Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 104
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Immunol ; 22(5): 595-606, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33903766

RESUMEN

Although the pathological significance of tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) heterogeneity is still poorly understood, TAM reprogramming is viewed as a promising anticancer therapy. Here we show that a distinct subset of TAMs (F4/80hiCD115hiC3aRhiCD88hi), endowed with high rates of heme catabolism by the stress-responsive enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), plays a critical role in shaping a prometastatic tumor microenvironment favoring immunosuppression, angiogenesis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. This population originates from F4/80+HO-1+ bone marrow (BM) precursors, accumulates in the blood of tumor bearers and preferentially localizes at the invasive margin through a mechanism dependent on the activation of Nrf2 and coordinated by the NF-κB1-CSF1R-C3aR axis. Inhibition of F4/80+HO-1+ TAM recruitment or myeloid-specific deletion of HO-1 blocks metastasis formation and improves anticancer immunotherapy. Relative expression of HO-1 in peripheral monocyte subsets, as well as in tumor lesions, discriminates survival among metastatic melanoma patients. Overall, these results identify a distinct cancer-induced HO-1+ myeloid subgroup as a new antimetastatic target and prognostic blood marker.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Hemo-Oxigenasa 1/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/inmunología , Melanoma/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Macrófagos Asociados a Tumores/inmunología , Animales , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/antagonistas & inhibidores , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Línea Celular Tumoral/trasplante , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Transición Epitelial-Mesenquimal/inmunología , Femenino , Hemo/metabolismo , Hemo-Oxigenasa 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Hemo-Oxigenasa 1/sangre , Hemo-Oxigenasa 1/genética , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/secundario , Melanoma/terapia , Proteínas de la Membrana/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/metabolismo , Ratones , Ratones Transgénicos , Células Progenitoras Mieloides/inmunología , Células Progenitoras Mieloides/metabolismo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Escape del Tumor/efectos de los fármacos , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Macrófagos Asociados a Tumores/metabolismo
2.
N Engl J Med ; 2024 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38899716

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 5-year results of this trial showed that adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in longer relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with BRAF V600-mutated stage III melanoma. Longer-term data were needed, including data regarding overall survival. METHODS: We randomly assigned 870 patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations to receive 12 months of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. Here, we report the final results of this trial, including results for overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 8.33 years for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 6.87 years for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo, although the benefit was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.01; P = 0.06 by stratified log-rank test). A consistent survival benefit was seen across several prespecified subgroups, including the 792 patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96). Relapse-free survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.63), as did distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.71). No new safety signals were reported, a finding consistent with previous trial reports. CONCLUSIONS: After nearly 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with better relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with resected stage III melanoma. The analysis of overall survival showed that the risk of death was 20% lower with combination therapy than with placebo, but the benefit was not significant. Among patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation, the results suggest that the risk of death was 25% lower with combination therapy. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

3.
N Engl J Med ; 383(12): 1139-1148, 2020 09 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32877599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the previously reported primary analysis of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in significantly longer relapse-free survival than placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations. To confirm the stability of the relapse-free survival benefit, longer-term data were needed. METHODS: We randomly assigned 870 patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive 12 months of oral dabrafenib (at a dose of 150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Here, we report 5-year results for relapse-free survival and survival without distant metastasis as the site of the first relapse. Overall survival was not analyzed, since the required number of events to trigger the final overall survival analysis had not been reached. RESULTS: The minimum duration of follow-up was 59 months (median patient follow-up, 60 months for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 58 months for placebo). At 5 years, the percentage of patients who were alive without relapse was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48 to 58) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 36% (95% CI, 32 to 41) with placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.61). The percentage of patients who were alive without distant metastasis was 65% (95% CI, 61 to 71) with dabrafenib plus trametinib and 54% (95% CI, 49 to 60) with placebo (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.70). No clinically meaningful between-group difference in the incidence or severity of serious adverse events was reported during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In the 5-year follow-up of a phase 3 trial involving patients who had resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations, 12 months of adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a longer duration of survival without relapse or distant metastasis than placebo with no apparent long-term toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Oximas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Análisis de Supervivencia
4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(5): 859-870, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36251355

RESUMEN

Little guidance is currently available for managing patients with melanocytic tumours of uncertain or low malignant potential (MelTUMPs, including melanocytomas), in particular the optimal excision margins and whether to offer sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The objective of this review was to evaluate excision margins and the prognostic utility of SNB by systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to October 2021 for studies of patients with MelTUMPs reporting excision margins and/or SNB-positivity. Meta-analysis was performed on the SNB-positivity rate using a random effects model, followed by sensitivity analyses on subgroups. 111 primary studies reported excision margins and/or SNB data for 1962 patients. Follow-up was available for 1649 patients: 1561 (94.7%) were alive without disease at last review, 53 (3.2%) had developed further disease, 29 (1.8%) had died of metastatic disease (melanoma) and six (0.4%) died of unrelated causes. SNB was performed in 837 patients. The pooled positivity rate on meta-analysis was 32% (95% CI: 23-44%). Clinical outcome could be correlated with excision margin in only 171 patients (60% of those with known follow up) and was therefore not analysed further. Evidence indicating the ideal excision margins for MelTUMPs was lacking. SNB had a high positivity rate despite very low rates of recurrence or melanoma-related death. Consequently, SNB should not be offered routinely for MelTUMPs (including melanocytomas), due to its lack of prognostic utility for this tumour type (high certainty of evidence).


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Nevo de Células Epitelioides y Fusiformes , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Melanoma/patología , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Pronóstico
5.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(7): 1318-1326, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924058

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Melanoma guidelines recommend surgical excision with 10 mm margins for T1 melanomas (invasive melanomas with Breslow thickness ≤1 mm), including those in radial growth phase, which are without metastatic potential; however, such margins may be problematic on head-and-neck. OBJECTIVE: We compared outcomes of wide (10 mm margins) versus narrow (5 mm margins) excisions in patients with radial growth phase T1 melanoma on head-and-neck including face. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 610 consecutive patients excised with wide versus narrow margins, from 2001 to 2018, at six European centres. In all cases, radial growth phase, and clear margins with 5 or 10 mm of clearance, were ascertained histologically. Multivariable models investigated associations of margins and other factors with overall survival and local recurrence. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixteen (51.8%) patients received wide excision, 219 (69.3%) with primary wound closure, 97 (30.7%) with reconstruction; 294 (48.2%) patients received narrow excision, 264 (89.8%) with primary wound closure, 30 (10.2%) with reconstruction (p < 0.001). Median follow-ups were 88 months (wide) and 187 months (narrow) (inter-quartile ranges 43-133 and 79-206, respectively). Ten-year overall survival (95% confidence interval) was 96.7% (94.2%-99.3%) in wide and 98.2% (96.4%-100%) in narrow patients. Ten-year local recurrence incidence was 6.4% (4.1%-10.1%) in wide and 7.8% (5.3%-11.6%) in narrow groups. Lentigo maligna melanoma subtype appeared associated with increased risk of local recurrence in narrow versus wide patients (15.0% vs. 7.5%; p = 0.190). CONCLUSIONS: Narrower excision margins for T1 radial growth phase melanoma are not associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 0.97, p = 0.996) or increased local recurrence (subdistribution hazard ratio: 0.87; p = 0.751) compared to wider margins, and may be safely applied to such lesions, although caution may be required in the presence of lentigo maligna melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson/cirugía , Melanoma/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Márgenes de Escisión , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología
6.
BMC Cancer ; 22(1): 610, 2022 Jun 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35659273

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The management of melanoma patients with metastatic melanoma in the sentinel nodes (SN) is evolving based on the results of trials questioning the impact of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and demonstrating the efficacy of new adjuvant treatments. In this landscape, new prognostic tools for fine risk stratification are eagerly sought to optimize the therapeutic path of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 2,086 patients treated with CLND after a positive SN biopsy in thirteen Italian Melanoma Centers was reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was the outcome of interest; included independent variables were the following: age, gender, primary melanoma site, Breslow thickness, ulceration, sentinel node tumor burden (SNTB), number of positive SN, non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSN) status. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: The 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 79%, 70% and 54%, respectively. At univariate analysis, all variables, except for primary melanoma body site, were found to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that older age (P < 0.0001), male gender (P = 0.04), increasing Breslow thickness (P < 0.0001), presence of ulceration (P = 0.004), SNTB size (P < 0.0001) and metastatic NSN (P < 0.0001) were independent negative predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: The above results were utilized to build a nomogram in order to ease the practical implementation of our prognostic model, which might improve treatment personalization.


Asunto(s)
Linfadenopatía , Melanoma , Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/patología , Ganglio Linfático Centinela/cirugía , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Carga Tumoral
7.
Br J Cancer ; 124(3): 574-580, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33087895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant targeted therapy (TT) improves relapse free survival in patients with resected BRAF mutant stage III melanoma. The outcomes and optimal management of patients who relapse after adjuvant TT is unknown. METHODS: Patients from twenty-one centres with recurrent melanoma after adjuvant TT were included. Disease characteristics, adjuvant therapy, recurrence, treatment at relapse and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients developed recurrent melanoma; nineteen (22%) during adjuvant TT. Median time to first recurrence was 18 months and median follow-up from first recurrence was 31 months. Fifty-eight (68%) patients received immunotherapy (IT) or TT as 1st line systemic therapy at either first or subsequent recurrence and had disease that was assessable for response. Response to anti-PD-1 (±trial agent), combination ipilimumab-nivolumab, TT rechallenge and ipilimumab monotherapy was 63%, 62% 25% and 10% respectively. Twenty-eight (33%) patients had died at census, all from melanoma. Two-year OS was 84% for anti-PD-1 therapy (±trial agent), 92% for combination ipilimumab and nivolumab, 49% for TT and 45% for ipilimumab monotherapy (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who relapse after adjuvant TT respond well to subsequent anti-PD-1 based therapy and have outcomes similar to those seen when first line anti-PD-1 therapy is used in stage IV melanoma.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Nivolumab/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adulto Joven , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
8.
Oncologist ; 26(12): 1079-1084, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34355463

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma discontinuing BRAF-targeted therapy for cumulative toxicity after sustained response are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective case series analysis conducted at a single Cancer Center in Italy included patients with BRAF mutated metastatic melanoma treated with a BRAF inhibitor as a single agent or in combination with a MEK inhibitor between June 1, 2011 and January 1, 2020 and interrupted treatment due to cumulative toxicity after achieving complete response (CR) or long-lasting partial response (PR; i.e. >12 months). RESULTS: We included 24 patients with a median treatment duration of 59.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.4-63.4; range, 12-88). CR and PR were achieved in 71% and 29% of patients, respectively. At a median follow-up after treatment discontinuation of 37.8 months (95% CI, 33.7-41.9), the 12-month progression-free survival after discontinuation (dPFS) rate was 70.8% (95% CI 54.8-91.6) and 24-month dPFS rate was 58.3% (95% CI, 41.6-81.8). Baseline patient and tumor characteristics as well as treatment duration and best response did not significantly impact on dPFS. Patients with CR and negative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at time of discontinuation had a significantly improved dPFS compared with patients with either radiological residual disease or ctDNA positivity (p = .007). No patient in CR with undetectable ctDNA experienced progression. CONCLUSION: The risk of progression is high even in patients with sustained sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Integration of liquid biopsy in clinical trials investigating the optimal management of patients with sustained sensitivity to BRAF/MEK inhibitors is warranted. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma discontinuing BRAF-targeted therapy for cumulative toxicity are unknown. This study analyzed patients with sustained responses (median treatment duration 59.4 months). Twelve- and 24-month progression-free survival following discontinuation were 70.8% and 58.3%, respectively. Complete response and negative circulating tumor DNA at time of discontinuation are promising prognostic biomarkers in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Humanos , Biopsia Líquida , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 19(10): 1165-1173, 2021 07 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34311443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prognostic parameters in sentinel node (SN)-positive melanoma are important indicators to identify patients at high risk of recurrence who should be candidates for adjuvant therapy. We aimed to evaluate the presence of melanoma cells beyond the SN capsule-extranodal extension (ENE)-as a prognostic factor in patients with positive SNs. METHODS: Data from 1,047 patients with melanoma and positive SNs treated from 2001 to 2020 at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milano, Italy, were retrospectively investigated. Kaplan-Meier survival and crude cumulative incidence of recurrence curves were estimated. A multivariable logistic model was used to investigate the association between ENE and selected predictive factors. Cox models estimated the effect of the selected predictors on survival endpoints. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 69 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 62.5% and 71.7% for patients with positive SNs with and without ENE, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 54.0% and 64.0% for patients with positive SNs with and without ENE, respectively. The multivariable logistic model showed that age, size of the main metastatic focus in the SN, and numbers of metastatic non-SNs were associated with ENE (all P<.0001). The multivariable Cox regression models showed the estimated prognostic effects of ENE associated with age, ulceration, size of the main metastatic focus in the SN, and number of metastatic non-SNs (all P<.0001) on disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: ENE was a significant prognostic factor in patients with positive-SN melanoma. This parameter may be useful in clinical practice as a selection criterion for adjuvant treatment in patients with stage IIIA disease with a tumor burden <1 mm in the SN. We recommend its inclusion as an independent prognostic determinant in future updates of melanoma guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Extensión Extranodal , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Melanoma/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
10.
Lancet Oncol ; 21(3): 358-372, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007138

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib reduced the risk of relapse versus placebo in patients with resected, BRAFV600-mutant, stage III melanoma in the phase 3 COMBI-AD trial. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis aimed to evaluate potential prognostic or predictive factors and mechanisms of resistance to adjuvant targeted therapy. METHODS: COMBI-AD is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial comparing dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily plus trametinib 2 mg orally once daily versus two matched placebos. Study participants were at least 18 years of age and underwent complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma, per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with a BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the two treatment groups by an interactive voice response system, stratified by mutation type and disease stage. Patients, physicians, and the investigators who analysed data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was relapse-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation to disease recurrence or death from any cause. Biomarker assessment was a prespecified exploratory outcome of the trial. We assessed intrinsic tumour genomic features by use of next-generation DNA sequencing and characteristics of the tumour microenvironment by use of a NanoString RNA assay, which might provide prognostic and predictive information. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01682083, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled in the trial. Median follow-up at data cutoff (April 30, 2018) was 44 months (IQR 38-49) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 42 months (21-49) in the placebo group. Intrinsic tumour genomic features were assessed in 368 patients (DNA sequencing set) and tumour microenvironment characteristics were assessed in 507 patients (NanoString biomarker set). MAPK pathway genomic alterations at baseline did not affect treatment benefit or clinical outcome. An IFNγ gene expression signature higher than the median was prognostic for prolonged relapse-free survival in both treatment groups. Tumour mutational burden was independently prognostic for relapse-free survival in the placebo group (high TMB, top third; hazard ratio [HR] 0·56, 95% CI 0·37-0·85, p=0·0056), but not in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (0·83, 95% CI 0·53-1·32, p=0·44). Patients with tumour mutational burden in the lower two terciles seem to derive a substantial long-term relapse-free survival benefit from targeted therapy (HR [versus placebo] 0·49, 95% CI 0·35-0·68, p<0·0001). However, patients with high tumour mutational burden seem to have a less pronounced benefit with targeted therapy (HR [versus placebo] 0·75, 95% CI 0·44-1·26, p=0·27), especially if they had an IFNγ signature lower than the median (HR 0·88 [95% CI 0·40-1·93], p=0·74). INTERPRETATION: Tumour mutational burden alone or in combination with IFNγ gene expression signature or other markers for an adaptive immune response might be of relevance for identifying patients with stage III melanoma who might derive clinical benefit from targeted therapy. Further validation in prospective clinical trials is warranted. FUNDING: Novartis Pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinonas/administración & dosificación , Terapia Recuperativa , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
11.
N Engl J Med ; 377(19): 1813-1823, 2017 11 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891408

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib plus the MEK inhibitor trametinib improved survival in patients with advanced melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. We sought to determine whether adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib would improve outcomes in patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations. METHODS: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 870 patients with completely resected, stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations to receive oral dabrafenib at a dose of 150 mg twice daily plus trametinib at a dose of 2 mg once daily (combination therapy, 438 patients) or two matched placebo tablets (432 patients) for 12 months. The primary end point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, distant metastasis-free survival, freedom from relapse, and safety. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.8 years, the estimated 3-year rate of relapse-free survival was 58% in the combination-therapy group and 39% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39 to 0.58; P<0.001). The 3-year overall survival rate was 86% in the combination-therapy group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio for death, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.79; P=0.0006), but this level of improvement did not cross the prespecified interim analysis boundary of P=0.000019. Rates of distant metastasis-free survival and freedom from relapse were also higher in the combination-therapy group than in the placebo group. The safety profile of dabrafenib plus trametinib was consistent with that observed with the combination in patients with metastatic melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant use of combination therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in a significantly lower risk of recurrence in patients with stage III melanoma with BRAF V600E or V600K mutations than the adjuvant use of placebo and was not associated with new toxic effects. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01682083 ; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15 .).


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Oximas/uso terapéutico , Piridonas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinonas/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oximas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
12.
Cell Commun Signal ; 18(1): 156, 2020 09 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32967672

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has improved the survival of patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma, but most patients relapse upon the onset of drug resistance induced by mechanisms including genetic and epigenetic events. Among the epigenetic alterations, microRNA perturbation is associated with the development of kinase inhibitor resistance. Here, we identified and studied the role of miR-146a-5p dysregulation in melanoma drug resistance. METHODS: The miR-146a-5p-regulated NFkB signaling network was identified in drug-resistant cell lines and melanoma tumor samples by expression profiling and knock-in and knock-out studies. A bioinformatic data analysis identified COX2 as a central gene regulated by miR-146a-5p and NFkB. The effects of miR-146a-5p/COX2 manipulation were studied in vitro in cell lines and with 3D cultures of treatment-resistant tumor explants from patients progressing during therapy. RESULTS: miR-146a-5p expression was inversely correlated with drug sensitivity and COX2 expression and was reduced in BRAF and MEK inhibitor-resistant melanoma cells and tissues. Forced miR-146a-5p expression reduced COX2 activity and significantly increased drug sensitivity by hampering prosurvival NFkB signaling, leading to reduced proliferation and enhanced apoptosis. Similar effects were obtained by inhibiting COX2 by celecoxib, a clinically approved COX2 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Deregulation of the miR-146a-5p/COX2 axis occurs in the development of melanoma resistance to targeted drugs in melanoma patients. This finding reveals novel targets for more effective combination treatment. Video Abstract.


Asunto(s)
Ciclooxigenasa 2/metabolismo , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/genética , MicroARNs/metabolismo , FN-kappa B/metabolismo , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Línea Celular Tumoral , Ciclooxigenasa 2/genética , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/genética , Quinasas MAP Reguladas por Señal Extracelular/metabolismo , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , MicroARNs/genética , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasas de Proteína Quinasa Activadas por Mitógenos/metabolismo , Modelos Biológicos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-akt/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos
13.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(10): 1327-1336, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022642

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atypical melanocytic tumors (AMTs) include a wide spectrum of melanocytic neoplasms that represent a challenge for clinicians due to the lack of a definitive diagnosis and the related uncertainty about their management. This study analyzed clinicopathologic features and sentinel node status as potential prognostic factors in patients with AMTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinicopathologic and follow-up data of 238 children, adolescents, and adults with histologically proved AMTs consecutively treated at 12 European centers from 2000 through 2010 were retrieved from prospectively maintained databases. The binary association between all investigated covariates was studied by evaluating the Spearman correlation coefficients, and the association between progression-free survival and all investigated covariates was evaluated using univariable Cox models. The overall survival and progression-free survival curves were established using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 126 months (interquartile range, 104-157 months). All patients received an initial diagnostic biopsy followed by wide (1 cm) excision. Sentinel node biopsy was performed in 139 patients (58.4%), 37 (26.6%) of whom had sentinel node positivity. There were 4 local recurrences, 43 regional relapses, and 8 distant metastases as first events. Six patients (2.5%) died of disease progression. Five patients who were sentinel node-negative and 3 patients who were sentinel node-positive developed distant metastases. Ten-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 97% (95% CI, 94.9%-99.2%) and 82.2% (95% CI, 77.3%-87.3%), respectively. Age, mitotic rate/mm2, mitoses at the base of the lesion, lymphovascular invasion, and 9p21 loss were factors affecting prognosis in the whole series and the sentinel node biopsy subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Age >20 years, mitotic rate >4/mm2, mitoses at the base of the lesion, lymphovascular invasion, and 9p21 loss proved to be worse prognostic factors in patients with ATMs. Sentinel node status was not a clear prognostic predictor.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Mitosis , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
14.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(5): 701-710, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30928620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 COMBI-AD study, patients with resected, stage III melanoma with BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutations received adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib or placebo. The primary analysis showed that dabrafenib plus trametinib significantly improved relapse-free survival at 3 years. These results led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of dabrafenib plus trametinib as adjuvant treatment for patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutations. Here, we report the patient-reported outcomes from COMBI-AD. METHODS: COMBI-AD was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study done at 169 sites in 25 countries. Study participants were aged 18 years or older and had complete resection of stage IIIA (lymph node metastases >1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC cutaneous melanoma as per American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition criteria, with BRAFV600E or BRAFV600K mutations, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice response system, stratified by mutation type and disease stage, to receive oral dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus oral trametinib (2 mg once daily) or matching placebos for 12 months. Patients, physicians, and the investigators who analysed the data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival, reported elsewhere. Health-related quality of life, reported here, was a prespecified exploratory endpoint, and was assessed with the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions 3-Levels (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. We used a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis to assess differences in health-related quality of life between groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01682083. The trial is ongoing, but is no longer recruiting participants. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 870 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n=438) or matching placebos (n=432). Data were collected until the data cutoff for analyses of the primary endpoint (June 30, 2017). The median follow-up was 34 months (IQR 28-39) in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group and 33 months (20·5-39) in the placebo group. During the 12-month treatment phase, there were no significant or clinically meaningful changes from baseline between groups in EQ-5D-3L visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) or utility scores. During treatment, there were no clinically meaningful differences in VAS scores or utility scores in the dabrafenib plus trametinib group between patients who did and did not experience the most common adverse events. During long-term follow-up (range 15-48 months), VAS and utility scores were similar between groups and did not differ from baseline scores. At recurrence, there were significant decreases in VAS scores in both the dabrafenib plus trametinib group (mean change -6·02, SD 20·57; p=0·0032) and the placebo group (-6·84, 20·86; p<0·0001); the mean change in utility score also differed significantly at recurrence for both groups (dabrafenib plus trametinib -0·0626, 0·1911, p<0·0001; placebo -0·0748, 0·2182, p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: These findings show that dabrafenib plus trametinib did not affect patient-reported outcome scores during or after adjuvant treatment, and suggest that preventing or delaying relapse with adjuvant therapy could be beneficial in this setting. FUNDING: Novartis.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Biomarcadores de Tumor/antagonistas & inhibidores , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Melanoma/terapia , Mutación , Oximas/administración & dosificación , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/antagonistas & inhibidores , Piridonas/administración & dosificación , Pirimidinonas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Dermatologicos/mortalidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/secundario , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oximas/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Piridonas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinonas/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Lancet Oncol ; 19(7): 916-929, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908991

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite newly approved treatments, metastatic melanoma remains a life-threatening condition. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic in patients with stage IIIB or IIIC melanoma in the adjuvant setting. METHODS: DERMA was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done in 31 countries and 263 centres. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had histologically proven, completely resected, stage IIIB or IIIC, MAGE-A3-positive cutaneous melanoma with macroscopic lymph node involvement and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1. Randomisation and treatment allocation at the investigator sites were done centrally via the internet. We randomly assigned patients (2:1) to receive up to 13 intramuscular injections of recombinant MAGE-A3 with AS15 immunostimulant (MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic; 300 µg MAGE-A3 antigen plus 420 µg CpG 7909 reconstituted in AS01B to a total volume of 0·5 mL), or placebo, over a 27-month period: five doses at 3-weekly intervals, followed by eight doses at 12-weekly intervals. The co-primary outcomes were disease-free survival in the overall population and in patients with a potentially predictive gene signature (GS-positive) identified previously and validated here via an adaptive signature design. The final analyses included all patients who had received at least one dose of study treatment; analyses for efficacy were in the as-randomised population and for safety were in the as-treated population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00796445. FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2008, and Sept 19, 2011, 3914 patients were screened, 1391 randomly assigned, and 1345 started treatment (n=895 for MAGE-A3 and n=450 for placebo). At final analysis (data cutoff May 23, 2013), median follow-up was 28·0 months [IQR 23·3-35·5] in the MAGE-A3 group and 28·1 months [23·7-36·9] in the placebo group. Median disease-free survival was 11·0 months (95% CI 10·0-11·9) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·2 months (8·6-14·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·01, 0·88-1·17, p=0·86). In the GS-positive population, median disease-free survival was 9·9 months (95% CI 5·7-17·6) in the MAGE-A3 group and 11·6 months (5·6-22·3) in the placebo group (HR 1·11, 0·83-1·49, p=0·48). Within the first 31 days of treatment, adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported by 126 (14%) of 894 patients in the MAGE-A3 group and 56 (12%) of 450 patients in the placebo group, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse by 36 (4%) patients given MAGE-A3 vs six (1%) patients given placebo, and at least one serious adverse event by 14% of patients in both groups (129 patients given MAGE-A3 and 64 patients given placebo). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neoplasms (33 [4%] patients in the MAGE-A3 group vs 17 [4%] patients in the placebo group), general disorders and administration site conditions (25 [3%] for MAGE-A3 vs four [<1%] for placebo) and infections and infestations (17 [2%] for MAGE-A3 vs seven [2%] for placebo). No deaths were related to treatment. INTERPRETATION: An antigen-specific immunotherapeutic alone was not efficacious in this clinical setting. Based on these findings, development of the MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic for use in melanoma has been stopped. FUNDING: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.


Asunto(s)
Antígenos de Neoplasias/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas de Neoplasias/efectos de los fármacos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antígenos de Neoplasias/genética , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Melanoma/mortalidad , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
16.
Stem Cells ; 34(10): 2449-2460, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27301067

RESUMEN

Melanoma is a highly heterogeneous tumor for which recent evidence supports a model of dynamic stemness. Melanoma cells might temporally acquire tumor-initiating properties or switch from a status of tumor-initiating cells (TICs) to a more differentiated one depending on the tumor context. However, factors driving these functional changes are still unknown. We focused on the role of cyto/chemokines in shaping TICs isolated directly from tumor specimens of two melanoma patients, namely Me14346S and Me15888S. We analyzed the secretion profile of TICs and of their corresponding melanoma differentiated cells and we tested the ability of cyto/chemokines to influence TIC self-renewal and differentiation. We found that TICs, grown in vitro as melanospheres, had a complex secretory profile as compared to their differentiated counterparts. Some factors, such as CCL-2 and IL-8, also produced by adherent melanoma cells and melanocytes did not influence TIC properties. Conversely, IL-6, released by differentiated cells, reduced TIC self-renewal and induced TIC differentiation while IL-10, produced by Me15888S, strongly promoted TIC self-renewal through paracrine/autocrine actions. Complete neutralization of IL-10 activity by gene silencing and antibody-mediated blocking of the IL-10Rα was required to sensitize Me15888S to IL-6-induced differentiation. For the first time these results show that functional heterogeneity of melanoma could be directly influenced by inflammatory and suppressive soluble factors, with IL-6 favoring TIC differentiation, and IL-10 supporting TIC self-renewal. Thus, understanding the tumor microenvironment (TME) role in modulating melanoma TIC phenotype is fundamental to identifying novel therapeutic targets to achieve long-lasting regression of metastatic melanoma. Stem Cells 2016;34:2449-2460.


Asunto(s)
Linaje de la Célula/efectos de los fármacos , Factores Inmunológicos/farmacología , Melanoma/patología , Células Madre Neoplásicas/patología , Comunicación Autocrina/efectos de los fármacos , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Autorrenovación de las Células/efectos de los fármacos , Senescencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Interleucina-10/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Melanoma/metabolismo , Células Madre Neoplásicas/efectos de los fármacos , Células Madre Neoplásicas/metabolismo , Pruebas de Neutralización , Comunicación Paracrina/efectos de los fármacos , Fenotipo , Receptores de Quimiocina/metabolismo , Esferoides Celulares/metabolismo , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
17.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 64(1): 113-21, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25314912

RESUMEN

Advances in the understanding of tumor immunology and molecular biology of melanoma cells have favored a larger application of immunotherapy and targeted therapies in the clinic. Several selective mutant gene inhibitors and immunomodulating antibodies have been reported to improve overall survival or progression-free survival in metastatic melanoma patients. However, despite impressive initial responses, patients treated with selective inhibitors relapse quickly, and toxicities associated to the use of immunomodulating antibodies are not easily manageable. In this sense, the concept of using antibodies as delivery vehicles for the preferential in vivo localization of the drug at the site of disease with reduction of side effects has raised particular interest. Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (termed immunocytokines) represent a new simple and effective way to deliver the immunomodulatory payload at the tumor site, with the aim of inducing both local and systemic antitumoral immune responses and limiting systemic toxicities. Several clinical trials have been conducted and are actually ongoing with different immunocytokines, in several tumor histotypes. In metastatic melanoma patients, different drug delivery modalities such as systemic, loco-regional and intratumoral are under investigation. In this review, the rationale for the use of L19-IL2 and L19-TNF, two clinical stage immunocytokines produced by the Philogen group, as well as opportunities for their future development will be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Citocinas/inmunología , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/inmunología , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/inmunología , Animales , Citocinas/genética , Citocinas/metabolismo , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/metabolismo
18.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 64(8): 999-1009, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971540

RESUMEN

The intratumoral injection of cytokines, in particular IL2, has shown promise for cutaneous melanoma patients with unresectable disease or continuous recurrence despite surgery. We recently reported that the intralesional injection of L19-IL2, an immunocytokine combining IL2 and the human monoclonal antibody fragment L19, resulted in efficient regional control of disease progression, increased time to distant metastasis and evidence of effect on circulating immune cell populations. We have also shown in preclinical models of cancer a remarkable synergistic effect of the combination of L19-IL2 with L19-TNF, a second clinical-stage immunocytokine, based on the same L19 antibody fused to TNF. Here, we describe the results of a phase II clinical trial based on the intralesional administration of L19-IL2 and L19-TNF in patients with stage IIIC and IVM1a metastatic melanoma, who were not candidate to surgery. In 20 efficacy-evaluable patients, 32 melanoma lesions exhibited complete responses upon intralesional administration of the two products, with mild side effects mainly limited to injection site reactions. Importantly, we observed complete responses in 7/13 (53.8 %) non-injected lesions (4 cutaneous, 3 lymph nodes), indicating a systemic activity of the intralesional immunostimulatory treatment. The intralesional administration of L19-IL2 and L19-TNF represents a simple and effective method for the local control of inoperable melanoma lesions, with a potential to eradicate them or make them suitable for a facile surgical removal of the residual mass.


Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia/métodos , Melanoma/terapia , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
19.
J Pediatr ; 164(2): 376-82.e1-2, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24252782

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe a series of cutaneous melanoma in children collected by the Italian Rare Tumors in Pediatric Age project. STUDY DESIGN: From 2000 to 2012, 54 patients younger than 18 years of age were prospectively registered and treated at 12 Italian pediatric centers on the basis of the same diagnostic/therapeutic recommendations and with the same forms to record clinical data. RESULTS: Considering the estimated annual incidence in Italy, the registered cases accounted for 30% of those expected in children and 10% of adolescents. Clinically, 47% of the tumors were amelanotic and 81% were raised, 39% of cases had tumor thickness >2 mm, and 36% had lymph node involvement. For the whole series, 5-year event-free survival and overall survival rates were 75.2% and 84.6%, respectively. Patient survival correlated with tumor stage and ulceration. No relapses were recorded for T1-2 (thickness <2 mm), N0, and stage 0-I-II cases. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the variables influencing survival in children with melanoma are the same as for adults, the clinical approach used in adults is feasible in children, and pediatric cases are more likely to have advanced disease at diagnosis but similar survival. New effective drugs are needed for advanced disease, and biological studies and international cooperative schemes are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/epidemiología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Adolescente , Distribución por Edad , Biopsia , Niño , Preescolar , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Melanoma Cutáneo Maligno
20.
Exp Dermatol ; 23(10): 766-8, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25060715

RESUMEN

Prostaglandins, especially prostaglandin E synthetase (PGE2), influence carcinogenesis by promoting cell proliferation, inhibiting apoptosis, stimulating angiogenesis and mediating immune suppression. Cyclooxygenase-2, coded by the PTGS2 gene, is the key enzyme in the production of prostaglandins. In melanoma, Cox-2 is over expressed in primary malignant melanoma (MM) and in their corresponding metastases. Polymorphisms in the promoter region of PTGS2 gene can modulate gene expression and could modify individual susceptibility to MM. Two hundred and forty melanoma patients and 342 controls were genotyped for polymorphisms -765G>C (rs20417) and -1195A>G (rs689466). Allele -765C frequency was significantly higher in melanoma patients. No allele frequency differences for -1195A>G polymorphism were observed. Haplotype analysis revealed that the haplotypes carrying the minor alleles were associated to a higher risk of melanoma (P = 0.02). Expression analysis showed that allele -765C is associated to a higher gene expression and could represent a risk allele by affecting the functionality of the promoter.


Asunto(s)
Ciclooxigenasa 2/genética , Melanoma/enzimología , Melanoma/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Neoplasias Cutáneas/enzimología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Fibroblastos/enzimología , Expresión Génica , Haplotipos , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Regiones Promotoras Genéticas , Piel/enzimología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA