistochemistry, analysis of immune cell subsets, and novel genomic and epigenomic markers integrated with machine-learning approaches offer new avenues for identifying robust biomarkers. Liquid biopsy-based approaches, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and exosome-based analyses, hold promise for real-time monitoring and early detection of treatment response.

A Comprehensive Review on Cancer Vaccines and Vaccine Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

HCC, the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer, presents a substantial global health challenge due to its high mortality and limited therapeutic options. This review delves into the potential of cancer vaccines as a novel therapeutic avenue for HCC. We examine the various categories of cancer vaccines, including peptide-based, dendritic cell-based, viral vector-based, DNA, and mRNA vaccines, and their potential application in HCC management. This review also addresses the inherent challenges in vaccine development, such as tumor heterogeneity and the need for identifying tumor-specific antigens. We underscore the role of cancer vaccines in reshaping the immune environment within HCC, fostering durable immune memory, and their potential in combination therapies. The review also evaluates clinical trials and emphasizes the necessity for more extensive research to optimize vaccine design and patient selection criteria. We conclude with future perspectives, highlighting the significance of personalized therapies, innovative antigen delivery platforms, immune modulatory agents, and predictive biomarkers in revolutionizing HCC treatment. Simple Summary: This review explores the potential of cancer vaccines as a promising therapeutic strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a prevalent and deadly liver cancer. The authors discuss various types of cancer vaccines, their challenges, and their role in modulating the immune response within HCC. They also highlight clinical trials and future perspectives, emphasizing the importance of personalized therapies, novel antigen delivery platforms, and predictive biomarkers. The findings from this research could significantly impact the research community by providing a comprehensive understanding of the current state of cancer vaccines for HCC, thereby guiding future research and potentially transforming HCC treatment strategies.

Neoadjuvant Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High Colorectal Cancer: Shedding Light on the Future.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment paradigm of mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (MMMR-D/MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC). Unique molecular features of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC with frameshift alterations, which result in mutation-associated neoantigen (MANA) generation, create an ideal molecular framework for MANA-driven T-cell priming and antitumor immunity. These biologic characteristics of MMR-D/MSI-H CRC resulted in rapid drug development with ICIs for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H CRC. Observed deep and durable responses with the use of ICIs in advanced-stage disease have stimulated the development of clinical trials with ICIs for patients with early-stage MMR-D/MSI-H CRC. Most recently, neoadjuvant dostarlimab monotherapy for nonoperative management of MMR-D/MSI-H rectal cancer and neoadjuvant NICHE trial with nivolumab and ipilimumab for MMR-D/MSI-H colon cancer resulted in groundbreaking results. Although nonoperative management of patients with MMR-D/MSI-H rectal cancer with ICIs will potentially define our current therapeutic approach, therapeutic goals of neoadjuvant ICI therapy for patients with MMR-D/MSI-H colon cancer may differ given that nonoperative management has not been well established for colon cancer. Herein, we overview recent advancements in ICI-based therapies for patients with early-stage MMR-D/MSI-H colon and rectal cancer and elaborate on the future treatment paradigm of this unique subgroup of CRC.

The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced stage microsatellite stable colorectal cancer and high tumor mutation burden: quantity or quality?

INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved pembrolizumab for patients with unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with tumor mutational burden (TMB) of ≥ 10 mutations/megabase. However, the clinical implications of this universal cutoff of TMB ≥ 10 for patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain debatable. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we discuss the tissue agnostic approval of pembrolizumab, its efficacy, and clinical relevance in the management of patients with MSS CRC patients with high TMB (defined as TMB ≥ 10). We also elaborate on molecular subgroups of MSS CRC that influence the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response for patients with MSS CRC, including pathogenic POLE and POLD1 mutations associated with ultramutated tumors. EXPERT OPINION: Patients with microsatellite stable CRC with TMB ≥ 10 without POLE and POLD1 mutations may not significantly benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Predetermined cutoff TMB ≥ 10 mutation per MB does not seem to define a universal cutoff for the benefit of disease-agnostic ICI therapy, particularly for patients with MSS CRC. Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations with MSS CRC represent a unique biological subgroup of MSS CRC with favorable responses to ICI therapy.

A Meta-Analysis to Assess the Efficacy of HER2-Targeted Treatment Regimens in HER2-Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC).

Recent trials provide evidence that HER2 is a potential new target for patients with colorectal cancer. While HER2-positive tumors do not show a very encouraging response to anti-HER2-positive agents like trastuzumab alone, promising results have been observed when combined with other synergistically acting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Our meta-analysis was conducted following the Cochrane Handbook and written following the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42022338935. After a comprehensive search for relevant articles, 14 CTs were identified and uploaded to Rayyan, and six trials were ultimately selected for inclusion. The meta-analysis revealed that a median of three prior lines of therapy was used before enrolling in the six trials comprising 238 patients with HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 31.33% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.27-38.39) and 74.37% (95% CI 64.57-84.17), respectively. The pooled weighted progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.2 months. The pooled ORR and DCR meta-analysis indicate a significant response to HER2-targeted therapy in this patient in HER2-positive mCRC. Additionally, a pooled PFS of 6.2 months suggests that HER2-targeted treatment regimens are associated with a meaningful improvement in survival outcomes in this population.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients with dMMR/MSI-High Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Changing Paradigm.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the management of mismatch repair-deficient (MMR-D)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) gastrointestinal cancers, particularly colorectal cancer. Cancers with the MMR-D/MSI-H genotype often carry a higher tumor mutation burden with frameshift alterations, leading to increased mutation-associated neoantigen (MANA) generation. The dramatic response seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which are orchestrated by MANA-primed effector T cells, resulted in the rapid development of these novel therapeutics within the landscape of MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers. Recently, several clinical trials have utilized ICIs as potential neoadjuvant therapies for MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers and demonstrated deep clinical and pathological responses, creating opportunities for organ preservation. However, there are potential challenges to the neoadjuvant use of ICIs for certain disease types due to the clinical risk of overtreatment for a disease that can be cured through a surgery-only approach. In this review article, we discuss neoadjuvant management approaches with ICI therapy for patients with MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers, including those with oligometastatic disease. We also elaborate on potential challenges and opportunities for the neoadjuvant utilization of ICIs and provide further insight into the changing treatment paradigm of MMR-D/MSI-H gastrointestinal cancers.