Reorganization of mental health services: from institutional to community-based models of care.

Mental health services in the Eastern Mediterranean Region are predominantly centralized and institutionalized, relying on scarce specialist manpower. This creates a major treatment gap for patients with common and disabling mental disorders and places an unnecessary burden on the individual, their family and society. Six steps for reorganization of mental health services in the Region can be outlined: (1) integrate delivery of interventions for priority mental disorders into primary health care and existing priority programmes; (2) systematically strengthen the capacity of non-specialized health personnel for providing mental health care; (3) scale up community-based services (community outreach teams for defined catchment, supported residential facilities, supported employment and family support); (4) establish mental health services in general hospitals for outpatient and acute inpatient care; (5) progressively reduce the number of long-stay beds in mental hospitals through restricting new admissions; and (6) provide transitional/bridge funding over a period of time to scale up community-based services and downsize mental institutions in parallel.

[Mental health and public health: an essential bond]. / Santé mentate et sante publique: un lien incontournable.

The Mental Health domain is larger than psychiatry because it implies the establishment of strategies aiming at the promotion of the well-being of the population, the prevention of mental disorders and their treatment and care. Politicians, planners, users and families and society at large have a great expectations and this require health professionals to be able to provide public mental health knowledge. It is necessary to identify those specific public mental health actions to which general practitioners and specialist could contribute. To do so more knowledge in public mental health is needed and more training is necessary.

Factors associated with length of stay and readmission in acute psychiatric inpatient services in Portugal.

Assessing the factors that influence duration and number of hospitalizations may support mental health services planning and delivery. This study examines the factors associated with length of stay and readmission in Portuguese psychiatric inpatient services during 2002, 2007 and 2012. Data from all admissions were extracted from clinical files. Logistic regression models estimated the association between length of stay (<17 vs ≥17 days) and number of admissions per year (1 vs >1 admission) with sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual factors. Older age, a diagnosis of psychosis, and compulsory admission were associated with higher odds of longer length of stay. Being married, secondary education, suicide attempt, a diagnosis of substance use and "other mental disorders", being admitted in 2012, and two of the psychiatric inpatient services associated with lower odds of longer length of stay. Being retired (or others), a diagnosis of psychosis, compulsory admission, and psychiatric service were associated with increased odds of readmission. Older age, and secondary and higher education were associated with lower odds of readmission. The findings indicate that multiple factors influence length of stay and readmission. Identifying these factors provides useful evidence for clinicians and policy makers to design more targeted and cost-effective interventions.

Rethinking global mental health and its priorities.

Global mental health (GMH) seems to enjoy increasing visibility in the global health and development discourse. However, this visibility implies also the urgency of addressing few questions about new priority setting in the domains of policy, care delivery, service organisation and research. Even before trying to answer these questions, rethinking more deeply the notion and implications of GMH seems to be a useful collective exercise. Some unanswered questions should be at the core of this exercise: Is GMH really global or rather Western? Is GMH concerned enough with local context? Is GMH too unbalanced towards a biomedical model? What are the consequences of the predominant emphasis given by GMH on common mental disorders and primary care level on people with severe mental disabilities? GMH is not global but rather it is hegemonised by western institutions. It would be useful to have an independent and very inclusive think tank which should promote a global debate on these issues and offer an unbiased support to WHO.

Mapping actions to improve access to medicines for mental disorders in low and middle income countries.

AIMS: In recent years a number of intergovernmental initiatives have been activated in order to enhance the capacity of countries to improve access to essential medicines, particularly for mental disorders. In May 2013 the 66th World Health Assembly adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2020, which builds upon the work of WHO's Mental Health Gap Action Programme. Within this programme, evidence-based guidelines for mental disorders were developed, including recommendations on appropriate use of medicines. Subsequently, the 67th World Health Assembly adopted a resolution on access to essential medicines, which urged Member States to improve national policies for the selection of essential medicines and to promote their availability, affordability and appropriate use. METHODS: Following the precedent set by these important initiatives, this article presents eleven actions for improving access and appropriate use of psychotropic medicines. RESULTS: A 4 × 4 framework mapping actions as a function of the four components of access - selection, availability, affordability and appropriate use - and across four different health care levels, three of which belong to the supply side and one to the demand side, was developed. The actions are: developing a medicine selection process; promoting information and education activities for staff and end-users; developing a medicine regulation process; implementing a reliable supply system; implementing a reliable quality-control system; developing a community-based system of mental health care and promoting help-seeking behaviours; developing international agreements on medicine affordability; developing pricing policies and a sustainable financing system; developing or adopting evidence-based guidelines; monitoring the use of psychotropic medicines; promoting training initiatives for staff and end-users on critical appraisal of scientific evidence and appropriate use of psychotropic medicines. CONCLUSIONS: Activating these actions offers an unique opportunity to address the broader issue of increasing access to treatments and care for mental disorders, as current lack of attention to mental disorders is a central barrier across all domains of the 4 × 4 access framework.

Consequences of mental distress recognition in general practice in Italy: a follow-up study. Italian Cooperative Group on Mental Distress in General Practice.

Many reports have been recently published on the accuracy of mental distress detection by general practitioners. Recognition of 'caseness', irrespective of its accuracy, nevertheless determines the implementation of therapeutic interventions. This paper reports the results of a naturalistic study describing the consequences for the patients of being identified as 'cases' in the general practice (in terms of referral strategies at recruitment and outcome 3 months and 1 year later), in the context of care provision generated by the 1978 Italian psychiatric reform. Sixty-eight GPs recruited 878 'cases' according to implicit criteria. Overall 20% of the patients were referred the psychiatric setting; only half of these for psychiatric care. After 3 months and 1 year from recruitment respectively 12% and 23% of the subjects were no longer 'cases'. The factors contributing to predict the outcome at three months were age, symptom duration, comorbidity, presence of social context risk factors and prior psychiatric history (or presence of 'major' symptoms); after one year the predictors of caseness were caseness status at 3 months, and clinical severity, symptom duration and presence of somatization at recruitment. GPs remain the main care providers in the short- and long-term. The results of the study indicate the need for a reappraisal of the emphasis to be put on caseness recognition and on the development of standardized instruments for the identification of mental distress. Non-clinical variables concurring in the definition of caseness in general practice, and the factors influencing physicians' decision-making in the implementation of alternative intervention strategies should be further clarified by ad hoc studies.

Cooperation in mental health: an Italian project in Nicaragua.

The experience acquired over the last four years in developing a program of cooperation in mental health in Nicaragua is reported. The concept of 'transfer' underlying the intervention and the general framework of Nicaragua's mental health system is discussed together with the results of the cooperative work. This included organizing training for mental health workers in six teaching and supervision modules, drawing up a mental health manual for primary health care workers, and survey of patterns of care in the 15 existing psychiatric services. Besides the key aspects of general reform of the psychiatric system after the revolution, the paper focuses on differences between organization and patterns of care in urban and rural areas.

Low-dose neuroleptic therapy and extrapyramidal side effects in schizophrenia: An effect size analysis.

A meta-analysis of the published literature was performed in order to quantify the efficacy of low-dose neuroleptic therapy in reducing extrapyramidal side effects in schizophrenic patients. A low-dose regimen between 50-100 mg equivalents of chlorpromazine, in comparison to a standard-dose regimen between 200-500 mg reduced extrapyramidal side effects by a 0.30 (+/-0.12) standard deviation, which is only a limited effect.

Low-dose neuroleptic therapy and relapse in schizophrenia: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

We assessed the relative efficacy and effectiveness of low-versus standard-dose neuroleptic therapy in reducing relapse rate in schizophrenic patients. Six long-term randomized controlled trials were retrieved through a MEDLINE search. A dose regimen between 50 and 100 mg equivalent of chlorpromazine, compared to a conventional one between 200 and 500 mg, was found to increase the likelihood of relapse in chronic schizophrenic patients. Differences, however, were statistically significant at 12 but not at 24 months of treatment.

Suicide mortality in Italy: an update from 1955 to 1987.

Suicide mortality in Italy over the period 1955-87 has been analysed in terms of age-specific and age-standardised death certification rates, and using a log-linear model to disentangle the effects of age, cohort of birth and calendar period at death. In males, the overall age-adjusted rate (on the World Standard population) was 8.6/100,000 in 1955-59, decreased to 6.7/100,000 in 1965-69, but steadily increased thereafter to reach 9.2/100,000 in 1985-87. In women, overall suicide mortality was 3.3/100,000 in 1955-59, decreased to 2.7/100,000 in 1965-69, and increased to 3.2/100,000 in the late 1980's. The percent rise over the last two decades was approximately 35% for males and over 15% for females, corresponding to an excess of over 1,000 deaths per year. The rise in males was attributable to both a period and a cohort effect, and appreciable increases were evident among younger generations over most recent periods. For females, trends at younger ages were more favourable, and the recent increases were essentially on a period of death basis. Recent unfavourable trends are discussed in relation to increased unemployment in Italy during the early 1970's, and to changes in psychiatric care delivery, since a radical psychiatric reform was implemented in Italy in 1978. Differences of trends for males and females, and comparison with suicide trends in other Western countries, however, would not support any simple relationship between these factors and national suicide rates.

Methodological lessons from the Italian psychiatric experience.

One of the main reasons why the Italian experience has been the object of much controversial attention in the international literature over the last decade lies in the ambiguity of the terms of reference used. Methodologically, it is of critical importance to re-establish the permanent dialectical relationship between the reality of the Italian experience, the prescription of the Law, and the administration of the reform. In this context, the evaluative variables are less the 'process' indicators of implementation of the reform, and more the qualitative 'outcome' assessment of the fate of the policy. The following concepts are discussed in detail, both in relation to Italy and to the broader status of psychiatry: de-Institutionalisation and de-hospitalisation; psychiatric hospital; rehabilitation-Home; Service-Services-Intervention; User; primary health care; evaluative research.

The Qualyop Project. 1: Monitoring the dismantlement of Italian public psychiatric hospitals. Characteristics of patients scheduled for discharge.

OBJECTIVES: Monitoring and evaluating the Italian psychiatric hospitals closure process, stated by the law to be concluded by 31 December 1996, and then postponed to 31 March 1998, identifying characteristics related to the possibility of discharge in 4493 patients living in twenty-two public psychiatric hospitals. METHOD: Sociodemographic and clinical data, information on impairment and functioning and plans for discharge in the subsequent twelve months of all patients were collected at baseline using a standard questionnaire. RESULTS: Discharge was planned within twelve months for 11% of the patients: 4% to other psychiatric or non-psychiatric institutions and 7% to community settings. Severely disabled patients and patients with some behavioural problems were more frequently scheduled to go to institutional settings. For both types of discharge, an adequate network of social relationships was an important determinant. Patients were more frequently planned for discharge if they resided in hospitals with a higher care providers/patients ratio, and in Emilia Romagna and Rome, than in Lombardy and Liguria. CONCLUSION: Frequency of planned discharge depended partly on the patients' personal characteristics related to independence and functioning, but the effect of these factors on frequency of planned discharge was influenced by characteristics of the hospitals where the patients lived.

The provision of psychiatric care in southern Italy. Results from the 'Psychiatry in Southern Italy's Services' (De PISIS) survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe structural features, attenders' characteristics and intervention habits in a large sample of Community Mental Health Departments (CMHDs) in Southern Italy. DESIGN AND SETTING: 1) Survey of resources and organization features of collaborating CMHDs; 2) Unreplicated registration of all attenders and of therapeutic interventions during an index week. RESULTS: A self-selected sample of 47 CMHDs in Southern Italy recruited 3845 patients during the last week of October 1992. Participating CMHDs were serving a socially deprived and severely ill population: 45.8% of attenders had 8 years or less of formal education; only 18.9% were employed, 30.9% of diagnoses were of the schizophrenia spectrum group and 23% of the affective disorders group. Sixty-eight per cent of patients were being treated with psychotropic drugs, while only 19% received rehabilitative interventions. The activity of CMHDs were oriented more towards the control of active symptomatology than towards rehabilitation. A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder diagnosis were found in contact during the index week with those CMHDs providing both residential and semiresidential (day-hospital, community center) facilities.

Mental health in EMRO: the future is now.

Recognizing the magnitude of the problem of mental health disorders globally, the World Health Organization has made mental health the focus of the year 2001. In this paper three priority areas for action in the Eastern Mediterranean Region are suggested, namely: human rights, mental hospitals and community care, drug abuse, and reconstruction of the health care system in Afghanistan.

Reorganization of mental health services:from institutional to community-based models of care

Mental health services in the Eastern Mediterranean Region are predominantly centralized and institutionalized, relying on scarce specialist manpower. This creates a major treatment gap for patients with common and disabling mental disorders and places an unnecessary burden on the individual,their family and society. Six steps for reorganization of mental health services in the Region can be outlined: [1]integrate delivery of interventions for priority mental disorders into primary health care and existing priority programmes; [2]systematically strengthen the capacity of non-specialized health personnel for providing mental health care; [3]scale up community-based services [community outreach teams for defined catchment, supported residential facilities,supported employment and family support]; [4]establish mental health services in general hospitals for outpatient and acute inpatient care;[5]progressively reduce the number of long-stay beds in mental hospitals through restricting new admissions; and [6]provide transitional/bridge funding over a period of time to scale up community-based services and downsize mental institutions in parallel

Les services de santé mentale dans la Région de la Méditerranée orientale sont essentiellement centralisés et institutionnalisés.Ils reposent sur un personnel spécialisé qui est rare. Cette situation crée un large fossé thérapeutique pour les patients atteints de troubles mentaux courants et handicapants, et fait porter une charge inutile pour l'individu,sa famille et la société.Six étapes pour la réorganisation des services de santé mentale dans la Région peuvent être présentées de la manière suivante : 1]intégrer l'offre des interventions pour les troubles de santé mentale prioritaires dans les programmes de soins de santé primaires et les programmes prioritaires existants ; 2]renforcer systématiquement les capacités du personnel de santé non spécialisé à fournir des soins de santé mentale ; 3]intensifier les services communautaires [équipes communautaires de proximité pour une zone de desserte définie,établissements résidentiels bénéficiant d'assistance aide à l'emploi et soutien apporté à la famille]; 4]établir des services de soins de santé mentale dans des hôpitaux généraux pour les soins externes et les soins aigus chez le patient hospitalisé ; 5]réduire progressivement le nombre de lits de long séjour dans les hôpitaux de soins de santé mentale en diminuant le nombre des nouvelles admissions ; 6]fournir un financement de transition/provisoire pendant une certaine durée pour intensifier les services communautaires et parallèlement réduire la taille des institutions de santé mentale