Effects of Rituximab on Atherosclerotic Biomarkers in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Rituximab is widely used in kidney transplantation for a variety of situations, and rituximab may inhibit some cytokines and antibodies that may play an active role in the atherosclerotic process. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of rituximab on atherosclerosis biomarkers in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: All patients, 18 years of age and older, who underwent kidney transplantation and received at least 1 dose of 375 mg/m2 rituximab were considered for participation in this study. The primary study endpoint was the development of cardiovascular diseases after rituximab therapy. The secondary endpoint was the onset of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease or biopsy-confirmed BK virus nephropathy. In addition, comparison of atherosclerosis biomarkers was performed between study and control groups. RESULTS: There were no cardiovascular events observed during follow up. Only 8 patients in the study group suffered from CMV disease during follow up. Serum interleukin 10 levels were significantly higher in the rituximab group compared with the control group, although anti-oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels were lower in the rituximab group compared with the control group, though this did not achieve statistical significance. DISCUSSION: Rituximab treatment may increase the risk of CMV reactivation and decrease lymphocyte counts and interleukin 10 levels; however, significant decreases in all atherosclerotic-related biomarkers have not been shown in our study.

Tac-MMF Versus CsA-MMF/CsA-AZA-Based Regimens in Development of De Novo Complement-Binding Anti-HLA Antibodies After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive regimens with tacrolimus or cyclosporine A (CsA) were compared for graft-related outcomes in conjunction with complement-binding de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). METHODS: Non-sensitized adult patients without rejection episodes within 3 months after transplantation were screened for the presence of de novo DSAs and C1q binding. Clinical and biopsy data were retrospectively obtained. RESULTS: The analysis included 118 patients (68 tacrolimus, 50 CsA), with mean age and follow-up of 36.1 ± 11.4 and 7.2 ± 4.8 years, respectively. As compared with tacrolimus, the CsA group had higher rates of both class II DSAs and C1q-binding DSAs (20% vs 4.4%, P = .008, and 18% vs 0%, P = .003, respectively). Rates of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR), proteinuria >500 mg/g, and levels of creatinine both at last visits were also higher in the CsA group (20% vs 0%, P = .002, 30% vs 5.9%, P = .005, 1.67 ± 1.31 vs 1.18 ± 0.45 mg/dL, P = .019, respectively).Class II DSAs and C1q-binding class II DSAs were significantly correlated with the clinical outcomes (creatinine levels, proteinuria, and cAMR). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with tacrolimus, CsA appears to pose a higher risk for the development of de novo anti-HLA antibodies with C1q-binding properties and, consequently, adverse graft-related outcomes.

Relevance of Flow Cytometric Auto-Crossmatch to the Post-transplant Course of Kidney Transplant Recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The crossmatch test is essential prior to kidney transplantation (tx) to confirm compatibility between the donor and the recipient. However, its results can be misleading due to "undetectable antibodies" in the recipient's serum. To establish if undetectable autoantibodies are responsible for a positive result, an auto-crossmatch test can be performed. In this study, we aim to determine the long-term prognostic value of auto-flow cytometric auto-crossmatch (FCXM) test on kidney survival in kidney tx recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The primary outcome variable was reduced renal function. Secondary endpoints were incidence of biopsy-confirmed chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) and recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN). RESULTS: There were no differences regarding initial serum creatinine levels between the study and control groups (P = .441). Patients who had positive auto-B FCXM had a significantly reduced renal function compared with the control group (P = .016). Four patients developed biopsy-confirmed CAMR in the study group and 1 patient in the control group (P = .047). Five patients had biopsy-confirmed recurrent GN in the GN study group, and only 1 patient had recurrent GN in the GN control group (P = .026). DISCUSSION: Kidney transplant recipients with positive auto-FCXM test had significantly reduced renal function and a higher incidence of recurrent GN and CAMR compared with the control group. The findings of this study suggest a potential role of auto-antibody causing positive auto-FCXM test result, meanwhile increasing the risk of CAMR, recurrent GN, and new-onset diabetes after tx.