AVI-7288 for Marburg Virus in Nonhuman Primates and Humans.

BACKGROUND: AVI-7288 is a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer with positive charges that targets the viral messenger RNA that encodes Marburg virus (MARV) nucleoprotein. Its safety in humans is undetermined. METHODS: We assessed the efficacy of AVI-7288 in a series of studies involving a lethal challenge with MARV in nonhuman primates. The safety of AVI-7288 was evaluated in a randomized, multiple-ascending-dose study in which 40 healthy humans (8 humans per dose group) received 14 once-daily infusions of AVI-7288 (1 mg, 4 mg, 8 mg, 12 mg, or 16 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo, in a 3:1 ratio. We estimated the protective dose in humans by comparing pharmacokinetic variables in infected nonhuman primates, uninfected nonhuman primates, and uninfected humans. RESULTS: Survival in infected nonhuman primates was dose-dependent, with survival rates of 0%, 30%, 59%, 87%, 100%, and 100% among monkeys treated with 0 mg, 3.75 mg, 7.5 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 30 mg of AVI-7288 per kilogram, respectively (P<0.001 with the use of the log-rank test for the comparison of survival across groups). No safety concern was identified at doses up to 16 mg per kilogram per day in humans. No serious adverse events were reported. Drug exposure (the area under the curve) was dose-dependent in both nonhuman primates and humans; drug clearance was independent of dose but was higher in nonhuman primates than in humans. The protective dose in humans was initially estimated, on the basis of exposure, to be 9.6 mg per kilogram per day (95% confidence interval, 6.6 to 12.5) for 14 days. Monte Carlo simulations supported a dose of 11 mg per kilogram per day to match the geometric mean protective exposure in nonhuman primates. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that, on the basis of efficacy in nonhuman primates and pharmacokinetic data in humans, AVI-7288 has potential as postexposure prophylaxis for MARV infection in humans. (Funded by the Department of Defense; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01566877.).

Safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers with activity against ebola virus and marburg virus: results of two single-ascending-dose studies.

Two identical single-ascending-dose studies evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AVI-6002 and AVI-6003, two experimental combinations of phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers with positive charges (PMOplus) that target viral mRNA encoding Ebola virus and Marburg virus proteins, respectively. Both AVI-6002 and AVI-6003 were found to suppress disease in virus-infected nonhuman primates in previous studies. AVI-6002 (a combination of AVI-7537 and AVI-7539) or AVI-6003 (a combination of AVI-7287 and AVI-7288) were administered as sequential intravenous (i.v.) infusions of a 1:1 fixed dose ratio of the two subcomponents. In each study, 30 healthy male and female subjects between 18 and 50 years of age were enrolled in six-dose escalation cohorts of five subjects each and received a single i.v. infusion of active study drug (0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 1.5, 3, and 4.5 mg/kg per component) or placebo in a 4:1 ratio. Both AVI-6002 and AVI-6003 were safe and well tolerated at the doses studied. A maximum tolerated dose was not observed in either study. The four chemically similar PMOplus components exhibited generally similar PK profiles. The mean peak plasma concentration and area under the concentration-time curve values of the four components exhibited dose-proportional PK. The estimated plasma half-life of all four components was 2 to 5 h. The safety of the two combinations and the PK of the four components were similar, regardless of the target RNA sequence.

Eteplirsen for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

OBJECTIVE: In prior open-label studies, eteplirsen, a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer, enabled dystrophin production in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) with genetic mutations amenable to skipping exon 51. The present study used a double-blind placebo-controlled protocol to test eteplirsen's ability to induce dystrophin production and improve distance walked on the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). METHODS: DMD boys aged 7 to 13 years, with confirmed deletions correctable by skipping exon 51 and ability to walk 200 to 400 m on 6 MWT, were randomized to weekly intravenous infusions of 30 or 50 mg/kg/wk eteplirsen or placebo for 24 weeks (n = 4/group). Placebo patients switched to 30 or 50 mg/kg eteplirsen (n=2/group) at week 25; treatment was open label thereafter. All patients had muscle biopsies at baseline and week 48. Efficacy included dystrophin-positive fibers and distance walked on the 6MWT. RESULTS: At week 24, the 30 mg/kg eteplirsen patients were biopsied, and percentage of dystrophin-positive fibers was increased to 23% of normal; no increases were detected in placebo-treated patients (p≤0.002). Even greater increases occurred at week 48 (52% and 43% in the 30 and 50 mg/kg cohorts, respectively), suggesting that dystrophin increases with longer treatment. Restoration of functional dystrophin was confirmed by detection of sarcoglycans and neuronal nitric oxide synthase at the sarcolemma. Ambulation-evaluable eteplirsen-treated patients experienced a 67.3 m benefit compared to placebo/delayed patients (p≤0.001). INTERPRETATION: Eteplirsen restored dystrophin in the 30 and 50 mg/kg/wk cohorts, and in subsequently treated, placebo-controlled subjects. Duration, more than dose, accounted for dystrophin production, also resulting in ambulation stability. No severe adverse events were encountered.

Network intervention analysis indicates that roluperidone achieves its effect on negative symptoms of schizophrenia by targeting avolition.

Roluperidone, a 5-HT2A, sigma2, and ɑ1A-adrenergic receptor antagonist, has proven efficacious for treating negative symptoms of schizophrenia in phase 2b and phase 3 clinical trials. Using network analysis, we demonstrated that the improvements observed in the phase 2b trial resulted from targeting avolition which was highly central and spurred a cascading effect of global negative symptom reductions when successfully treated. The current study aims to replicate these network findings using the phase 3 roluperidone clinical trial data. Participants included 496 schizophrenia patients with moderate to severe negative symptoms who were randomized to either roluperidone 32 mg/day (n =167), 64 mg/day (n = 162), or placebo (n = 167). Negative symptoms were assessed at baseline and weeks 2,4,8, and 12. Network intervention analysis (NIA) evaluated treatment-induced symptom changes over time to identify direct and indirect treatment effects. This analytic approach extends prior work by determining whether the symptoms with highest centrality have causal effects on the entire negative symptom construct and directly lead to symptom improvement. NIA indicated that the efficacious 64 mg/day dose of roluperidone had a direct effect on avolition, suggesting that changes in avolition propels treatment effects across the entire negative symptom constellation. These phase 3 findings replicated the phase 2b findings, indicating that from a network perspective, roluperidone achieves its effect by influencing the extent to which avolition drives other negative symptoms. These findings are relevant for understanding negative symptoms and how to treat them in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Prevalence of prominent and predominant negative symptoms across different criteria for negative symptom severity and minimal positive symptoms: A comparison of different criteria.

Negative symptoms are a source of disability in schizophrenia, but criteria for identifying patients for clinical trials are in flux. Minimum severity for negative symptoms is paired with a definition of minimal psychosis to identify predominant negative symptoms. Two previous successful negative symptoms treatment studies used very different severity and selection criteria. We compared the prevalence of participants meeting those two criteria in a large outpatient sample of participants with schizophrenia. Data from 867 outpatients with schizophrenia who participated in one of four NIMH-funded studies were analyzed. Common data elements included diagnoses, the PANSS, and an assessment of everyday functioning. We compared previous criterion for premoninant negative symptoms based on low levels of agitation and psychosis and different cut-offs for negative symptoms severity. 57 % of the participants met the agitation-based criteria for low scores and 33 % met the psychosis-based criteria. 18 % met total PANSS score ≥ 20 and 8 % met ≥24 prominent negative symptoms criteria. 14 % met low agitation and PANSS≥20 and 2 % met the low psychosis and negative symptoms ≥24 criteria. Participants who met all predominant criteria had more impairments in social functioning (all p < .001, all d > 0.37). Criteria for predominant negative symptoms from previous clinical trials identify widely different numbers of cases, with criteria for negative symptom severity and low symptoms both impacting. All criteria yield the expected profile of relatively specific social deficits. Even in unselected populations who participated in complex research protocols, 14 % meet low- agitation based criteria for predominant negative symptoms and many more participants would be expected to meet criteria with enrichment for the presence of negative symptoms.

Somno-Art Software identifies pathology-induced changes in sleep parameters similarly to polysomnography.

Polysomnographic sleep architecture parameters are commonly used to diagnose or evaluate treatment of sleep disorders. Polysomnography (PSG) having practical constraints, the development of wearable devices and algorithms to monitor and stage sleep is rising. Beside pure validation studies, it is necessary for a clinician to ensure that the conclusions drawn with a new generation wearable sleep scoring device are consistent to the ones of gold standard PSG, leading to similar interpretation and diagnosis. This paper reports on the performance of Somno-Art Software for the detection of differences in sleep parameters between patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), insomniac or major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to healthy subjects. On 244 subjects (n = 26 healthy, n = 28 OSA, n = 66 insomniacs, n = 124 MDD), sleep staging was obtained from PSG and Somno-Art analysis on synchronized electrocardiogram and actimetry signals. Mixed model analysis of variance was performed for each sleep parameter. Possible differences in sleep parameters were further assessed with Mann-Whitney U-test between the healthy subjects and each pathology group. All sleep parameters, except N1+N2, showed significant differences between the healthy and the pathology group. No significant differences were observed between Somno-Art Software and PSG, except a 3.6±2.2 min overestimation of REM sleep. No significant interaction 'group'*'technology' was observed, suggesting that the differences in pathologies are independent of the technology used. Overall, comparable differences between healthy subjects and pathology groups were observed when using Somno-Art Software or polysomnography. Somno-Art proposes an interesting valid tool as an aid for diagnosis and treatment follow-up in ambulatory settings.

Validation of Somno-Art Software, a novel approach of sleep staging, compared with polysomnography in disturbed sleep profiles.

Study Objectives: Integrated analysis of heart rate (electrocardiogram [ECG]) and body movements (actimetry) during sleep in healthy subjects have previously been shown to generate similar evaluation of sleep architecture and continuity with Somno-Art Software compared to polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard. However, the performance of this new approach of sleep staging has not yet been evaluated on patients with disturbed sleep. Methods: Sleep staging from 458 sleep recordings from multiple studies comprising healthy and patient population (obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], insomnia, major depressive disorder [MDD]) was obtained from PSG visual scoring using the American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules and from Somno-Art Software analysis on synchronized ECG and actimetry. Results: Inter-rater reliability (IRR), evaluated with 95% absolute agreement intra-class correlation coefficient, was rated as "excellent" (ICCAAAvg95% ≥ 0.75) or "good" (ICCAAAvg95% ≥ 0.60) for all sleep parameters assessed, except non-REM (NREM) and N3 sleep in healthy participants (ICCAAAvg95% = 0.43, ICCAAAvg95% = 0.56) and N3 sleep in OSA patients (ICCAAAvg95% = 0.59) rated as "fair" IRR. Overall sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Cohen's kappa coefficient of agreement (κ) on the entire sample were respectively of 93.3%, 69.5%, 87.8%, and 0.65 for wake/sleep classification and accuracy and κ were of 68.5% and 0.55 for W/N1+N2/N3/rapid eye movement (REM) classification. These performances were similar in healthy and patient population. Conclusions: The present results suggest that Somno-Art can be a valid sleep-staging tool in both healthy subjects and patients with OSA, insomnia, or MDD. It could complement existing non-attended techniques measuring sleep-related breathing patterns or be a useful alternative to laboratory-based PSG when this latter is not available.

Performance of Somno-Art Software compared to polysomnography interscorer variability: A multi-center study.

The visual scoring of gold standard polysomnography (PSG) is known to present inter- and intra-scorer variability. Previously, Somno-Art Software, a cardiac based sleep scoring algorithm, has been validated in comparison to 2 expert visual PSG scorers. The goal of this research is to evaluate the performances of the algorithm against a pool of scorers. Sixty PSG and actimetry recording nights, representative of clinical practice (healthy subjects and patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea [OSA], insomnia or major depressive disorder), were scored by 5 different sleep scoring centers and by the Somno-Art Software. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test were calculated between each scorer and the average value of the 6 scorers, including Somno-Art Software. In addition, epoch-by-epoch agreement between scorers were analyzed. Somno-Art Software estimation of sleep efficiency, wake, N1+N2, N3 and REM sleep fit within the interscorer range for the full dataset and the subgroups, except for underestimating N3 sleep in OSA patients. Additionally, Somno-Art Software overestimated sleep latency compared to the average scoring for insomniacs (+4.7 ± 1.6min). On the full dataset, Somno-Art Software had good (0.75 < ICC<0.90) or excellent (ICC>0.90) ICC scores for all sleep parameters except N3 sleep (moderate score, 0.50 < ICC<0.75). For the 4-stages epoch-by-epoch agreement, Somno-Art Software was slightly below that of the visual scorers except for the healthy sub-group where an overlap was demonstrated. Somno-Art Software sleep scoring shows a good interscorer reliability in the range of the 5 visual polysomnography scorers.

Effects of Roluperidone (MIN-101) on two dimensions of the negative symptoms factor score: Reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression.

BACKGROUND: Recent research has suggested that negative symptoms (NS) can be considered in terms of two different dimensions: reduced expression (expressive deficit) and reduced experience (experiential deficit). Roluperidone, a compound with high affinities for 5 HT2A and sigma2 receptors, has previously shown superiority over placebo on improving NS in a prospective study in patients with schizophrenia. The objective here is to explore the effect of roluperidone compared to placebo, on the 2 domains of the Negative Symptoms. METHODS: This was a multi-national Phase 2b trial that enrolled 244 symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia who had baseline scores ≥20 on the NS subscale of the PANSS. Patients were randomized to daily monotherapy with roluperidone 32 mg, roluperidone 64 mg, or placebo in a 1:1:1 ratio. All enrolled patients were Caucasian, and 137 (56%) were male. The 3 treatment groups were balanced on all demographic and illness-related baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Both doses of roluperidone were superior to placebo on both domains: Reduced Experience (p ≤ .006 for the 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for the 64 mg) with persistent superiority from Week 2 for the 64 mg dose and Week 8 for the 32 mg dose; Reduced Expression (p ≤ .003 for 32 mg; p ≤ .001 for 64 mg) with similar persistence. IMPLICATIONS: Both doses of roluperidone previously improved PANSS negative symptoms in general and demonstrated tolerability in stable schizophrenia patients. The post hoc analysis reported here found the drug to work on both the reduced emotional experience and reduced emotional expression sub-scales empirically derived from the PANSS.

Network Analysis Indicates That Avolition Is the Most Central Domain for the Successful Treatment of Negative Symptoms: Evidence From the Roluperidone Randomized Clinical Trial.

A recent conceptual development in schizophrenia is to view its manifestations as interactive networks rather than individual symptoms. Negative symptoms, which are associated with poor functional outcome and reduced rates of recovery, represent a critical need in schizophrenia therapeutics. MIN101 (roluperidone), a compound in development, demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. However, it is unclear how the drug achieved its effect from a network perspective. The current study evaluated the efficacy of roluperidone from a network perspective. In this randomized clinical trial, participants with schizophrenia and moderate to severe negative symptoms were randomly assigned to roluperidone 32 mg (n = 78), 64 mg (n = 83), or placebo (N = 83). Macroscopic network properties were evaluated to determine whether roluperidone altered the overall density of the interconnections among symptoms. Microscopic properties were evaluated to examine which individual symptoms were most influential (ie, interconnected) on other symptoms in the network and are responsible for successful treatment effects. Participants receiving roluperidone did not differ from those randomized to placebo on macroscopic properties. However, microscopic properties (degree and closeness centrality) indicated that avolition was highly central in patients receiving placebo and that roluperidone reduced this level of centrality. These findings suggest that decoupling the influence of motivational processes from other negative symptom domains is essential for producing global improvements. The search for pathophysiological mechanisms and targeted treatment development should be focused on avolition, with the expectation of improvement in the entire constellation of negative symptoms if avolition is effectively treated.

The brief negative symptom scale (BNSS): Sensitivity to treatment effects.

The Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS) grew out of a recommendation by the NIMH-sponsored Consensus Development Conference on Negative Symptoms that a scale based on contemporary concepts be developed. We assessed sensitivity to change of the BNSS in a trial of MIN-101, which showed efficacy for negative symptoms (PANSS pentagonal model) at daily doses of 32 and 64mg/day. Using mixed-effects model for repeated measures, we examined change in BNSS total score and in the BNSS factors of anhedonia/avolition/asociality (AAA), and expressivity (EXP). Compared to placebo, the 64mg group (N=83) showed a significant decrease in BNSS total score (effect size d [ES] 0.56, p<0.01) and both factor scores (AAA ES=0.48, EXP ES=0.46, p<0.02 for both). Patients in the trial had minimal depression and positive symptom scores; covarying for disorganization, positive symptoms, or anxiety/depression did not cause a meaningful change in the significance of the BNSS total or factor scores in this group. The 32mg group (N=78) did not differ significantly from placebo (N=83) on BNSS total score (ES=0.33, p<0.09), AAA (ES=0.25, p<0.20) or EXP (ES=0.30, p<0.12) scores. These results demonstrate the BNSS is sensitive to change.

Cognitive Effects of MIN-101 in Patients With Schizophrenia and Negative Symptoms: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Current dopamine-blocking antipsychotic drugs have little impact on the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. We evaluated whether MIN-101, a molecule that combines sigma-2 antagonism and 5-HT2A antagonism, might improve cognitive deficits in individuals with moderate to severe negative symptoms in schizophrenia. METHODS: Individuals (N = 244) aged 18 to 60 years with stable symptoms of DSM-5-defined schizophrenia and moderate to severe negative symptoms were randomized to placebo (n = 83), MIN-101 32 mg (n = 78), or MIN-101 64 mg (n = 83) in a 12-week, phase 2b, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial between May 2015 and December 2015. In a post hoc analysis, mean z and T score changes from baseline at 12 weeks of treatment in the cognitive composite score and individual tests on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Battery were compared between MIN-101 and placebo. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients (95.2%) from the placebo group, 76 (97.4%) from the MIN-101 32 mg group, and 79 (95.2%) from the MIN-101 64 mg group completed the BACS at baseline. The BACS token motor (P = .04), verbal fluency (P = .01), and composite z scores (P = .05) showed significant improvements in the MIN-101 32 mg group compared to the placebo group. At week 4, the clinical improvements from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative factor showed a significant correlation with improvements from baseline on the BACS composite in the 64 mg group (r = -0.292, P = .020). At week 12, improvement in the PANSS negative factor showed significant correlations with improvements in the BACS composite (r = -0.408, P = .002), Trail Making Test (r = -0.394, P = .003), and verbal memory (r = -0.322, P = .017) for the 64 mg group. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a possible benefit of MIN-101 on cognitive performance in individuals with schizophrenia with stable positive symptoms and concurrent clinically significant negative symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register identifier: 2014-004878-42​.

Assessing sleep architecture and continuity measures through the analysis of heart rate and wrist movement recordings in healthy subjects: comparison with results based on polysomnography.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the reliability of a new methodology for assessing sleep architecture descriptors based on heart rate and body movement recordings. METHODS: Twelve healthy male and female subjects between 18 and 40 years of age, without sleep disorders and not taking any drug or medication that could affect sleep, were recorded continuously during five consecutive nights. Together with the standard polysomnography, heart rate was recorded with a Holter and wrist movements by actimetry. Of the 60 recorded nights, 48 artifact-free nights were analyzed by two independent and well-trained visual scorers according to the rules of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. Sleep stages were assigned to every 30-s epoch. In parallel, the same nights were analyzed by the new methodology using only heart rate and actimetry data, allowing a 1-s epoch sleep stage classification. Sleep architecture was measured for 48 nights, independently for the two manual scorings and the automatic analysis. RESULTS: Over 42 nights, the intra-class correlation coefficient, used to assess the consistency or reproducibility of quantitative measurements made by different observers, was classified as excellent when all 12 descriptors were combined. Analyses of the individual descriptors showed excellent interclass correlation for eight and good for four of the 12. CONCLUSION: The automatic analysis of heart rate and body movement during sleep allows for the evaluation of sleep architecture and continuity that is equivalent to those obtained by manual scoring of polysomnography. The technique used here is simple and robust to allow for home sleep monitoring.